User talk:Pelirojopajaro
Lysander Spooner
[edit]I'm sorry, how is it undue? I thought I sourced it. Individualist anarchists like Spooner were anti-capitalists and identified as part of the American socialist movement which at the time was mainly a form of artisanal socialism due to American material conditions. I do not deny Spooner and Tucker's influences on right-libertarianism, but they cannot be retroactively made part of the capitalist movement as they identified as anti-capitalists or socialists, in Spooner's case even opposing wage labor. Just like people such as Molinari, Bastiat and Say identified as liberals and were not anarcho-capitalists, so Spooner was opposed to capitalism and part of the socialist movement. This cannot be removed just because of modern standards, or because someone thinks today Spooner would be a right-libertarian or anarcho-capitalist and not a socialist-leaning, left-libertarian anti-capitalist. Besides, it is not like I removed the libertarianism sidebar to push a POV, I just think the American socialism and libertarian socialism sidebars should be retained as well for the reasons stated above.--79.52.153.59 (talk) 22:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sure, maybe he had some socialist leanings but it is important to emphasize consensus facts in the article. Clearly the fact that he started a mail company to compete with a government monopoly indicates that he was a capitalist. We can agree that he was an individualist and libertarian so these infoboxes should clearly be first. Regarding the paragraph where you cite the anarchist FAQ, I'm not sure that this counts as a reliable source but let's leave it. Thanks for your effort. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 07:30, 23 March 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply and for not reverting my edits this time. No, Spooner did not have some socialist leanings, Spooner was a socialist. Obviously, if you think socialism as state ownership, of course he would not be a socialist. As I stated above, individualist anarchism in the United States was a form of artisanal socialism due the United States' material conditions at the time. Indeed, individualist anarchism was what today is called libertarian socialism, albeit there are some differences due to the vastly different material conditions from the 19th century to the 20th and 21st centuries. The fact that he started a mail company to compete with a government monopoly does not make him a capitalist. Competition does not equal capitalism. Indeed, it was the socialist individualist anarchists' value of competition against capitalism which they claimed was in fact anti-competitive and based on state privileges. Ironically, just like today socialism usually means state socialism and all socialism must inevitabily results in "totalitarianism", yesterday capitalism meant state capitalism and state capitalism was indeed seen as the inevitable end results of capitalism itself. Thus, I think the anarchism and individualism sidebars should go first and right after the American socialism sidebar as it is now. The libertarian socialism and libertarianism sidebars are good in his political views section and in the influence section, respectively, both because they cannot be both under the first three sidebars as there would not be enough space and because the political views section speaks of its involvement in the anarchist and socialist circles as well as his opposition to wage labor and support for workers' self-management whereas the influence section speaks exactly of all his influence on libertarianism as a whole. I thought it was notable to add due to right-libertarians and Rothbard himself claiming Spooner, among others, as one of their own and a precursor of anarcho-capitalism. Spooner may well be an anarcho-capitalist today if he was brought back in the 21st cetnury, but that would mean he would have gone against all of his economic views at the time, making his whole philosophy inchoerent since he rejected wage labor and favored self-management. We should describe someone's political views as it was at the time he lived rather than do it it by modern standards and Spooner was an individualist anarchist and a socialist, or by today's standard an anti-capitalist left-libertarian. That is why I thought it was also important to add the opinion of those who thought of him as an anti-capitalist and left-libertarian at the time he actually lived and expressed his thoughts rather than an anarcho-capitalist or right-libertarian by today's standards.--95.247.157.16 (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- I don't really know how to respond to this because left-libertarianism is a complete self-contradiction in my mind. I think Spooner was a bit confused economically. I haven't read enough of his work to really give my own opinion, but there really doesn't seem to be enough of a consensus to solidly call him a socialist or an anarcho-capitalist. Some of his work certainly comes out against the price system and wages. Some recently re-discovered works of his supposedly come out very much capitalist, although I haven't read them myself.[1] If you want to put the left-libertarian sidebars up then the austrian school should also go up. Then everyone will be pissed. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 09:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Hey, I'm sorry for the late reply, I just saw your reply. I also wanted to add what will follow, but I thought I would wait for your reply first. However, I saw it only now, so I will first write what I wanted to add and then reply to you.
