User talk:Homogenie

Welcome!

Hi Homogenie! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Kj cheetham (talk) 19:31, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

September 2020

Hello, I'm Heba Aisha. I noticed that you recently removed content from Chutia people without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Heba Aisha (talk) 01:46, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

• Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Heba Aisha (talk) 02:30, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

December 2020

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, you may be blocked from editing. —SpacemanSpiff 07:56, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Chutia people. If you can't understand our sourcing policies then Wikipedia is not for you. —SpacemanSpiff 16:12, 26 December 2020 (UTC)

You have inserted WP:OR again [1]. Please stop. Chaipau (talk) 11:29, 27 December 2020 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Moran people

Hello, Homogenie. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Moran people, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:01, 2 March 2021 (UTC)

Chutia people

Hi, Homogenie, I undid a few of your good faith edits at Chutia people due to lack of sourcing, or questionable sourcing. If you wish to use unpublished student theses listed at Shodhganga such as this one, please gain consensus for it. As things stand, it may be an unreliable source; you can raise a new discussion at the Reliable sources noticeboard to discuss this point if you wish; if you do, please link to this discussion in your message. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 05:01, 18 March 2021 (UTC)

You keep adding the Bodo-Kachari people as related to the Chutia. This cannot be correct because the Chutia people belong to the Bodo-kachari group. To be related, the Bodo-Kachari and the Chutia have to be different. Furthermore, there is no evidence that the Boro-Kachari peoples sprang from the same ethnic and/or linguistic stock. So lease stop doing this. Chaipau (talk) 11:47, 21 March 2021 (UTC)

If you insist on removing cited texts and inserting your POV, as you did here, you will be reported for disruptive editing. Wikipedia editors cannot insert personal experience and research in Wikipedia. Chaipau (talk) 14:46, 22 March 2021 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Moran people

Hello, Homogenie. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Moran people".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:19, 30 March 2021 (UTC)

Chutia people

There is no evidence that the Chutia people were speaking a Tibeto-Burman language when the Chutia kingdom collapsed in 1524. Chaipau (talk) 17:54, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

There is no evidence that Chutia people were speaking a Indo- Aryan language either. Moran language was alive till early 1900s. Ahom language was not replaced till the end of the 17th century. Morever it was a the royal court where it was replaced . The Ahom kings started to speak Assamese not the common Ahoms. The priestly class of Ahoms i.e Bailung, Gogoi, Mohan and Chiring didnt accept Assamese language till the end, infact rejecting Brahminical influence altogether. Most indegenious kingdom native languages in Northeast india were not replaced with a Indo-Aryan tongue except for Ahom, Koch and Chutia. Except for Assam Valley, the rest of Northeast remained outside of the egalitarian Vaishnivite influence which includes Dimasa Kingdom, Jaintia Kingdom, Manipur Kingdom. My point is Chutia language got extinct (might be still alive i.e Deori language) due to sanskrisation and later by Vaishnavite movement Homogenie (talk) 20:07, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Kamarupa

The reason why Sadiya is not mentioned in Kamarupa inscriptions is because the Chutia kingdom did not exist in the Kamarupa times. This is precisely how Shin uses it. No need for the lack of mention in Kamarupa inscription. Chaipau (talk) 19:51, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Chutiya kingdom

Please stop removing citations and cited content. If you persist, I shall report you to ANI. Chaipau (talk) 20:14, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Chutia people

You are inserting text here which are not supported by the references. Please stop this type of editing. Chaipau (talk) 21:04, 17 April 2021 (UTC)

Chutia people

You are passing off Ahom khels for Chutia clans. The Hindu-Chutia do not have clans. Please stop this charade. Chaipau (talk) 03:11, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

These clans have nothing to do with Hindu -Chutias . These clans were before Chutias were converted. Homogenie (talk) 03:49, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Final warning

It is clear that you are not here to edit collaboratively or follow our policies but to just add your own opinion. You've been warned about this multiple times but refuse to listen. Any further such edits and your editing privileges will be revoked. —SpacemanSpiff 15:47, 27 May 2021 (UTC)

Koch people

Stop making POV edits on Koch people. If you persist, you will be reported. Chaipau (talk) 13:25, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Asking you to stop again. There was a language called pani Koch that was reported but which no longer exists. So currently, they are not a Tibeto-Burman speaking ethno-linguistic group. Furthermore linguists have reported that their society seems more Austroasiatic, just like Garo people. So their ethnolinguistic identity is not purely Tibeto-Burman. Chaipau (talk) 16:26, 11 June 2021 (UTC)

Koch in lower assam are a Tibeto Burman. These are not my words but the authors. The Koch language in meghalaya has six variants : 1.Tintekiya 2.Banai 3.Harigaya 3.Satpariya 4.Wanang 5.Chapra Out of these Banai, Wanang are called Pani Koch. Here is source variants of Koch language 1. http://www.endangeredlanguages.com/lang/4359 Here is the source that Pani Koch is Banai and Wanang. 2. http://www.endangeredlanguages.com/lang/5679

The journal "Outline of Harigaya Koch Grammer" is about the HARIGAYA dialect of the KOCH LANGUAGE which i have given in reference in the Koch people Page: 1. https://www.sil.org/system/files/reapdata/32/61/30/32613089348164783135897741672857876054/sillcdd_46.pdf

Pani koch is not extinct, it is endangered.

The Koch in Meghalaya are this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDLC3SXMwUA

They are not OBCs But Schedule tribe

Here is the source of them being schedule Tribe: 1. https://censusindia.gov.in/Tables_Published/SCST/dh_st_meghalaya.pdf

And Garo is not a Austroasiatic, even if they are Austroasiatic (which they are not as i provided the evidence), they still arent INDO-ARYAN AND They are still not OBCS as the source provided above.

This page is not about Rajbanshi who are a amalgamation of different tribes who now speaks Assamese and Rajbanshi. This is about a group that is still present and speaks a Tibeto burman tongue in Meghalaya! This group is not extinct.

And donot remove CITED source. Please stop pushing your POV. Wikipedia runs on WP:SOURCE.

Chutia kingdom

Legends created after the fall of the Chutia kingdom has nothing to do with the kingdom. Please stop inserting these spurious accounts. Chaipau (talk) 09:26, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Talk before you remove something

Don't just remove whatever you think it's confusing to you. Better do some research before you do it. Robo Zay (talk) 12:16, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Chutia people

Please complete the discussion and come to a consensus before making edits. The edits I have removed are some recent ones and they are grossly misleading. Do not reinstate them. Chaipau (talk) 17:20, 12 July 2021 (UTC)

Edit war

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Proposed states and union territories of India. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. –Gladamas (talk · contribs) 01:21, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hi Homogenie! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia – it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. TrangaBellam (talk) 04:00, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sonowal Khel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bora. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

DS Alert IPA

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Template:Z33 Chaipau (talk) 08:56, 23 September 2021 (UTC)