Abortion: Revision history

5 July 2010

• curprev 20:2620:26, 5 July 2010‎ 108.2.187.84 talk‎ 75,606 bytes −19‎ →‎Types
• curprev 12:2412:24, 5 July 2010‎ TFOWR talk contribs‎ 75,625 bytes −3‎ Reverted good faith edits by 193.63.25.183; Test edit? Try here. (TW)
• curprev 12:2212:22, 5 July 2010‎ 193.63.25.183 talk‎ 75,628 bytes +3‎ No edit summary
• curprev 06:5206:52, 5 July 2010‎ HiLo48 talk contribs‎ 75,625 bytes −10‎ Undid revision 371807304 by 125.60.240.223 (talk)
• curprev 06:5006:50, 5 July 2010‎ 125.60.240.223 talk‎ 75,635 bytes +10‎ →‎Spontaneous
• curprev 06:2806:28, 5 July 2010‎ MastCell talk contribs‎ 75,625 bytes −268‎ per WP:MEDRS; inappropriate to cherry-pick primary sources to undermine the conclusions of reliable secondary sources; also, as talk page should make clear, JPandS is NOT a reliable source here
• curprev 03:3103:31, 5 July 2010‎ Haymaker talk contribs‎ 75,893 bytes +268‎ per talk on 6/18
• curprev 02:0002:00, 5 July 2010‎ Huey45 talk contribs‎ 75,625 bytes +50‎ BRD. Implemented change discussed on talk page. See Talk:Abortion#Pro-choice.3F
• curprev 01:2601:26, 5 July 2010‎ DumbBOT talk contribs‎ 75,575 bytes −35‎ removing a protection template from a non-protected page (info)

29 June 2010

• curprev 21:1821:18, 29 June 2010‎ Kaldari talk contribs‎ 75,610 bytes +556‎ reluctantly reverting self due to article protection
• curprev 18:5718:57, 29 June 2010‎ Kaldari talk contribs‎ 75,054 bytes −556‎ removing infobox picture - showing a demon pounding on a pregnant woman with a pestle isn't exactly an accurate (or NPOV) illustration of abortion

27 June 2010

• curprev 18:3418:34, 27 June 2010‎ TFOWR talk contribs‎ 75,610 bytes −11‎ adding {{pp-dispute|expiry={{subst:#time:F j, Y|+1 week}}}} (TW)
• curprev 18:3418:34, 27 June 2010‎ TFOWR talk contribs‎ m 75,621 bytes 0‎ Changed protection level of Abortion: Full protection: dispute, Requested at WP:RFPP. Slow edit warring without consensus. using TW ([edit=sysop] (expires 18:34, 4 July 2010 (UTC)) [move=sysop] (expires 18:34, 4 July 201
• curprev 18:1218:12, 27 June 2010‎ SheffieldSteel talk contribs‎ 75,621 bytes +1,971‎ Restoring reliably sourced on-topic material. There is no consensus for its removal, only one disruptive editor insisting on getting his own way
• curprev 16:0616:06, 27 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 73,650 bytes +839‎ If no one has argument pointing a problem with this text, by Talk:Abortion#Moving on towards a baseline version, then we have WP:Consensus about it. Respect it.
• curprev 15:4615:46, 27 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 72,811 bytes −2,810‎ Undid Andrew c, All that is new content we need to discuss in a consensual way, redoing that DocJames edit, won't solve this problem.

26 June 2010

• curprev 04:0704:07, 26 June 2010‎ Huey45 talk contribs‎ m 75,621 bytes +2‎ It's "per year", not "a year". This is an encyclopaedia; getting the words right is important.

25 June 2010

• curprev 20:0720:07, 25 June 2010‎ Andrew c talk contribs‎ 75,619 bytes +2,810‎ Undid User:Nutriveg (talk) we need to discuss the maternal death comparison. everyone agrees on that. removing it outright, along with scores of refs is disruptive
• curprev 12:0112:01, 25 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 72,809 bytes −555‎ →‎Physical health: This MastCell change has no consensus http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abortion&diff=368258226&oldid=368256146
• curprev 11:5711:57, 25 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 73,364 bytes −2,810‎ →‎Health risks: If there was no consensus for that version, there's no consensus for this version neither. Removing it while we discuss both versions until we reach an agreement.

24 June 2010

• curprev 20:5320:53, 24 June 2010‎ RexxS talk contribs‎ 76,174 bytes +2,526‎ Reverted 3 edits by Nutriveg; No consensus for changing the text; discuss on talk. (TW)
• curprev 19:4019:40, 24 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 73,648 bytes −557‎ Rv unconsensual change, what update sources say and relevance to this article is still to be agreed. Undid revision 368791453 by SheffieldSteel
• curprev 19:2219:22, 24 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ m 74,205 bytes +5‎ →‎Health risks: fixing ref
• curprev 19:2019:20, 24 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 74,200 bytes −1,974‎ →‎Health risks: As by Talk:Abortion#Moving on towards a baseline version
• curprev 02:1102:11, 24 June 2010‎ Anythingyouwant talk contribs‎ 76,174 bytes +30‎ Insert wlink in lead.

