Jump to content

Chabad: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Restoring old consensus text. Eliezer is flat out lying. His behaviour may call for serious intervention.
Line 73: Line 73:
Schneerson renounced the traditionally insular or assimilationist way of life espoused by many Jews in the United States. He encouraged growing long beards, women wearing wigs and other overt signs of religiosity. His followers held public [[Hannukah]] celebrations, encouraged secular Jews to put on [[tefillin]] in public and made themselves highly visible in their Jewish observance. This caused a backlash from both liberal and traditional factions of the Jewish establishment. Chabad fought battles in court all the way to the [[United States Supreme Court]] against the [[American Jewish Congress]] over the display of a public [[Menorah]]. Many prominent Rabbis were staunchly opposed to allowing secular Jews to wear [[tefillin]], as they believed it to be a desecration. The controversies over the role of a ''[[tzadik]]'' and the coming of the [[Jewish Messiah]] continue to rage.
Schneerson renounced the traditionally insular or assimilationist way of life espoused by many Jews in the United States. He encouraged growing long beards, women wearing wigs and other overt signs of religiosity. His followers held public [[Hannukah]] celebrations, encouraged secular Jews to put on [[tefillin]] in public and made themselves highly visible in their Jewish observance. This caused a backlash from both liberal and traditional factions of the Jewish establishment. Chabad fought battles in court all the way to the [[United States Supreme Court]] against the [[American Jewish Congress]] over the display of a public [[Menorah]]. Many prominent Rabbis were staunchly opposed to allowing secular Jews to wear [[tefillin]], as they believed it to be a desecration. The controversies over the role of a ''[[tzadik]]'' and the coming of the [[Jewish Messiah]] continue to rage.


===Relationship between God, the Rebbe and his followers===
=== Relationship between Lubavitch Jews and their rebbe ===
Before Schneerson's death, the beliefs of Chabad Hasidim had become extremely controversial among other [[Orthodox Judaism|Orthodox]] [[Jews]].
Based on the teachings of Rabbi [[Isaac Luria]], the [[Baal Shem Tov]] and the [[Ohr ha-Chaim]], Rabbi [[Shneur Zalman of Liadi]] taught in the name of the [[Zohar]] that "He who breathed life into man, breathed from Himself." Therefore ones soul comes from the essence of God.


All [[Hassidic Judaism|Hasidic]] Jews are adherents of [[Kabbalah]], esoteric Jewish mysticism. Among Kabbalists the role of the ''[[tzadik]]'' ("righteous" or "saintly" person) is stressed more than among non-Kabbalists. A ''tzadik'' is believed to have close connection with [[God]], acting as a "chariot for the Divine" (מרכבה לשכנה), both in life and after death. ([http://www.chabad.org/library/archive/LibraryArchive2.asp?AID=7972 Tanya Epistle 27])
According to [[kabbalah]], a Tzadik, because he has completely nullified himself and his desires to what God wants, his soul which like every Jewish soul is part of God is revealed within him more than other people whom have not completely nullified themselves to God. However, [[Judaism]] does not believe in the Tzadik being like God.


Many Jewish sources stress prayer directly to [[God]], and not through an intermediary. However, Hasidism has stressed the ability of ''tzadik'' to act as an intermediary with God on their behalf. Hasidim continue to ask for such intervention even after the death of their [[Rebbe]] and often visit their burial places to pray for blessings. The stipulation in such prayer is that one must recognize that the ''tzadik'' is not God. Among Hasidim all [[rebbe]]s are held to be ''tzadikim'' and revelation of God.
This concept is based upon many Jewish sources, as elaborated upon in [[Tzadik]].


Schneerson's teachings developed this theology into a new direction, holding that "It is not possible to ask a question about a [Rebbe being a] go-between, since this is the essence of God Himself, as He has clothed Himself in a human body" (''Likutei Sichos'' II:510-511). Schneerson holds that a ''tzadik'', who does whatever God wants, effectively nullifies their own soul as his soul joins with the will of God. In this view the words of the ''tzadik'' are the words of God (Pavzener, based on [http://www.chabad.org/library/archive/LibraryArchive2.asp?AID=7881 Tanya Chapter 2]).
In [[1951]] the seventh [[Rebbe]] of [[chabad]], Rabbi [[Menachem Mendel Schneerson]] said a similiar statement to those statements discussed in [[Tzadik]], (Lekutei Sichos Vol 2 pg 510-511) saying regarding the practice by [[Hasidic Judaism|Hasidim]] to have a Rebbe act as an intermediary with God on their behalf, by explaining that "''the Rebbe is completely connected with his Hasidim, not like two separate things that connect, rather they become completely one. And the Rebbe is not an intermediary which separates rather he is one that connects. Therefore by a Hassid, he with the Rebbe with God are all one...Therefore one can not ask a question about an intermediary since this is the essence of God Himself, as He has clothed Himself in a human body''" While the term received little attention at the time, it was later used to shock those who have no exposure to these sources.

