Crimen sollicitationis: Difference between revisions
Returned image to top. Template lower down, since this document is not mainly related to child abuse |
What is normally meant by the term is the 1962 document |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{dablink| For the song of the same title, please see [[Crimen sollicitationis (song)]]}} |
{{dablink| For the song of the same title, please see [[Crimen sollicitationis (song)]]}} |
||
[[File:SantCompostela25.jpg|thumb|250px|right|The Latin expression ''crimen sollicitationis'' refers to a sexual advance made before, during or immediately after administration (even simulated) of the [[Sacrament of Penance (Catholic Church)|Sacrament of Penance]]<ref>"Crimen sollicitationis habetur cum sacerdos aliquem poenitentem, quaecumque persona illa sit, vel in actu sacramentalis |
[[File:SantCompostela25.jpg|thumb|250px|right|The Latin expression ''crimen sollicitationis'' refers to a sexual advance made before, during or immediately after administration (even simulated) of the [[Sacrament of Penance (Catholic Church)|Sacrament of Penance]]<ref>"Crimen sollicitationis habetur cum sacerdos aliquem poenitentem, quaecumque persona illa sit, vel in actu sacramentalis confessionis ..." (opening words of the document)</ref>]] |
||
'''''Crimen sollicitationis''''' ({{lang-la|the crime of soliciting}}) was a |
'''''Crimen sollicitationis''''' ({{lang-la|the crime of soliciting}}) was a 1962 document from the Holy Office (which is now called the [[Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith]]) codifying procedures to be followed in cases of [[Priesthood (Catholic Church)|priests]] or bishops of the [[Catholic Church]] accused of having used the sacrament of [[Sacrament of Penance (Catholic Church)|Penance]] to make sexual advances to penitents.<ref name=Doyle>[http://www.richardsipe.com/Doyle/2008/2008-10-03-Commentary%20on%201922%20and%201962%20documents.pdf Thomas Doyle, ''The 1922 instruction and the the 1962 instruction "''Crimen sollictationis''" promulgated by the Vatican]</ref><ref>[http://www.bishop-accountability.org/resources/resource-files/churchdocs/EpistulaEnglish.htm De delictis gravioribus,] footnote 3</ref> |
||
It repeated, with additions, the contents of an instruction issued in 1922 by the same office.<ref name=Doyle/><ref>[http://www.justice.ie/en/JELR/Part%201.pdf/Files/Part%201.pdf Murphy Report], Irish Government, 2009. Para 4.18-19</ref> |
|||
⚫ | The |
||
⚫ | The 1962 document, approved by [[Pope John XXIII]] and signed by Cardinal [[Alfredo Ottaviani]], Secretary of the Holy Office, was addressed to "all [[Patriarch#Patriarchs of the Catholic Church|Patriarchs]], [[Archbishop#Catholic Church)|Archbishops]], [[Bishop (Catholic Church)|Bishop]]s and other [[Ordinary|Local Ordinaries]], including those of [[Eastern Catholic Churches|Eastern Rite]]". It gave specific instructions on how to carry out the rules in the [[Canon Law (Catholic Church)#Codification|Code of Canon Law]]:<ref>[http://www.intratext.com/IXT/LAT0813/_P4X.HTM Codex Iuris Canonici (1917), Liber quartus: De processibus]</ref> on dealing with such cases, and directed that the same procedures be used when dealing with denunciations of [[homosexuality|homosexual]], [[paedophilia|paedophile]] or [[zoophilia|zoophile]] behaviour by clerics. Dioceses were to use the instruction for their own guidance and keep it in their archives for confidential documents;<ref>The rules concerning the secret archives, distinct from the general archives and the historical archives, are explained in [http://books.google.ie/books?id=X5rcnhLnRYMC&pg=PA643&lpg=PA643&dq=%22secret+archives%22+%22canon+law%22&source=bl&ots=ExpequKIUA&sig=Qa9yt8CrzJ7_V_HjSMBL2vyPl0w&hl=en&ei=GYGsS5vgFoqy0gTSh_iEDg&sa=X&oi=book_result&ct=result&resnum=10&ved=0CB8Q6AEwCQ#v=onepage&q=%22secret%20archives%22%20%22canon%20law%22&f=false John P. Beal, James A. Coriden, Thomas J. Green, A New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law,] 642-644.</ref> they were not to publish the instruction nor produce commentaries on it.<ref>"Servanda diligenter in archivio secreto curiae pro norma interna. Non publicanda nec ullis commentariis augenda" (heading of the Instruction).</ref> |
||
