Jump to content

Historical definitions of races in India: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[pending revision][pending revision]
Content deleted Content added
Dark Tea (talk | contribs)
added citation from Thomas Huxley
restored lost material and rearranged contents of page
Line 1: Line 1:
This article presents some [[Race (historical definitions)|historical definitions of race]] in India. Most of these theories are pre-1940 and only of historical interest now. The scientific support for terms such as [[Caucasoid]], [[Negroid]], [[Mongoloid]] used widely in these theories has fallen steadily. Where 78 percent of the articles in the 1931 Journal of Physical Anthropology employed these or similar synonymous terms reflecting a bio-race paradigm, only 36 percent did so in 1965, and just 28 percent did in 1996<ref>Leonard Lieberman, Rodney C. Kirk, and Alice Littlefield, "Perishing Paradigm: Race—1931-99," American Anthropologist 105, no. 1 (2003): 110-13. A following article in the same issue, by Mat Cartmill and Kaye Brown, questions the precise rate of decline, but agrees that the Negroid/Caucasoid/Mongoloid paradigm has fallen into near-total disfavour.</ref>.
:''See [[Demographics of India]] for information about population of India. See [[Genetics and Archaeogenetics of South Asia]] for current debates of the genetic makeup of South Asian populations.''


Various attempts have been made, under the [[British Raj]], to classify the [[demographics of India|population of India]] according to a [[typology (anthropology)|racial typology]]. Pre-colonial Indian literature and traditions made no such racial classifications. After the [[independence of India|independence]], in pursuance of the Government's policy to discourage community distinctions based on race, the 1951 Census of India did away with racial classifications <ref name="padmanabha_anthro"/>. The national Census of independent India does not recognize any racial groups in India <ref name=Kumar>Kumar, Jayant. [http://www.censusindia.net/ Census of India]. 2001. September 4, 2006.</ref>. In India, "[[Dravidian people|Dravidian]]", "[[Indo-Aryans|Indo-Aryan]]", and similar words are generally considered as linguistic terms, rather than ethnic terms.
Since the 1940s, the evolutionary scientists have rejected the view of race. Also, it should be noted that the national Census of India does not recognize any racial groups in India<ref>Kumar, Jayant. [http://www.censusindia.net/ Census of India]. 2001. September 4, 2006.</ref>. In India, the [[dravidian people|Dravidian]], [[Indo-Aryan|Indo-Aryans]] and similar words are generally considered as linguistic terms, rather than ethnic terms. Pre-colonial Indian literature and traditions make no such racial classifications. '''Throughout most anthropological research, the so-called "Indo-Aryan" and "Dravidian" groups are identified as members of the same race''' (but perhaps of different subraces.)


Some scholars of the colonial epoch attempted to find a method to classify the various groups of India according to the predominant [[scientific racism]] theories popular at that time in Europe. This pseudo-scientific racial classification was used by the British census of India. It was often mixed with considerations about the [[Indian caste system|caste system]], as well as conflating linguistic groups (such as Dravidians) with "races."


==17th century Anthropologists==
Most importantly, contemporary [[demographics of India|demographists]] underline that the population of India is the results of millenary [[miscegenation]] which makes it impossible to distinguish biological traits which would pertain to only one group. To the contrary, ethnic groups can be distinguished, as they are characterized by specific culture, language, religion, habits and customs, without being biologically different from others populations.
===François Bernier (1684)===
{{François Bernier Racial Definitions}}


==17th and 18th century anthropologists==
==18th Century Anthropologists==
===Carolus Linnaeus===
[[François Bernier]] (1684) [[François Bernier#Racial Classification System|classified]] all Indians under the same group "European, North African, Middle Eastern, South Asian and Native American race"<ref>{{cite book
{{Carolus Linnaeus Racial Definitions}}
| last =Bernier
| first =François
| authorlink =François Bernier
| title =Nouvelle division de la terre par les differents especes ou races qui l'habitent ("A New Division of the Earth, According to the Different Species or Races of Men Who Inhabit It")
| year =1684
| language =French
}}</ref>. [[Carolus Linnaeus]], the father of modern [[taxonomy]], [[Carolus Linnaeus#Mankind|classified]] majority of Indians under a single racial group called "Europeus albescens", while classifying North-East Indians as "Asiaticus fucus"<ref>{{cite book
| last =Linnaeus
| first =Carolus
| authorlink =Carolus Linnaeus
| title =[[Systema Naturae]]
| year =1735
| language =Latin
}}</ref>.


==19th Century Anthropologists==
John G. Jackson, in his book ''Ethiopia and the Origin of Civilization'', stated that the early inhabitants of India were "an Ethiopic ethnic type",. which were described by Dr. Will Durant as "a dark-skinned, broad-nosed people". Durant didn't about the origin or the language of these "early Hindus", but he termed them "Dravidians".<ref>Jackson, John G. ''[http://www.nbufront.org/html/MastersMuseums/JGJackson/EthiopiaOriginOfCivilization.html Ethiopia and the Origin of Civilization]''. 1939. September 25, 2007.</ref>
===Johann Friedrich Blumenbach===
{{Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Racial Definitions}}
===Louis Agassiz===
{{Louis Agassiz Racial Definitions}}
===Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau===
{{Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau Racial Definitions}}
===Thomas Huxley===
[[Thomas Huxley]], in his ''Journal of the Ethnological Society of London'' (1870), claimed that India was obviously Australoid due to the Australoid physical type's distinctiveness in physical appearance<ref>http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/SM3/GeoDis.html</ref>.