Schneerson makes this explicit "Just as 'God and the Torah and the Jews are One', means not just that the Jews are connected to the Torah and to God, but literally they are all one, so too is the connection of Chassidim and their Rebbe, they are not like two things that become united but rather they become literally one. Therefore, to a Chosid, him and the Rebbe and God are one entity." This view is presented by Chabad Jews as being identical to that of mainstream Hasidic Judaism, but it has been rejected as heretical by many Orthodox Jews. Many see this as a new formulation of hasidic philosophy that contradicts the [[Jewish principles of faith]].


===Various forms of messianism===
===Various forms of messianism===
During the later years of his life Schneerson's teachings were interpreted by many to mean that he was claiming to be the [[Jewish Messiah|Messiah]]. Shortly before the time of his death the majority of Chabad Hasidim viewed him as the messiah.

During the later years of his life Schneerson's teachings were interpreted by some to mean that he was claiming to be the [[Jewish Messiah|Messiah]]. Shortly before the time of his death the majority of Chabad Hasidim viewed him as potentially being the presumptive Messiah.


The development of this messianism and its impact on Chabad in specific — and [[Orthodox Judaism]] in general — has been the subject of much discussion in the Jewish press, as well as within the pages of peer-reviewed journals. Few within Chabad deny the existence or extent of this messianism; the defenders of these beliefs hold rather it is simply true that Menchem Mendel Schneerson is indeed the messiah and that he will return from the dead immediately.
The development of this messianism and its impact on Chabad in specific — and [[Orthodox Judaism]] in general — has been the subject of much discussion in the Jewish press, as well as within the pages of peer-reviewed journals. Few within Chabad deny the existence or extent of this messianism; the defenders of these beliefs hold rather it is simply true that Menchem Mendel Schneerson is indeed the messiah and that he will return from the dead immediately.


Vociferous opponents of the "''meschichist''" ("messianist") approach were some of the prominent [[rosh yeshiva|''roshei yeshiva'']] (deans of Talmud colleges), such as [[Rabbi]] Elazar Menachem Shach, dean of the Ponovezh yeshiva in Israel, who had condemned Chabad beliefs even before Schneerson's death. He was the leader of a group that had historically been at odds with all Hasidim, including Chabad, though from the 20th century onwards they worked quite closely together in organizations such as [[World Agudath Israel|Agudath Israel]], and Shach himself had not criticized any other Hasidic group in this way. It is noteworthy that many [[rosh yeshiva|''roshei yeshiva'']], including the late [[Rabbi]] Moses Feinstein and [[Rabbi]] Abraham Pam held Schneerson in the highest regard.
Vociferous opponents of the "''meschichist''" ("messianist") approach were some of the prominent [[rosh yeshiva|''roshei yeshiva'']] (deans of Talmud colleges), such as [[Rabbi]] Elazar Menachem Shach, dean of the Ponovezh yeshiva in Israel, who had condemned Chabad beliefs even before Schneerson's death. He was the leader of a group that had historically been at odds with all Hasidim, including Chabad, though from the 20th century onwards they worked quite closely together in organizations such as [[World Agudath Israel|Agudath Israel]], and Shach himself had not criticized any other Hasidic group in this way.


The messianic response has taken various forms amongst Chabad members:
The messianic response has taken various forms amongst Chabad members:
* Some Chabad Hasidim hold that Schneerson was the best candidate for Messiah in his generation, but that we now know it was mistaken to believe that he was the Messiah. Rather, he ''could'' have been the messiah if God willed it to be so, but it was not to be. As such, the Messiah will come nonetheless in the person of some other great leader.
* Some Chabad Hasidim hold that Schneerson was the best candidate for messiah in his generation, but now say that people were mistaken to believe that he was the messiah. Rather, he ''could'' have been the messiah if God willed it to be so, but it was not to be. As such, the messiah will come nonetheless in the person of some other great leader.
* Some Chabad Hasidim hold that the classic meaning of [[death]] does not apply to a truly righteous person such as Schneerson, as his soul was closer to God than that of an ordinary human being. In this view Schneerson never died, and is still alive in some way that ordinary humans cannot perceive. He will return in a more obvious way to proclaim his messiahship (see e.g. Rabbi Levi Yitzchack Ginsberg, of Kfar Chabad Yeshiva, in his book ''Mashiah Akhshav'', volume IV, 1996). Many Chabad Hasidim refuse to put the typical honorifics for the dead (e.g. zt"l or ''zecher tzaddik livrocho'', "may the memory of the righteous be for a blessing") after Schneerson's name.
* Some Chabad Hasidim hold that the classic meaning of [[death]] does not apply to a truly righteous person such as Schneerson, as his soul was closer to God than that of an ordinary human being. In this view Schneerson never died, and is still alive in some way that ordinary humans cannot perceive. He will return in a more obvious way to proclaim his messiahship (see e.g. Rabbi Levi Yitzchack Ginsberg, of Kfar Chabad Yeshiva, in his book ''Mashiah Akhshav'', volume IV, 1996). Many Chabad Hasidim refuse to put the typical honorifics for the dead (e.g. zt"l or ''zecher tzaddik livrocho'', "may the memory of the righteous be for a blessing") after Schneerson's name. This view is considered to be a form of neo-Christianity by some critics of Chabad messianism.
* Some Chabad Hasidim hold that the Schneerson literally will return from the dead amidst a general bodily resurrection of the dead, and will be proclaimed as Messiah. Although this position is considered by Berger to be a radical innovation in Jewish theology, some Chabad Hasidim with the support of leading academic authorities on kabbalah have developed an extensive literature of prooftexts attempting to show that this is what previous rabbinic literature actually meant.
* Some Chabad Hasidim hold that the Schneerson literally will return from the dead amidst a general bodily resurrection of the dead, and will be proclaimed as messiah. This position is considered by most rabbis to be a radical innovation in Jewish theology. Some Chabad Jews have developed an extensive literature of prooftexts attempting to show that this is what previous rabbinic literature actually meant, even though no rabbinic Jews previously ever actually had such beliefs.
* Berger asserts that a few Chabad followers hold Schneerson to be God incarnate, and that they worship him as such. This, however, is in direct contradiction with Chabad teachings, and therefore subject to much doubt.
* Some Chabad followers worship Schneerson as God incarnate.



