Jump to content

User talk:Addaick: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Autoblocks
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown)
Line 101: Line 101:


Hi, thanks for notifying me. Unfortunately we can't know whether or not the block will trigger some other accounts. This is intended for privacy reasons. I apologize for the inconvenience and should I block this account again, I'll try not to activate the autoblock. Cheers! -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 12:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
Hi, thanks for notifying me. Unfortunately we can't know whether or not the block will trigger some other accounts. This is intended for privacy reasons. I apologize for the inconvenience and should I block this account again, I'll try not to activate the autoblock. Cheers! -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 12:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)
:Well, without going into too much details, we can either choose not to block the other accounts from the same IP when we block (but in 99% of the cases, we do want to do this since most people don't share their IP), or lift the autoblock once someome complained about being blocked and having nothing to do with the vandal. Right now the other users of this IP are no longer blocked. -- [[User:Lucasbfr|lucasbfr]] <sup>[[User talk:Lucasbfr|<font color="darkblue">talk</font>]]</sup> 13:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:50, 8 August 2007

Welcome!

Hello, Addaick, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!  -- Longhair\talk 08:24, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Standardizing article format

Hi Addaick. Your edits in music pages are very much welcome. When you create new articles about a musical composition, you can make them better by following a standard format. I took the liberty of formating two articles you started: Serenade for string orchestra, Op.20 (Elgar) and the Brook Green Suite. Keep up the good work--Atavi 11:17, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Helping Hands

Thanks (Jmc) to your correction of the page of Serenade for string orchestra,Op.20 (Elgar). Due to I can't find any helping hand, can you please teach me how to add the composer's name beside the music name in the top title? Many thanks! (Addaick 15:10, 16 July 2007 (UTC))[reply]

You're welcome, Atavi. Changing an article's title actually requires moving the article itself. Click on the 'move' tab at the top right of the page and read the instructions carefully.
If you need another 'helping hand', please feel free to ask here. Best wishes. -- Jmc 21:38, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Much thanks to your useful instruction!
Sorry, Addaick - I really have no idea where Atavi came from! -- Jmc 05:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Addaick. Please make the necessary changes so that the instrumentation is correct. I am not really qualified to do it myself; I would not know exactly what to write. --Atavi 09:47, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Venue suggestion needed for a meet-up in Yuen Long

La Transfiguration de Notre Seigneur Jésus-Christ

A tag has been placed on La Transfiguration de Notre Seigneur Jésus-Christ, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Book article with no assertion of notability

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet very basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Nyttend 13:34, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It appeared to me to be a book. I don't know about symphonies or whatever this is (I don't work with music articles on purpose), but you need to establish its notability better. Go look at Wikipedia:Notability: it will be able to help you more than this. Thanks for checking in Nyttend 13:49, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

edit summary

Hello Addaick. The comment in my edit summary was in fact directed at Nyttend (talk · contribs) who earlier requested the speedy deletion of the article as a non-notable book. I removed the speedy deletion request since 1) it's not a book and 2) it most likely is notable enough to have an article. I sugget however that you further assert the importance of the piece, in particular by providing further references to third-party commentary of the piece. Feel free to remove the tag I put on top of the article when you feel that the issue has been addressed and let me know if you have further questions. Cheers, Pascal.Tesson 15:18, 1 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry

I've done the same myself before, it's easy enough to do. I hope I've got the sense of what you were trying to say about tonal harmonies etc reappearing in that piece, I found the sentence as it was rather hard to get my head around. David Underdown 14:27, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Serenade for string orchestra, Op.20 (Elgar)‎

Sorry, Addaick. I've had to remove your addition of "THIS ENGLAND CD Booklet" as a reference to the 'Serenade for string orchestra' article. There needs to be a clear explanation of why this booklet should be a reference for this article, and details of the CD need to be provided. Thanks for your interest in Elgar! -- Jmc 20:21, 2 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

checkY

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 202.40.139.171 lifted or expired.

Request handled by:  Netsnipe  ►  10:58, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Autoblocks

Hi, thanks for notifying me. Unfortunately we can't know whether or not the block will trigger some other accounts. This is intended for privacy reasons. I apologize for the inconvenience and should I block this account again, I'll try not to activate the autoblock. Cheers! -- lucasbfr talk 12:53, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Well, without going into too much details, we can either choose not to block the other accounts from the same IP when we block (but in 99% of the cases, we do want to do this since most people don't share their IP), or lift the autoblock once someome complained about being blocked and having nothing to do with the vandal. Right now the other users of this IP are no longer blocked. -- lucasbfr talk 13:48, 8 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]