User talk:GearedBull

Please click here to leave me a message.

Talk:Mitt Romney presidential campaign, 2008

I wanted to give you a heads up on your editing of the Discussion page. If you read WP:TALK, it gives lots of rules and guidelines on what to do on discussion pages. You edited another editor's POV section title, which isn't good form. Below are the general guidelines:

Editing others' comments is generally not allowed. Exceptions are:

• If you have their permission
• Removing prohibited material such as libel and personal details
• Removing personal attacks and incivility. Please read WP:ATTACK#Removal_of_text and WP:CIVIL#Removing_uncivil_comments before removing anything.
• Unsigned comments: You are allowed to append {{unsigned}} or one of its variants to the end of someone's comment if they have failed to sign it. The form is {{subst:unsigned|USER NAME OR IP}}, which results in —The preceding unsigned comment was added by USER NAME OR IP (talk • contribs) ..
• Interruptions: In some cases, it is OK to interrupt a long contribution, either by a short comment (as a reply to a minor point) or by a headline (If the contribution introduces a new topic. In that case, add "<small>Headline added to (reason) by ~~~~</small>"). In such cases, please add {{subst:interrupted|USER NAME OR IP}} before the interruption.

As you can see "Ford and Nazis" though fairly inflammatory, is not prohibited material, is not a personal attack or incivility (against another editor, we can make nonlibelous remarks about Romney all day long, and since he's a politician, it's pretty hard to libel him anyways). If you read much more intensely discussed articles, individuals are banned for censoring discussion pages, and "Ford and Nazis" hardly rates censoring. In general, unless it is really bad, never censor a Discussion section, no matter how obnoxious. Orangemarlin 17:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)

The Mystery Man

For the record, I wanted to let you know that I do not support the following comments made by User:The Mystery Man regarding homosexuality:

Both of these pages are disgusting displays of lies toward great people, especially Lincoln who, in my opinion, is the greatest American ever to live. I support the deletion of the pages which hold nothing but pure lies and dribble.

I did not remove the material from James Buchanan, nor post the proposed for deletion notice on the Sexuality of James Buchanan page for the reasons listed by The Mystery Man. I have no problem with homosexuals or homosexuality. I have a problem with rumors being included in Wikipedia articles. Nothing more, nothing less. K. Scott Bailey 20:08, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

Apology

I think I owe you an apology. You made comments on the James Buchanan talk page which I think you did in jest, and I misinterpreted them. In any case, even if you were serious, I probably shouldn't have made personal statements. Sorry. NickBurns 10:49, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for accepting the apology. I just need to be less sleepy when I read a long list of comments! I had not seen the Canadian Bill Burns stuff - I will check it out. Your mention of that reminded me of Bill Burns, who was a famous news anchor in Pittsburgh where I grew up. Now I may have to make a Wikipedia entry for him! As for Door County, I've not been that far north yet. Much of WI is very pretty, but so far I'm still in a mindset where I think Madison is just a very distant suburb of Chicago!!! NickBurns 15:09, 17 March 2007 (UTC)

Your edit to Blue Room (White House)

Your recent edit to Blue Room (White House) (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 20:09, 18 March 2007 (UTC)

Bill Burns vs Bill Burns

Hey, remember when I said I was gonna create an article about the TV anchor Bill Burns that I knew? I did.....and now I'm wondering if you are interested in creating an article for Bill Burns, the artist? If not, I can try to do it....just thought maybe you were knowledgeable about the subject?

I already set up a disambiguation page here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bill_Burns

Let me know, either way. Thanks! NickBurns 22:56, 21 March 2007 (UTC)

Hey - I just wanted to let you know that I set up the Bill Burns (artist) page. You're right....his work was right down my alley!!! Thanks so much for introducing me to him. NickBurns 22:40, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Verdana

Re Verdana - I wasn't aware of the place name, so the removal of the edit was apropriate. As the Nike mark is in a different TM "class" than the font name, there's really no legal issue with their use of it. Cheers, iloveverdana@hotmail.com

