Jump to content

Theonomy: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

10 August 2024

8 August 2024

15 July 2024

19 May 2024

4 March 2024

18 January 2024

4 November 2023

27 September 2023

26 September 2023

24 August 2023

18 June 2023

21 May 2023

22 March 2023

21 March 2023

16 March 2023

8 January 2023

5 January 2023

18 November 2022

25 October 2022

13 October 2022

7 October 2022

6 August 2022

27 July 2022

26 June 2022

1 June 2022

3 May 2022

15 October 2021

7 September 2021

30 April 2021

  • curprev 17:2517:25, 30 April 2021 Butlerblog talk contribs 15,337 bytes −1 Undid revision 1020698434 by Iwiwan (talk) The term as used is an adjective describing the authors themselves, not necessarily their positional argument. All of the authors noted are Theonomists. undo Tag: Undo
  • curprev 15:2015:20, 30 April 2021 Iwiwan talk contribs m 15,338 bytes +1 Goals: The first 3 sentences in this section are "Theocratic" arguments - not "Theonomic" arguments.... For example - "Political Polytheism" p84 - just before the reference given: "biblical theocrats insist...". The cited position was theocratic along with 2 alternate positions by Pietists and Pluralists. A more relevant place for the first 3 sentences of this section would be on the Theocracy page. undo Tag: Reverted

9 April 2021

1 April 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)