Jump to content

Dictatorship: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rv unexplained removal
→‎History: deleted quotation from selfpublished book. not an RS. and even if it was, it was hardly fitting source for this subject.
Line 26: Line 26:
* Personalist
* Personalist
* Hybrid
* Hybrid

==History ==
[[File:Mobutu Sese Seko 1973.jpg|thumb|[[Mobutu Sese Seko]], Zaire's longtime dictator, embezzled over $5 billion from his country.]]
Boyd C. Purcell wrote: " ... [[Adolf Hitler|Hitler]], who started the war, was responsible for approximately 50 million deaths as a result of the Second World War. Throughout recorded history of the world, dictators driven by anger, power, greed, pride, and/or paranoia have killed far more than 100 million people. Just in the last century, to name a few of the most well known: [[Joseph Stalin|Stalin]] of the Soviet Union, [[Mao Zedong|Mao]] of China, [[Hirohito]] of Japan, [[Kim Il Sung]] of North Korea, [[Pol Pot]] of Cambodia, [[Idi Amin|Amin]] of Uganda, [[Benito Mussolini|Mussolini]] of Italy, and [[Saddam Hussein|Hussein]] of Iraq have collectively slaughtered tens of millions of people."<ref>Boyd C. Purcell (2008). "''[http://books.google.cz/books?id=spwHeS3Rxl0C&pg=&dq&hl=en#v=onepage&q=&f=false Spiritual Terrorism: Spiritual Abuse from the Womb to the Tomb]''". AuthorHouse. p.144. ISBN 1434378888</ref>


==Origins of power==
==Origins of power==

Revision as of 18:11, 8 January 2013

Democracy Index by the Economist Intelligence Unit, 2011.[1] Countries that are more red are authoritarian, and most often dictatorships. Most of current dictatorships are in Africa and Asia.

A dictatorship is defined as an autocratic form of government in which the government is ruled by an individual: a dictator. It has three possible meanings:

  1. A Roman dictator was the incumbent of a political office of legislate of the Roman Republic. Roman dictators were allocated absolute power during times of emergency. Their power was originally neither arbitrary nor unaccountable, being subject to law and requiring retrospective justification. There were no such dictatorships after the beginning of the 2nd century BC, and later dictators such as Sulla and the Roman Emperors exercised power much more personally and arbitrarily.
  2. A government controlled by one person, or a small group of people. In this form of government the power rests entirely on the person or group of people, and can be obtained by force or by inheritance. The dictator(s) may also take away much of its peoples' freedom.
  3. In contemporary usage, dictatorship refers to an autocratic form of absolute rule by leadership unrestricted by law, constitutions, or other social and political factors within the state.
Chinese Communist Party Chairman Mao Zedong meets with U.S. President Richard Nixon. Mao's dictatorial rule from 1949 to 1976 is believed to have caused the deaths of 40 to 70 million people.[2]

For some scholars, a dictatorship is a form of government that has the power to govern without consent of those being governed (similar to authoritarianism), while totalitarianism describes a state that regulates nearly every aspect of public and private behavior of the people. In other words, dictatorship concerns the source of the governing power and totalitarianism concerns the scope of the governing power.

In this sense, dictatorship (government without people's consent) is a contrast to democracy (government whose power comes from people) and totalitarianism (government controls every aspect of people's life) opposes pluralism (government allows multiple lifestyles and opinions).

Other scholars stress the omnipotence of the State (with its consequent suspension of rights) as the key element of a dictatorship and argue that such concentration of power can be legitimate or not depending on the circumstances, objectives and methods employed.[3]

Definitions

File:Hitlermusso2 edit.jpg
Adolf Hitler and Benito Mussollini. Hitler's policies and orders resulted in the death of about 40 million people.[4]

The most general term is despotism, a form of government in which a single entity rules with absolute power. That entity may be an individual, as in an autocracy, or it may be a group,[5] as in an oligarchy. Despotism can mean tyranny (dominance through threat of punishment and violence), or absolutism; or dictatorship (a form of government in which the ruler is an absolute dictator, not restricted by a constitution, laws or opposition, etc.).[6] Dictatorship may take the form of authoritarianism or totalitarianism.

