User talk:PrBeacon: Difference between revisions
→Blocked: making section collapsible, for better navig. |
→Sea Shepherds and Violence: warning about incivility on SSCS talkpage |
||
Line 195: | Line 195: | ||
Just wanted to say thank you for the repsecful tone that seems to be settling on the community in the discussion at the moment. It makes a nice environment for cooperative work, you make that article a better place. --[[Special:Contributions/68.41.80.161|68.41.80.161]] ([[User talk:68.41.80.161|talk]]) 04:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
Just wanted to say thank you for the repsecful tone that seems to be settling on the community in the discussion at the moment. It makes a nice environment for cooperative work, you make that article a better place. --[[Special:Contributions/68.41.80.161|68.41.80.161]] ([[User talk:68.41.80.161|talk]]) 04:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
:I might regret this but [[Sea Shepherd Conservation Society|get in here]]. Started poking around more recently and think your counterbalance would be beneficial to the article.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 06:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
:I might regret this but [[Sea Shepherd Conservation Society|get in here]]. Started poking around more recently and think your counterbalance would be beneficial to the article.[[User:Cptnono|Cptnono]] ([[User talk:Cptnono|talk]]) 06:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
||
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please do not [[Wikipedia:No personal attacks|attack]] other editors{{#if:Talk:Sea Shepherd Conservation Society|, as you did at [[:Talk:Sea Shepherd Conservation Society]]}}. Comment on ''content'', not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please [[Wikipedia:Staying cool when the editing gets hot|stay cool]] and keep this in mind while editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-npa2 --> — <em>[[User:NRen2k5|NRen2k5]]</em><sup>([[User_talk:NRen2k5|TALK]])</sup>, 21:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:46, 7 July 2009
Welcome!
(unless you're a stalker)
June + July 2009
Dispute with wiki-bully |
---|
ANI DiscussionThere is an discussion specifically regarding you at ANI Excirial (Contact me,Contribs) 12:26, 19 June 2009 (UTC)
DisputeI’ve notified a few editors who I’ve worked with and asked them to weigh in on the issue. [6][7][8][9][10] I believe the way I did so is within the rules (WP:CANVAS). Feel free to correct me if I’m wrong, and feel free to do so yourself (within the rules, of course). — NRen2k5(TALK), 00:16, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
July 2009
Archives are just that: archives. They’re meant to keep a record of discussions that are now finished and are not meant to be edited. If you feel there is something unresolved in an archived discussion, the proper thing to do would be to ask an experienced editor or an admin about unarchiving it or starting a new discussion on the matter. — NRen2k5(TALK), 05:43, 1 July 2009 (UTC)
|
Blocked
Edit warring, inappropriate username |
---|
![]() {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 02:56, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() PrBeacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: As usual, NRen2k5 is overstating my role & understating his own. This dispute has escalated from article talk pages (on Sea Shepherd and Whale Wars to my WP:EAR, then his WP:WQA and WP:ANI, none of which delivered a favorable outcome to him, so he continues his wiki-bullying on my talk page and now here. The above revert-war is his attempt to get &keep the last word on that archive, yet nowhere there or on WP:Archive does it say new edits are not allowed. Furthermore, his last edit to it before it was archived is a blatant violation of standard format: his small reply to Bwilkin's admin note is misleading & redundant (pushing his POV in summary/admin format). Decline reason: This doesn't address the reason why you were blocked. Other users actions aren't an excuse for your own. \ Backslash Forwardslash / {talk} 03:10, 2 July 2009 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
![]() PrBeacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: Agreed, I understand what I was blocked for and I will stop modifying the ANI archive. However, in my defense I should say that I honestly did not know all archives should not be modified. While it may be "well-known" to veteran users, it is not explicitly stated on the page in question or the WP:Archive page. And I did not get a warning about this policy. The other editor NRen2k5 placed a warning about edit warring on my talk page but I disregarded it due to his conflict of interest. And so I thought he was making up a rule about new edits there, since he was engaged in the revert war, too, and has done so before. Lastly, my initial appeal above was incomplete -- it was originally my reply to the ANE section which the other editor started, but I got blocked before I could post it there. Decline reason: You should not have disregarded the warning and need to look at how you edit here. Also, you need to change your username - it is inappropriate, violating username policy. Toddst1 (talk) 13:18, 2 July 2009 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. ![]()