== Orthodox criticism of Chabad theology ==
Responses from various Jewish spokespeople have been aimed specifically at the last two expressions of messianism. Longtime critic Allan Nadler (2001) and Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller (1998) warn that Chabad has moved its focus from God to Schneerson to the point that they "worship him".
Responses from various Jewish spokespeople have been aimed specifically at the last two expressions of messianism. Longtime critic Allan Nadler (2001) and Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller (1998) warn that Chabad has moved its focus from God to Schneerson to the point that they "worship him".


In response to criticism, most members of Chabad themselves insist that this latter group is a tiny aberration, and inflated by their critics in order to embarrass Chabad. Non-Chabad Jews agree that this group is statistically small. However, many are concerned that this position seems to be a logical result of the mainstream Chabad belief and results in neo-Christian beliefs. Rabbi Jack Riemer (Conservative Judaism), for example, refers to the literature of meschichist Chabad Jews as Christian, and as being the same as that of [[Jews for Jesus]] tract. Professor Jacob Neusner (Conservative) similarly writes (2001) that Chabad has invented "halachic Christianity".
Chabad members insist that this latter group is a tiny aberration, and inflated by their critics in order to embarrass Chabad. Non-Chabad Jews agree that this group is statistically small. However, many are concerned that this position seems to be a logical result of the mainstream Chabad belief and results in neo-Christian beliefs.

Rabbi Aharon Feldman (Orthodox) of Ner Israel on June 24, 2003 distributed a virtual excommunication against Chabad Jews who view Schneeron as the embodiment of divinity. He also wrote that even the mere belief that Scheerson is the messiah is dangerous to Judaism because their beliefs dig “beneath very foundation of Jewish belief in the Moshiach.” About Chabad Jews who worship their late rebbe as God Rabbi Feldman writes “It is still forbidden to support them or publicize their opinions for it is forbidden to support falsehood. All the more so in this case, where there exists the danger that their belief might spread to the general Jewish community and thus the Torah itself could be erased from Israel, chas v’shalom."

Before this, Rabbi Schmuel Yaakov Weinberg held that Chabad's view on messianic were beyond the pale of Jewish thought.

Former president of the Orthodox [[Rabbinical Council of America]], Rabbi [[Marc Angel]], Congregation Shearith Israel, told his congregants not to eat a delis run by messianic Chabad Jews, as religious Jews are forbidden by Jewish law from eating food prepared by Jews perceived to be involved in heresy.

Berger's research has been well received by much of Modern Orthodoxy, some of the Yeshivish world, and much of non-Orthodox Judaism. In response to his work, the [[Rabbinical Council of America]] resolved that “In light of disturbing developments which have recently arisen in the Jewish community, the Rabbinical Council of America . . . declares that there is not and never has been a place in Judaism for the belief that Mashiach ben David [i.e., the messiah] will begin his messianic mission only to experience death, burial, and resurrection before completing it.”

However, Berger's research has been attacked as false and misleading by several authorities sympathetic to Chabad. [[Aviezer Ravitzky]], chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy at Hebrew University, said that he was so offended by Mr. Berger's speech at a conference that he spoke at that he considered gathering his notes and leaving the conference. [[Moshe Idel]], Professor of Jewish Thought at Hebrew University, considered the world's foremost academic authority on kabbala, or Jewish mysticism, disagreed with Berger's key point, that Judaism abhors the idea of a messiah who rises from the dead. Idel believes that this notion is compatible with Kabbalistic Judaism, and is not automatically heresy. Nonetheless, n regards to those Chabad Jews who wait for Schneerson to return from the deas as a messiah, Idel stated "Torah does not prohibit a person from being stupid."