==20th Century Anthropologists==
==Martial races theory==
===Stanley M. Garn===
{{Stanley M. Garn Racial Definitions}}
===William Henry Boyd===
{{William Henry Boyd Racial Definitions}}
===Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt===
{{Von E. Eickstedt racial definitions}}
===Carleton S. Coon===
{{Carleton S. Coon Racial Definitions}}
[[Carleton S. Coon|Coon]] was an American anthropologist who attended Harvard University (Ph.D., 1928) and who traveled around the world, photographing the specimin of humans as he traveled. He believed that the Dravidians were too Caucasiods due to their Caucasiod skull structure and other physical traits (e.g. noses, eyes, hair.) In his book he published in 1969, "The Living Races of Man," he said, "'''''India is the easternmost outpost of the Caucasian racial region.'''''"


{{main|Martial Race}}


The [[Martial Race|Martial races theory]] was a [[British Empire|British]] [[ideology]] based on the [[assumption]] that certain [[ethnic]] races were more martially inclined as opposed to the general populace or other races<ref name="heather_streets_martial">Heather Streets. ''Martial Races: The military, race and masculinity in British Imperial Culture, 1857-1914''</ref>. The British divided the entire Indian [[ethnic]] groups into two categories: Martial race and Non Martial race. The martial race was typically brave and well built for fighting but were also described as "unintelligent"<ref>{{cite journal
|last=Rand
|first=Gavin
|title=Martial Races and Imperial Subjects: Violence and Governance in Colonial India 1857–1914
|journal= European Review of History
|volume=13
|issue=1
|pages=1-20
|publisher=Routledge
|date=March 2006
|doi=10.1080/13507480600586726
}}</ref>. The non martial races were those whom the British believed to be unfit for battle because of their sedentary lifestyle, but were regarded as smarter.


==Idea That Many More Racial Groups Exist==
The critics of this theory state that the [[Indian rebellion of 1857]] may have played a role in British reinforcement of the Martial races theory. During this rebellion, some Indian troops, particularly in Bengal, mutinied, but the "loyal" [[Sikhs]], [[Punjabi people|Punjabi]]s, [[Dogra]]s, [[Gurka]]s, [[Garhwal Rifles|Garhwalis]] and Pakhtuns ([[Pathans]]) did not join the mutiny and fought on the side of the British Army. The critics state that this theory was used to the hilt to accelerate recruitment from among these races, while discouraging enlistment of "disloyal" Indians who had sided with the [[rebellion|rebel army]] during the war<ref>[http://countrystudies.us/pakistan/8.htm Country Studies: Pakistan] - [[Library of Congress]]</ref>. Critics have also called the Martial races theory as racial and gender-biased masculine ideology<ref>{{cite web
===McCulloch===
|url=http://www.telegraphindia.com/1050701/asp/opinion/story_4933880.asp
[[Richard McCulloch]] (born 1949) is an author, who proposes [[racial separatism]]. He divides Indian people into three races<ref>http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html</ref>:
|title=As tough as man can be: Review of ''Martial Races and Imperial Subjects: Violence and Governance in Colonial India 1857-1914''
* Indic race, North India
|date=2005-07-01
* Dravidic race, Central India
|publisher=The Telegraph
* Veddoid race, South India
|accessdate=2007-03-24
===Risley (1881)===
}}</ref>
[[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland|British]] anthropologist Sir Herbert Hope Risley's Racial Classification of India (1881) is as follows<ref>http://www.csas.ed.ac.uk/fichiers/BATES_RaceCaste&Tribe.pdf</ref>:
* [[Mongoloid]]
* [[Dravidian people|Dravidian]]
* [[Indo-Aryans]]
* [[Turko-Iranian]]
* Mongolo-Dravidian
* Aryo-Dravidian
* [[Scythians|Scytho]]-Dravidian


==Racial theories ==
===Hodson and Wyse===
In ''Analysis of the 1931 Census of India''<ref>{{cite web
{{see also|Scientific racism}}
|url=http://www.athelstane.co.uk/tchodson/ind_ethn/ind_ethn.htm#q020
|title=Analysis of the 1931 Census of India: Race in India
|publisher=Government of India Press
|date=1937
|accessdate=2006-11-12
}} (Now in public domain)</ref> (Government of India Press, 1937), Prof. Thomas Callan Hodson (1871-1953) and William Wyse (Professor of Social Anthropology, Fellow, [[St Catharine's College, Cambridge]]), analysed the physical types in India, in great detail. This analysis was independent of the [[Indian caste system|castes]], and Brahmins and Dalits were classified in the same racial groups. For example, [[Telugu Brahmins]] and [[Chamar]]s were classified as Racial Element A.


