Jump to content

Talk:Dark Horse (George Harrison album): Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification of altered sources needing review #IABot (v1.2.7.1)
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 56: Line 56:


Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 22:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)
Cheers.—[[User:InternetArchiveBot|'''<span style="color:darkgrey;font-family:monospace">InternetArchiveBot</span>''']] <span style="color:green;font-family:Rockwell">([[User talk:InternetArchiveBot|Report bug]])</span> 22:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

== Article reads like a fan trying very hard to justify an album that was poorly received and lacks objectivity; this article belongs among the worst of what Wikipedia has to offer—bias, personally and ideologically motivated, and poorly written. ==

“Cultural historian Michael Frontani [chastised the criticism of the album and tour]” you mean a random associate professor at a nameless university with no credittrials as a historian being that he isn’t a history professor but a communications professor!

This article is awful. Clearly written by a beatle fan that feels personally spited and offended that his idol George had a poorly received album. Very poorly written. Bias. Etc. [[Special:Contributions/2600:1012:B159:E092:4183:2664:79B:61D2|2600:1012:B159:E092:4183:2664:79B:61D2]] ([[User talk:2600:1012:B159:E092:4183:2664:79B:61D2|talk]]) 23:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:42, 3 January 2022

Good articleDark Horse (George Harrison album) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 23, 2012Good article nomineeListed
Please add {{WikiProject banner shell}} to this page and add the quality rating to that template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.
WikiProject iconThe Beatles GA‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis George Harrison-related article is within the scope of WikiProject The Beatles, which focuses on improving coverage of English rock band The Beatles and related topics on Wikipedia. Users who are willing to participate in the project should visit the project page, where they can join and see a list of open tasks.
GAThis article has been rated as GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to albums on Wikipedia.
Note icon
This article was the project collaboration on at least one previous occasion.
To-do list:
For WikiProject The Beatles

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

This article does not yet have a related to do list. If you can think of any ways to improve the article, why not create one?

"BITS & PIECES"

The "words of wisdom" found on the borders of the gatefold sleeve , were various quotes from Sir Frank Crisp , that George Harrison found on an old "Travellers Map" , that was handed out to visitors , when "Friar Park" was open to public viewing. ( Harrison incorporated a lot of Sir Frank's quips into several of his albums. )

The school photo , on the front cover , is edited and re-arranged slightly. If you look hard enough , you will find:Paul McCartney,(his brother)Mike McCartney,John Lennon,Ringo Starr , and Beatle chum Neil Aspinal.( Among others. ) Harvey J Satan (talk) 00:57, 22 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on Dark Horse (George Harrison album). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:43, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Article reads like a fan trying very hard to justify an album that was poorly received and lacks objectivity; this article belongs among the worst of what Wikipedia has to offer—bias, personally and ideologically motivated, and poorly written.

“Cultural historian Michael Frontani [chastised the criticism of the album and tour]” you mean a random associate professor at a nameless university with no credittrials as a historian being that he isn’t a history professor but a communications professor!

This article is awful. Clearly written by a beatle fan that feels personally spited and offended that his idol George had a poorly received album. Very poorly written. Bias. Etc. 2600:1012:B159:E092:4183:2664:79B:61D2 (talk) 23:42, 3 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]