== Reaction in the non-Orthodox community ==


Rabbi Jack Riemer (Conservative Judaism), for example, refers to the literature of meschichist Chabad Jews as Christian, and as being the same as that of [[Jews for Jesus]] tract. Professor Jacob Neusner (Conservative) similarly writes (2001) that Chabad has invented a halakhically observant form of Christianity.
Berger's claims have been attacked as false and misleading by several books written in respopnse to his claims. Aviezer Ravitzky, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy at Hebrew University, said that he was so offended by Mr. Berger's theatrics at a conference that he spoke at that he considered gathering his notes and leaving the conference. Moshe Idel, the Max Cooper Professor of Jewish Thought at Hebrew University, considered the world's foremost academic authority on kabbala, or Jewish mysticism, hammered away at Mr. Berger's key point, that Judaism abhors the idea of a messiah who rises from the dead. He pointed out that this notion is not as foreign as Mr. Berger would have readers believe. After all, the professor argued, the late King David is considered in Jewish literature as a top candidate for the post of Messiah. (Yanover)


==References==
==References==
Line 144: Line 159:
**[http://www.moshiachlisten.com/history.html A Brief History of Lubavitch Messianism]
**[http://www.moshiachlisten.com/history.html A Brief History of Lubavitch Messianism]


[[Category:Chabad Lubavitch|*]]
[[Category:Chabad Lubavitch| ]]
[[Category:Hasidic dynasties|Lubavitch]]
[[Category:Jewish organizations]]


[[cs:Chabad lubavič]]
[[cs:Chabad lubavič]]

Revision as of 19:38, 2 December 2005

Chabad Lubavitch, or Lubavich, is a large branch of Hasidic Judaism founded by Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi. It is also known simply as Chabad (חבד) a Hebrew acronym for "חכמה Wisdom- בינה Understanding- דעת Knowledge", or as Lubavitch (ליובאוויטש), the town that served as the movement's headquarters for over a century. In Russian, the name means "town of brotherly love".

Its adherents, or Chasidim, known as "Lubavitchers", are Orthodox Jews belonging to Hasidic Judaism as defined by the Chabad traditions. In Israel they are known as Chabadnikim ("Chabadniks"), a derivation of the movement's second name.

Belarus, where Lubavitch originated

Like all Hasidim they follow the teachings and customs of halakha (Jewish law and custom) as taught by their own Rebbes (rabbis, leaders) starting from the founder of Hasidism, Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov. In this case, the teachings of the Baal Shem Tov are traced through their founder's master works known as The Tanya and the Shulchan Aruch HaRav. Similarly, Chabad attaches importance to singing Hasidic nigunim (tunes), either with or without words and following precise customs of their leaders.

Until the death of the 7th Chabad leader, Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson in 1994, they were governed by a succession of leaders, each descended from the founder of the movement. The death of their Rebbe in 1994 came as a great shock to members of the movement, since many believed that he was the Moshiach - the Jewish Messiah, and would be revealed to the world as such. Schneerson, who was childless, did not appoint a successor; Chabad Hasidim still consider him to be their leader and Rebbe.

File:Rebbe.jpg
Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994) the seventh Rebbe of Chabad Lubavitch.

Early origins

The movement originated in Belarus in Eastern Europe. Chabad traces its roots back to the beginnings of Hasidic Judaism:

Rebbes of Chabad

Portrait of Shneur Zalman of Liadi (1745-1812) founder of Chabad Lubavitch and author of Tanya and Shulchan Aruch HaRav.
  1. Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi 1745 - 1812, son of Rabbi Boruch, was a student of Dovber of Mezeritch and founded the Chabad dynasty within Hasidism. He defined the direction of his movement and influenced Hasidic Judaism through his master works the Tanya, which is primarily mystical and in line with the Zohar, and his authoritative work on Jewish law known as the Shulchan Aruch HaRav. He was a recognized posek (rabbinic authority in Jewish law), and is often cited in other important works such as the Mishnah Berurah and the Ben Ish Chai. The names "Schneersohn" and "Schneerson" began as patronymics by Shneur Zalman's descendants. The first form of this name was "Shneuri" (Hebrew for "of Shneur") This was later changed to "Schneersohn".
  2. Rabbi Dovber 1773 - 1827, son of Shneur Zalman.
  3. Rabbi Menachem Mendel 1789 - 1866, grandson of Shneur Zalman and son-in-law of Dovber.
  4. Rabbi Shmuel 1834 - 1882, son of Rabbi Menachem Mendel.
  5. Rabbi Sholom Dovber 1860 - 1920, son of Rabbi Shmuel.
  6. Rabbi Joseph Isaac Schneersohn 1880 - 1950, only son of Sholom Dovber.
  7. Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson 1902 - 1994, (his family name does not have the "h" of "...sohn" as he was a cousin from a different branch of the family), sixth in paternal line from Rabbi Menachem Mendel, and son-in-law of Joseph Isaac.

