User talk:Deepfriedokra/20120823-20130831

Archives

• Talk archives for 2006 and 2007

• January 2008

• February 2008

• March and April 2008

• May and June 2008

• July and August 2008

---

Vandalism is futile Please understand that this userpage is frequently vandalized, and vandalism is reverted pretty quickly. You will not accomplish anything by vandalizing Wikipedia. If you wish to try test editing, you may do so in our sandbox located at Wikipedia:Sandbox or create a test subpage by putting "/test" after your username and clicking "create page." Thanks

Contacting me

If you wish to contact me, the quickest and easiest way is to CLICK HERE.

If you have a question about a deleted article, please leave a message by CLICKING HERE. You can also appeal a deletion by clicking this link to Deletion Review and following the directions found there.

Messages

Ecoletage's RfA

I removed your refactoring of my comment, and came up with a much simpler implementation. The bolding and insertion of your signature just made the whole thing look choppy and added emphasis I didn't intend. Your formatting was also off as you didn't complete the bracketed wiki-markup and instead inserted an extra set of parenthesis. I understand why you did this, but don't appreciate not having the chance to do so myself. I'm a fairly active user, and if you feel something I've said needs refactoring or clarification, I'd appreciate the courtesy of at least a note on my talk page telling me you've changed my comments. Thanks. AniMate 19:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

Civic Solidarity victory candle!

That's another reason why we use Google translations to assert the quality of foreign language articles. While babel fish is horrid, I've seen more than a handful of Google machine translations, even from Chinese, that made a lot of sense. Also, there's no corresponding entry on the Korean Wiki. Anyhow, I've put this up at Pages needing translation, let's see what comes out of it. De728631 (talk) 09:14, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which did not succeed with 47 support, 21 oppose, and 1 neutral. I appreciate both the supports and the opposes. Thanks again and cheers! TN‑X-Man 18:28, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Eccentric Flamingoes

Can you tell me why you deleted the entry for my cricket club the Eccentric Flamingoes?

The reason given was Patent Nonsense!

Are you trying to suggest we don't exist?

Here's our homepage on the net http://www.geocities.com/hitoutgetout/

A reference to a match reports from one of our regular opponents http://www.woodcutterscc.com/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=blogsection&id=5&Itemid=33

2 mentions on the fixture list of another Edinburgh Club http://www.geocities.com/stucampbell_uk/mortonfxitures2m.htm

Another match report http://infcricket.inf.ed.ac.uk/2006/2006MatchReports.htm

Hope we can clear this up amicably

Cheers Simon —Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.235.182.33 (talk) 20:02, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

No but the article was nonsensical and made no assertion of notability. It will need a total rewrite in any event. Look at WP:MOS, wp:v and WP:N. These will guide you in your editing. I will restore the article, based on Google book hits. Looking at the sources you quote, geocities and blogs don't count as reliable sources. Mentions on your webpage or your opponents do not. Mere existence does not suffice for an encyclopedia article-- subjects must meet notability requirements. The paucity of google news hits argues against notability based on significant coverage by third party sources. Google books hits argue for it. Cheers, and happy editing. Dlohcierekim 20:18, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

My RfA

Thank you for your support in my recent RfA, which was successful with 58 support, 4 oppose and 1 neutral. Kind regards. --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:40, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Li'l ol' Largo

Funny. Aren't city councils a blast? :-) They're even more fun to cover as a reporter. been there, done that, and glad I'm in sports now. (Which reminds me - gotta get back to work, as deadline approaches.) - Realkyhick (Talk to me) 01:57, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

re: zoe tagged for speedy deletion

Well...it is utter nonsense.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Miquonranger03 (talk • contribs) unsigned Miquonranger03> Dlohcierekim 23:28, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

RfA thanks

Thank you for voting in my RfA, which succeeded with 71 support, 14 oppose, and 5 neutral. Thanks for your participation. I hope I serve you well!

--Smashville^BONK! 23:26, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Deletion of Effervescence mm'8 page. The page has just been made, and is under development. Please give time for it to meet Wikipedia Standards. Efforts are made to remove all statements making it sound like an AD.

Thanks,

--Param Aggarwal (talk) 08:22, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

My RFA

Thanks for voting on my RFA, although it was unsuccessful, I do appreciate the feedback; my lowered activity since my last RFA was certainly a valid concern. You’re also right in saying that policy has changed; I think I’m up-to-date, so hopefully I can see you around Wikipedia and perhaps sway you :D. Thanks again for the vote regardless of what it was, and I truly hope that I’ll see you around.--danielfolsom 03:19, 8 September 2008 (UTC)

User talk:76.19.222.40

Sorry about the collision. That's a very rare case there - I hate to protect a page of a person I've blocked, but in this case I think it was necessary. Toddst1 (talk) 19:40, 9 September 2008 (UTC)