White House image

Would you mind explaining the rationale behind your saying that a 650x487 image is "sharper and higher res" than a 6142x3245 image? Noclip 01:59, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Noclip. thanks for writing me about the White House north portico image. I may have mispoke. The problem is more focus and clarity. the present picutre is in much better focus and shows more architectural detail. While I liked the appropriate spring time look to your pic it was very milky and did not show much detail. CApitol3 15:40, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe I am misunderstanding you. I'm not sure what you mean by more architectural detail, are there any specific areas that serve as examples? My image is a stitch of 8 images, each 8 megapixels. I'm not exactly a great photographer, but I imagine it'd be pretty hard for 8 images at 200mm to show less detail than one. Noclip 17:22, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Hi Noclip. On my monitor, the image I placed there last night shows much more detail. I can see the dentils in the pediment, and more detail around the wiondows. CApitol3 20:37, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Maybe it's just me, but the dentils in this image seem just as visible. Noclip 21:28, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

OpenFontLibrary!

Hi, I'm involved in the www.openfontlibrary.org project and I love your type specimens in the wikicommons. I hope you'll check out the OFLB project and join in! Best, Dave —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Davelab6 (talk • contribs) 07:51, 31 March 2007 (UTC).

AfD nomination of Free State of Montzoar Palatinate

An editor has nominated Free State of Montzoar Palatinate, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free State of Montzoar Palatinate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Coat of arms of Montzoar

An editor has nominated Coat of arms of Montzoar, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free State of Montzoar Palatinate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Flag of Montzoar

An editor has nominated Flag of Montzoar, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Free State of Montzoar Palatinate and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 18:22, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

Image:MonacoSp.png

Why did you use the word "homokaasu" as a sample text in this pic? It's not a very good sample text, meaning "gay gas" in Finnish and refers to some Internet joke. Maybe something in English instead? Nikke 08:33, 10 April 2007 (UTC)

OpenFontLibrary

The OpenFontlibrary wiki is for documenting and planning the open font library project, a project to collect the worlds best free software fonts, licensed under the SIL open font license :-) There is also www.typosium.org that is more focused on typeface history that you might like too. Please consider joining the OFLibrary mailing list :-) —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 87.127.70.142 (talk) 14:25, 12 April 2007 (UTC).

Nancy Reagan China Pic

Hey. I deleted your picture for two reasons: (1.) look at the article right now. There's a huge gap between your picture and the next paragraph, which isn't displayed in any of the other pictures. There isn't a way to fix that without deleting the pic. (2.) We should be displaying Mrs. Reagan's time as first lady, and not the China she ordered for the White House. I know and understand that it was a big part of her first term as First Lady, but I don't care what the China looked like; it wasn't the design that caused the controversy. I want to see pictures of Nancy Reagan. I would recommend this photo because it shows what Mrs. Reagan did to overcome the bad press she was getting from the china. The china pic is in a bad place; it doesn't really display anything having to do with Nancy Reagan, other than the fact she bought it, and there was some controvery over she buying it not over the pattern or design of it. Again, the china piture is not necessary, for it leaves a large space, and it does not sufficiently show Reagan's time as First Lady. Happyme22 19:21, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Well I guess we can agree to disagree. I still don't think the picture should go in, but the article should mention more about her active role in choosing new White Hosue China. I'm sorry if I've gotten a little carried away. I no that this Wikipedia article is not a shrine to Mrs. Reagan, but I still son't think the pic should go in. Is there an article about all of the White House Chinas? You could add it there, or even make one. Happyme22 19:40, 12 April 2007 (UTC)

Excellent Font Previews

Hi GearedBull

Those font samples you've made for Myriad Pro, Andale Mono, and Lucida Grande are awesome!

I'd like to get samples like this for other fonts, such as Lucida Sans and Calibri.

How did you do them? Can I help make samples for other fonts?

Thanks

MichaelWard 06:42, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Re: Type specimens

Hi Jim

I don't have QuarkXPress or Illustrator, and don't have any experience with vector graphics programs. Apparently Inkscape is free, so I'll try to see what I can do using that. It will be a good learning experience in any case.

If you want to get Calibri and are happy to jump thru a few hoops, you can download the PowerPoint 2007 viewer then extract the fonts using cabextract, File Juicer, or p7zip.

MichaelWard 00:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Local organizations in high-level categories

Please note for information that it is not appropriate to put local organizations in high-level categories - it raises queries re notability. You should look for lower-level categories. For example, of all local cultural heritage organizations were placed under Category:Cultural heritage it would become huge. I hope this helps you with future categorization. — Jonathan Bowen 16:24, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

I have added some of your entries to [:Category:Heritage organizations]] instead, which seems more appropriate. You might want to use this category in future. Regards, Jonathan Bowen 16:31, 26 April 2007 (UTC)

Times

I know it is called Times Roman but the Roman refers to the "regular" or upright typeface. The registered trademark is Times as can be seen here: http://www.linotype.com/1537/times-family.html.

