Jump to content

Mifepristone: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Europe: Added approvation of RU486 in Italy
Line 120: Line 120:
In France, the percentage of medical abortions of all abortions continues to increase: 38% in 2003, 42% in 2004, 44% in 2005, 46% in 2006 (vs. 18% in 1996).<ref>{{cite web |author=Vilain, Annick |date=September 2008 |title=Voluntary terminations of pregnancies in 2006 |publisher=DREES, Ministry of Health |url=http://www.sante.gouv.fr/drees/etude-resultat/er-pdf/er659.pdf |accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref> In England and Wales, 43% of early abortions (less than 9 weeks gestation) in 2007 were medical; the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 12 years (from 5% in 1995 to 35% in 2007) and has more than doubled in the last five years.<ref>{{cite web |author=Department of Health |date=June 19, 2008 |title=Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2007 |publisher=Department of Health (United Kingdom) |url=http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_085508 |accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref> In Scotland, 69.1% of early abortions (less than 10 weeks gestation) in 2007 were medical (up from 55.8% in 1992 when medical abortion was introduced); the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 15 years (from 16.4% in 1992 to 61.8% in 2007).<ref>{{cite web |author=ISD Scotland |date=May 27, 2008 |title=Abortion Statistics, year ending December 2007 |publisher=Information Services Division (ISD), NHS National Services Scotland |url=http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/5644.html |accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref> In Sweden, 82.9% of early abortions (before the end of the 9th week of gestation) and 69.0% of abortions before the end of the 12th week of gestation in 2008 were medical; 64.2% of all abortions in 2008 were medical.<ref>{{cite web |author=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |date=April 29, 2009 |title=Induced Abortions 2008 |publisher=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |url=http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/NR/rdonlyres/93831CA6-90A3-4755-8BCE-CD6EABCD6209/13853/200912510_rev3.pdf |accessdate=2009-05-16}}</ref>
In France, the percentage of medical abortions of all abortions continues to increase: 38% in 2003, 42% in 2004, 44% in 2005, 46% in 2006 (vs. 18% in 1996).<ref>{{cite web |author=Vilain, Annick |date=September 2008 |title=Voluntary terminations of pregnancies in 2006 |publisher=DREES, Ministry of Health |url=http://www.sante.gouv.fr/drees/etude-resultat/er-pdf/er659.pdf |accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref> In England and Wales, 43% of early abortions (less than 9 weeks gestation) in 2007 were medical; the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 12 years (from 5% in 1995 to 35% in 2007) and has more than doubled in the last five years.<ref>{{cite web |author=Department of Health |date=June 19, 2008 |title=Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2007 |publisher=Department of Health (United Kingdom) |url=http://www.dh.gov.uk/en/Publicationsandstatistics/Publications/PublicationsStatistics/DH_085508 |accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref> In Scotland, 69.1% of early abortions (less than 10 weeks gestation) in 2007 were medical (up from 55.8% in 1992 when medical abortion was introduced); the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 15 years (from 16.4% in 1992 to 61.8% in 2007).<ref>{{cite web |author=ISD Scotland |date=May 27, 2008 |title=Abortion Statistics, year ending December 2007 |publisher=Information Services Division (ISD), NHS National Services Scotland |url=http://www.isdscotland.org/isd/5644.html |accessdate=2009-04-27}}</ref> In Sweden, 82.9% of early abortions (before the end of the 9th week of gestation) and 69.0% of abortions before the end of the 12th week of gestation in 2008 were medical; 64.2% of all abortions in 2008 were medical.<ref>{{cite web |author=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |date=April 29, 2009 |title=Induced Abortions 2008 |publisher=National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden |url=http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/NR/rdonlyres/93831CA6-90A3-4755-8BCE-CD6EABCD6209/13853/200912510_rev3.pdf |accessdate=2009-05-16}}</ref>