Origin of name

Chabad

The names Chabad and Lubavitch each have a history. Chabad is a Hebrew acronym for Chochma ("wisdom"), Bina ("understanding"), and Da'as ("knowledge"), that was chosen early on by its founder, the first Rebbe, Shneur Zalman of Liadi. The name Chabad reflects the intellectual accessibility of the mystical teachings of the Kabbalah. Rabbi Shneur Zalman is the author of the seminal Hassidic work, Tanya, as well as the Shulchan Aruch HaRav - a code of Jewish Law.

Chabad is sometimes written as Habad in English, and in all the phonetic equivalents of the name in all the countries they operate in. Thus, as an example, Jabad is the Spanish form, particularly important to the Jews of Latin America, most notably Argentina, which has the largest concentration of Spanish speaking Jews anywhere in the world and therefore has a large Lubavitch presence as well.

Lubavitch

Lubavitch is the name of a small town in Russia meaning "town of love". It was Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi who founded the movement, but his son established court in Lubavitch, and the name stuck. In Hasidic Judaism, a dynasty normally takes its name from the town in Eastern Europe where it was born and originated. The followers of Lubavitch place great emphasis on the value and meaning of their group name and town of origin. They say that this evokes, symbolizes and embodies who they are.

The movement

In 19th and 20th century Russia Chabad had a large following and had a sizeable network of yeshivoth called Tomchei Temimim. Most of this system was destroyed by Bolshevik governments and the German invasion in 1942. The then current Rebbe Joseph Isaac Schneersohn had been living in Warsaw, Poland, and with the lobbying of many Jewish leaders on his behalf, he was finally granted diplomatic immunity and given safe conduct to go via Berlin, then to Riga, and then on to New York City where he arrived on March 19 1940. His son-in-law and cousin Menachem Mendel Schneerson, who had been living in Paris, France, since 1933, escaped from France in 1941 and joined his father-in-law in the Crown Heights section of Brooklyn, New York City. Menachem Mendel Schneerson, after becoming the Rebbe himself, and following an initiative of the previous Rebbe, spurred the movement on to what has become known as shlichus (outreach work). As a result, Chabad shluchim (emissaries) have moved all over the world with a mission of helping all Jews, regardless of denomination or affiliation, to learn more about their Jewish heritage, and Judaism as practiced by Chabad.

The movement, following Rabbi Schneerson's call, has trained and ordained thousands of rabbis, educators, ritual slaughterers, and ritual circumcisers, who are all accompanied by equally motivated spouses and typically large families, all of whom aim to fulfill their mandate of Jewish outreach, education, and revival. They look for and recruit Jews who want to join them, encourage Jews to strengthen their commitment to Judaism, and assist in supporting the religious needs of hundreds of thousands of Jews worldwide. They are the originators of, and major players in, the Teshuva movement, which encourages Jews alienated from their religion to become more Jewishly aware and religiously observant.

Schneerson greatly emphasized spreading awareness of the coming of Moshiach and preparing for his imminent arrival. Some of the points Schneerson stressed in his teaching include:

  • Belief in the imminent coming of Moshiach is a fundamental Jewish belief as explained by the Rambam.
  • The Geula, or the Era of Redemption, is the culmination of the spiritual work since the Creation of the world.
  • Jews prepare and pave the way for the coming of Moshiach and the Geula by doing mitzvoth - the 613 commandments, as detailed in the Torah
  • Non-Jews have seven mitzvoth, called the Noahide Laws, that they should become aware of and practice. These are in fact general categories containing many details and ramifications, as discussed in the book The Path of The Righteous Gentile.
  • The importance of opposing any discussion concerning concession of territories in the Holy Land of Israel, or otherwise strategically vital territories to Arabs or anyone else.

Often when asked what remains to be done to bring Moshiach (the messiah), Schneerson answered that we need to perform "Acts of Goodness and Kindness," now a popular catchphrase. Rabbi Schneerson intended that Moshiach awareness be an essential part of everything we do, and thus it is unusual for any Chabad function to be without mention of the desire for the immediate Redemption.

The worldwide headquarters of the Chabad movement is 770 Eastern Parkway in the neighborhood of Crown Heights, Brooklyn, referred to as "770" by Lubavitchers who deem the number to have great mystical significance.

In contrast with other Hasidic sects, Chabad hassidim do not wear shtreimels (fur hats worn on special days and occasions), a practice introduced by the sixth Rebbe. Chabad is also remarkable in its openness to non-Orthodox Jews; in fact, it aims to attract them to the Orthodox world, and believes this will bring Messianic times. This practice is called "mivtzoim".

