Jump to content

Oxfam: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

19 June 2024

15 June 2024

14 June 2024

  • curprev 00:5100:51, 14 June 2024Avatar317 talk contribs 82,128 bytes +251 Restored criticism statement to lead; removed by IP editor. The lead is supposed to summarize the article, and there is a substantial criticism section in this article. That said, this statement could be improved by covering more of the criticism, but I don't have the time to do that right now. undo

12 June 2024

4 June 2024

1 May 2024

13 April 2024

4 April 2024

2 April 2024

8 March 2024

5 March 2024

2 March 2024

27 February 2024

13 February 2024

3 February 2024

2 February 2024

31 January 2024

30 January 2024

17 January 2024

11 January 2024

9 January 2024

7 January 2024

  • curprev 23:1023:10, 7 January 2024Avatar317 talk contribs 80,503 bytes +1,704 →‎Accusations of overrepresenting poverty: Restored "2022 "Profiting from Pain" report" with new title. Noah Smith (writer) 's blog is acceptable in this case, per WP:SPS: "Self-published expert sources may be considered reliable when produced by an established subject-matter expert, whose work in the relevant field has previously been published by reliable, independent publications" - He is known as a reputable writer on economics issues.. undo
  • curprev 23:0523:05, 7 January 2024Avatar317 talk contribs 78,799 bytes +2,100 →‎Internal structures and political role: Restored "2015 study on net worth inequality" - Money magazine is not rated unreliable in WP:RSP and the source story is written by one of their editors, not an opinion piece by an unrelated person. I'll restore the following paragraph in my next edit with explanation. When talking about significant (not one-time minor personnel conflicts) criticisms, discussions of their widely published poverty reports definitely deserve mention here. undo
  • curprev 20:5920:59, 7 January 2024Rambling Rambler talk contribs 76,699 bytes −11,195 Undid revision 1194212042 by Avatar317 (talk) Reverting, see talk page. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 20:4920:49, 7 January 2024Avatar317 talk contribs 87,894 bytes +11,195 Reverted good faith WP:GF edits. Some of these removals are not justified; the arguments between Starbucks and Oxfam are well sourced, and the Charity Navigator ratings are also properly sourced. It would be helpful if you did multiple smaller edits rather than a few large edits; that makes it is easier for others to leave your good edits and revert your controversial/disputed ones, as well as it making it easier for others to follow what you are doing. I recommend you make deletions separ undo Tags: Undo Reverted

6 January 2024

31 December 2023

20 December 2023

17 December 2023

11 December 2023

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)