Jump to content

Talk:Toothpaste tube theory: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
DYKadminBot (talk | contribs)
Article has appeared in WP:DYK - Adding {{dyktalk}} template
sociology, not physics
Line 1: Line 1:
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProjectBannerShell|1=
{{WikiProject Law|nested=yes|importance=low|class=start}}
{{WikiProject Law|nested=yes|importance=low|class=start}}
{{WikiProject Physics|importance=low|class=start|nested=yes}}
{{WikiProject Sociology|importance=|class=start|nested=yes}}
{{philosophy|ethics=yes|social=yes|importance=low|class=start|nested=yes}}
{{philosophy|ethics=yes|social=yes|importance=low|class=start|nested=yes}}
}}
}}

Revision as of 02:12, 26 May 2009

Suggesting improvements

I think this article is probably notable but it is propped up by some slightly weak sourcing. The link to a wiki page would be better replaced by a link to the case/book (I'm not a lawyer, so it's not clear to me which it is) which it refers to in the first place. A better source for the Byrnes case is at Rominger Legal, or better yet the ruling direct.

There's an interesting other view on toothpaste theory here and a mention of it in the community here. How it relates to derivatives and there are other books that mention it: " Google book search has a good link to a paragraph in a book.

With these sources this would be a much fuller, and better sourced, article, good luck. Bigger digger (talk) 21:36, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]