Chabad hassidim pronounce Hebrew according to the Ashkenazi dialect, with the vowel cholem sounding somewhat closer to /ey/ than the Modern Hebrew /o/ and the Ashkenazi /oi/.

Chabad has had a notable influence on Haredi entertainment. Singing rabbi Shlomo Carlebach was affiliated with Chabad, and popular singers such as Avraham Fried and Mordechai ben David and children's entertainer Uncle Moshie attract sizable crowds on their tours and have popularized many melodies for various Jewish occasions.

Controversies

File:Rebes.jpg
Sixth Rebbe of Chabad Lubavitch Joseph Isaac Schneersohn (1880-1950) left, with his son-in-law and successor Menachem Mendel Schneerson (1902-1994), right, the last Lubavitcher Rebbe.

History of controversy

Since its inception, Hasidism was the center of much controversy within the Jewish community. The founder of Hasidism, Rabbi Israel Baal Shem Tov was a populist preacher and Kabbalist virtually unknown to the accepted Rabbinate at the time. His quickly growing popularity and novel interpretations of the Torah and halakha (Jewish law) quickly caused a growing backlash by established Rabbis who called themselves mitnagdim (lit. opposers). Hasidim were accused of idolatry, false messianism and laxity in observance of halakha. This opposition was led by Rabbi Eliyahu Kramer, known as the Vilna Gaon.

After the death of the Baal Shem Tov's successor, Rabbi Dovber of Mezeritch; Hasidism split into many groups. Rabbi Shneur Zalman of Liadi is believed by Chabad Hasidim to be the rightful heir and successor of Rabbi Dovber of Mezritch. During the lives of Rabbi Shneur Zalman and his son Dovber, the controversies between the Hasidim and Mitnagdim intensified in many ways. Subjects of the disagreement were the rules for ritual slaughter and the conduction and phrasing of prayers, but rapidly involved many other aspects of Jewish life. As a result, Rabbi Shneur Zalman and his followers were subjected to bans and persecution. Finally, a prominent member of the mitnagdim informed the Russian government that Rabbi Shneur Zalman was encouraging his followers to send money to Palestine. Palestine was a part of the Ottoman Empire, which was at war with Russia. Rabbi Shneur Zalman was arrested for treason. His subsequent release on 19 Kislev is celebrated by Chabad Hasidim as the New Year of Hasidism and divine vindication of the movement.

There was brief rapprochement between Chabad, other Hasidim and the mitnagdim during the tenure of Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneersohn, the grandson of Rabbi Shneur Zalman. However, Chabad continued to be controversial in all of its generations.

Controversy during the seventh Rebbe's life

Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson, the seventh Chabad leader, took the reins of the sect shortly after World War II and became their Rebbe. At the time, many believed that Orthodox Judaism was about to die. Schneerson believed that the Messiah was soon to come. At the speech where he accepted leadership, he proclaimed the defining theme of his tenure. He stated that his purpose as the seventh Rebbe was to complete the work of bringing the Jewish Messiah. He further stated that the previous Rebbe had not finished this work, but because of the unusual character of his self-sacrifice was still present to lead the charge in bringing about the Messianic Age. "Beyond this, the Rebbe will bind and unite us with the infinite Essence of G-d... When he redeems us from the exile with an uplifted hand and the dwelling places of all Jews shall be filled with light... May we be privileged to see and meet with the Rebbe here is this world, in a physical body, in this earthy domain - and he will redeem us" (Basi L'Gani 1951).

Schneerson renounced the traditionally insular or assimilationist way of life espoused by many Jews in the United States. He encouraged growing long beards, women wearing wigs and other overt signs of religiosity. His followers held public Hannukah celebrations, encouraged secular Jews to put on tefillin in public and made themselves highly visible in their Jewish observance. This caused a backlash from both liberal and traditional factions of the Jewish establishment. Chabad fought battles in court all the way to the United States Supreme Court against the American Jewish Congress over the display of a public Menorah. Many prominent Rabbis were staunchly opposed to allowing secular Jews to wear tefillin, as they believed it to be a desecration. The controversies over the role of a tzadik and the coming of the Jewish Messiah continue to rage.

Relationship between Lubavitch Jews and their rebbe

Before Schneerson's death, the beliefs of Chabad Hasidim had become extremely controversial among other Orthodox Jews.

All Hasidic Jews are adherents of Kabbalah, esoteric Jewish mysticism. Among Kabbalists the role of the tzadik ("righteous" or "saintly" person) is stressed more than among non-Kabbalists. A tzadik is believed to have close connection with God, acting as a "chariot for the Divine" (מרכבה לשכנה), both in life and after death. (Tanya Epistle 27)

Many Jewish sources stress prayer directly to God, and not through an intermediary. However, Hasidism has stressed the ability of tzadik to act as an intermediary with God on their behalf. Hasidim continue to ask for such intervention even after the death of their Rebbe and often visit their burial places to pray for blessings. The stipulation in such prayer is that one must recognize that the tzadik is not God. Among Hasidim all rebbes are held to be tzadikim and revelation of God.