23 June 2010

• curprev 00:0300:03, 23 June 2010‎ Melaen talk contribs‎ 76,144 bytes −15‎ can't be the margaret mclean who died in 1923 have written a book in 1999

22 June 2010

• curprev 21:2521:25, 22 June 2010‎ LeadSongDog talk contribs‎ 76,159 bytes −115‎ →‎Spontaneous: citegnome
• curprev 20:1220:12, 22 June 2010‎ LeadSongDog talk contribs‎ 76,274 bytes +146‎ citegnome, fix sentence starting with numerals
• curprev 19:4419:44, 22 June 2010‎ Anythingyouwant talk contribs‎ 76,128 bytes −5‎ The word "determinate" is seldom used as a noun. The word "determinant" is appropriate here. Also removing editorializing from lede.

21 June 2010

• curprev 17:1617:16, 21 June 2010‎ LeadSongDog talk contribs‎ 76,133 bytes +205‎ →‎Abortion law: citegnome

18 June 2010

• curprev 13:2313:23, 18 June 2010‎ SheffieldSteel talk contribs‎ 75,928 bytes +557‎ Restoring information about risk of placenta previa from two procedures, citing the best sources currently available, following discussion on Talk
• curprev 06:5406:54, 18 June 2010‎ Snalwibma talk contribs‎ 75,371 bytes +6‎ →‎Types: picture caption
• curprev 06:2006:20, 18 June 2010‎ Haymaker talk contribs‎ m 75,365 bytes +31‎ added the little guy's age

17 June 2010

• curprev 22:4422:44, 17 June 2010‎ Xqbot talk contribs‎ m 75,334 bytes +35‎ robot Adding: ml:ഭ്രൂണഹത്യ

16 June 2010

• curprev 14:0614:06, 16 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 75,299 bytes −812‎ It already was discussed and you were not there. Undid revision 368390001 by SheffieldSteel (talk)
• curprev 14:0414:04, 16 June 2010‎ SheffieldSteel talk contribs‎ 76,111 bytes +812‎ Undid revision 368374609 by Nutriveg (talk) This needs to be discussed before removal
• curprev 13:4413:44, 16 June 2010‎ Hordaland talk contribs‎ 75,299 bytes −188‎ →‎Surgical: remove uncited and unnecessary sentence
• curprev 12:1612:16, 16 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 75,487 bytes −812‎ →‎Physical health: moving to Dilation and curettage
• curprev 12:1312:13, 16 June 2010‎ Nutriveg talk contribs‎ 76,299 bytes +255‎ →‎Physical health: Grimes (2004, secondary source) uses an old sources (1990) for his review, while the tertiary one (2007), cites a 2003
• curprev 10:0910:09, 16 June 2010‎ Crillium talk contribs‎ m 76,044 bytes 0‎ No edit summary
• curprev 06:0806:08, 16 June 2010‎ Hordaland talk contribs‎ 76,044 bytes 0‎ →‎Incidence: Changed "which say" to "which had", hoping that is what was meant.
• curprev 06:0506:05, 16 June 2010‎ Hordaland talk contribs‎ m 76,044 bytes +1‎ grammar
• curprev 05:3505:35, 16 June 2010‎ MastCell talk contribs‎ 76,043 bytes −71‎ →‎Physical health: rm link to non-existent content
• curprev 05:3405:34, 16 June 2010‎ MastCell talk contribs‎ m 76,114 bytes +1‎ →‎Physical health: typo fix
• curprev 05:3305:33, 16 June 2010‎ MastCell talk contribs‎ 76,113 bytes −86‎ →‎Physical health: replace with up-to-date secondary source reflecting current knowledge - important to note that vacuum aspiration is not linked to an increase risk
• curprev 03:2503:25, 16 June 2010‎ Doc James talk contribs‎ 76,199 bytes +207‎ returned other edits
• curprev 03:2403:24, 16 June 2010‎ Doc James talk contribs‎ 75,992 bytes −14,945‎ Reverted to revision 368274345 by Nutriveg; restored edits, do not do blank reverts, your removed a bunch of well referenced material. (TW)
• curprev 02:4802:48, 16 June 2010‎ RexxS talk contribs‎ m 90,937 bytes 0‎ →‎Physical health: correct syntax for editor parameters
• curprev 02:4502:45, 16 June 2010‎ RexxS talk contribs‎ 90,937 bytes +484‎ →‎Physical health: WP:ASSERT recommends attribution when opinions differ
• curprev 02:3602:36, 16 June 2010‎ Anythingyouwant talk contribs‎ 90,453 bytes +14,461‎ Restoring to version as exited by Hordaland a few hours ago, per talk page. Many concerns about bold rewriting of article. Discussion & consensus are needed first.