Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vivek Kumar Pandey: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:05, 8 August 2011

Vivek Kumar Pandey

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A (so far) unremarkable scientist, the section "Responsibilities and research he carried out so far" in whose article is completely unsourced. What sourcing there is elsewhere in the article is somewhat desperate. I don't doubt that he was Honored by having his name included in list of "TOP 100 SCIENTISTS 2010" of International Biographical Centre (IBC), Sponsored & Administered by International Biographical Centre, Cambridge, England (an imprint of Melrose Press Ltd. Registered in England (No) 965274). Not written by, but perhaps related to, the User Dr. vivek Kumar Pandey (contributions). He's young; perhaps he will go far. Hoary (talk) 00:13, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 00:19, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. —Hoary (talk) 00:21, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Science-related deletion discussions. — • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is not a majority vote, but instead a discussion among Wikipedia contributors. Wikipedia has policies and guidelines regarding the encyclopedia's content, and consensus (agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, not by counting votes.

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to assume good faith on the part of others and to sign your posts on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end.

Note: Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected single-purpose accounts: {{subst:spa|username}}; suspected canvassed users: {{subst:canvassed|username}}; accounts blocked for sockpuppetry: {{subst:csm|username}} or {{subst:csp|username}}.

Clear delete with a grand total of 2 cites on GS and at least one of those a self-cite! Xxanthippe (talk) 02:16, 7 August 2011 (UTC).[reply]
Delete Nicely formatted, knows his wikimarkup. Unfortunately, that's not enough. --Crusio (talk) 07:27, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the Artcle he is worthy of the wikipedia article and for his detail see the web link: ^[1]. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs) — 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
~~Keep~~ Article about vivek pandey is good to find here. He has got proud of past honor Allahabad university in academic field in very early age among 42 members also IBC scientist 2010 award is going to make him notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.199.149.2 (talk • contribs)
Do not delete Artcle is about the person who initiated his study from the place where was no facity at all for Oceanic Research. The Centre becomes the permanent centre of the university with Faculty in 2009 while enrollments in D.Phil was possible since begining. Pandey got first D.Phil from that centre which was not expected by this project mode centre due to local politics. Pandey worked on Indonesian Throughflow using POM model and became first on from India in the field.Dr. Pandey is not only academics, scientist but social and cultural person which is well know by most of the person. I gone through the wikibin page of Dr. Pandey and found him a Noble person of the world as comment described. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 117.211.83.245 (talk • contribs)
Original and Notable Article It is not recreation but original article motivated from the wikibin article on Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey and near about 300 comments on the article. Kindly consider the influence of the wikibin article page^[2].— Preceding unsigned comment added by Kook2011 (talk • contribs) — Kook2011 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Comment adding a {{reflist}}, so refs may show up - Nabla (talk) 10:17, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

^ "wikibin article with 321 comments on Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey". Pandey's major reference
^ "wikibin article with 321 comments on Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey". Pandey's major reference

Keep it on the wikipedia I have read the reference and comment on wikibin of Dr. Pandey and found him notable. added by 117.199.146.116 (contributions)— 117.199.146.116 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete per nom and Crusio. Beagel (talk) 11:34, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Quite notable person Keep the article as permanent article of wikipedia. I found no doubt on Dr. Pandey's Notablity. Added by 117.199.144.213 (contributions)— 117.199.144.213 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Comment If this piece at "Wikibin" is "Pandey's major reference", as Kook2011 claims, then Pandey is in trouble. It's pretty easy for anyone to have an article there. As for the comments on the Wikibin article, they're hilarious (where they're comprehensible). -- Hoary (talk) 13:00, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep it The article is notable according the wikibin comment. Dear Hoary why pandey in trouble. Please do not spread such words. Added by 117.199.149.232 (contributions)— 117.199.149.232 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
Delete, only an Assistant Professor, minimal citability in GScholar, fails WP:PROF. Nsk92 (talk) 13:25, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - THere are bunch of sockpuppets here uh? He fails WP:PROF, Wikipedia is not a curriculum vitae and he has no impact or has reached controversy enough to meet the GNG, the references provided are academical however my major's tutor has greater number of scientific published articles, but this isn't a reason why I should create his article. Eduemoni ^↑talk↓ 15:53, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: No sources have been found that show that these sockpuppets are correct. Joe Chill (talk) 17:46, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Strong delete - No sources that meet guidelines were found on Yahoo and Google. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 7 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. The sources are adequate to verify the facts stated in the article but not to show notability. There is no evidence that he passes WP:PROF nor WP:GNG. I removed two "Who's Who" type vanity scam awards from the honors section; that sort of thing in an article here is less an indication of notability than the opposite, and should be removed per WP:BLP as an embarrassment to the subject. —David Eppstein (talk) 00:53, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
No doubt in notability Dear user Nsk92 Iwant to say that Tathagat Avatar Tulsi is also Assistant Professor contract while Dr. Pandey is permanent Assistant Professor. I have seen his blog written by name Jai Hind Pandey which shows his cultural, religious and social impact and thoughts^[1]
Delete. No evidence of significant achievements, but strong evidence of fervent attempts to promote that individual, both from reading the article and this page. Materialscientist (talk) 05:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep it. Dear Hoary, I created the article not fully based on wikibin article but I have no doubt on his notability as per my best knowledge. I point you 1. he is written topper in 96 UP BN Jaunpur under Varanasi Group NCC in 1997. He is honored with a historical university’s Alumni Association “Proud Past” among 42 persons list. He is honored by IBC as Top 100 Scientist. He has done remarkable work on Indonesian through flow as 1st of Indian Scientist and also he worked on Indian Ocean variabilty. His cultural and social approach and behavior is also remarkable. Without such influence no article can get 321 comments most in favor of Dr. Pandey as per my knowledge this is highest commented article in wikibin sources. If in your knowledge any article got more that 321 comments in wikibin sources then let me know.

