Jump to content

Capital punishment in Hungary: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

24 June 2024

  • curprev 19:2619:26, 24 June 2024Ymblanter talk contribs 11,451 bytes +2,260 I see that a lot of sources were removed; pls discuss at the talk page; we have no obligation to be nice to Orban undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 02:0002:00, 24 June 2024121.98.232.221 talk 9,191 bytes −191 This is an opinion, not fact. Further, the reference link is not working. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
  • curprev 01:5901:59, 24 June 2024121.98.232.221 talk 9,382 bytes −151 The sentence implies a causal relationship between abolishing capital punishment and lower offending rates without supporting data. This speculative assertion lacks a correctly cited reference, making it misleading. It's crucial to provide empirical evidence or rephrase the content to reflect the uncertainty of such a link. The current assertion is unsupported and unclear, potentially leading to misconceptions about the relationship between legal penalties and crime rates. undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit
  • curprev 01:5501:55, 24 June 2024121.98.232.221 talk 9,533 bytes −459 The data currently cited in the article is outdated by 20 years, which may lead to misinterpretations or inaccuracies in understanding the contemporary context. Furthermore, there is an error in the way the data is presented: it should refer to the number of police officers per 100,000 population, not "police officer crime." This misrepresentation needs correction. Lastly, the inclusion of this data is contextually irrelevant to the discussion of capital punishment in Hungary. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
  • curprev 01:4901:49, 24 June 2024121.98.232.221 talk 9,992 bytes −541 The current text inaccurately presents Jean-Claude Juncker's opinion on Viktor Orbán's stance regarding capital punishment as a factual assertion. It is crucial to clarify that Viktor Orbán did not explicitly advocate for the reintroduction of capital punishment; rather, he suggested that the decision on capital punishment should fall within state jurisdiction. This interpretation by Juncker reflects a subjective view and should be identified as such in the article. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
  • curprev 01:4301:43, 24 June 2024121.98.232.221 talk 10,533 bytes −661 The source is non-existent. I have not found any information from reputable sources backing up these statements. It is defamatory therefore to include these sentences in a Wikipedia article. undo Tags: Reverted references removed Visual edit
  • curprev 01:4001:40, 24 June 2024121.98.232.221 talk 11,194 bytes −257 This is not referenced and is not correct, in facy Viktor Orban said the opposite that this article states. Viktor Orban suggested that capital punishment should be a matter of state jurisdiction. Reference: https://www.magyarhirlap.hu/belfold/Orban_Viktor_A_halalbuntetes_legyen_tagallami_hataskor undo Tags: Reverted Visual edit

19 May 2024

5 April 2024

6 March 2023

28 February 2023

27 October 2022

26 August 2022

20 June 2022

22 March 2022

15 January 2022

20 May 2021

17 May 2021

9 January 2021

10 October 2020

11 September 2020

21 May 2020

12 September 2019

23 May 2019

2 May 2019

1 April 2019

27 January 2019

5 December 2018

3 December 2018

15 October 2018

1 June 2018

7 March 2017

9 February 2017

3 January 2017

17 December 2016

12 July 2016

25 December 2015

30 June 2015

4 June 2015

2 June 2015

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)