User talk:Cloudz679

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Anything (album).jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Anything (album).jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:55, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Stop

Stop putting the Nicole Wray discography page back. I have talk to several users admin and they say it okay. Here are examples

[1] [2] Soccermeko (talk) 15:34, 16 February 2008 (UTC)

What are you doing

Stop erasing the albums, singles, eps, and mixtapes. This page proves that mixtapes can be there [3], and this page proves that eps can be there [4], and this page proves that unreleased albums can be there [5]. so stop erasing the all of it including the singles that did not chart. Soccermeko (talk) 19:15, 17 February 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Wray template

why are you deleting the stuff on the template. I stated the resources for every album, mixtape and ep. Stop deleting it. Soccermeko (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Stop editting

I sent a message to the users. They will decide what stays and goes. Soccermeko (talk) 22:22, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Stop editting

No you show no respect. I follow the rules and do my best to keep balance of the page. All you do is delete this because what you feel is best. Don't talk about what i do, you need to worry about your own sorry self. Soccermeko (talk) 22:30, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

Sources

Well, I give reliable sources. Later on today will give you a list of all the sources. Soccermeko (talk) 16:10, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Mdsummermsw for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page.Template:Do not delete Mdsummermsw (talk) 13:27, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Wray discography

If I Was Your Girlfriend is not from the Elektric Blue album, it's from the Lovechild album. Soccermeko (talk) 15:04, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Another One Bites the Dust (1998 song)

An editor has nominated Another One Bites the Dust (1998 song), an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Another One Bites the Dust (1998 song) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:00, 23 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: Nicole Wray edits

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources, as you did to Nicole Wray. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your reference to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you. Cloudz679 (talk) 21:22, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Your comment was deleted because it made no sense and I did cite the sources. Your comment was deleted! Thank You Soccermeko (talk) 21:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Wray pages

Stop warring with other users. I noticed this and just studd aside while you continued to keep putting wrong information on the page. So i going to help you.

Things wrong with your edits

• Also known as/Nickname

1. Betty Boo [Nicole was being called this on her mixtape] Fails WP:RS
2. Billie Hollidae of the Streets [Nicole was also being called this on her mixtape] Fails WP:RS
3. Nikki Wray [Her fans call her Nikki (for proof, go to her "Elektric Blue Petition")] Fails WP:RS

• Albums

1. Make It Hot [why do you keep adding N/A on the Certification, it was announced Certified Gold along time ago.] [6] and [7] Fails WP:V
2. Elektric Blue [Time and time again you were given proof about these articles and yet you deleted them, this belong on the template, disco page, and her profile page.] Fails WP:RS
3. Lovechild [You were given proof about that article and yet you deleted it, this belong on the template, disco page, and her profile page to.] Fails WP:RSCloudz679 (talk) 02:39, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
4. Upcoming album [You know for a fact that all them other artist like (Beyonce, Missy Elliott, Usher, Mocha, and other have "TBA" or "whatever studio album" under albums. You also were provided with interview pages.] Fails WP:RS

• Singles

1. Stand Up [all pages don't start out with a lot of info on it and yet it is still created] Fails WP:RS
2. Regrets and Can't Get Out Of The Game [why were they deleted, when it met the needs of Wikipedia] Fails WP:RS
3. Don't Have To [that page has been sitting up there like that for a while, and now you feel like it should be deleted] Fails WP:RS
4. I Can't See and Eyes Better Not Wander [they shouldn't be merge because thats what happen with the "Elektric Blue" page and the "Elektric Blue EP". They were merge and altogether they were deleted. That's your opinion.

Infostorm (talk) 02:36, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Please take a moment

Please respond at Talk:Nicole_Wray#.22Also_known_as.22. Thanks. - Mdsummermsw (talk) 14:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Also Known As

===That's the dumpest question, how many artists do you actually here releasing stuff under there street name. Ex [Beyonce is also called Sasha], [Trina is also called the Diamond Princess]. I have reference this, if you listen for once. Don't mak me your enemy, because i won't stop until i finish you. now you can edit that.=== Infostorm (talk) 21:22, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm sorry

I'm sorry for act mad but you kept being rude. Please let the "Fourth Studio Album" stay on the her profile and template. Infostorm (talk) 21:48, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

Alias's

I agree with earlier posts about your edits of AKA's. While artists may not "release" under these names, they do go by them. I for one added "Best Rapper Alive" as Lil' Waynes alias and i cited an article as proof of this alias. If you could just let me know your reasoning for this, I would appreciate it. Zad27 (talk) 20:35, 3 March 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Wray

Why do you still deny the singles, and a new album. this all true and i wll keep adding it back whether you like it or not. And just so you will know, i contacting the head admin of this web. Nicolefan (talk) 22:22, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

