Third-party evidence for Apollo Moon landings: Revision history


For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)

8 May 2024

14 March 2024

9 February 2024

9 January 2024

3 January 2024

2 September 2023

1 September 2023

27 August 2023

24 August 2023

22 August 2023

10 June 2023

12 May 2023

14 April 2023

29 March 2023

26 January 2023

19 January 2023

17 November 2022

16 November 2022

9 September 2022

8 September 2022

4 September 2022

7 August 2022

22 June 2022

  • curprev 09:3609:36, 22 June 2022Samuel.Damoy talk contribsm 46,121 bytes +378 Reference 37 in citations (JC Laul et al. 1973) is OK to show similarity of Luna and Apollo samples, but from a moon hoax believer's point of view, it could be argued that all authors are Americans and the analysis was done in an American laboratory, son not really independent. So I added a complementary reference to a similar analysis but made in a Russian laboratory by Russian authors: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168900201010890 undo

6 May 2022

13 April 2022

4 April 2022

21 November 2021

11 November 2021

2 November 2021

(newest | oldest) View (newer 50 | ) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)