In Denmark, mifepristone was used in between 3,000 and 4,000 of just over 15,000 abortions in 2005.<ref>{{cite web|title=The abortion pill Mifegyne tested for adverse reactions|publisher=Danish Medicines Agency|date=July 27, 2005|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://www.dkma.dk/1024/visUKLSArtikel.asp?artikelI=1 | d=6496}}</ref> Mifepristone is not approved in Ireland, where abortion is illegal, or Poland, where abortion is highly restricted.<ref>{{cite web|author=Peter S. Green|title=A Rocky Landfall for a Dutch Abortion Boat|publisher=''The New York Times''|date=June 24, 2003|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9F02E3D7153BF937A15755C0A9659C8B63}}</ref> Clinical trials in Italy have been constrained by protocols requiring women be hospitalized for three days, and the drug remains unavailable to the general public.<ref>{{cite web |author=Rey, Anne-Marie Rey |month=October 17, |year=2006 |title=Abortion in Italy |url=http://64.233.179.104/translate_c?hl=en&u=http://www.svss-uspda.ch/fr/facts/italie.htm&prev=/search%3Fq%3D%2522Silvio%2BViale%2522%2Bsuspended%26hl%3Den%26rls%3Dcom.microsoft:en-US |publisher=SVSS-USPDA |accessdate=2007-03-01}}</ref> It was approved in [[Hungary]] in 2005, but as of 2005 had not been released on the market yet, and was the target of protests.<ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion pill sparks bitter protest|publisher=The Budapest Times|date=September 19, 2005|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://www.budapesttimes.hu/index.php?art=1077}}</ref>
In Denmark, mifepristone was used in between 3,000 and 4,000 of just over 15,000 abortions in 2005.<ref>{{cite web|title=The abortion pill Mifegyne tested for adverse reactions|publisher=Danish Medicines Agency|date=July 27, 2005|accessdate=2006-09-20|url=http://www.dkma.dk/1024/visUKLSArtikel.asp?artikelI=1 | d=6496}}</ref> Mifepristone is not approved in Ireland, where abortion is illegal, or Poland, where abortion is highly restricted.<ref>{{cite web|author=Peter S. Green|title=A Rocky Landfall for a Dutch Abortion Boat|publisher=''The New York Times''|date=June 24, 2003|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?sec=health&res=9F02E3D7153BF937A15755C0A9659C8B63}}</ref> In Italy clinical trials have been constrained by protocols requiring women be hospitalized for three days, but the drug was finally approved in 2009 despite strong opposition from the Vatican.<ref>{{cite web |author= BBC News |month=July 31, |year=2009 |title=Abortion pill approved in Italy |url=http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/8178152.stm |publisher= |accessdate=2009-07-31}}</ref> It was approved in [[Hungary]] in 2005, but as of 2005 had not been released on the market yet, and was the target of protests.<ref>{{cite web|title=Abortion pill sparks bitter protest|publisher=The Budapest Times|date=September 19, 2005|accessdate=2006-09-16|url=http://www.budapesttimes.hu/index.php?art=1077}}</ref>


===Other countries===
===Other countries===

Revision as of 16:16, 31 July 2009

Mifepristone
Clinical data
Pregnancy
category
  • Used for terminating pregnancy
Routes of
administration
Oral
ATC code
Legal status
Legal status
Pharmacokinetic data
Bioavailability69%
Metabolismhepatic
Elimination half-life18 hours
ExcretionFecal: 83%; Renal: 9%
Identifiers
  • 11β-[p-(Dimethylamino)phenyl]-
    17β-hydroxy-17-(1-propynyl)estra-
    4,9-dien-3-one
CAS Number
PubChem CID
DrugBank
ChemSpider
CompTox Dashboard (EPA)
ECHA InfoCard100.127.911 Edit this at Wikidata
Chemical and physical data
FormulaC29H35NO2
Molar mass429.60 g/mol g·mol−1

Mifepristone is a synthetic steroid compound used as a pharmaceutical. It is used as an abortifacient in the first two months of pregnancy, and in smaller doses as an emergency contraceptive. During early trials, it was known as RU-486, its designation at the Roussel Uclaf company, which designed the drug. The drug was initially made available in France, and other countries then followed—often amid controversy. In France and countries other than the United States it is marketed and distributed by Exelgyn Laboratories under the tradename Mifegyne. In the United States it is sold by Danco Laboratories under the tradename Mifeprex. It is a prescription drug, but it is not available to the public through pharmacies; its distribution is restricted to specially qualified licensed physicians.

History

The compound was discovered by researchers at Roussel Uclaf of France in 1980 (the "RU" in RU-486) while they were studying glucocorticoid receptor antagonists. Étienne-Émile Baulieu recognized its anti-progesterone activities and saw its potential for the induction of a medical abortion. Clinical testing began in 1982. The drug was first licensed in France in 1988, for use in combination with a prostaglandin, under the name Mifegyne. After license approval but before market release, Roussel Uclaf announced it would abandon distribution of the drug, bowing to pressure from pro-life groups and the threat of a boycott. However, two days later, the French government, part owner of Roussel Uclaf, intervened, leading to the resumption of production and distribution of RU-486. The French Health Minister, explaining the government's intervention, stated, "I could not permit the abortion debate to deprive women of a product that represents medical progress. From the moment Government approval for the drug was granted, RU-486 became the moral property of women."[2]

Indications

Mifegyne is sold outside the U.S. by Exelgyn Laboratories, made in France, and is approved for:

  1. Medical termination of intrauterine pregnancies of up to 49 days gestation (up to 63 days gestation in Britain and Sweden)
  2. Softening and dilatation of the cervix prior to mechanical cervical dilatation for pregnancy termination
  3. Use in combination with gemeprost for termination of pregnancies between 13 and 24 weeks gestation
  4. Labor induction in fetal death in utero.[3]

