User talk:Promethean

I confirm that my freenode nick is Prom3th3an

——————————————— PROM3TH3AN's TALK PAGE ———————————————

Picture of the day European spruce bark beetle Photograph credit: Ivar Leidus Archive More featured pictures Click here to leave me a message. WP:HAU, Status, and you! As you may know, the StatusBot responsible for maintaining the status of the Highly Active Users was taken offline. We now have a replacement in the Qui status system. This semi-automatic system will allow you to easily update your status page found at Special:Mypage/Status which the HAU page code is now designed to read from. If you are already using Qui (or a compatible system) - great! - no action is needed (other than remembering to update your status as necessary). If not, consider installing Qui. You can also manually update this status by changing the page text to online, offline, or busy. While it is not mandatory, the nature of HAU is that people are often seeking a quick answer from someone who is online and keeping our statuses up-to-date will assist with this. Note if you were previously using your /Status page as something other than a one-word status indicator, your HAU entry may have been set to "status=n" to correct display issues. Please clear this parameter if you change things to be "HAU compatible". Further questions can be raised at WT:HAU. This message was delivered by xenobot 23:14, 8 July 2008 (UTC) M63 Mona Lisa Eine Forelle Who's Up For the Challenge? Find my secret page and recieve the ultra-special honour of a POKEYNUT AWARD. (NO CHEATING!)The Rebel's Gone Pokeynuts LOL 05:32, 13 July 2008 (UTC) Hello, Promethean. You have new messages at Xenocidic's talk page. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template. TfD nomination of Template:User:Prom3th3an/welcome Template:User:Prom3th3an/welcome has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — WOSlinker (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2008 (UTC) You have mail "Open your inbox quickly. It's really important. Shapiros10 contact meMy work 14:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Re: Your ANI comment Prom3th3an, you need to back off. Now. I'm investigating some of the issues here, but you need to be patient. Comments like this are entirely counterproductive and will accomplish nothing other than getting you into trouble. That, and slowing down my investigations, since I'm spending my time saying this to you rather than investigating the background issues... --Deskana (talk) 16:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Fippancy You flippancy is quite shocking in the AN/I thread. I simply posted the information about why GB was blocked, I didn't even make the block - yet you feel the need to call me a joke??? I do hope you weren't hoping to run an RfA in the next year, because that comment alone will fail it. Ryan Postlethwaite 16:20, 14 July 2008 (UTC) I dont think i have plans of joining the admin brothel anytime soon especially with some of the deadbeats that are in it. And thanks for reminding me about the obvious, it reminds me i have nothing to loose   «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l»  (talk) 16:25, 14 July 2008 (UTC) RE: YOUR A JOKE That's really not appropriate for an ANI thread, considering Ryan did nothing against you. Any further behaviour of that kind may result in a block. weburiedoursecretsinthegarden 16:26, 14 July 2008 (UTC) Blocked You have been blocked for three hours for civility issues. I can't think of very many websites out there that would let people roam around their site insulting their administrators. If you promise me that you will stop making comments like this then I will unblock you, but be warned that breaking that promise will result in an even longer block. Also note your civility accomplished nothing apart from slowing an investigation down. I was already looking into the details behind the case that you decided to go on a civility rampage about, and having to spend time doing things like writing this message has just slowed that investigation down. I'd certainly be done by now, otherwise. --Deskana (talk) 16:32, 14 July 2008 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Promethean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: The attack mentioned was not personal nor directed at any specific editor. Decline reason: It certainly was not helpful in the slightest; nor was it civil, which is why you were blocked. — Rjd0060 (talk) 16:38, 14 July 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Also note that I didn't block you for attacks, personal or otherwise. --Deskana (talk) 16:39, 14 July 2008 (UTC) why did you block me?   «l| Ψrom3th3ăn ™|l»  (talk) 16:40, 14 July 2008 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Promethean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Per Above, the block is invalid. MOAR DRAMA!!!! Decline reason: No.Wait it out. Three hours is nothing. If you don't stop, I'll request your talk be protected. — — MaggotSyn 16:42, 14 July 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy). Promethean (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: I;d take this to ARBCOM but it seems like there already here Decline reason: Per above. Talk page protected. — PeterSymonds (talk) 16:45, 14 July 2008 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. Deflagging The account creator and rollbacker tools are meant to be used by users who the community can trust to responsibly handle the tools. Given your recent behavior, I do not believe you have the community's trust to use such tools and have removed them. MBisanz talk 02:48, 15 July 2008 (UTC)