Hodson and Wyse believed that the earliest occupants of India were probably of the [[Negrito]] race, followed by the proto-[[Australoid]]s. Later, an early stock probably of the Mediterranean race, came to India and mingled with the proto-australoids. These people spoke an agglutinative tongue from which the present [[Austro-Asiatic languages]] are derived. They had a rudimentary knowledge of agriculture, building stone monuments, and primitive navigation. This migration was followed by an immigration of civilised Mediterraneans from the [[Persian Gulf]] (ultimately from eastern Europe). These people had the knowledge of the metals, but not of [[iron]]. They were followed by later waves of immigrants who developed the [[Indus valley civilization]]. All these immigrants were of the [[dolichocephalic]] type, but the Indus valley people had a mixed [[brachycephalic]] element coming from the [[Anatolia|Anatolian plateau]], in the form of the [[Armenoid]] branch of the [[Alpine race]]. These people probably spoke the [[Dravidian languages]]. Later, a [[brachycephalic]] race speaking perhaps an Indo-European language of the "[[Pisacha]] or [[Dardic languages|Dardic]] family", migrated to India from the Iranian plateau and the Pamirs. During about 1500 B.C., the [[Indo-Aryans]] migrated into Northern India.
In the turn of the 19th century, various authors and members of the [[physical anthropology]] school, began to attempt to classify the [[human species]] into various "races." These theories, which remained popular until [[World War II]], are now often labelled as "[[scientific racism]]." Modern scientists have defined the [[Homo Sapiens Sapiens]] as [[monotypic]] (i.e. comprising only one "race" without [[sub-species]]). The scientific support for terms such as [[Caucasoid]], [[Negroid]], [[Mongoloid]] used widely in these earlier theories has fallen steadily. Where 78 percent of the articles in the 1931 ''[[Journal of Physical Anthropology]]'' employed these or similar synonymous terms reflecting a bio-race paradigm, only 36 percent did so in 1965, and just 28 percent did in 1996<ref>Leonard Lieberman, Rodney C. Kirk, and Alice Littlefield, "Perishing Paradigm: Race—1931-99," American Anthropologist 105, no. 1 (2003): 110-13. A following article in the same issue, by Mat Cartmill and Kaye Brown, questions the precise rate of decline, but agrees that the Negroid/Caucasoid/Mongoloid paradigm has fallen into near-total disfavour.</ref>.


Hudson and Wyse stated that, broadly, seven racial elements are present in Indian people:
[[Johann Friedrich Blumenbach]], one of the founders of [[craniometry]], classified most Indians as "[[Caucasian race]]", in the same group as Europeans, while putting North-East Indians in the "Mongolian race" group<ref>''Collectionis suae craniorum diversarum gentium illustratae decades''. Gottingae, J. C. (H.) Dieterich, 1790-1828.</ref>. However, [[Louis Agassiz]] classified all Indians as "Tropical Asiatic race", distinct from "European Temperate race"<ref>[[Louis Agassiz]]. ''Essay on Classification''. 1851.</ref>. [[Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau]], author of ''[[An Essay on the Inequality of the Human Races]]'' (1853-55), a milestone in "[[scientific racism]]" theories, classified majority of Indians as "Degenerative race", putting North-East Indians in the "Yellow race" group<ref>[[Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau|Gobineau, Arthur]] (Count Joseph Arthur de Gobineau) and Adrian Collins. (1853-55) 1983. The Inequality of Human Races. Second edition, reprint. Torrance, Calif.: Noontide Press.</ref>.


;Racial Element A
[[Image:Huxleyraces.gif|thumb|300px|Huxley's map of racial categories from ''On the Geographical Distribution of the Chief Modifications of Mankind''. Australioids, marked in blue, are identified as occupants of Australia and India]]In ''On the Methods and Results of Ethnology'' (1865), [[Thomas Huxley]] classified much of the mainly Dravidian population of South India as "[[Australioid]]". He classified the indigenous peoples of the [[Andaman and Nicobar Islands]] as "Mincopies race", which he said lies "midway between the Negro and Negrito races". He stated that "the Hindoos of the valleys of the Ganges and Indus" result from the intermixture of distinct stocks.<ref>[[Thomas Huxley]]. [http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/CE7/M-REthn.html On the Methods and Results of Ethnology]. 1865</ref>. Furthermore, [[Thomas Huxley]] said the "''Aryan invaders were white men. It is hardly doubted that they intermixed with the dark Dravidian aborginees''", making Indians "''mongrel[s]''"<ref>Huxley, Thomas. <u>Collected Essays of Thomas Huxley: Man's Place in Nature and Other</u> Kessinger Publishing: Montana, 2005. ISBN 1417974621 p.284</ref>
:Characterized by short-stature, long-head with high cranial vault but faintly marked supra-orbital ridges and broad, short but ortho-gnathous face, with medium lips. The nose is prominent and long but the alae moderately spread out, giving a mesorrhine index. The skin colour varies from light brown to dark tawny brown. The eye colour is dark brown, and the hair colour is usually black. The authors stated the [[Telugu Brahmins]], "Kallas of Southern Tamil country" and the "Illuvas of Cochin" ([[Ezhava]]) as examples. They said that this element is predominant in the lower stratum of the population of Northern India, including to some extent the Punjab (for example, Chubra and [[Chamar]], which appear to be closely related to the Mediterranean stock of [[Europe]])


