Jump to content

Talk:Blair Wark: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
rerate wpa
passed GAN
Line 1: Line 1:
{{ArticleHistory
{{GA nominee|08:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)|page=1| subtopic=World history|status=}}
| action1 = GAN
| action1date = 7 September 2008
| action1link = Talk:Blair Anderson Wark/GA1
| action1result = listed
| action1oldid = 236940866

| currentstatus = GA
| itndate =
| dykdate =
| maindate =
| topic = history
| small =
}}

{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=y|WWI=y|Australian=y|peer-review=yes|nested=yes}}
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=y|WWI=y|Australian=y|peer-review=yes|nested=yes}}
Line 10: Line 24:
}}
}}
{{Wikiproject VC migration}}
{{Wikiproject VC migration}}
{{Talk:Blair Anderson Wark/GA1}}

Revision as of 22:00, 7 September 2008

Good articleBlair Wark has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
September 7, 2008Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Blair Anderson Wark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Passed GA

Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.

  • It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
Writing is of a high standard (8/10).
  • It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
References are all reliable and appropriately positioned.
  • It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  • It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
  • It is stable.
  • It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
    a (tagged and captioned): b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA): c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
  • Overall:
    a Pass/Fail:

Thank you and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]