Mifeprex is sold in the U.S. by Danco Laboratories, made in China,[4] and is U.S. Food and Drug Administration-approved to terminate intrauterine pregnancies of up to 49 days gestation. Under the FDA-approved regimen, a 600 mg dose is administered by a clinician following a counseling session. Two days later, a clinician administers 400 µg of another medicine, misoprostol, to induce contractions. In European studies, this method terminated 96 to 99% of pregnancies of up to 49 days gestation, but in one large multicenter trial in the U.S. conducted from September 1994 to September 1995, the efficacy was lower (92%), which the authors of the study suggested may have been due to lack of experience with this method in the U.S. and/or the design of their study.[5] In Europe and China, an observation period of several hours is required after administration of misoprostol. If expulsion of fetal tissue does not occur during the observation period, surgical abortion is offered. There is no required observation period in the U.S., but it is strongly recommended.[6]

According to the current RCOG abortion evidence-based clinical guideline:[7]

  • All methods of first-trimester abortion carry a small risk of failure to terminate the pregnancy, thus necessitating a further procedure. The risk for surgical abortion is around 0.23% and for medical abortion between 0.1% and 1.4% (depending on the regimen used and the experience of the centre).
  • Medical abortion using mifepristone plus prostaglandin is the most effective method of abortion at gestations of less than 7 weeks.
  • Conventional vacuum aspiration should be avoided at gestations below 7 weeks.
  • Early vacuum aspiration using a rigorous protocol (which includes magnification of aspirated material and indications for serum βhCG follow-up) may be used at gestations below 7 weeks, although data suggest that the failure rate is higher than for medical abortion.
  • Medical abortion using mifepristone plus prostaglandin continues to be an appropriate method for women in the 7–9 week gestation band.

Mifepristone can also be used in smaller doses as an emergency contraceptive; if taken after sex but before ovulation, it can prevent ovulation and so prevent pregnancy. In this role, a 10 mg dose is not as effective as the 600 mg dose, but has fewer side-effects.[8] Mifeprex and Mifegyne are only available in 200 mg tablets.[9] A review of studies in humans found that the contraceptive effects of the 10 mg dose were probably due mainly to its effects on ovulation, and not inhibition of implantation, but "the knowledge of the mechanism of action remains incomplete." Treatment with 200 mg of mifepristone changes steroid receptor expression in the fallopian tube, inhibits endometrial development, and effectively prevents implantation.[10]

Other uses

Other medical applications of mifepristone that have been studied in Phase II clinical trials include regular long-term use as an oral contraceptive, and treatment of: uterine fibroids, endometriosis, major depression with psychotic features, glaucoma, meningiomas, breast cancer, ovarian cancer, prostate cancer, and some types of Cushing's syndrome.

Mifepristone has been studied as an antiretroviral for its in vivo interference with the HIV regulatory protein vpr. It showed no detectable anti-HIV activity in clinical trials.[11] [12][13][14] It is currently being studied as a treatment for chronic multisymptom illness.[15] Mifepristone has not been approved by the FDA for any of these uses.

Mifepristone has shown significant effectiveness[16] in psychotic major depression, a form of depression resistant to normal treatment. The effect was rapid and the study was double-blinded, but it was limited by small study group and limited treatment duration.

Contraindications

In clinical trials, nearly all women using mifepristone experienced abdominal pain, uterine cramping, and vaginal bleeding or spotting for an average of 9–16 days. Up to 8% of women experienced some type of bleeding for 30 days or more. Other less common side effects included nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, dizziness, fatigue, and fever.[17] Pelvic inflammatory disease (PID) is a very rare but serious complication.[18] Excessive bleeding and incomplete termination of a pregnancy require further intervention by a doctor (such as vacuum aspiration). Between 4.5 and 7.9% of women required surgical intervention in clinical trials.[17] Mifepristone is contraindicated in the presence of an intrauterine device (IUD), as well as with ectopic pregnancy, adrenal failure, hemorrhagic disorders, inherited porphyria, and anticoagulant or long-term corticosteroid therapy.[17]

The FDA prescribing information states that there are no data on the safety and efficacy of mifepristone in women with chronic medical conditions, and that "women who are more than 35 years of age and who also smoke 10 or more cigarettes per day should be treated with caution because such patients were generally excluded from clinical trials of mifepristone."[17]

Adverse effects

No long-term studies to evaluate the carcinogenic potential of mifepristone have been performed. Results from studies conducted in vitro and in animals have revealed no genotoxic potential for mifepristone.