- I forgot to say this in my second reply and just wanted to add it is understandable to misunderstood such individualist anarchists, with their emphasis on competition and such things which may superficially remind ourselves of modern right-wing poltics. However, more important is why they proposed such things and what was their end. Their end would be strongly left-wing and a libertarian, socialist society. I would argue many early liberals (classical liberalism is an American 20th century creation which actually goes against many of what liberals said) could be read as advocating exactly the same thing. Indeed, socialism and communism arose as a reaction to actually existing liberalism and its failures to provide liberty and equality. John Locke's arguments and his Lockean proviso as well as his appeal of God's Earth belonging to everyone can be read as being in favor of the commons in practice and against his own homestead principle. Individualist anarchists wanted to abolish things such as rent and usury, just to name a few, as well as any economic privilege and simply thought that a free-market and competition would do so, which led to people like Marx arguing against market socialism because due to actually existig materially conditions such ends would not happen. Indeed, it can be argued that a true free-market and laissez-faire system can only be socialism as any private ownership of the means of production (i.e. productive property) for a few while the rest works for a wage would inevitally lead to what actually happened and we see today, namely capitalism as state capitalism and privileges, with the latter ironically being one of the four things laissez-faire capitalism claims to reject. It can be argued that what a free-market really means is being free from all forms of economic privilege, monopolies and artificial scarcities (i.e. free from rent) rather than government regulations. I think this is exactly what individualist anarchists argued.
- I don't really know how to respond to this because left-libertarianism is a complete self-contradiction in my mind. I think Spooner was a bit confused economically. I haven't read enough of his work to really give my own opinion, but there really doesn't seem to be enough of a consensus to solidly call him a socialist or an anarcho-capitalist. Some of his work certainly comes out against the price system and wages. Some recently re-discovered works of his supposedly come out very much capitalist, although I haven't read them myself.[1] If you want to put the left-libertarian sidebars up then the austrian school should also go up. Then everyone will be pissed. Pelirojopajaro (talk) 09:42, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply and for not reverting my edits this time. No, Spooner did not have some socialist leanings, Spooner was a socialist. Obviously, if you think socialism as state ownership, of course he would not be a socialist. As I stated above, individualist anarchism in the United States was a form of artisanal socialism due the United States' material conditions at the time. Indeed, individualist anarchism was what today is called libertarian socialism, albeit there are some differences due to the vastly different material conditions from the 19th century to the 20th and 21st centuries. The fact that he started a mail company to compete with a government monopoly does not make him a capitalist. Competition does not equal capitalism. Indeed, it was the socialist individualist anarchists' value of competition against capitalism which they claimed was in fact anti-competitive and based on state privileges. Ironically, just like today socialism usually means state socialism and all socialism must inevitabily results in "totalitarianism", yesterday capitalism meant state capitalism and state capitalism was indeed seen as the inevitable end results of capitalism itself. Thus, I think the anarchism and individualism sidebars should go first and right after the American socialism sidebar as it is now. The libertarian socialism and libertarianism sidebars are good in his political views section and in the influence section, respectively, both because they cannot be both under the first three sidebars as there would not be enough space and because the political views section speaks of its involvement in the anarchist and socialist circles as well as his opposition to wage labor and support for workers' self-management whereas the influence section speaks exactly of all his influence on libertarianism as a whole. I thought it was notable to add due to right-libertarians and Rothbard himself claiming Spooner, among others, as one of their own and a precursor of anarcho-capitalism. Spooner may well be an anarcho-capitalist today if he was brought back in the 21st cetnury, but that would mean he would have gone against all of his economic views at the time, making his whole philosophy inchoerent since he rejected wage labor and favored self-management. We should describe someone's political views as it was at the time he lived rather than do it it by modern standards and Spooner was an individualist anarchist and a socialist, or by today's standard an anti-capitalist left-libertarian. That is why I thought it was also important to add the opinion of those who thought of him as an anti-capitalist and left-libertarian at the time he actually lived and expressed his thoughts rather than an anarcho-capitalist or right-libertarian by today's standards.--95.247.157.16 (talk) 06:31, 24 March 2019 (UTC)
