Talk:Blair Wark: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
rerate wpa |
passed GAN |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{ArticleHistory |
|||
{{GA nominee|08:13, 5 September 2008 (UTC)|page=1| subtopic=World history|status=}} |
|||
| action1 = GAN |
|||
| action1date = 7 September 2008 |
|||
| action1link = Talk:Blair Anderson Wark/GA1 |
|||
| action1result = listed |
|||
| action1oldid = 236940866 |
|||
| currentstatus = GA |
|||
| itndate = |
|||
| dykdate = |
|||
| maindate = |
|||
| topic = history |
|||
| small = |
|||
}} |
|||
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1= |
||
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=y|WWI=y|Australian=y|peer-review=yes|nested=yes}} |
{{WPMILHIST|class=B|B1=y|B2=y|B3=y|B4=y|B5=y|Biography=y|WWI=y|Australian=y|peer-review=yes|nested=yes}} |
||
Line 10: | Line 24: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
{{Wikiproject VC migration}} |
{{Wikiproject VC migration}} |
||
{{Talk:Blair Anderson Wark/GA1}} |
Revision as of 22:00, 7 September 2008
![]() | Blair Wark has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
|
![]() | This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
![]() | This article was created or added to during the Victoria Cross Reference Migration. It may contain material that was used with permission from victoriacross.net. | ![]() |
GA Review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Blair Anderson Wark/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Passed GA
Hi there, I am happy to tell you that this article has passed GA without the need for any further improvement. Listed below is information on how the article fared against the Wikipedia:good article criteria, with suggestions for future development. These are not required to achieve GA standard, but they might help in future A-class or FAC review process.
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
b (MoS):
- a (prose):
- Writing is of a high standard (8/10).
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (references):
- References are all reliable and appropriately positioned.
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- a (fair representation):
b (all significant views):
- a (fair representation):
- It is stable.
- It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
- a (tagged and captioned):
b (lack of images does not in itself exclude GA):
c (non-free images have fair use rationales):
- a (tagged and captioned):
- Overall:
- a Pass/Fail:
- a Pass/Fail:
Thank you and congratulations, an excellent addition to Wikipedia:Good Articles. All the best.--Jackyd101 (talk) 21:57, 7 September 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- History good articles
- B-Class military history articles
- B-Class biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- B-Class Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history task force articles
- B-Class World War I articles
- World War I task force articles
- Start-Class biography articles
- Start-Class biography (military) articles
- Unknown-importance biography (military) articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- Mid-importance Australia articles
- Mid-importance Australia, New Zealand and South Pacific military history articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Wikipedia articles incorporating text from the Victoria Cross Reference