Times Roman

I agree. It's called Times Roman but not Times New Roman. The example picture is Times Roman and not Times New Roman, take a look at the E, e, and A. I will change the name in the image to Times Roman. Arne Padmos 12:01, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Gary Bauer

You may not be aware of our policy on biographies of living people, but it's important that we don't add defamatory information about living people without having good sources. The policy, WP:BLP, now recommends that editors remove such material whenever seen. (The Siegenthaler Rule). As for the material in question, it appears to quote a diner owner and a small-town NRA chairman on the mannerisms of the subject. Even with a source those two don't have what I'd call "noteworthy opinions" that require quoting. I know it seems odd when an unregistered user deletes material, but in this case they were correct. -Will Beback · † · 10:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Valentine Bandit

Sure, I'll remove the notice although I still have notability concerns. If I still have notability concerns after a reasonable amount of time (probably a week or two) it is more likely now that I will nominate the article for deletion. But if you establish notability I will have no problem with the article staying. Ta-ra!--Yon Yonson 02:48, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Typography articles

I've seen your good work across wikipedia on typography, and was wondering if you'd be interested in starting a group effort to discuss and tackle typography related articles? I'm not sure if a new wikiproject is necessary, but I've started a discussion that you are welcome to join at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Graphic design. Thanks for your consideration, and keep up the good work.-Andrew c 23:08, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Oatmeal Sans

Thanks for the Oatmeal. Not sure what that means, but "Oatmeal Smith" and I like the work you're doing with type specimens. But... where's Template Gothic? Come on! I can link that to the Eye magazine article that Oatmeal Smith and I have been sweating over for the last few weeks. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 141.152.24.153 (talk) 00:16, 9 May 2007 (UTC).

Park Street Church

Please see Category_talk:Ex-gay_movement#Sub-topics. --Flex (talk/contribs) 13:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Are you satisfied with the discussion there, or would you like to solicit more input with an RfC? --Flex (talk/contribs) 15:47, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Serrated?

Dangerous country - Monty Python - need a passsport with every in-joke on the crib sheet to get pass the border guards with Lumberjack uniforms SatuSuro 13:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:AkzidenzGroteskT.png

Thanks for uploading Image:AkzidenzGroteskT.png. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:05, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Vermont Template

I just put it there because it seemed relevant. If you want to contribute, go ahead, and if not, I'll get around to adding info. Thanks -- ChunkyStyle (talk • contribs) 17:49, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Re serrate Lupin leaves

Though it's pleasant to be approached by you on any subject, I don't recall editing lupin recently. Do respond at User talk:Wetman Wetman 21:23, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Dated cleanup tags

Hi, thanks for your message, SmackBot does not generally add tags, but merely dates those that are already there. Regards, Rich Farmbrough, 13:31 10 May 2007 (GMT).

Category:Physicist Wikipedians

I have speedy deleted a category you created, Category:Physicist Wikipedians, as recreation of deleted material. This category was renamed to category:Wikipedian physicists here. Thanks, VegaDark (talk) 04:22, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Typeface categorization

Thanks for catching my error with Korinna. I'm not sure why I did that. There are so many articles to deal with I don't remember exactly why I put that one there. If I did it by mistake, I apologize. Looking at it now, it clearly isn't modern. However, it doesn't strike me as a slab either. As for Bell, it shares some features of transitionals, so I felt it was ok (plus there was a source, maybe not a good source, but a source that states the face is less severe than the French models and is now classified as Transitional[1]). The beauty of categories is we don't have to make a typeface fit into a single category. Anyway, any help and input on categorizing typeface articles is great. Thanks very much for contacting me. So, do you think organizing typefaces by foundry is a bad idea? I was thinking that having a category for designer if notable, (say a Matthew Carter or Eric Gill or Hermann Zapf), a category or two for style, a category for date, if applicable, and a foundry or two would be a very solid categorization scheme. I understand that foundry can get real messy, but if we keep a strict hold on things, just focusing on for who the typeface was originally created (or revived), I believe categorizing by foundry can be helpful. However, do you think I should stop and we should delete all those by foundry cats? I think it is of particular interest to list say all the Emigre typefaces together, but as I said, it can get messier with older faces.-Andrew c 04:02, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:GreenMtBoys.jpg

I was wondering if you could take a look again at Image:GreenMtBoys.jpg that you uploaded. You copyright tagged it as PD-art but this only applies to 2-d works of art - and a flag most definitely exists in three dimensions. If you took the picture yourself tag it as PD-self, otherwise you will have to consider an alternative license or the image might be deleted. Madmedea 14:58, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Copperplate!