;Racial Element B
Similarly, [[Edgar Thurston]] identified a "Homo Dravida" who had more in common with the [[Australian aboriginal]]s than their [[Indo-Aryans|Indo-Aryan]] or high-caste neighbors. As evidence, he adduced the use of the boomerang by [[Kallan]] and [[Marawan]] warriors and the proficiency at tree-climbing among both the [[Kadirs]] of the [[Anamalai]] hills and the [[Dayaks]] of [[Borneo]].<ref>C. Bates, 'Race, Caste and Tribes in Central India' in: ''The Concept of Race'', ed. Robb, OUP (1995), p. 245, cited after Ajay Skaria, ''Shades of Wildness Tribe, Caste, and Gender in Western India'', The Journal of Asian Studies (1997), p. 730.</ref>. Interestingly, the idea was embraced by national mysticist [[Tamil activism|Tamil activists]], and in 1966 [[Devaneya Pavanar]] would endorse the separate identity of Thurston's "Homo Dravida" as the purest descendant of the people of the sunken continent of [[Kumari Kandam]].
:A [[Brachycephalic]] element of medium stature with flattened occiput but having also high head and not infrequently receding forehead. Characterized by short and orthognathous, but somewhat broader face. "The nose is long and quite often arched and convex". The skin colour varies from a pale white to light brown. The eye colour is usually dark brown, but a small per cent shows light eyes. The hair colour is black with a small proportion showing a dark brown tint. The hair is generally straight and the pilous system well developed. The examples given by the authors included the [[Nagar Brahmins]] of Gujarat, the [[Kayastha]] of Bengal and the [[Kannadiga|Kannada]] non-Brahmins.


;Racial Element C
[[Stanley M. Garn]] classified North Indians as "European race", North-East Indians as "Asiatic race" and South Indians as "Indian race".
:A long-headed strain with comparatively lower but longer head and tall stature and possessing a long face and prominent narrow long nose. The skin color varies from a rosy white tint to light transparent brown. The eye color is usually grey-blue, and the hair color is [[chestnut (color)|chestnut]]. A small proportion of people have light eyes and brownish hair. Among this type also the hair is usually straight and the pilous system well developed. The examples stated by the authors included the "North-west Himalayan tribes like the [[Hindukush Kafir people|Kaffirs]] and the [[Pashtun people|Pathans]]", the [[Sikh]]s of the Punjab, and the [[Brahmin]]s of [[United Provinces of Agra and Oudh|U. P.]]


;Racial Element D
20th century athropologist Carleton Coon said that within the Caucasoid race there is a "''third division [Mediterraneans which]... included... southern India''" due to a "''Caucasoid skull structure''"<!--unknown section of quotation--> but remarked this group had "''facial features of a Veddoid character which in some instances suggest Australoid affinities.''"<!-- ChapterXIII ---><ref name=RacesEurope /> He further elaborated that in India there are "''Veddoids... individuals who are to all extents and purposes Australoid''"<!--Chapter XI section 6--> He considered Northeast Indians to be "''Mongoloid''".<!--p.# needed probably from Living Races of Man--> Over the exact racial composition of India Coon admitted, "''[t]he racial history of southern Asia has not yet been thoroughly worked out, and it is too early to postulate what these relationships may be...[I] shall leave the problems of Indian physical anthropology in the competent hands of Guha and of Bowles.''"<ref name=RacesEurope>Coon, Carleton S. <u>The Races of Europe.</u> Greenwood:USA, 1972 ISBN 0837163285 p.2</ref><!--(Chapter XI, section 6) The Veddoid periphery, Hadhramaut to Baluchistan-->
:A short and moderately high-headed strain with very often strongly marked brow ridges, broad short face, the mouth slightly inclined forwards and small flat nose with the alae extended. The hair varies from wavy to curliness and the skin is of a shade of dark chocolate brown approaching black. The examples given were the aboriginal tribes of Central and Southern India, including [[Bhil]]s and the [[Chenchu]]s. The authors also stated that this strain seems to have entered in a considerable degree in the lower stratum of the Indian population. The authors also believed that this type is closely related to the [[Wanniyala-Aetto|Veddas of Ceylon]], the [[Sulawesi|Toalas of Celebes]], and the [[Sakai (tribe)|Sakais of the Malay Peninsula]]. The [[Indigenous Australians|Aborigines of Australia]] were considered a primitive form of this type by the authors.


;Racial Element E
[[William Henry Boyd]] put North-East Indians in the "Asiatic race" group, while classifying rest of the Indians as "European race". [[Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt]] classified majority of the Indians as "Mediterranean race". [[Richard McCulloch]] (born 1949), a supporter of [[racial separatism]], divided Indian people into following "races" <ref>{{cite web
:A dark [[Pygmy]] strain having spirally curved hair. The examples given were the Kadars, the [[Pulayar|Pulayans]], and the Angairti [[Naga people|Nagas]]. The authors stated that the [[Andamanese]] are racially homogeneous and of distinct type, characterised by a dwarfish stature, black complexion and woolly hair.
|url=http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html
|title=The Races of Humanity
|author=Richard McCulloch
|accessdate=2007-03-21
}}</ref>: "Caucasoid" or "Europid Subspecies" (Geographic distribution centered in the Caucasus mountains), "Indic or Nordindid race" (North India), "Dravidic race", "ancient stabilized Indic-Veddoid ([[Australoid]]) blend" (South India), "Australoid Subspecies" and "Veddoid race" (remnant "[[Australoid]]" population in central and southern India).


