Jump to content

User talk:HighInBC: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 55: Line 55:


:You know putting a retired box on your account and saying you are no longer active on Wikipedia after getting off of a block then carrying on editing as an IP could be seen as an illegitimate use of an alternate account. <small>[[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="text-shadow:black 0.05em 0.05em 0em;color:Blue">HighInBC</b>]] <small><sup>Need help? '''[[User talk:HighInBC|Just ask.]]'''</sup></small></small> 13:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)
:You know putting a retired box on your account and saying you are no longer active on Wikipedia after getting off of a block then carrying on editing as an IP could be seen as an illegitimate use of an alternate account. <small>[[User talk:HighInBC|<b style="text-shadow:black 0.05em 0.05em 0em;color:Blue">HighInBC</b>]] <small><sup>Need help? '''[[User talk:HighInBC|Just ask.]]'''</sup></small></small> 13:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)

== Appeal by TillermanJimW ==

I've posted an [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#Arbitration_enforcement_action_appeal_by_TillermanJimW appeal] to the topic ban you sanctioned me with. Think this, and my posting a Diffs (though why Diffs & not a link?) on that page, qualifies as the required notification.

But I think I may have screwed up my appeal somewhat - seems I've created two sections on that page. Seems to be a conflict of sorts between the way the template works and what the "For appeals: Create new section" notification section recommends. If you could fix that up somehow that would be most appreciated. Or advise me how to do so. Thanks. --[[User:TillermanJimW|TillermanJimW]] ([[User talk:TillermanJimW|talk]]) 00:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)

Revision as of 00:32, 11 September 2021

Tokens from other editors:

RfA candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report
RfB candidate S O N S% Ending (UTC) Time left Dups? Report

No RfXs since 00:50, 23 June 2024 (UTC).—cyberbot ITalk to my owner:Online

Archive
Talk page archives - Archive index
  • Hello and welcome to my talk page! Click the + button at the top of the page to create a new discussion or use any of the "edit" buttons to contribute to an already existing discussion.
  • Postings made in the form of haiku will be given first priority.
  • Note: I was once known as Chillum, so perhaps you already know me. HighInBC 20:10, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

JPL

You might want to check whose input you're awaiting at User talk:Johnpacklambert#Indefinite block - Blocking administrator seems unlikely to respond... (To save you having to look it up, El C applied the block.) Yrs, Narky Blert (talk) 12:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. I have spoken to El C. Regardless I won't be proceeding with the unblock of this user. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 12:21, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No worries. I have no dog in this fight. Narky Blert (talk) 16:35, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Mugsalot

HI , this user change every reverts for me , why ? I do not know and he refuse any discuss , I speak with him but he do not answer me , I do not know where is problem if we put location in place , can you see this articles Zembîlfiroş and Batel , please help me , I see his reverts are not good work , I wait your answer , thank you Hamaredha (talk) 21:04, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page watcher) Mugsalot has answered you and explained the problem well (I thought) both at Talk:Zembîlfiroş and at Talk:Batel. The {{Infobox settlement}} you keep trying to add to Zembîlfiroş is inappropriate for a work of literature. At Batel there seem to be multiple problems; Mugsalot has mentioned some of them, but I see you have removed both templates and content, and have also misused the |settlement_type= parameter, all without providing any explanation in an edit summary. Edit summaries are especially important when you are reverting somebody else's edits. Please start using them (and maybe you won't need to bother HighInBC). — JohnFromPinckney (talk / edits) 09:14, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
As an editor I have no interest in this topic. As an administrator I will not involve myself with a content dispute. I will say take care to avoid edit warring. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 09:24, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you ,Hamaredha (talk) 09:48, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

Hi, FYI: ==Notice of noticeboard discussion== Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--PLUS ULTRA CARLOS (talk) 14:32, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I don't think this discussion needs anything further from me. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Userboxes, slowly disappearing

Howdy. You mentioned in a past discussion, that there won't ever be a push to 'delete' userboxes, that announces an editors gender on their userpage. I hope you're correct :) GoodDay (talk) 17:58, 27 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

People will push all kinds of stupid things, but it will not get consensus. There is nothing offensive about revealing your gender, nor is it an attack on anyone else. This is a fairly simple distinction for the majority of people. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 00:50, 28 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]


thoughts on uncyclopedia?

Just wondering - 2601:192:8701:B4C0:516E:E7D2:EEAF:EE8D (talk)

No thoughts, never heard of it. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 01:41, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Precious anniversary

Precious
Two years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:56, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! 2 years since what? HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 09:02, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
"Precious", and there's a link, no? --Gerda Arendt (talk) 09:21, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you, it is very much appreciated. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 11:24, 8 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-social Wikipedia user

This user: "call-girls-jaipur00" (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) needs to be thrown out and is asking for an *** whooping. Please do the honours accordingly. 59.92.227.87 (talk) 10:16, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You know putting a retired box on your account and saying you are no longer active on Wikipedia after getting off of a block then carrying on editing as an IP could be seen as an illegitimate use of an alternate account. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 13:39, 9 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appeal by TillermanJimW

I've posted an appeal to the topic ban you sanctioned me with. Think this, and my posting a Diffs (though why Diffs & not a link?) on that page, qualifies as the required notification.

But I think I may have screwed up my appeal somewhat - seems I've created two sections on that page. Seems to be a conflict of sorts between the way the template works and what the "For appeals: Create new section" notification section recommends. If you could fix that up somehow that would be most appreciated. Or advise me how to do so. Thanks. --TillermanJimW (talk) 00:32, 11 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]