There is no "head admin" of Wikipedia, there are some 1,500 admins you may contact if you wish, but they have no special authority in content disputes. Please check our dispute resolution pages for more info on what to do when you are in a content dispute with one or more other editors. Fram (talk) 08:30, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I will be referring this to the administrators should there be further disruptive edits from this user as a suspected sockpuppet of Soccermeko. Cloudz679 (talk) 08:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Nicole Wray discography and template

why do continue to revert the pages back after the information has been sourced and confirmed. And stop posting false information on the Nicole Wray discography. I'm Lookin' went #66 on the US R&B, not #76 Nicolefan (talk) 01:11, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

Vandalism Disruption

It is very logical to change the naming of Serbian Pristina University for example to Prishtina University because that is the real name. Check it!!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendobs (talk • contribs) 12:27, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

The Name of Place is Prishtina

Check the references you refer to University of Prishtina and you write it in Serbian!!!! This is my reference: http://www.uni-pr.edu/ check the Heading and name of the University!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendobs (talk • contribs) 12:38, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

All Links Have to be Renamed

You are being biased. I do not object the naming of links but using Priština is biased. It is Serbian and not original - Pristina, the English naming, has been taken from old Yugoslav maps which were internationally recognized in Serbian therefore Priština became Pristina in English due to the lack of sign "š" in English. When Prishtina is pronounced there is a sound "sh" so originally it must be Prishtina. I can give you many references for that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendobs (talk • contribs) 12:46, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Not Stopping - Why do you change them into Serbian

Not Stopping - Why do you change them into Serbian. Also the Name was Serbia with Serbian Flag! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendobs (talk • contribs) 13:56, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

F"U"C"K SERBIA

Go to hell Serbian oppressor. You are the vandal. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kendobs (talk • contribs) 23:05, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Explain

The edits to the kosovan capital, are you saying it's serbian or kosovoan?--Jakezing (talk) 23:21, 6 March 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for edit warring

I regret to inform you that you have been blocked for 24 hours for edit warring on this article. If you wish to contest this block, you may add {{unblock|your reason here}} to your talk page. Note that I have also blocked Kendobs for edit warring. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 03:09, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Cloudz679 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

all of my edits were vandalism reverts; fixing links to interwiki pages and moving links back to direct pages, other than to redirects. Further as you can see above I was continually personally harrassed, which I did not reciprocate at the talk page of the other user. He was trying to make this political. I just wanted to fix the links. Whilst being aware of The Wrong Version, I believe a direct link to a page is more desirable than a redirect (or in the case of interwiki, broken links as you can find with any of the other editors contributions. All of my edits restored functionality to the page, so I believe I acted in good faith. My warnings on the talk page of the other user and the fact I signposted him to the appropriate talk page in order to seek a resolution mitigate my actions. Please reconsider the block for the above reasons. Cloudz679 (talk) 05:47, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Your edits to Priština certainly look like edit warring. Calling another editors work "vandalism" when it is clearly not is transparently disruptive. They may not be quality edits, but blindly reverting them under a mask of calling it "vandalism" is not allowed per WP:3RR. — Jayron32.talk.contribs 06:01, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I agree with Jayron's decline above, and encourage you to read it carefully so you won't do this again. Nonetheless, I've unblocked you because another admin has protected the article in question, making this block essentially punitive. Be careful, though: we could end up here again if you get into edit wars again. Heimstern Läufer (talk) 06:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Do not blame me

I am not a sock. I do love Nicole Wray but just because I edit her stuff does not give you the right to blame and accuse me of being someone else. I do not appreciate it and do not encourage your behavior and the way you've been acting. I was only trying to help out like what I was invited to do. And if I was a sock would Soccermeko have email me to take care of the page for him or her. Fan196 (talk) 19:29, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Apla Ta Pragmata.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Apla Ta Pragmata.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Polly (Parrot) 01:17, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Emotional (song)

(copied from AfD discussion) Comment Just because the artist is red linked doesn't mean that he isn't notable. The song did indeed chart, so it's very likely that Casely is indeed a notable artist. With that in mind, I plan to create a page on Casely, and then will suggest that this song be merged to his page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 18:25, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

• Comment I have just created a page for Casely. If you want, I can merge the content from Emotional (song) and 1985 (Casely album) to his page. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • ^{(Broken clamshells•Otter chirps)} 19:10, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
• I don't necessarily agree that having a number 73 single confirms notability but your effort to at least have all the related information in one place is admirable. Cloudz679 (talk) 19:41, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Sockpuppet case

you need to know that Harp(not sure if that her name on this site) and Infostorm are not the same users. I know this because they both are apart of the Fanatics board and they both revealed their emails. Please tell your other half Mdmummersz to unblock them for they were only trying to help. I'm telling you this because they wanted somebody from the board to tell you this. Please do not start blaming me about being a sock for I am not. Nicolewrayeditor (talk) 00:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)