Schneerson's teachings developed this theology into a new direction, holding that "It is not possible to ask a question about a [Rebbe being a] go-between, since this is the essence of God Himself, as He has clothed Himself in a human body" (Likutei Sichos II:510-511). Schneerson holds that a tzadik, who does whatever God wants, effectively nullifies their own soul as his soul joins with the will of God. In this view the words of the tzadik are the words of God (Pavzener, based on Tanya Chapter 2).

Schneerson makes this explicit "Just as 'God and the Torah and the Jews are One', means not just that the Jews are connected to the Torah and to God, but literally they are all one, so too is the connection of Chassidim and their Rebbe, they are not like two things that become united but rather they become literally one. Therefore, to a Chosid, him and the Rebbe and God are one entity." This view is presented by Chabad Jews as being identical to that of mainstream Hasidic Judaism, but it has been rejected as heretical by many Orthodox Jews. Many see this as a new formulation of hasidic philosophy that contradicts the Jewish principles of faith.

Various forms of messianism

During the later years of his life Schneerson's teachings were interpreted by many to mean that he was claiming to be the Messiah. Shortly before the time of his death the majority of Chabad Hasidim viewed him as the messiah.

The development of this messianism and its impact on Chabad in specific — and Orthodox Judaism in general — has been the subject of much discussion in the Jewish press, as well as within the pages of peer-reviewed journals. Few within Chabad deny the existence or extent of this messianism; the defenders of these beliefs hold rather it is simply true that Menchem Mendel Schneerson is indeed the messiah and that he will return from the dead immediately.

Vociferous opponents of the "meschichist" ("messianist") approach were some of the prominent roshei yeshiva (deans of Talmud colleges), such as Rabbi Elazar Menachem Shach, dean of the Ponovezh yeshiva in Israel, who had condemned Chabad beliefs even before Schneerson's death. He was the leader of a group that had historically been at odds with all Hasidim, including Chabad, though from the 20th century onwards they worked quite closely together in organizations such as Agudath Israel, and Shach himself had not criticized any other Hasidic group in this way.

The messianic response has taken various forms amongst Chabad members:

  • Some Chabad Hasidim hold that Schneerson was the best candidate for messiah in his generation, but now say that people were mistaken to believe that he was the messiah. Rather, he could have been the messiah if God willed it to be so, but it was not to be. As such, the messiah will come nonetheless in the person of some other great leader.
  • Some Chabad Hasidim hold that the classic meaning of death does not apply to a truly righteous person such as Schneerson, as his soul was closer to God than that of an ordinary human being. In this view Schneerson never died, and is still alive in some way that ordinary humans cannot perceive. He will return in a more obvious way to proclaim his messiahship (see e.g. Rabbi Levi Yitzchack Ginsberg, of Kfar Chabad Yeshiva, in his book Mashiah Akhshav, volume IV, 1996). Many Chabad Hasidim refuse to put the typical honorifics for the dead (e.g. zt"l or zecher tzaddik livrocho, "may the memory of the righteous be for a blessing") after Schneerson's name. This view is considered to be a form of neo-Christianity by some critics of Chabad messianism.
  • Some Chabad Hasidim hold that the Schneerson literally will return from the dead amidst a general bodily resurrection of the dead, and will be proclaimed as messiah. This position is considered by most rabbis to be a radical innovation in Jewish theology. Some Chabad Jews have developed an extensive literature of prooftexts attempting to show that this is what previous rabbinic literature actually meant, even though no rabbinic Jews previously ever actually had such beliefs.
  • Some Chabad followers worship Schneerson as God incarnate.


Orthodox criticism of Chabad theology

Responses from various Jewish spokespeople have been aimed specifically at the last two expressions of messianism. Longtime critic Allan Nadler (2001) and Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller (1998) warn that Chabad has moved its focus from God to Schneerson to the point that they "worship him".

Chabad members insist that this latter group is a tiny aberration, and inflated by their critics in order to embarrass Chabad. Non-Chabad Jews agree that this group is statistically small. However, many are concerned that this position seems to be a logical result of the mainstream Chabad belief and results in neo-Christian beliefs.

Rabbi Aharon Feldman (Orthodox) of Ner Israel on June 24, 2003 distributed a virtual excommunication against Chabad Jews who view Schneeron as the embodiment of divinity. He also wrote that even the mere belief that Scheerson is the messiah is dangerous to Judaism because their beliefs dig “beneath very foundation of Jewish belief in the Moshiach.” About Chabad Jews who worship their late rebbe as God Rabbi Feldman writes “It is still forbidden to support them or publicize their opinions for it is forbidden to support falsehood. All the more so in this case, where there exists the danger that their belief might spread to the general Jewish community and thus the Torah itself could be erased from Israel, chas v’shalom."