Neonatal exposure to a single large dose of mifepristone in rats was not associated with any reproductive problems, although chronic low-dose exposure of newborn rats to mifepristone was associated with structural and functional reproductive abnormalities.[17]

Teratology studies in mice, rats and rabbits revealed teratogenicty for rabbits, but not rats or mice.[17] The rate of birth defects in human infants exposed in utero to mifepristone and misoprostol is very low,[19] and may be due to misoprostol alone.[20]

Pharmacology

In the presence of progesterone, mifepristone acts as a competitive receptor antagonist at the progesterone receptor (in the absence of progesterone, mifepristone acts as a partial agonist). Mifepristone is a 19-nor steroid with a bulky p-(dimethylamino)phenyl substituent above the plane of the molecule at the 11β-position responsible for inducing or stabilizing an inactive receptor conformation and a hydrophobic 1-propynyl substituent below the plane of the molecule at the 17α-position that increases its progesterone receptor binding affinity.[21][12][22]

In addition to being an antiprogestogen, mifepristone is also an antiglucocorticoid and a weak antiandrogen. Mifepristone's relative binding affinity at the progesterone receptor is more than twice that of progesterone, its relative binding affinity at the glucocorticoid receptor is more than three times that of dexamethasone and more than ten times that of cortisol, its relative binding affinity at the androgen receptor is less than one third that of testosterone. It does not bind to the estrogen receptor or the mineralocorticoid receptor.[23]

Mifepristone as a regular contraceptive at 2 mg daily prevents ovulation (1 mg daily does not). A single preovulatory 10 mg dose of mifepristone delays ovulation by 3 to 4 days and is as effective an emergency contraceptive as a single 1.5 mg dose of the progestin levonorgestrel.[13]

In women, mifepristone at doses greater or equal to 1 mg/kg antagonizes the endometrial and myometrial effects of progesterone. In humans, an antiglucocorticoid effect of mifepristone is manifested at doses greater or equal to 4.5 mg/kg by a compensatory increase in ACTH and cortisol. In animals, a weak antiandrogenic effect is seen with prolonged administration of very high doses of 10 to 100 mg/kg.[3][24]

In medical abortion regimens, mifepristone blockade of progesterone receptors directly causes endometrial decidual degeneration, cervical softening and dilatation, release of endogenous prostaglandins and an increase in the sensitivity of the myometrium to the contractile effects of prostaglandins. Mifepristone induced decidual breakdown indirectly leads to trophoblast detachment, resulting in decreased syncytiotrophoblast production of hCG, which in turn causes decreased production of progesterone by the corpus luteum (pregnancy is dependent on progesterone production by the corpus luteum through the first 9 weeks of gestation--until placental progesterone production has increased enough to take the place of corpus luteum progesterone production). When followed sequentially by a prostaglandin, mifepristone 200 mg is (100 mg may be, but 50 mg is not) as effective as 600 mg in producing a medical abortion.[21][22]

Legal status

United States

Roussel Uclaf did not seek U.S. approval, so U.S. availability was not an initial possibility.[25] The first Bush administration banned importation of Mifepristone for personal use in 1989, a decision supported by Roussel Uclaf. In 1994, Roussel Uclaf gave the U.S. drug rights to the Population Council in exchange for immunity from any product liability claims.[26][27] The Population Council sponsored US clinical trials.[28] The drug went on approvable status from 1996. Production was intended to begin through the Danco Group in 1996 but they withdrew briefly in 1997 due to a corrupt business partner, delaying availability again.[29][30] Mifepristone was approved for abortion in the U.S. by the FDA, in September 2000, during the final months of President Bill Clinton's administration.[31] It is legal and available in all 50 states, Washington D.C., Guam and Puerto Rico.[32]

Medical abortions as a percentage of total abortions in the United States have increased every year since the approval of mifepristone: 1.0% in 2000, 2.9% in 2001, 5.2% in 2002, 7.9% in 2003, 9.3% in 2004, 9.9% in 2005 (15.1% of those at less than 9 weeks gestation); although data is limited by ten states not reporting statistics to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (including California where an estimated >23% of total U.S. abortions were performed in 1997).[33]

Subsection H

Some drugs are approved by the FDA under sub-section H, which has two sub-parts. The first sets forth ways to rush experimental drugs, such as aggressive HIV and cancer treatments, to market when speedy approval is deemed vital to the health of potential patients. The second part of sub-section H applies to drugs that not only must meet restrictions for use due to safety requirements, but also are required to meet postmarketing surveillance to establish that the safety results shown in clinical trials are seconded by use in a much wider population. Mifepristone was approved under the second part of sub-section H. The result is that women cannot pick the drug up at a pharmacy but must now receive it directly from a doctor. Due to the possibility of adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding which may require a blood transfusion and incomplete abortion which may require surgical intervention, the drug is only considered safe if a physician who is capable of administering a blood transfusion or a surgical abortion is available to the patient in the event of such emergencies.[34] The approval of mifepristone under Subsection H included a black box warning.