If the images in our photo blog display other fonts, it's because they are near Copperplate Gothic in the photos. We take pictures of Copperplate Gothic where ever we see it, and although other fonts may sneak into the picture, the focus is nonetheless on Copperplate and the variants used in real-world design (italic, bold, horrible resizing, shadows, etc.) We had discussed blurring the photos except for Copperplate, but it was distracting. These are photos uploaded immediately from our camera phones, so they are candid and we cannot be expected to include ONLY Copperplate in the photos.

I would very much like to keep our link on the Copperplate Gothic entry, and I feel that it's not only entirely 100% relevant but also educational regarding the wide-spread use of the font. The link stayed on the Wikipedia entry for months without incident -- it's not bashing (aside from the title) and has information not available on the Wikipedia entry in some of the posts.

Thanks! --Pinkfairywand 16:53, 14 May 2007 (UTC)—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Pinkfairywand (talk • contribs) 16:50, 14 May 2007 (UTC).

Copperplate again

These are the first messages I have ever received from you, so I'm sorry if you have confused me with someone else.

If we have included fonts that are not Copperplate GoThic in our entries it is because they look almost exactly like it and we are not as intelligent as you. If you could spend some of your time telling me which photos are not Copperplate I can mark them as such if that will make you feel better about our site.

Our site is hardly opinionated, so far as "I hate Copperplate" goes, because we are documenting the font extensively with no commentary. Even if you love Copperplate Gothic, we have educational and informative information available that is largely free of our clearly humorous "hate" slant.

If needed I will take the issue up in the talk page for the entry but I really don't see a reason for all of this. --Pinkfairywand 17:08, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

Copperplate again

Actually, I just looked up all the fonts you mentioned, and I can assure you that NONE of the things we call Copperplate Gothic are actually those fonts. The quality of the photos may be iffy, but we are not THAT poor at typography. Clearly the fonts are hard to read in some of our photos and so I can understand your confusion. If we mistake a font for Copperplate it is because the designer took Copperplate and used it as a base for a new font. I'm glad that you can identify so many different typefaces, but again I assure you with 100% certainty that none of the fonts you listed are displayed on our page as Copperplate Gothic. --Pinkfairywand 17:26, 14 May 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:WHJBKGarden.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:WHJBKGarden.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 00:10, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

More typeface stuff

I guess we should have coordinated our classification efforts a little better on the the typeface font. I realized this after I created Category:Incised typefaces and then, only after the fact, realized you had previously created Category:Glyphic serif typefaces. I thought that this grouping could contain serif and sans-serif faces (for example, Trajan vs. Lithos), and because we didn't have an over abundance of incised typefaces, that we could just group them together. So which category should we keep? I'd be happy to speedy delete mine if you feel that is best. If that happened, would we also create Category:IGlyphic sans-serif typefaces? I personally feel we should just group the two together, but also put them in the general serif or sans-serif category as well. Next, I noticed you added two classification of sans-serif faces. Good work with that. The names scheme are different from mine, so do you think we should CfD rename the serif categories so that they all contain the word "serif" in the category? For example Category:Old style typefaces would become Category:Old style serif typefaces. I really am torn on this, because it seems redundant to my ears that an old style face would be serif. However, it may be easier for someone unfamiliar with type classifications if we mention whether the sub cat is serif or san serif (of course, we wouldn't have to rename slab-serif). Anyway, just my thoughts. Do you have any further ideas or concerns with the categorization project we have begun to undertake?

