Jump to content

User talk:65.88.88.126: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ip658888x (talk | contribs)
Line 57: Line 57:


:OK, I found and read the report. The block will definitely be contested. However your comment about contributors from the NYPL is out of bounds. There are 3 people editing the Jiddu Krishnamurti and about a dozen related articles from several IPs. One person also edits a couple of science fiction pages. These are the only pages we edit. Anything else is unrelated to us. And to forestall questions, none has any interest in registering. However, it is interesting you brought up sock puppets. There is definitely a good chance that they are involved in this. [[Special:Contributions/65.88.88.126|65.88.88.126]] ([[User talk:65.88.88.126#top|talk]]) 01:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)
:OK, I found and read the report. The block will definitely be contested. However your comment about contributors from the NYPL is out of bounds. There are 3 people editing the Jiddu Krishnamurti and about a dozen related articles from several IPs. One person also edits a couple of science fiction pages. These are the only pages we edit. Anything else is unrelated to us. And to forestall questions, none has any interest in registering. However, it is interesting you brought up sock puppets. There is definitely a good chance that they are involved in this. [[Special:Contributions/65.88.88.126|65.88.88.126]] ([[User talk:65.88.88.126#top|talk]]) 01:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)

== Redirect [[Jiddu Krishnamurti]] related talk ==

Please redirect [[Jiddu Krishnamurti]]-related comments, to [[User talk:Ip658888x]]. Thank you. [[User:Ip658888x|ip658888x]] ([[User talk:Ip658888x|talk]]) 21:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)

Revision as of 21:50, 7 November 2011

September 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you.--John (talk) 20:29, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 16:22, 12 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

January 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Jiddu Krishnamurti. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Fences&Windows 00:02, 18 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Jiddu Krishnamurti has been reverted.<br />Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmyXzvIEd-E (matching the regex rule \byoutube\.com). If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. Video links are also strongly deprecated by our guidelines for external links, partly because they're useless to people with slow internet connections.<br />If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 14:52, 18 March 2010 (UTC)<br /><small>If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.</small>[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Your nomination at Articles for Creation was a success, and List of works about Jiddu Krishnamurti was created.

  • The article has been assessed as List-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see what needs to be done to bring it to the next level.
  • Please continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia, and please consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.
  • If you would to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping Wikipedia! fetch·comms 00:46, 15 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your edits!

Hi, I've seen a few of your edits to the Theosophy article and wanted to thank you for re-writing, expanding, and adding sources. Also, you might want to create a user account so you can easily keep track of articles no matter where you are. You can even join some WikiProjects like WikiProject Religion if you're interested in working with other editors on improving those kinds of articles. If you have any questions, feel free to ask on my talk page. Thanks again! Stu (aeiou)I'm Researching Wikipedia 17:34, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

thanks for the favorable review! the article imo was unsatisfactory, like many such in religion, philosophy, politics etc. it was taken up as an afterthought, following the editing of Jiddu Krishnamurti and some related pages over the past year. all this is a collab. effort with others around here. i don't know if we'll be able to continue to a more "finished" page, since noone is, or wants to become, an expert on theosophy or the theosophical society, hence all the message boxes begging for help. we'd especially like to expand in sourcing works other than the Secret Doctrine... hopefully it's going to happen. thank you again. 65.88.88.126 (talk) 17:49, 25 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Template:Userbox documentation subpage, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. The reverted edit can be found here. Thank you. CSLoomis ( talk | contribs ) 00:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Jiddu Krishnamurti. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. Sunray (talk) 17:24, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not assume ownership of articles. If you aren't willing to allow your contributions to be edited extensively or be redistributed by others, please do not submit them. Thank you. Sunray (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. Sunray (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No I think your behavior leaves a lot to be desired. You changed the Talk:Jiddu Krishnamurti page to be more like your opinion. You characterized a valid opinion as "attack". I considered your reinsertion of the templates disruptive because you refused then and now, to justify them. You also had NOT followed proper procedure like adding parameters to the template. So your accusations are hollow and ill-conceived. 65.88.88.126 (talk) 22:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

November 2011

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Jiddu Krishnamurti. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

  1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. 74.198.151.37 (talk) 19:41, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, good evening!! And you are?? I'm asking because I noticed that this warning is your single contribution to wikipedia. This is getting funnier and funnier... 65.88.88.126 (talk) 00:46, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

The complete report of this case is at WP:AN3#User:65.88.88.126, User:65.88.88.46 reported by User:Sunray (Result: Both blocked). EdJohnston (talk) 21:20, 1 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot find the complete report you are referring to above. Could you direct me to it? Thanks. 65.88.88.126 (talk) 00:40, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
OK, I found and read the report. The block will definitely be contested. However your comment about contributors from the NYPL is out of bounds. There are 3 people editing the Jiddu Krishnamurti and about a dozen related articles from several IPs. One person also edits a couple of science fiction pages. These are the only pages we edit. Anything else is unrelated to us. And to forestall questions, none has any interest in registering. However, it is interesting you brought up sock puppets. There is definitely a good chance that they are involved in this. 65.88.88.126 (talk) 01:00, 3 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please redirect Jiddu Krishnamurti-related comments, to User talk:Ip658888x. Thank you. ip658888x (talk) 21:49, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]