Media accounts sometimes presented the instruction as not concerned principally with sexual solicitation in [[Confession]], but with denunciations of paedophilia, and reported interpretations of the oath of secrecy about the conduct of the trial as a generic oath of secrecy, contrary to what the instruction itself stated.<ref name="Allen2003">{{cite web | url=http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/update/bn080703.htm |title=1962 document orders secrecy in sex cases: Many bishops unaware obscure missive was in their archives| last=Allen| first=John L. | authorlink=John L. Allen, Jr. | date=2003-08-07 | publisher=[[National Catholic Reporter]] | accessdate=2010-03-26}}</ref> |
Media accounts sometimes presented the instruction as not concerned principally with sexual solicitation in [[Confession]], but with denunciations of paedophilia, and reported interpretations of the oath of secrecy about the conduct of the trial as a generic oath of secrecy, contrary to what the instruction itself stated.<ref name="Allen2003">{{cite web | url=http://www.nationalcatholicreporter.org/update/bn080703.htm |title=1962 document orders secrecy in sex cases: Many bishops unaware obscure missive was in their archives| last=Allen| first=John L. | authorlink=John L. Allen, Jr. | date=2003-08-07 | publisher=[[National Catholic Reporter]] | accessdate=2010-03-26}}</ref> |
||
Line 117: | Line 119: | ||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
* Unofficial |
* Unofficial English translation provided by the [[Holy See]] (vatican.va): [http://www.vatican.va/resources/resources_crimen-sollicitationis-1962_en.html INSTRUCTION: On the Manner of Proceeding in Causes involving the Crime of Solicitation] |
||
* [http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/crimenlatinfull.pdf ''Instructio. De modo procedendi in causis de crimine sollicitationis''], original Latin text of ''Crimen sollicitationis'' with hand-written English annotations. The few lines on the final page are missing (confirmatory oath by the accused, and certification by the notary). |
* [http://www.cbsnews.com/htdocs/pdf/crimenlatinfull.pdf ''Instructio. De modo procedendi in causis de crimine sollicitationis''], original Latin text of ''Crimen sollicitationis'' with hand-written English annotations. The few lines on the final page are missing (confirmatory oath by the accused, and certification by the notary). |
||
* [http://www.sarabite.info/crimen.pdf ''Instruction on the Manner of Proceeding in Cases of Solicitation''] (44 pages, @ sarabite.info): |
* [http://www.sarabite.info/crimen.pdf ''Instruction on the Manner of Proceeding in Cases of Solicitation''] (44 pages, @ sarabite.info): private English translation of ''Crimen sollicitationis''. |
||
* [http://www.vatican.va/resources/Beal-article-studia-canonica41-2007-pp.199-236.pdf The 1962 instruction ''Crimen sollicitationis'': Caught red-handed or handed a red herring?] by John P. Beal in ''Studia canonica'', 41(2007), pp. 199-236 |
* [http://www.vatican.va/resources/Beal-article-studia-canonica41-2007-pp.199-236.pdf The 1962 instruction ''Crimen sollicitationis'': Caught red-handed or handed a red herring?] by John P. Beal in ''Studia canonica'', 41(2007), pp. 199-236 |
||
* [http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news5/2003_07_29_Shaw_VaticanDocument.htm "Vatican Document Instructed Secrecy in Abuse Cases"] by Kathleen A. Shaw in ''Worcester Telegram & Gazette'', 29 July 2003. Accessed 3 September 2007. |
* [http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news5/2003_07_29_Shaw_VaticanDocument.htm "Vatican Document Instructed Secrecy in Abuse Cases"] by Kathleen A. Shaw in ''Worcester Telegram & Gazette'', 29 July 2003. Accessed 3 September 2007. |
||
Line 125: | Line 127: | ||
* [http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word0815.htm ''Explaining ''Crimen Sollicitationis''"] by John L. Allen Jr., 15 August 2003 in National Catholic Reporter. Accessed 3 September 2007. |
* [http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/word/word0815.htm ''Explaining ''Crimen Sollicitationis''"] by John L. Allen Jr., 15 August 2003 in National Catholic Reporter. Accessed 3 September 2007. |
||
* [http://www.advancedchristianity.com/Pages/CBS/CBS.htm CBS: 1962 Vatican Document] |
* [http://www.advancedchristianity.com/Pages/CBS/CBS.htm CBS: 1962 Vatican Document] |
||