;Racial Element F
===Risley's Racial Classification of India===
:A [[brachycephalic]] [[Mongoloid]] type, having. The authors stated that the Mongoloid racial strain does not appear to have entered in any considerable extent in mainland Indians. It is found along the sub-Himalayan region of North-Eastern [[Kashmir]] to [[Bhutan]]. The type that forms the dominant element in [[Burma]] (which was then a part of [[British India]]) is also brachycephalic but somewhat shorter in stature and having a short flat nose and a tendency to alveolar prognathism. It appears to exhibit certain affinities with the [[Thai people|Siamese]], the [[Malay people|Malay]] and the [[Cochinchina|Cochin Chinese]].
[[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland|British]] anthropologist and [[physiognomist]] Herbert Hope Risley was the Census Commissioner for India in 1901<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.censusindia.net/census2001/history/censushistory.html
|title=History of Indian Census
|publisher=Office of the Registrar General, India
|accessdate=2007-03-25
}}</ref>. He stated that the population of India consisted of seven basic types<ref name="crispin_bates_race">{{cite book
| last =Bates
| first =Crispin
| title =Race, Caste and Tribe in Central India: The Early Origins of Indian Anthropometry
| url =http://www.csas.ed.ac.uk/fichiers/BATES_RaceCaste&Tribe.pdf
| accessdate =2007-03-25
| year =1995
| publisher =Centre for South Asian Studies, School of Social & Political Studies, University of Edinburgh
| location =Edinburgh
| isbn =1-900-795-02-7
}}</ref>: "[[Mongoloid]]", "[[Dravidian people|Dravidian]]", "[[Indo-Aryans]]", "[[Turko-Iranian]]", "Mongolo-Dravidian", "Aryo-Dravidian" and "[[Scythians|Scytho]]-Dravidian".


;Racial Element G
Risley's classification was subsequently revised and published as a separate volume in 1908 under the title ''The People of India'' (edited by W. Crooke, ISBN 81-206-1265-5)<ref name="padmanabha_anthro">{{cite web
:A second [[Mongoloid]] strain characterised by medium stature, longish head and medium nose, but exhibiting like the typical Mongoloid characteristics of the face and eye. Examples given were people of Assam and Northern Burma, including the [[Angami]] Nagas and the [[Mikir]]-[[Bodo people]].
|url=http://www.censusindia.net/library/anthro.pdf
|title=Indian Census And Anthropological Investigations
|author=P. Padmanabha
|publisher=Registrar General, Government of India
|accessdate=2007-03-25
}}</ref>. Risley believed that the "Mongoloid" and "Dravidian races" were the original inhabitants of [[North-East India]] and [[South India]] respectively. He stated that the [[Scythian]]s arrived from [[Central Asia]] "sometime in the 2nd millenium, sweeping down the west coast", and the Aryans arrived shortly after. Risley also believed that the basic linguistic divisions of the Indian subcontinent could be traced back to racial origins.


===Dr. B. S. Guha's classification===
Risley believed in biological [[determinism]] which would explain, according to him, social distinctions (including the [[Indian caste system|caste system]]). Thus, he thought their causes ultimately resided in [[physiognomy]], [[skin colour]] or bone structure. His classification was criticized by his contemporaries for taking into consideration only a limited number of characteristics, using linguistic terminology in a racial classification (a cultural factor which proponents of [[scientific racism]] attempted to get rid of), and ignoring important tribal groups <ref name="padmanabha_anthro"/>. [[Max Müller]] (1823-1900) denounced his theory as "unholy alliance" between comparative [[philology]] and [[ethnology]] that laid behind Risley's ethnographic survey <ref name="crispin_bates_race"/>.
Dr. [[Biraja Sankar Guha]] (1894-1961), an eminent Indian anthropologist, believed that the population of India is derived from six main ethnic groups<ref>http://www.culturopedia.com/Tribes/tribesintro.html</ref><ref>http://www.southasianmedia.net/profile/india/india_ethnology.cfm</ref>:


;[[Negrito]]s
===B. S. Guha's classification===
:Guha stated that the Negritos or the [[Brachycephalic]] (broad headed) people from [[Africa]] were the earliest inhabitants of India. They have survived in their original habitation in [[Andaman and Nicobar Islands]]. The [[Jarawa (Andaman Islands)|Jarawa]], [[Onge]], [[Sentinelese]], and the [[Great Andamanese]] are some examples. Some hill tribes such as the [[Irula]]s, [[Kodar]]s, [[Paniyan]]s, and [[Kurumba]]s are found in some places in the southern part of mainland India. Siddis are tribes found in Gujarat.
The Census Commissioner for the 1931 Census of India enlisted the services of [[Biraja Sankar Guha]] (1894-1961), the first Director of the Anthropological Survey of India. Guha carried out a survey in [[Indian subcontinent]] on the basis of [[anthropometric]] and [[somatoscopic]] observations, measuring 3,771 persons belonging to 51 "racial strains". He took measurements on 18 different characteristics, besides recording a number of somatoscopic observations on skin, eye and hair colours for isolating the "racial types"<ref name="padmanabha_anthro"/>. Guha claimed that the population of India was derived from six main [[ethnic group]]s<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.southasianmedia.net/profile/india/india_ethnology.cfm
|title=The Origin of Races
|publisher=South Asian Media Net
|accessdate=2007-03-25
}}</ref>: "[[Negrito]]s", which he also called "[[Brachycephalic]]" ("broad headed"), "[[Australoid|Pro-Australoids]]" or "[[Austric]]s", "Mongoloids", "Dravidians", "Western Brachycephalic", "Indo-Aryans".