- As another example, it has been incorrectly argued, especially by right-wing Americans, that Nazis adopted leftist economic policies, despite the fact in practice they underwent massive privatizations and the term itself was coined to describe such thing. Adopting social welfare policies and supporting what would be called a welfare state does not mean anything if you exclude citizens from such benefits, especially for something which they were born with such as Jews or ethnic minorities, because otherwhise it becomes right-wing policies, with right-wing meaning "certain social orders and hierarchies are inevitable, natural, normal, or desirable, typically supporting this position on the basis of natural law, economics, or tradition, as hierarchy and inequality may be viewed as natural results of traditional social differences". Unlike the right, the left is universalistic. Thus, Nazis adopted "leftist economics" (actually pretty mainstream policies even at the time) for right-wing ends. At the same time, it would be a mistake to argue that individualist anarchists adopted right-wing policies because back then there were actually pretty radical leftist, so they still adopted left-wing politics for leftist ends, albeit by today they may sounds as right-wing politics (if you mean liberalism, rather then the actually definition of right-wing I stated) for left-wing ends. I'm sorry for dwelling upon all this and sound essay-like, but I wanted to better explain my reasoning. It really was an interesting conversation, so thank you.
- Now onto your reply. I find it funny you say that about left-libertarianism, especially considering that until the 1970s (when right-libertarianism developed, not surprisingly just as neo-liberalism was rising; that is not a coincidence) left-libertarianism was synonymous with libertarianism and indeed they were one and the same. I would argue that right-libertarianism is an oxymoron (I just noticed you actually said self-contradiction instead) and that there can be no "libertarian" right-wing politics. For right-wing politics, I mean the meaning stated above which I took from its own Wikipedia page viz a viz left-wing politics meaning supporting freedom vs. authority, social equality/egalitarianism (meaning equal liberty) and against social hierarchies which I find pretty accurate and still useful, no matter what some people may see or think as outdated or useless; the political spectrum is still good and useful, but there ought to be a libertarian/authoritarian axis. Unfortunately, what "the left" means nowdays is just watered-down social democracy and social liberalism, i.e. the center-left/center itself. Just like egalitarianism has been made a mockery (equality of outcome, everyone the same, yadda yadda yadda), it really always meant simply equal liberty, the main precept of liberalism, nothing more, nothing less; or what the great liberal Herbert Spencer proclaimed as "each has freedom to do all that he wills provided that he infringes not the equal freedom of any other". It is just they completely ignore the harm caused by productive private property being unacessible to the majority of people; to them, that is not coercion; the fact that it requires force and coercion to defend, that apparently does not infringe "the equal freedom of any other", but I digress again. Anyways, I just thought it was important to clarify since you see left-libertarianism as an oxymoron and thus probably have a vision of the left as commonly stereotyped. With this, I am not saying there are no leftists authoritarian. Unfortunately, there are. It is just they are leftists right-wing authoritarian (see the right-wing authoritarianism Wikipedia page). The right-wing here "does not necessarily refer to someone's politics, but to psychological preferences and personality". It is just the right is associated with authority, traditionalism and other things which made up such right-wing authoritarian personality. Indeed, it could be argued that the Jacobin were leftists right-wing authoritarian: (1) they were leftists meaning in favore of change/liberty/equality; (2) they were right-wing because they were forced to adopt policies which are in practice right-wing, such as authoritarianism. Often times, a revolution (examples being the French and Russian Revolutions) usually turn into a right-wing authoritarian regime to defend the revolution itself which can either end with the adoption of its ideals without authoritarianism which is what happened to the French Revolution after its end; or in being toppled like in the Revpolutions of 1989 with its failure. A rightist revolution (or more correctly, reaction; a rightist revolution usually happens as a reaction to a left-wing one) become an extreme right-wing one, which is what happened with fascism in Italy and Germany.