Thus I finally want to say that wikibin is only not a base of the creation of article but sure so many comments in favor of him and his fame in IISc, Bangaore due to involvement in Bhagvat Group, cultural activities and his personality as Project Associate made me to decide a notable article on wikipedia.

^ "Vivekanand and Modern Tradition". Dr. Pandey's Blog with name Jai Hind Pandey.

[1] "wikibin article with 321 comments on Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey". Pandey's major reference

[2] "wikibin article with 321 comments on Dr. Vivek Kumar Pandey". Pandey's major reference

[3] "Vivekanand and Modern Tradition". Dr. Pandey's Blog with name Jai Hind Pandey.

[1]

[2]

[1]

@@ Line 29: / Line 29: @@
 *'''No doubt in notability''' Dear user [[User:Nsk92|Nsk92]] Iwant to say that [[Tathagat Avatar Tulsi]] is also Assistant Professor contract while Dr. Pandey is permanent Assistant Professor. I have seen his blog written by name Jai Hind Pandey which shows his cultural, religious and social impact and thoughts<ref>[http://vandemataramvivekananddrvkprssbhupuau.blogspot.com/ "Vivekanand and Modern Tradition"]. Dr. Pandey's Blog with name Jai Hind Pandey.</ref>
 *'''Delete'''. No evidence of significant achievements, but strong evidence of fervent attempts to promote that individual, both from reading the article and this page. [[User:Materialscientist|Materialscientist]] ([[User talk:Materialscientist|talk]]) 05:32, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
-*’’’Keep it’’’.  Dear Hoary, I created the article not fully based on wikibin article but I have no doubt on his notability as per my best knowledge. I point you 1. he is written topper in 96 UP BN Jaunpur under Varanasi Group NCC in 1997. He is honored with a historical university’s Alumni Association “Proud Past” among 42 persons list. He is honored by IBC as Top 100 Scientist. He has done remarkable work on Indonesian through flow as 1st of Indian  Scientist and also he worked on Indian Ocean variabilty. His cultural and social approach and behavior is also remarkable. Without such influence no article can get 321 comments most in favor of Dr. Pandey as per my knowledge this is highest commented article in wikibin sources. If in your knowledge any article got more that 321 comments in wikibin sources then let me know.
+*'''Keep it'''.  Dear Hoary, I created the article not fully based on wikibin article but I have no doubt on his notability as per my best knowledge. I point you 1. he is written topper in 96 UP BN Jaunpur under Varanasi Group NCC in 1997. He is honored with a historical university’s Alumni Association “Proud Past” among 42 persons list. He is honored by IBC as Top 100 Scientist. He has done remarkable work on Indonesian through flow as 1st of Indian  Scientist and also he worked on Indian Ocean variabilty. His cultural and social approach and behavior is also remarkable. Without such influence no article can get 321 comments most in favor of Dr. Pandey as per my knowledge this is highest commented article in wikibin sources. If in your knowledge any article got more that 321 comments in wikibin sources then let me know.
 Thus I finally want to say that wikibin is only not a base of the creation of article but sure so many comments in favor of him and his fame in IISc, Bangaore due to involvement in Bhagvat Group, cultural activities and his personality as Project Associate made me to decide a notable article on wikipedia.