===Thomas Hodson===

In ''Analysis of the 1931 Census of India''<ref>{{cite web
|url=http://www.athelstane.co.uk/tchodson/ind_ethn/ind_ethn.htm#q020
|title=Analysis of the 1931 Census of India: Race in India
|publisher=Government of India Press
|date=1937
|accessdate=2006-11-12
}} (Now in public domain)</ref> (Government of India Press, 1937), Thomas Callan Hodson (1871-1953), the William Wyse Professor of Social Anthropology and Fellow of [[St Catharine's College, Cambridge]], analysed the physical types in India, in great detail, adopting the models dominant in his day. This analysis was independent of the [[Indian caste system|castes]], and Brahmins and Dalits were classified in the same "racial groups". For example, [[Telugu Brahmins]] and [[Chamar]]s were classified as "Racial Element A". In total, he distinguished seven "racial elements", from A to G.


;[[Australoid|Pro-Australoids]] or [[Australoid|Austrics]]
Hodson used the classical "[[brachycephalic]]" and "[[dolichocephalic]]" terminology in force in racial discourses of the day. This was a typology constructed from the so-called "[[cephalic index]]" (the ratio of the maximum width of the head to its maximum length) and to classify human populations according to this purported scientific [[measure]]. Invented by the anatomist [[Anders Retzius]] (1796-1860), the cephalic index classification was disputed by [[Franz Boas]]'s [[anthropological]] works, and Boas's criticisms are widely accepted today. Hodson also typically associates racial categories with supposed stages of economic and linguistic development, implying a hierarchy of racially defined cultures, a view characteristic of [[scientific racism]].
::According to Guha, Austrics were the next to come to India after the Negritos. He believed that the Austrics were the main builders of the [[Indus Valley Civilization]]. The people that Guha classified as Austrics are now found in some parts of India, in [[Myanmar]] and on the islands of [[South-East Asia]]. Their languages have survived in Central and Eastern India and are said to "form the bedrock of the people".


;[[Mongoloid]]s
Hodson believed that the earliest occupants of India were probably of the "[[Negrito]] race", followed by the "proto-[[Australoid]]s". Later, an early stock probably of the [[Mediterranean race]], came to India and mingled with the proto-Australoids. He believed that these people spoke an [[agglutinative language]] from which the present [[Austro-Asiatic languages]] are derived. They had a rudimentary knowledge of agriculture, building stone monuments, and primitive navigation. This migration was followed by an immigration of more civilised Mediterraneans from the [[Persian Gulf]] (ultimately from eastern Europe). These people had the knowledge of the metals, but not of [[iron]]. They were followed by later waves of immigrants who developed the [[Indus valley civilization]]. All these immigrants were of the [[dolichocephalic]] type, but the Indus valley people had a mixed [[brachycephalic]] element coming from the [[Anatolia|Anatolian plateau]], in the form of the [[Armenoid]] branch of the [[Alpine race]]. These people probably spoke the [[Dravidian languages]]. Later, a [[brachycephalic]] race speaking perhaps an Indo-European language of the "[[Pisacha]] or [[Dardic languages|Dardic]] family", migrated to India from the Iranian plateau and the Pamirs. During about 1500 B.C., the [[Indo-Aryans]] migrated into Northern India.
:These people are found in northeastern India in the states of [[Assam]], [[Nagaland]], [[Mizoram]], [[Meghalaya]], [[Arunachal Pradesh]], [[Manipur]], and [[Tripura]]. They also are found in northern regions of [[West Bengal]], [[Sikkim]], and [[Ladakh]].


;[[Dravidian people|Dravidians]]
=="Aryans"==
:Guha stated that this group came to India from the Southwest Asia. These people built up the city civilization of the Indus Valley and comprised of three types: Paleo-Mediterranean, the true Mediterranean and Oriental Mediterranean.
{{Mergefrom|Aryan_Invasion_Theory_%28history_and_controversies%29#Racialisation_of_the_theory|date=September 2007}}
{{see|Aryan race|Indigenous Aryans|Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?}}
{{further|[[Indo-European studies]]}}


;Western [[Brachycephalic|Bracycephals]]
== Census of Modern India ==
:These include the [[Alpinoid]]s, [[Dinaric race|Dinaric]]s and [[Armenoid]]s. The [[Parsi]]s, who arrived long after the Indo-Aryans, and the [[Kodava]]s (Coorgis) were also classified in this category by Guha.
{{main|Demographics of India}}


;[[Indo-Aryans]]
India's population is not divided into various "races" today.<ref name="Kumar">Kumar, Jayant. [http://www.censusindia.net/ Census of India]. 2001. September 4, 2006.</ref> The concept of "[[race]]" itself has been strongly disputed, many scientists agreeing that the [[human being]] can not be usefully divided into various "sub-groups" according to biological factors. This concept has widely been replaced by "[[ethnic groups]]," which take into account cultural traits (language, religion, customs, etc.).
:According to Guha, this group arrived between 2000 and 1500 B.C, and is now mainly found in the [[North India|northern]] and central parts of India.


==See also==
==See also==
* [[Race (historical definitions)]]
* [[Scientific racism]]
* [[Demographics of India]]
* [[Races of Craniofacial Anthropology]]
* [[Brown people]]
* [[Brown people]]
* [[Racial classification of Indian Americans]]
* [[Racism by country]]
* [[Genetics and Archaeogenetics of South Asia]]]


==References==
==References==
<references/>
{{reflist|2}}


[[Category:Race (historical definitions)|India]]
[[Category:Race (historical definitions)]]
[[Category:Ethnic groups in India| ]]
[[Category:Ethnic groups in India]]
[[Category:Scientific racism]]
[[Category:Colonialism]]

Revision as of 02:04, 2 October 2007

This article presents some historical definitions of race in India. Most of these theories are pre-1940 and only of historical interest now. The scientific support for terms such as Caucasoid, Negroid, Mongoloid used widely in these theories has fallen steadily. Where 78 percent of the articles in the 1931 Journal of Physical Anthropology employed these or similar synonymous terms reflecting a bio-race paradigm, only 36 percent did so in 1965, and just 28 percent did in 1996[1].