FDA controversy

Many pro-life groups in the US actively campaigned against the approval of mifepristone,[35][36][37] and continue to actively campaign for its withdrawal.[38] They cite either ethical issues with abortion or safety concerns regarding the drug and the adverse reactions associated with it, including death.[39] The proposed "RU-486 Suspension and Review Act," also known as Holly's Law, was initiated by a citizen's petition to the FDA from namesake Holly Patterson's father,[40] and the May 17, 2006 House Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources hearing entitled "RU-486 - Demonstrating a Low Standard for Women’s Health?”[41]—called by its pro-life chairman Rep. Mark Souder—are the principal results of this effort. Religious and pro-life groups outside the US have also protested mifepristone, especially in Germany[42] and Australia.[43][44]

A small but vocal group of female scientists from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology's Institute on Women and Technology issued a report under the name of "Feminist International Network of Resistance to Reproductive and Genetic Engineering" in the early '90s to express their opposition to mifepristone, because "We felt what was being lost in the political debate was how the drug affects women. In contrast with the groups who are anti-feminist and anti-abortion, the Institute on Women and Technology advocates women's rights to abortion and self determination," said Dr. Janice Raymond of FINRRAGE. Additional feminist critics exist, such as Pauline Connor (LI.B.) of Feminists Against Eugenics in England who stated, "What has been presented as a simple, pill-popping exercise is, in fact, an intensely medicalized and painful procedure which can involve up to four clinic visits and last 12 days."[45]

Europe

Mifepristone was approved for use in France in 1988 (initial marketing in 1989), the United Kingdom in 1991, Sweden in 1992, then Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, Greece, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Spain, and Switzerland in 1999.[46] In 2000, it was approved in Norway, Russia and Ukraine. Serbia and Montenegro approved it in 2001,[47] Belarus and Latvia in 2002, Estonia in 2003, Moldova in 2004, Albania and Hungary in 2005, Portugal in 2007, and Romania in 2008.[48] In Sweden and the UK, mifepristone is licensed for use with vaginal gemeprost instead of oral misoprostol. As of 2000, more than 620,000 women in Europe had had medical abortions using a mifepristone regimen.[49]

In France, the percentage of medical abortions of all abortions continues to increase: 38% in 2003, 42% in 2004, 44% in 2005, 46% in 2006 (vs. 18% in 1996).[50] In England and Wales, 43% of early abortions (less than 9 weeks gestation) in 2007 were medical; the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 12 years (from 5% in 1995 to 35% in 2007) and has more than doubled in the last five years.[51] In Scotland, 69.1% of early abortions (less than 10 weeks gestation) in 2007 were medical (up from 55.8% in 1992 when medical abortion was introduced); the percentage of all abortions that are medical has increased every year for the past 15 years (from 16.4% in 1992 to 61.8% in 2007).[52] In Sweden, 82.9% of early abortions (before the end of the 9th week of gestation) and 69.0% of abortions before the end of the 12th week of gestation in 2008 were medical; 64.2% of all abortions in 2008 were medical.[53]

In Denmark, mifepristone was used in between 3,000 and 4,000 of just over 15,000 abortions in 2005.[54] Mifepristone is not approved in Ireland, where abortion is illegal, or Poland, where abortion is highly restricted.[55] In Italy clinical trials have been constrained by protocols requiring women be hospitalized for three days, but the drug was finally approved in 2009 despite strong opposition from the Vatican.[56] It was approved in Hungary in 2005, but as of 2005 had not been released on the market yet, and was the target of protests.[57]

Other countries

The pill was authorized in Italy on July 30th 2009. It must be' prescribed and used in a clinical structure and is not sold at chemists.

Mifepristone was banned in Australia in 1996. In late 2005, a Private Member's bill was introduced to the Australian Senate to lift the ban and transfer the power of approval to the Therapeutic Good Administration (TGA). The move caused much debate in the Australian media and amongst politicians. The Bill passed the Senate on 10 February 2006, and whilst mifepristone is now legal for use in Australia, as of yet, no drug company has applied to import and distribute it. Currently there are only a couple of known instances where a doctor has applied to the TGA for dispensing mifepristone in specific cases.

In New Zealand, pro-choice doctors established an import company, Istar, and submitted a request for approval to MedSafe, the New Zealand pharmaceutical regulatory agency. After a court case brought by Right to Life New Zealand failed, use of mifepristone was permitted.[58]

The drug was approved in Israel in 1999.[59]

Clinical trials of mifepristone in China began in 1985. In October 1988, China became the first country in the world to approve mifepristone. Chinese organizations tried to purchase mifepristone from Roussel Uclaf, who refused to sell it to them, so in 1992 China began its own domestic production of mifepristone. In 2000, the cost of medical abortion with mifepristone was higher than surgical abortion and the percentage of medical abortions varied greatly, ranging from 30% to 70% in cities to being almost nonexistent in rural areas.[60][61] A report from the United States Embassy in Beijing in 2000 said mifepristone had been widely used in Chinese cites for about two years, and that according to press reports a black market had developed with many women starting to buy it illegally (without a prescription) from private clinics and drugstores for about $15, causing Chinese authorities to worry about medical complications from use without physician supervision.[62]

In 2001, mifepristone was approved in Taiwan.[63] Vietnam included mifepristone in the National Reproductive Health program in 2002.[64]