Dictatorship is defined by Merriam-Webster[7] as 'a form of government in which absolute power is concentrated in a dictator or a small clique' or 'a government organisation or group in which absolute power is so concentrated', whereas democracy, with which the concept of dictatorship is often compared, is defined by most people as a form of government where those who govern are selected through contested elections. Authoritarian dictatorships are those where there is little political mobilization and "a small group exercises power within formally ill-defined limits but actually quite predictable ones".[8] Totalitarian dictatorships involve a "single party led by a single powerful individual with a powerful secret police and a highly developed ideology." Here, the government has "total control of mass communications and social and economic organizations".[9] Hannah Arendt labelled totalitarianism a new and extreme form of dictatorship involving "atomized, isolated individuals" in which ideology plays a leading role in defining how the entire society should be organised.[10] Juan Linz argues that the distinction between an authoritarian regime and a totalitarian one is that while an authoritarian one seeks to suffocate politics and political mobilization (depoliticization), a totalitarian one seeks to control politics and political mobilization.[11]

Dictatorships may be classified in a number of ways, such as

  • Military dictatorship
    • "arbitrator" and "ruler" types may be distinguished; arbitrator regimes are professional, civilian-oriented, willing to give up power once problems have been resolved, and support the existing social order; "ruler" types view civilians as incompetent and have no intention of returning power to them, are politically organised, and have a coherent ideology[12]
  • Single-party state
    • "weak" and "strong" versions may be distinguished; in weak single-party states, "at least one other actor eclipses the role of the party (like a single individual, the military, or the president)."[13]
  • Personalist
  • Hybrid

Origins of power

Dictators may attain power in a number of ways.

Impact on culture

The wave of military dictatorships in Latin America in the second half of the twentieth century left a particular mark on Latin American culture. In Latin American literature, the dictator novel challenging dictatorship and caudillismo, is a significant genre. There are also many films depicting Latin American military dictatorships.

See also

Further reading

  • Friedrich, Carl J. (1965). Totalitarian Dictatorship and Autocracy (2nd ed. ed.). Praeger. {{cite book}}: |edition= has extra text (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  • Bueno de Mesquita, Bruce (2003). The Logic of Political Survival. The MIT Press. ISBN 0-262-63315-9. {{cite book}}: Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)

References

  1. ^ "Democracy Index 2011" (PDF). Economist Intelligence Unit.
  2. ^ Daniel Jonah Goldhagen. Worse Than War: Genocide, Eliminationism, and the Ongoing Assault on Humanity. PublicAffairs, 2009. ISBN 1-58648-769-8 p. 53: "...the Chinese communists' murdering of a mind-boggling number of people, perhaps between 50 million and 70 million Chinese, and an additional 1.2 million Tibetans."
  3. ^ [1], Plinio Correa de Oliveira, Revolution and Counter-Revolution,(York, PA: The American Society for the Defense of Tradition, Family, and Property, 1993), pp. 20-23.
  4. ^ Del Testa, David W; Lemoine, Florence; Strickland, John (2003). Government Leaders, Military Rulers, and Political Activists. Greenwood Publishing Group. p. 83. ISBN 978-1-57356-153-2.
  5. ^ Encyclopædia Britannica
  6. ^ WordNet Search - 3.0
  7. ^ [2]
  8. ^ Juan Linz, quoted in Natasha M. Ezrow, Erica Frantz (2011), Dictators and Dictatorships: Understanding Authoritarian Regimes and Their Leaders, Continuum International Publishing Group. p2
  9. ^ Ezrow and Frantz (2011:2-3)
  10. ^ Ezrow and Frantz (2011:3)
  11. ^ Ezrow and Frantz (2011:4)
  12. ^ Ezrow and Frantz (2011:6-7)
  13. ^ Ezrow and Frantz (2011:6)