Since the 1940s, the evolutionary scientists have rejected the view of race. Also, it should be noted that the national Census of India does not recognize any racial groups in India[2]. In India, the Dravidian, Indo-Aryans and similar words are generally considered as linguistic terms, rather than ethnic terms. Pre-colonial Indian literature and traditions make no such racial classifications. Throughout most anthropological research, the so-called "Indo-Aryan" and "Dravidian" groups are identified as members of the same race (but perhaps of different subraces.)


17th century Anthropologists

François Bernier (1684)

Template:François Bernier Racial Definitions

18th Century Anthropologists

Carolus Linnaeus

Template:Carolus Linnaeus Racial Definitions

19th Century Anthropologists

Johann Friedrich Blumenbach

Template:Johann Friedrich Blumenbach Racial Definitions

Louis Agassiz

Template:Louis Agassiz Racial Definitions

Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau

Template:Joseph Arthur Comte de Gobineau Racial Definitions

Thomas Huxley

Thomas Huxley, in his Journal of the Ethnological Society of London (1870), claimed that India was obviously Australoid due to the Australoid physical type's distinctiveness in physical appearance[3].

20th Century Anthropologists

Stanley M. Garn

This map shows the racial classification scheme of the anthropologist Stanley Marion Garn in his book Human Races (1961) Archived March 27, 2009, at the Wayback Machine, although he considered thirty-two local subraces to exist within the nine major races.
  1. African race (yellow)
  2. Amerindian race (blue)
  3. Asiatic race (aqua)
  4. Australian race (orange)
  5. European race (neon green)
  6. Indian race (pink)
  7. Melanesian-Papuan race (red)
  8. Micronesian race (lime green)
  9. Polynesian race (purple)

William Henry Boyd

Template:William Henry Boyd Racial Definitions

Egon Freiherr von Eickstedt

Template:Von E. Eickstedt racial definitions

Carleton S. Coon

Template:Carleton S. Coon Racial Definitions Coon was an American anthropologist who attended Harvard University (Ph.D., 1928) and who traveled around the world, photographing the specimin of humans as he traveled. He believed that the Dravidians were too Caucasiods due to their Caucasiod skull structure and other physical traits (e.g. noses, eyes, hair.) In his book he published in 1969, "The Living Races of Man," he said, "India is the easternmost outpost of the Caucasian racial region."


Idea That Many More Racial Groups Exist

McCulloch

Richard McCulloch (born 1949) is an author, who proposes racial separatism. He divides Indian people into three races[4]:

  • Indic race, North India
  • Dravidic race, Central India
  • Veddoid race, South India

Risley (1881)

British anthropologist Sir Herbert Hope Risley's Racial Classification of India (1881) is as follows[5]:

Hodson and Wyse

In Analysis of the 1931 Census of India[6] (Government of India Press, 1937), Prof. Thomas Callan Hodson (1871-1953) and William Wyse (Professor of Social Anthropology, Fellow, St Catharine's College, Cambridge), analysed the physical types in India, in great detail. This analysis was independent of the castes, and Brahmins and Dalits were classified in the same racial groups. For example, Telugu Brahmins and Chamars were classified as Racial Element A.

Hodson and Wyse believed that the earliest occupants of India were probably of the Negrito race, followed by the proto-Australoids. Later, an early stock probably of the Mediterranean race, came to India and mingled with the proto-australoids. These people spoke an agglutinative tongue from which the present Austro-Asiatic languages are derived. They had a rudimentary knowledge of agriculture, building stone monuments, and primitive navigation. This migration was followed by an immigration of civilised Mediterraneans from the Persian Gulf (ultimately from eastern Europe). These people had the knowledge of the metals, but not of iron. They were followed by later waves of immigrants who developed the Indus valley civilization. All these immigrants were of the dolichocephalic type, but the Indus valley people had a mixed brachycephalic element coming from the Anatolian plateau, in the form of the Armenoid branch of the Alpine race. These people probably spoke the Dravidian languages. Later, a brachycephalic race speaking perhaps an Indo-European language of the "Pisacha or Dardic family", migrated to India from the Iranian plateau and the Pamirs. During about 1500 B.C., the Indo-Aryans migrated into Northern India.

Hudson and Wyse stated that, broadly, seven racial elements are present in Indian people:

Racial Element A
Characterized by short-stature, long-head with high cranial vault but faintly marked supra-orbital ridges and broad, short but ortho-gnathous face, with medium lips. The nose is prominent and long but the alae moderately spread out, giving a mesorrhine index. The skin colour varies from light brown to dark tawny brown. The eye colour is dark brown, and the hair colour is usually black. The authors stated the Telugu Brahmins, "Kallas of Southern Tamil country" and the "Illuvas of Cochin" (Ezhava) as examples. They said that this element is predominant in the lower stratum of the population of Northern India, including to some extent the Punjab (for example, Chubra and Chamar, which appear to be closely related to the Mediterranean stock of Europe)
Racial Element B
A Brachycephalic element of medium stature with flattened occiput but having also high head and not infrequently receding forehead. Characterized by short and orthognathous, but somewhat broader face. "The nose is long and quite often arched and convex". The skin colour varies from a pale white to light brown. The eye colour is usually dark brown, but a small per cent shows light eyes. The hair colour is black with a small proportion showing a dark brown tint. The hair is generally straight and the pilous system well developed. The examples given by the authors included the Nagar Brahmins of Gujarat, the Kayastha of Bengal and the Kannada non-Brahmins.
Racial Element C
A long-headed strain with comparatively lower but longer head and tall stature and possessing a long face and prominent narrow long nose. The skin color varies from a rosy white tint to light transparent brown. The eye color is usually grey-blue, and the hair color is chestnut. A small proportion of people have light eyes and brownish hair. Among this type also the hair is usually straight and the pilous system well developed. The examples stated by the authors included the "North-west Himalayan tribes like the Kaffirs and the Pathans", the Sikhs of the Punjab, and the Brahmins of U. P.
Racial Element D
A short and moderately high-headed strain with very often strongly marked brow ridges, broad short face, the mouth slightly inclined forwards and small flat nose with the alae extended. The hair varies from wavy to curliness and the skin is of a shade of dark chocolate brown approaching black. The examples given were the aboriginal tribes of Central and Southern India, including Bhils and the Chenchus. The authors also stated that this strain seems to have entered in a considerable degree in the lower stratum of the Indian population. The authors also believed that this type is closely related to the Veddas of Ceylon, the Toalas of Celebes, and the Sakais of the Malay Peninsula. The Aborigines of Australia were considered a primitive form of this type by the authors.
Racial Element E
A dark Pygmy strain having spirally curved hair. The examples given were the Kadars, the Pulayans, and the Angairti Nagas. The authors stated that the Andamanese are racially homogeneous and of distinct type, characterised by a dwarfish stature, black complexion and woolly hair.
Racial Element F
A brachycephalic Mongoloid type, having. The authors stated that the Mongoloid racial strain does not appear to have entered in any considerable extent in mainland Indians. It is found along the sub-Himalayan region of North-Eastern Kashmir to Bhutan. The type that forms the dominant element in Burma (which was then a part of British India) is also brachycephalic but somewhat shorter in stature and having a short flat nose and a tendency to alveolar prognathism. It appears to exhibit certain affinities with the Siamese, the Malay and the Cochin Chinese.
Racial Element G
A second Mongoloid strain characterised by medium stature, longish head and medium nose, but exhibiting like the typical Mongoloid characteristics of the face and eye. Examples given were people of Assam and Northern Burma, including the Angami Nagas and the Mikir-Bodo people.

Dr. B. S. Guha's classification

Dr. Biraja Sankar Guha (1894-1961), an eminent Indian anthropologist, believed that the population of India is derived from six main ethnic groups[7][8]:

Negritos
Guha stated that the Negritos or the Brachycephalic (broad headed) people from Africa were the earliest inhabitants of India. They have survived in their original habitation in Andaman and Nicobar Islands. The Jarawa, Onge, Sentinelese, and the Great Andamanese are some examples. Some hill tribes such as the Irulas, Kodars, Paniyans, and Kurumbas are found in some places in the southern part of mainland India. Siddis are tribes found in Gujarat.
Pro-Australoids or Austrics
According to Guha, Austrics were the next to come to India after the Negritos. He believed that the Austrics were the main builders of the Indus Valley Civilization. The people that Guha classified as Austrics are now found in some parts of India, in Myanmar and on the islands of South-East Asia. Their languages have survived in Central and Eastern India and are said to "form the bedrock of the people".
Mongoloids
These people are found in northeastern India in the states of Assam, Nagaland, Mizoram, Meghalaya, Arunachal Pradesh, Manipur, and Tripura. They also are found in northern regions of West Bengal, Sikkim, and Ladakh.
Dravidians
Guha stated that this group came to India from the Southwest Asia. These people built up the city civilization of the Indus Valley and comprised of three types: Paleo-Mediterranean, the true Mediterranean and Oriental Mediterranean.
Western Bracycephals
These include the Alpinoids, Dinarics and Armenoids. The Parsis, who arrived long after the Indo-Aryans, and the Kodavas (Coorgis) were also classified in this category by Guha.
Indo-Aryans
According to Guha, this group arrived between 2000 and 1500 B.C, and is now mainly found in the northern and central parts of India.

See also

References

  1. ^ Leonard Lieberman, Rodney C. Kirk, and Alice Littlefield, "Perishing Paradigm: Race—1931-99," American Anthropologist 105, no. 1 (2003): 110-13. A following article in the same issue, by Mat Cartmill and Kaye Brown, questions the precise rate of decline, but agrees that the Negroid/Caucasoid/Mongoloid paradigm has fallen into near-total disfavour.
  2. ^ Kumar, Jayant. Census of India. 2001. September 4, 2006.
  3. ^ http://aleph0.clarku.edu/huxley/SM3/GeoDis.html
  4. ^ http://www.racialcompact.com/racesofhumanity.html
  5. ^ http://www.csas.ed.ac.uk/fichiers/BATES_RaceCaste&Tribe.pdf
  6. ^ "Analysis of the 1931 Census of India: Race in India". Government of India Press. 1937. Retrieved 2006-11-12. (Now in public domain)
  7. ^ http://www.culturopedia.com/Tribes/tribesintro.html
  8. ^ http://www.southasianmedia.net/profile/india/india_ethnology.cfm