Before this, Rabbi Schmuel Yaakov Weinberg held that Chabad's view on messianic were beyond the pale of Jewish thought.

Former president of the Orthodox Rabbinical Council of America, Rabbi Marc Angel, Congregation Shearith Israel, told his congregants not to eat a delis run by messianic Chabad Jews, as religious Jews are forbidden by Jewish law from eating food prepared by Jews perceived to be involved in heresy.

Berger's research has been well received by much of Modern Orthodoxy, some of the Yeshivish world, and much of non-Orthodox Judaism. In response to his work, the Rabbinical Council of America resolved that “In light of disturbing developments which have recently arisen in the Jewish community, the Rabbinical Council of America . . . declares that there is not and never has been a place in Judaism for the belief that Mashiach ben David [i.e., the messiah] will begin his messianic mission only to experience death, burial, and resurrection before completing it.”

However, Berger's research has been attacked as false and misleading by several authorities sympathetic to Chabad. Aviezer Ravitzky, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy at Hebrew University, said that he was so offended by Mr. Berger's speech at a conference that he spoke at that he considered gathering his notes and leaving the conference. Moshe Idel, Professor of Jewish Thought at Hebrew University, considered the world's foremost academic authority on kabbala, or Jewish mysticism, disagreed with Berger's key point, that Judaism abhors the idea of a messiah who rises from the dead. Idel believes that this notion is compatible with Kabbalistic Judaism, and is not automatically heresy. Nonetheless, n regards to those Chabad Jews who wait for Schneerson to return from the deas as a messiah, Idel stated "Torah does not prohibit a person from being stupid."

Reaction in the non-Orthodox community

Rabbi Jack Riemer (Conservative Judaism), for example, refers to the literature of meschichist Chabad Jews as Christian, and as being the same as that of Jews for Jesus tract. Professor Jacob Neusner (Conservative) similarly writes (2001) that Chabad has invented a halakhically observant form of Christianity.

References

  • Berger, David. "The Fragility of Religious Doctrine: Accounting for Orthodox Acquiescence in the Belief In A Second Coming," Modern Judaism, Vol. 22, p.103-114, 2002
  • Berger, David. The Rebbe, the Messiah, and the Scandal of Orthodox Indifference, Littman Library of Jewish Civilization, 2001 (ISBN 1874774889)
  • Dalfin, Chaim. Attack on Lubavitch: A Response, Jewish Enrichment Press, February 2002 (ISBN 1880880660)
  • Fishkoff, Sue. The Rebbe's Army: Inside the World of Chabad-Lubavitch, Schocken, 2003 (ISBN 0805241892)
  • Frumer, Assaf. Kol Hanikra Bishmi (Hebrew)
  • Hoffman, Edward. Despite All Odds: The Story of Lubavitch. Simon & Schuster, 1991 (ISBN 0671677039)
  • Keller, Chaim Dov. "G-d - Centered or Rebbe/Messiah - Centered: What is Normative Judaism?", Jewish Observer, March, 1998
  • Lessons in Tanya chabad.org
  • Mindel, Nissan. The philosophy of Chabad. Chabad Research Center, 1973
  • Nadler, Allan. Last Exit to Brooklyn: The Lubavitcher's powerful and preposterous messianism. The New Republic May 4, 1992.
  • Nadler, Allan. A Historian's Polemic Against 'The Madness of False Messianism' The Forward Oct. 19, 2001.
  • Neusner, Jacob. A Messianism That Some Call Heresy. Jerusalem Post October 19, 2001
  • Pavzener, Avraham. Al HaTzadikim (Hebrew). Kfar Chabad. 1991
  • Prager, Dennis. Irresponsible Slander Moment Magazine 2002
  • Riemer, Jack. Will the Rebbe Return?. Moment Magazine February 2002.
  • Schneerson, Menachem Mendel. On the Essence of Chasidus: A Chasidic Discourse by Rabbi Menachem Mendel Schneerson of Chabad-Lubavitch. Merkos L'Inyonei Chinuch, 2003 (ISBN 0826604668)
  • Schochet, Rabbi J. Immanuel. G-d Centered or Machloket-Centered: Which is Normative Judaism? A Response to Rabbi Chaim Dov Keller of Chicago. Algemeiner Journal.
  • Shaffir, William. When Prophecy is Not Validated: Explaining the Unexpected in a Messianic Campaign. The Jewish Journal of Sociology. Vol.XXXVII, No.2, Dec. 1995
  • Student, Gil. Can the Rebbe Be Moshiach?: Proofs from Gemara, Midrash, and Rambam that the Rebbe cannot be Moshiach, Universal Publishers, 2002, (ISBN 1581126115). online version
  • Yanover, Yori. Attack on Chabad Is Called Unredeemable The Forward January 18, 2002

See also

External links