It is approved in only one subsaharan African country—South Africa, where it was approved in 2001.[65] It is also approved in one north African country—Tunisia, also in 2001.[66]

Mifepristone was approved for use in India in 2002, where medical abortion is referred to as "Medical Termination of Pregnancy" (MTP). It is only available under medical supervision, not by prescription, due to adverse reactions such as excessive bleeding, and there are criminal penalties for buying or selling it on the black market or over-the-counter at pharmacies.[67]

Medical abortion is available in Canada on a limited basis using methotrexate and misoprostol; mifepristone is not legally approved, and importation of that drug in Canada is currently illegal. Clinical trials were done in 2000 in various Canadian cities comparing methotrexate to mifepristone, after approbation by the federal government. While both drugs had overall similar results, mifepristone was found to act faster.[68] As of May 2005, it is unclear whether or when RU-486 will be approved for use in Canada.[69]

Mifepristone was registered for use in Azerbaijan, Georgia, and Uzbekistan in 2002, Guyana and Moldova in 2004, Mongolia in 2005, and Armenia in 2007.[48][70]

Notes and references

  1. ^ "FDA-sourced list of all drugs with black box warnings (Use Download Full Results and View Query links.)". nctr-crs.fda.gov. FDA. Retrieved 22 Oct 2023.
  2. ^ Julie A. Hogan (2000). "The Life of the Abortion Pill in the United States". Legal Electronic Document Archive, Harvard Law School. Retrieved 2006-09-14.
  3. ^ a b Exelgyn Laboratories (2006). "Mifegyne UK Summary of Product Characteristics (SPC)". Retrieved 2007-03-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  4. ^ "Chinese to Make RU-486 for U.S." Washingtonpost.com. 2000. Retrieved 2006-08-22.
  5. ^ Spitz IM, Bardin CW, Benton L, Robbins A (1998). "Early pregnancy termination with mifepristone and misoprostol in the United States". N Engl J Med. 338 (18): 1241–7. doi:10.1056/NEJM199804303381801. PMID 9562577.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  6. ^ Suzanne Daley (October 5, 2000). "Europe Finds Abortion Pill is No Magic Cure-All". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-09-16. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  7. ^ RCOG (2004). The Care of Women Requesting Induced Abortion : Evidence-based clinical guideline number 7 (PDF). London: RCOG Press. ISBN 1-904752-06-3.
  8. ^ Piaggio G; et al. (2003). "Meta-analysis of randomized trials comparing different doses of mifepristone in emergency contraception". Contraception. 68 (6): 447. doi:10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00142-2. PMID 14698075. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  9. ^ Wertheimer, Randy E. (2000-11-15). "Emergency Postcoital Contraception" (HTML). American Family Physician. American Academy of Family Physicians. Retrieved 2006-07-23. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. ^ Gemzell-Danielsson, K. (2004-06-10). "Mechanisms of action of mifepristone and levonorgestrel when used for emergency contraception". Human Reproduction Update. 10 (4). Oxford University Press: 341–348. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmh027. PMID 15192056. {{cite journal}}: |access-date= requires |url= (help); |format= requires |url= (help); Check date values in: |date= (help); Unknown parameter |coauthors= ignored (|author= suggested) (help)
  11. ^ Flexner, Charles. “HIV drug development: the next 25 years”. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007 Dec;6(12):959-66.
  12. ^ a b Schimmer, Bernard P.; Parker, Keith L. (2006). "Adrenocorticotropic Hormone; Adrenocortical Steroids and Their Synthetic Analogs; Inhibitors of the Synthesis and Actions of Adrenocortical Hormones". In in Brunton, Laurence L.; Lazo, John S.; Parker, Keith L. (eds.) (ed.). Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1587–1612. ISBN 0-07-142280-3. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  13. ^ a b Chabbert-Buffet N, Meduri G, Bouchard P, Spitz IM (2005). "Selective progesterone receptor modulators and progesterone antagonists: mechanisms of action and clinical applications". Hum Reprod Update. 11 (3): 293–307. doi:10.1093/humupd/dmi002. PMID 15790602.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  14. ^ Tang OS, Ho PC (2006). "Clinical applications of mifepristone". Gynecol Endocrinol. 22 (12): 655–9. doi:10.1080/09513590601005946. PMID 17162706.
  15. ^ "A Controlled Trial of Mifepristone in Gulf War Veterans With Chronic Multisymptom Illness". ClinicalTrials.gov. U.S. National Institutes of Health. 2008. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help) Retrieved on November 7, 2008.
  16. ^ Belanoff JK, Flores BH, Kalezhan M, Sund B, Schatzberg AF (2001). "Rapid reversal of psychotic depression using mifepristone". J Clin Psychopharmacol. 21 (5): 516–21. doi:10.1097/00004714-200110000-00009. PMID 11593077. {{cite journal}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  17. ^ a b c d e f "Mifeprex label" (PDF). FDA. 2005-07-19. Retrieved 2006-08-22.