* [http://www.richardsipe.com/Doyle/2008/2008-04-01-Commentary_on_Crimen_Solicitationis.pdf The 1962 Vatican Instruction ''Crimen sollicitationis''] by Thomas Doyle, April 1, 2008. |
|||
* [http://www.richardsipe.com/Doyle/2008/2008-10-03-Commentary%20on%201922%20and%201962%20documents.pdf "The 1922 Instruction and the 1962 Instruction ''Crimen sollicitationis'' promulgated by the Vatican"] by Thomas Doyle, October 3, 2008. |
* [http://www.richardsipe.com/Doyle/2008/2008-10-03-Commentary%20on%201922%20and%201962%20documents.pdf "The 1922 Instruction and the 1962 Instruction ''Crimen sollicitationis'' promulgated by the Vatican"] by Thomas Doyle, October 3, 2008. |
||
Revision as of 09:37, 4 May 2010
Crimen sollicitationis (Latin: the crime of soliciting) was a 1962 document from the Holy Office (which is now called the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith) codifying procedures to be followed in cases of priests or bishops of the Catholic Church accused of having used the sacrament of Penance to make sexual advances to penitents.[2][3]
It repeated, with additions, the contents of an instruction issued in 1922 by the same office.[2][4]
The 1962 document, approved by Pope John XXIII and signed by Cardinal Alfredo Ottaviani, Secretary of the Holy Office, was addressed to "all Patriarchs, Archbishops, Bishops and other Local Ordinaries, including those of Eastern Rite". It gave specific instructions on how to carry out the rules in the Code of Canon Law:[5] on dealing with such cases, and directed that the same procedures be used when dealing with denunciations of homosexual, paedophile or zoophile behaviour by clerics. Dioceses were to use the instruction for their own guidance and keep it in their archives for confidential documents;[6] they were not to publish the instruction nor produce commentaries on it.[7]
Media accounts sometimes presented the instruction as not concerned principally with sexual solicitation in Confession, but with denunciations of paedophilia, and reported interpretations of the oath of secrecy about the conduct of the trial as a generic oath of secrecy, contrary to what the instruction itself stated.[8]
The 18 May 2001 document De delictis gravioribus updated Crimen sollicitationis in line with the 1983 Code of Canon Law, which had replaced the 1917 Code that was in force in 1962.
Canon law on cases of solicitation in confession
The Code of Canon Law in force when Crimen sollicitationis was issued[9] obliged anyone whom a priest solicited in confession to denounce him within one month and ordered that any such priest be subjected to a serious ecclesiastical punishment:
Canon 904. Ad normam constitutionum apostolicarum et nominatim constitutionis Benedicti XIV Sacramentum Poenitentiae, 1 Iun. 1741, debet poenitens sacerdotem, reum delicti sollicitationis in confessione, intra mensem denuntiare loci Ordinario, vel Sacrae Congregationi S. Officii; et confessarius debet, graviter onerata eius conscientia, de hoc onere poenitentem monere. Canon 2368 §1. Qui sollicitationis crimen de quo in can. 904, commiserit, suspendatur a celebratione Missae et ab audiendis sacramentalibus confessionibus vel etiam pro delicti gravitate inhabilis ad ipsas excipiendas declaretur, privetur omnibus beneficiis, dignitatibus, voce activa et passiva, et inhabilis ad ea omnia declaretur, et in casibus gravioribus degradationi quoque subiiciatur
|
Canon 904. In accordance with the apostolic constitutions, in particular the constitution Sacramentum Poenitentiae of Benedict XIV of 1 June 1741, a penitent must within one month denounce to the local Ordinary or the Sacred Congregation of the Holy Office a priest guilty of the crime of solicitation in confession; and a confessor must, under a grave obligation of conscience, inform a penitent of this duty. Canon 2368 §1. Anyone who has committed the crime of solicitation dealt with in canon 904 is to be suspended from celebrating Mass and hearing sacramental confessions and, if the gravity of the crime calls for it, he is to be declared unfit for hearing them; he is to be deprived of all benefices and ranks, of the right to vote or be voted for, and is to be declared unfit for all of them, and in more serious cases he is to be reduced to the lay state. |
Crimen sollicitationis indicated the procedure to be followed between a denunciation and the possible infliction of a penalty.