Our username policy provides guidance on selecting your username. In brief, usernames should not be offensive, disruptive, promotional, misleading, or related to a 'real-world' group or organization. Also, usernames may not end with the string "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account. If you have already made edits and wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name you may request a change in username. To do so, please follow these directions:
{{unblock|Your reason here}} below or emailing the administrator who blocked you. Toddst1 (talk) 13:19, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() PrBeacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: My username is not innappropriate. The admin's interpretation of it is incorrect ("F you" on his talk page) because the "h" in "hue" is not silent. Decline reason: How you read it, maybe. But the key standard is not how you intend your username, but how it affects the ability of other editors to work with you. "F hue" sounds so much like "F you" that people are taking it as an insult, which makes it impossible to collaborate with you. Mangojuicetalk 18:47, 5 July 2009 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked. I would recommend against unblocking unless this user promises to leave archives alone.— Dædαlus Contribs 20:36, 5 July 2009 (UTC)
![]() PrBeacon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Requested username: Juancholo (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)
Decline reason: I didn't know the term has offensive connotations since there are quite a few other users with the name. Yet you call me 'cholo' in the same breath. hmmm. ('Juancho' is a nickname in Mexico and i heard 'cholo' used jovially there as nomad, vagabond, trainhopper.) Fhue (talk) 03:25, 6 July 2009 (UTC) |
Unblocked, username change
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/4/42/Stop_x_nuvola.svg/40px-Stop_x_nuvola.svg.png)
{{unblock|Your reason here}}
below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 19:31, 6 July 2009 (UTC)I don't understand what you have against me. I've applied for the name change but the process takes a week. Am I supposed to wait that long before I can start contributing again? Fhue (talk) 19:41, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- You were expected to change your username before continuing editing. Now, you are required to do so. Toddst1 (talk) 19:46, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that's clear. However, you didn't answer my question. Should I modify my name/sig to reflect the impending change? Perhaps something like this.. Fh..->Prbeacon (talk)
- You should sign your posts with your username - the only one you have at the moment. I'll unblock you if it would make you feel better, but you need to agree to wait until your name change comes through before you edit anything other than this page, your sandbox and pages related to your name change. Toddst1 (talk) 20:18, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, that's clear. However, you didn't answer my question. Should I modify my name/sig to reflect the impending change? Perhaps something like this.. Fh..->Prbeacon (talk)
{{unblock|I believe this block is unjustified and the blocking admin may have a personal bias. I humbly request another admin to take an objective look at this case. I have applied for a name change in accordance with the original block for inappropriate name.}}
Thank you both, much appreciated. Fhue (talk) 01:02, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Actually I still cannot edit: "currently unable to edit pages on Wikipedia due to an autoblock affecting your IP address" (my emphasis) Fhue (talk) 01:16, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
{{unblock|Could someone please remove the autoblock of my IP: "currently unable to edit .. due to an autoblock" ? I was unblocked but apparently there are remnants of the username-block still in the system. The blocking admin's Talk page says he is offline now for a week. Thanks}}
Thanks again. Fhue (talk) 02:13, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just to let you know, this latest block and unblock is up for discussion; I acted rather hastily in unblocking you and consensus might develop against it, in which case you might again restricted from editing until your rename is complete. If you were to pick a different username that didn't require WP:USURP, it might help moot the issue more quickly: I note, for instance, that user:PrBeacon is available. Mangojuicetalk 04:20, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- Indeed, I'd thought of that after getting the 2nd block from Toddst1 but I had already put in the usurp request so i wasnt sure if i could cancel that. Now I will see if i can. WP:Changing_username request "Original name deemed inappropriate, 2nd choice Prbeacon taken but not active -- usurp request submitted, now advised to try this variation." Cheers. Fhue (talk) 04:33, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Sea Shepherds and Violence
Just wanted to say thank you for the repsecful tone that seems to be settling on the community in the discussion at the moment. It makes a nice environment for cooperative work, you make that article a better place. --68.41.80.161 (talk) 04:27, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
- I might regret this but get in here. Started poking around more recently and think your counterbalance would be beneficial to the article.Cptnono (talk) 06:42, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Talk:Sea Shepherd Conservation Society. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — NRen2k5(TALK), 21:46, 7 July 2009 (UTC)