Jump to content

ABA problem: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

24 July 2023

17 June 2023

21 May 2023

7 April 2023

17 October 2022

23 July 2022

19 April 2022

21 March 2022

24 February 2022

27 January 2022

26 January 2022

16 December 2021

5 December 2021

  • curprev 02:3502:35, 5 December 2021Chrisahn talk contribs 9,140 bytes −592 Undid revision 955363424 by Wilwan01 (talk); I found this paragraph confusing. I guess its author thought the "A" and "B" in the example have exactly the same meaning as "A" and "B" in "ABA", but that's not the case. In the example, the real problem is indeed that B has been deleted; in general, ABA can cause all kinds of problems, even if B doesn't get deleted. undo Tag: Undo

5 August 2021

11 June 2021

21 March 2021

18 December 2020

8 December 2020

29 November 2020

27 November 2020

11 August 2020

11 May 2020

7 May 2020

27 January 2020

24 January 2020

15 January 2020

21 July 2019

25 February 2019

5 October 2018

25 July 2018

23 July 2018

5 July 2018

20 March 2018

18 August 2017

28 February 2017

28 December 2016

  • curprev 18:4718:47, 28 December 2016174.116.121.132 talk 8,970 bytes −49 shared memory is misleading and confusing since it implies memory shared among different processes. In the article, this situation is commonly encountered with multiple threads accessing data in memory private to the process. undo

26 December 2016

14 November 2016

11 September 2016

28 April 2016

22 December 2015

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)