Finally, would could you mind please speedy tagging Category:Humanist sans-serif? Thanks for your good work!-Andrew c 15:22, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Wikipedia's deletion policy may help you. CfD stands for Categories for discussion, and that is the place where mergers, renames, and deletions are discussed for articles in the category namespace. You can view the CfD I posted for the serif sub-cats in question here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 May 15#Serif typeface classifications. Next, WP:SPEEDY is a way to delete content without going through the longer process of articles for deletion. Because you created the category and are the sole contributor of Category:Humanist sans-serif, this falls under speedy criteria 7. Therefore, you can simply add {{db-author}} to the top of the page to have an admin delete the category for you. Hope this helps.

As for the classification, as noted above, I have asked to rename the cats I created. I made a mistake and did not remember the exact name of the glyphic/incised category that you created, mentioned above. As for the 3rd category of sans-serif, the one listed in a few of my sources is Grotesque, so we can have Category:Grotesque sans-serif typefaces to house Helvetica, Univers, Arial, Akzidenz Grotesk, etc. I'll get on that now and start going through the sans-serifs to add classification and foundries. -Andrew c 20:32, 15 May 2007 (UTC)

Multiple type specimens for same face

I was going through the typeface sample category and noticed things like Image:BodAntiquaSpecimen.svg, Image:BodoniAntiquaSpec.svg, Image:BodonispecAIB.svg, Image:BodonispecimenAIB3.svg, that is 4 different yet very similar images for the same typeface. It seems like, instead of uploading a new version over the old version at a single image article, you simply uploaded a new image article each time. I just wanted to verify that the orphaned specimen (i.e. the ones not currently being used in articles) were mistakes and can be cleared for deletion. We also may want to consider consistent naming, but we can cross that bridge. Assuming that the unused type samples are no longer needed, I'm going to start tagging them for speedy deletion. -Andrew c 01:27, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

Folio thanks + Barnstar

Thanks for adding an image to Folio. I was going to do it later this weekend, but you beat me to it;) Also thanks for expanding the info. My intention was to go through the Meggs/Carter book and make sure we had an article on all 25 'great' typefaces, and Folio was the first one I came upon. Any word on the multiple specimen image issue? Thanks again for all your great work.-Andrew c 21:37, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

		The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
		I award you this barnstar for your excellent work in creating typeface articles and type specimen images. Andrew c 21:40, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Hey, thanks for the reply. As my user page states, I have a BFA from VCU :) I studied under some great people. Too bad I'm not a 'professional' graphic designer (yet?).-Andrew c 22:24, 18 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:BemboSpecimenAIB1.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BemboSpecimenAIB1.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BemboSpecimenAIB1.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:WmBembo.png, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:BemboSpecimenAIB1.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:42, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:BemboTypeSpec.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BemboTypeSpec.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BemboTypeSpec.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:WmBembo.png, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:BemboTypeSpec.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:AlbertusSpecimenAIB.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:AlbertusSpecimenAIB.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:AlbertusSpecimenAIB.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:AlbertusMT.png, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:AlbertusSpecimenAIB.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CentSchooSpec2.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:CentSchooSpec2.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:CentSchooSpec2.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:CenturySchoolbookSAIB.svg, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:CentSchooSpec2.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:BemboSpecimenAIB.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BemboSpecimenAIB.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BemboSpecimenAIB.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:WmBembo.png, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:BemboSpecimenAIB.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:43, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:TimesGeorgiaComp.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:TimesGeorgiaComp.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:TimesGeorgiaComp.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:TimesandGeorgia.svg, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:TimesGeorgiaComp.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CitySpecimenAIB.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:CitySpecimenAIB.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:CitySpecimenAIB.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:BCitySp.svg, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:CitySpecimenAIB.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:BrushScriptSpec.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:BrushScriptSpec.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:BrushScriptSpec.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:BSSpec.svg, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:BrushScriptSpec.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CooperSpec.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:CooperSpec.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:CooperSpec.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:CooperBlackspec.svg, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:CooperSpec.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:44, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CourierSpec.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:CourierSpec.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:CourierSpec.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:CourierWC.png, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:CourierSpec.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CourierAIB.svg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:CourierAIB.svg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:CourierAIB.svg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:CourierWC.png, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specimens

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:CourierAIB.svg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 16:45, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Image:CourierAIB.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:CourierAIB.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:CourierAIB.jpg fits the criteria for speedy deletion for the following reason:

Redundant with Image:CourierWC.png, orphaned image. Image creator did not realize there was an upload over existing image feature. I also have permission to tag for deletion from the image creator, see [[User_talk:Andrew_c#Folio.2C_multiple_specime