Jump to content

Talk:Matthias Corvinus: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 11: Line 11:
== Hungarian names for places before 1867 ==
== Hungarian names for places before 1867 ==
As the official language of the Kingdom of Hungary was Latin until 1867 [http://books.google.com/books?id=ei6TGveKcuEC&pg=PA72&dq=hungary+kingdom+latin+official+language&hl=en&ei=VhTPTZWJLZDIswb_2IjGCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CFMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=hungary%20kingdom%20latin%20official%20language&f=false], using Hungarian names for cities etc. before this date is anachronistic. Since the Latin name that was used at the time can scarcely be found, we should list all the places with their modern names [[User:Wladthemlat|Wladthemlat]] ([[User talk:Wladthemlat|talk]]) 06:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
As the official language of the Kingdom of Hungary was Latin until 1867 [http://books.google.com/books?id=ei6TGveKcuEC&pg=PA72&dq=hungary+kingdom+latin+official+language&hl=en&ei=VhTPTZWJLZDIswb_2IjGCw&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=1&ved=0CFMQ6AEwAA#v=onepage&q=hungary%20kingdom%20latin%20official%20language&f=false], using Hungarian names for cities etc. before this date is anachronistic. Since the Latin name that was used at the time can scarcely be found, we should list all the places with their modern names [[User:Wladthemlat|Wladthemlat]] ([[User talk:Wladthemlat|talk]]) 06:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
Latin was used only in written language. <span style="font-size: smaller;" class="autosigned">— Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/84.0.229.34|84.0.229.34]] ([[User talk:84.0.229.34|talk]]) 19:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC)</span><!-- Template:UnsignedIP --> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== I call for unbiased artibration ==
== I call for unbiased artibration ==
Line 20: Line 21:
: 3. This article is one which is under constant "attack" by the banned user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stubes99 Stubes99] and as new users appear and edit the same(or very similar) data this user tried to insert it is very suspicious at-least.
: 3. This article is one which is under constant "attack" by the banned user [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Stubes99 Stubes99] and as new users appear and edit the same(or very similar) data this user tried to insert it is very suspicious at-least.
: Greetings. [[User:Iadrian yu|Adrian]] ([[User talk:Iadrian yu|talk]]) 16:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
: Greetings. [[User:Iadrian yu|Adrian]] ([[User talk:Iadrian yu|talk]]) 16:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)

Haha, my constant attacks? I had 5 edits in this article. Dear romani-an chauvinist wiki-activist (My original name is not Stubes99, but Celebration81 Celebration 1981)

Revision as of 19:37, 30 May 2011


Hungarian names for places before 1867

As the official language of the Kingdom of Hungary was Latin until 1867 [1], using Hungarian names for cities etc. before this date is anachronistic. Since the Latin name that was used at the time can scarcely be found, we should list all the places with their modern names Wladthemlat (talk) 06:34, 23 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Latin was used only in written language.  — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.0.229.34 (talk) 19:35, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply] 

I call for unbiased artibration

My recent additions to the article has been complete removed for unknown reasons. Everything I provided in the opening stanza merits consideration for standing as it was all drawn the article itself. Let me again emphasize everything I wrote was complete drawn from the material contained in the origian article itself. I ask for unbiased impartial historical opinions who know the era and of the history of Central Europe to re-instate my additions. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MrMyronGuyton (talkcontribs) 04:12, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your edits are reverted for several reasons.
1. The data you are trying to add is "essay" like.
2. It is data without any valid reference. Even if you could provide references it should be rewritten because in this form it is very exaggerating.
3. This article is one which is under constant "attack" by the banned user Stubes99 and as new users appear and edit the same(or very similar) data this user tried to insert it is very suspicious at-least.
Greetings. Adrian (talk) 16:51, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, my constant attacks? I had 5 edits in this article. Dear romani-an chauvinist wiki-activist (My original name is not Stubes99, but Celebration81 Celebration 1981)