  18. ^ Lawton, BA; et al. (2006). "Atypical presentation of serious pelvic inflammatory disease following mifepristone-induced abortion". Contraception. 73 (4): 431-2. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2005.09.003. PMID 16531180. {{cite journal}}: Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help); More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)
  19. ^ Margaret M. Gary and Donna J. Harrison (2005). "Analysis of Severe Adverse Events Related to the Use of Mifepristone as an Abortifacient". The Annals of Pharmacology. Retrieved 2006-09-14. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  20. ^ Orioli, IM and Castilla, EE (2000). "Epidemiological assessment of misoprostol teratogenicity". BJOG. 107 (4): 519–23. doi:10.1111/j.1471-0528.2000.tb13272.x. PMID 10759272.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  21. ^ a b Loose, Davis S.; Stancel, George M. (2006). "Estrogens and Progestins". In in Brunton, Laurence L.; Lazo, John S.; Parker, Keith L. (eds.) (ed.). Goodman & Gilman's The Pharmacological Basis of Therapeutics (11th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. pp. 1541–1571. ISBN 0-07-142280-3. {{cite book}}: |editor= has generic name (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  22. ^ a b Fiala C, Gemzel-Danielsson K (2006). "Review of medical abortion using mifepristone in combination with a prostaglandin analogue". Contraception. 74 (1): 66–86. doi:10.1016/j.contraception.2006.03.018. PMID 16781264.
  23. ^ Heikinheimo O, Kekkonen R, Lahteenmaki P (2003). "The pharmacokinetics of mifepristone in humans reveal insights into differential mechanisms of antiprogestin action". Contraception. 68 (6): 421–6. doi:10.1016/S0010-7824(03)00077-5. PMID 14698071.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  24. ^ Danco Laboratories (2005). "Mifeprex US prescribing information" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-03-09. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  25. ^ Klitsch M (Nov-December 1991). "Antiprogestins and the abortion controversy: a progress report". Fam Plann Perspect. 23 (6): 275–82. doi:10.2307/2135779. PMID 1786809. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |year= (help)
  26. ^ Katharine Q. Seelye (1997-01-05-17). "Accord Opens Way for Abortion Pill in US in 2 Years". Retrieved 2006-08-26. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  27. ^ Nancy Gibbs (October 2, 2000). "The Pill Arrives". Cnn.com. Retrieved 2006-09-20.
  28. ^ Tamar Lewin (January 30, 1995). "Clinical Trials Giving Glimpse of Abortion Pill". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-09-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  29. ^ Tamar Lewin (November 13, 1997). "Lawsuits' Settlement Brings New Hope for Abortion Pill". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-09-16. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  30. ^ Sharon Lerner (2000). "RU Pissed Off Yet?". Village Voice. Retrieved 2006-09-16. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help); Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  31. ^ "FDA approval letter for Mifepristone". U.S. Gov. September 28, 2000. Retrieved 2006-09-16.
  32. ^ "Medication Abortion in the United States: Mifepristone Fact Sheet". Gynuity Health Projects. 2005.
  33. ^ Gamble SB, Strauss LT, Parker WY, Cook DA, Zane SB, Hamdan S; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) (November 28, 2008). "Abortion surveillance--United States, 2005" (PDF). MMWR Surveill Summ. 57 (13): 1–32. Retrieved 2009-04-27.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  34. ^ Woodcock, Janet (2006-05-12). "Testimony on RU-486". Committee on Government Reform, House of Representatives. FDA. Retrieved 2006-08-19.
  35. ^ Paige Comstock Cunningham, Leanne McCoy, Clarke D. Ferguson (February 28, 1995). "Citizen Petition to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration". Americans United for Life. Retrieved 2006-09-20.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  36. ^ Margaret Talbot (July 11, 1999). "The Little White Bombshell". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-09-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  37. ^ "Abortion Foes To Boycott Drugs (Altace) Made By RU-486 Manufacturer". The Virginia Pilot. July 8, 1994. Retrieved 2006-09-15. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  38. ^ Stan Guthrie (June 11, 2001). "Counteroffensive Launched on RU-486". Christianity Today. Retrieved 2006-09-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  39. ^ Gina Kolata (September 24, 2003). "Death at 18 Spurs Debate Over a Pill For Abortion". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-09-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  40. ^ Karen Tumulty (October 14, 2002). "Jesus and the FDA". Time. Retrieved 2006-09-20. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  41. ^ "RU-486 - Demonstrating a Low Standard for Women's Health?". House Subcommittee on Criminal Justice, Drug Policy and Human Resources. 2006-05-17. Retrieved 2006-08-25. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |d= ignored (help)