- Now back to the argument. Indeed, individualist anarchists had some interesting opinions and views, but as I stated above their ends were left-leaning and socialist. That is what the reasearch I did ended up supporting. Now in my opinion, Spooner was clearely a socialist and would be even by today's standards. He wanted to end the employer-employee relationship by having everyone being self-employed and end wage labor. However, that is my opinion. I did not add anywhere in the text that he was clearly socialist, not in the led nor anywhere else. If you were refering to the sidebars, I already explained my reasons. Just like many other individualist anarchists, he was part of the labor/socialist movement, even being part of the First International. His economic views are clearly libertarian socialist, albeit outdated. So I think the sidebar are perfect as they are now. The anarchism, individualism and American socialism sidebars right after the led as the most prominent and important ones related to Spooner and the libertarian socialism and libertaranism sidebars in the political views and influence sections, respectively. I do not think the Austrian School sidebar should be added: (1) where to add it? In the influence section, there is already the libertarianism sidebar which is more accurate; (2) his economic views in many ways run counter to the Austrian School; (3) many actually dispute Tucker and Spooner's influcenes on Rothbard, who basically used the subjective theory of value to go to different conclusion, his own. However, I would argue there is not really an issue between the labor and subjective theory of value, especially not the strawmenned version of the labor theory. As far as I know, people like Marx, Tucker and others never denied the subjective value. What Rothbard really did was what I did earlier with Locke by simply using their arguments to reach a different, more logical conclusion. To Rothbard, that was anarcho-capitalism. However, he was not really influenced by them economically, that is why I do not think the Austrian School sidebar should be added. Bastiat, Say, Molinari and others do not have it either and I think it should be added only for the one who were actually part of the Austrian School. Thank you again for the nice conversation and arguments.--79.36.167.52 (talk) 15:25, 5 April 2019 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Haus Fürsteneck
[edit]
Hello, Pelirojopajaro. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Haus Fürsteneck".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 04:07, 15 August 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
[edit]Hi Pelirojopajaro,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
Join the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
[edit]
Greetings!
The AfroCine Project invites you to join us again this October and November, the two months which are dedicated to improving content about the cinema of Africa, the Caribbean, and the diaspora.
Join us in this exciting venture, by helping to create or expand contents in Wikimedia projects which are connected to this scope. Kindly list your username under the participants section to indicate your interest in participating in this contest.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We would be adding additional categories as the contest progresses, along with local prizes from affiliates in your countries. For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. Looking forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 19:22, 22nd September 2020 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]
Your feedback is requested at Talk:White House COVID-19 outbreak on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:31, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
Controversial topic area alert
[edit] | This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Due to past disruption in this topic area, the community has enacted a more stringent set of rules. Any administrator may impose sanctions - such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks - on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic. For additional information, please see the guidance on these sanctions. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. |
— Newslinger talk 15:16, 12 October 2020 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
[edit]Greetings,
Thank you very much for participating in the Months of African Cinema global contest/edit-a-thon, and thank you for your contributions so far.
It is already the middle of the contest and a lot have been achieved already! We have been able to get over 1,500 articles created in over fifteen (15) languages! This would not have been possible without your support and we want to thank you. If you have not yet listed your name as a participant in the contest page please do so.
Please make sure to list the articles you have created or improved in the article achievements' section of the contest page, so that they can be easily tracked. To be able to claim prizes, please also ensure to list your articles on the users by articles page. We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
We are very excited about what has been achieved so far, but your contributions are still needed to further exceed all expectations! Let’s create more articles before the end of this contest, which is this November!!!
Thank you once again for being part of this global event! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 10:30, 06 November 2020 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck
[edit]HI Pelirojopajaro,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Christine Fang
[edit]I request your help with Christine Fang. You seem to know something about the policies of WP:BLP.
Years ago, Fang was followed by the FBI for fundraising with the Chinese community and fraternizing with politicians. The FBI didn't make a case, and when rumors circulated in 2015 she left the country. Scandalous details were leaked a few days ago to Axios, with a sensational conclusion spies are aggressively attacking the US. It became newsworthy for the embarrassment to politicians "linked" to her (Eric Swalwell). This biography page is just a readout of the Axios article. None of the usual biographical details are known, but the top line factually says she was an "intelligence operative for the Chinese Ministry of State Security". Other editors have dismissed my calls to follow WP:BLP and seem determined to emphasize all the circumstantial evidence to persuade readers she really was a spy. Thanks for your assistance. Travelmite (talk) 12:01, 13 December 2020 (UTC)
WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review
[edit]
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Rabies on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 23:31, 1 April 2021 (UTC)
Working Man's Barnstar
[edit]
|
The Working Man's Barnstar |
| Thanks for reverting some of the edits on a page that have already been repeatedly rejected! BasedMises (talk) 23:14, 12 April 2021 (UTC) |
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Ayurveda on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:30, 25 May 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Plandemic on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 5 June 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Archimedes on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:31, 21 June 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Abortion on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 8 August 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Apple cider vinegar on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 22 September 2021 (UTC)
Welcome to the Months of African Cinema Global Contest!
[edit]Greetings!
The AfroCine Project core team is happy to inform you that the Months of African Cinema Contest is happening again this year in October and November. We invite Wikipedians all over the world to join in improving content related to African cinema on Wikipedia!
Please list your username under the participants’ section of the contest page to indicate your interest in participating in this contest. The term "African" in the context of this contest, includes people of African descent from all over the world, which includes the diaspora and the Caribbean.
The following prizes would be recognized at the end of the contest:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap fillers - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Also look out for local prizes from affiliates in your countries or communities! For further information about the contest, the prizes and how to participate, please visit the contest page here. For further inquiries, please leave comments on the contest talkpage or on the main project talkpage. We look forward to your participation.--Jamie Tubers (talk) 23:20, 30th September 2021 (UTC)
Ýou can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
Your GA nomination of C. V. Raman
[edit]Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article C. V. Raman you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. 
This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 11:40, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of C. V. Raman
[edit]The article C. V. Raman you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold 
. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:C. V. Raman for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 15:00, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
Your GA nomination of C. V. Raman
[edit]The article C. V. Raman you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:C. V. Raman for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already appeared on the main page as a "Did you know" item, or as a bold link under "In the News" or in the "On This Day" prose section, you can nominate it within the next seven days to appear in DYK. Bolded names with dates listed at the bottom of the "On This Day" column do not affect DYK eligibility. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Jaguar -- Jaguar (talk) 22:41, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- As the primary author, I really thank you. Chhandama (talk) 04:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Malassezia on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 11:31, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
The Months of African Cinema Contest Continues in November!
[edit]Greetings,
It is already past the middle of the contest and we are really excited about the Months of African Contest 2021 achievements so far! We want to extend our sincere gratitude for the time and energy you have invested. If you have not yet participated in the contest, it is not too late to do it. Please list your username as a participant on the contest’s main page.
Please remember to list the articles you have improved or created on the article achievements' section of the contest page so they can be tracked. In order to win prizes, be sure to also list your article in the users by articles. Please note that your articles must be present in both the article achievement section on the main contest page, as well as on the Users By Articles page for you to qualify for a prize.
We would be awarding prizes to different categories of winners:
- Overall winner
- 1st - $500
- 2nd - $200
- 3rd - $100
- Diversity winner - $100
- Gender-gap filler - $100
- Language Winners - up to $100*
Thank you once again for your valued participation! --Jamie Tubers (talk) 18:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
You can opt-out of this annual reminder from The Afrocine Project by removing your username from this list
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:IP over Avian Carriers on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 09:30, 31 March 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:COVID-19 pandemic on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 13 May 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Transverse cervical artery on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Space Shuttle Challenger disaster on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:38, 8 August 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Kilometres per hour on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 26 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 12 February 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Alchemical symbol on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:34, 21 April 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:OffSec on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:31, 27 April 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:SpaceX Starship on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:30, 6 June 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:2023 Pacific typhoon season on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 03:31, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 5
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Little grass frog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anura.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 5 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Weather on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 01:30, 27 September 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Biology on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:List of best-selling game consoles on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:31, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Feedback request: Maths, science, and technology request for comment
[edit]Your feedback is requested at Talk:Turmeric on a "Maths, science, and technology" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.
Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 06:31, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2024 (UTC)