  42. ^ John L. Allen (February 12, 1999). "Abortion debates rock Germany: introduction of abortion pill exacerbates controversy". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved 2006-09-14. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help); Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  43. ^ "Catholic and Evangelical students join Muslims in RU-486 fight". Catholic News. February 9, 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-18. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  44. ^ "Death Toll Rises to 11 Women". Australians Against RU-486. 2006. Retrieved 2006-09-20.
  45. ^ Annette MacDonald (1992). "RU-486: A Dangerous Drug". The Vancouver Sun. Retrieved 2006-08-22.
  46. ^ Christin-Maitre S, Bouchard P, Spitz IM (2000). "Medical termination of pregnancy". N Engl J Med. 342 (13): 946–56. doi:10.1056/NEJM200003303421307. PMID 10738054.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  47. ^ Stojnic J; et al. (2006). "Medicamentous abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol in Serbia and Montenegro". 63 (6): 558–63. PMID 16796021. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help); Explicit use of et al. in: |author= (help)
  48. ^ a b Gynuity Health Projects (March 12, 2008). "Mifepristone approval" (PDF). Gynuity Health Projects. Retrieved 2009-04-27.
  49. ^ "FDA Approves Mifepristone for the Termination of Early Pregnancy". FDA press release/US Gov. 2000. Retrieved 2009-04-27.
  50. ^ Vilain, Annick (September 2008). "Voluntary terminations of pregnancies in 2006" (PDF). DREES, Ministry of Health. Retrieved 2009-04-27.
  51. ^ Department of Health (June 19, 2008). "Abortion statistics, England and Wales: 2007". Department of Health (United Kingdom). Retrieved 2009-04-27.
  52. ^ ISD Scotland (May 27, 2008). "Abortion Statistics, year ending December 2007". Information Services Division (ISD), NHS National Services Scotland. Retrieved 2009-04-27.
  53. ^ National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden (April 29, 2009). "Induced Abortions 2008" (PDF). National Board of Health and Welfare, Sweden. Retrieved 2009-05-16.
  54. ^ "The abortion pill Mifegyne tested for adverse reactions". Danish Medicines Agency. July 27, 2005. Retrieved 2006-09-20. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |d= ignored (help)
  55. ^ Peter S. Green (June 24, 2003). "A Rocky Landfall for a Dutch Abortion Boat". The New York Times. Retrieved 2006-09-16. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  56. ^ BBC News (2009). "Abortion pill approved in Italy". Retrieved 2009-07-31. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)
  57. ^ "Abortion pill sparks bitter protest". The Budapest Times. September 19, 2005. Retrieved 2006-09-16.
  58. ^ Sparrow MJ (2004). "A woman's choice". Aust NZ J Obstet Gynaecol. 44 (2): 88-92. doi:10.1111/j.1479-828X.2004.00190.x. PMID 15089829. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)
  59. ^ Etienne-Emile Baulieu, Daniel S. Seidman, Selma Hajri (2001). "Mifepristone(RU-486) and voluntary termination of prgnancy: enigmatic variations or anecdotal religion-based attitudes?". Human Reproduction. Retrieved 2006-09-16. {{cite web}}: Unknown parameter |month= ignored (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  60. ^ Ulmann A (2000). "The development of mifepristone: a pharmaceutical drama in three acts". J Am Med Women's Assoc. 55 (3 Suppl): 117–20. PMID 10846319.
  61. ^ Wu S (2000). "Medical abortion in China". J Am Med Women's Assoc. 55 (3 Suppl): 197–9, 204. PMID 10846339.
  62. ^ "Family planning in China: RU-486, abortion, and population trends". U.S. Embassy Beijing. 2000. Retrieved 2006-09-14.
  63. ^ Tsai EM, Yang CH, Lee JN (2002). "Medical abortion with mifepristone and misoprostol: a clinical trial in Taiwanese women". J Formos Med Assoc. 101 (4): 277–82. PMID 12101864.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  64. ^ Ganatra B, Bygdeman M, Nguyen DV, Vu ML, Phan BT (2004). "From research to reality: the challenges of introducing medical abortion into service delivery in Vietnam". Reprod Health Matters. 12 (24): 105-13. doi:10.1016/S0968-8080(04)24022-8. PMID 15938163. {{cite journal}}: More than one of |pages= and |page= specified (help)CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  65. ^ "Medical Abortion-Implications for Africa". Ipas. 2003. Retrieved 2006-09-16.
  66. ^ Hajri S (2004). "Medication abortion: the Tunisian experience". Afr J Reprod Health. 8 (1): 63–9. doi:10.2307/3583307. PMID 15487615.
  67. ^ "Mifepristone can be sold only to approved MTP Centres: Rajasthan State HRC". Indian Express Health Care Management. 2000.
  68. ^ ."Results of the Canadian trials of RU486, the 'Abortion Pill'." (n.d.). Retrieved 2006-12-08.
  69. ^ Jennifer Laliberte (September 30, 2005). "Still no mifepristone for Canada: is it safe?". National Review of Medicine. Retrieved 2006-09-16. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  70. ^ "Medication Abortion". Ibis. 2002. Retrieved 2006-09-19.

See also

External links

Template:AbortionMethods-horizontal Template:Sex hormones