Outline of the letter Crimen sollicitationis
- Preliminaries (sections 1-14)
- Title One: First intimation of the crime (15-28)
- Title Two: The trial (29-60)
- Chapter I: Investigation (29-41)
- Chapter II: Canonical regulations and cautioning of the accused (42-46)
- Chapter III: Summoning the accused (47-54)
- Chapter IV: Conduct of the trial, verdict and appeal (55-60)
- Title Three: Penalties (61-65)
- Title Four: Official communication (66-70)
- Title Five: The most evil crime (71-74)
- Approval by Pope John XXIII on 16 March 1962
- Appendices:
- Formula A: oath of office
- Formula B: abjuration of errors
- Formula C: absolution from excommunication
- Formula D: delegating a person to receive a denunciation
- Formula E: receiving a denunciation
- Formula F: delegating a person to examine witnesses
- Formula G: full examination of a witness (about the priest and the accuser)
- Formula H: partial examination of a witness (about the accuser only)
- Formula I: general examination of the accuser
- Formula L: conclusions and proposal of the Promoter of Justice
- Formula M: decision of the Local Ordinary
- Formula N: admonition of the accused
- Formula O: decree of arraignment
- Formula P: examination of the accused
- Formula Q: conclusions and proposal of the Promoter of Justice
- Formula R: sentencing a convicted accused person who denies guilt
- Formula S: sentencing a convicted accused person who admits guilt
- Formula T: communication of the sentence to the accused
Contents
The document's title, "Instructio de modo procedendi in causis sollicitationis" (Instruction on procedure in solicitation cases), indicates that it was composed to indicate how to carry out a canonical investigation into accusations of solicitation. It described the procedures to be followed in each phase: reception of a denunciation; the course of the investigation, summoning the accused, sentencing, and the possibility of appeal.
The result of the investigation could vary:
- if the accusation appeared to be unfounded, this was stated in the record and the documents containing the accusation were destroyed;
- if only vague evidence emerged, the case was filed away for use if fresh evidence appeared;
- if the evidence was strong but insufficient for arraigning the accused, he was given an admonition and the records were preserved with a view to any further developments;
- if the evidence was strong enough, the accused person was summoned and a canonical trial took place.
Quoting canon 2368 §1 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law, then in force, Crimen sollicitationis, 61 indicated the penalties that could be imposed after conviction. These penalties, such as suspension a divinis, deprivation of an office or rank, and reduction to the lay state, were of public character, even if the trial itself had been conducted with all due secrecy.
The same part of the document laid down that, in addition to those penalties, penances should be imposed on guilty priests, and those in danger of repeating their crime should be subjected to particular vigilance (64).
Except in connection with the sacrament of Penance, canon law imposed no legal obligation - though a moral one might exist - to denounce clerics guilty of engaging in or attempting a homosexual act; but the procedure described in Crimen sollicitationis was to be followed also in dealing with such accusations (71-72). And any gravely sinful external obscene act with prepubescent children of either sex or with animals engaged in or attempted by a cleric was to be treated, for its penal effects, as equivalent to an actual or attempted homosexual act (73).
Unless solicitation in connection with Confession was involved, not only the local bishop but also superiors of religious orders exempt from the jurisdiction of the local bishop could proceed, either by formal trial or non-judicially ("modo administrativo"), against members of those orders who had committed such crimes; superiors of non-exempt religious orders could also do so, but only non-judicially (74).
Trial confidentiality
Section 11 of Crimen sollicitationis outlines the required confidentiality of the investigation into accusations of the crime of solicitation. The document imposed absolute confidentiality on the trial's proceedings (explicitly excepting "what may happen to be lawfully published when this process is concluded and put into effect", meaning public portions of any verdict), both during its conduct and after any concluding verdict had been put into effect:
Quoniam vero quod in hisce causis tractandis maiorem in modum curari et observari debet illud est ut eaedem secretissime peragantur et, postquam fuerint definitae et executioni iam traditae, perpetuo silentio premantur (Instr. Sancti Officii, 20 febr. 1867, n. 14); omnes et singuli ad tribunal quomodocumque pertinentes vel propter eorum officium ad rerum notitiam admissi arctissimum secretum, quod secretum Sancti Officii communiter audit, in omnibus et cum omnibus, sub poena excommunicationis latae sententiae, ipso facto et absque alia declaratione incurrendae atque uni personae Summi Pontificis, ad exclusionem etiam Sacrae Poenitentiariae, reservatae, inviolabiliter servare tenentur. |
As, assuredly, what must be mainly taken care of and complied with in handling these trials is that they be managed with maximum confidentiality and after the verdict is declared and put into effect never be mentioned again (20 February 1867 Instruction of the Holy Office, 14), each and every person, who in any way belongs to the tribunal or is given knowledge of the matter because of their office, is obliged to keep inviolate the strictest secrecy (what is commonly called "the secrecy of the Holy Office") in all things and with all persons, under pain of automatic (latae sententiae) excommunication, incurred ipso facto without need of any declaration other than the present one, and reserved to the Supreme Pontiff in person alone, excluding even the Apostolic Penitentiary. |
An oath of secrecy was to be taken by all members of the tribunal; violation incurred a penalty of automatic excommunication. The ecclesiastical penalty for violation of secrecy by the accused priest was automatic suspension a divinis, although he was free to discuss with his defence counsel (Section 13).
Unless violation of secrecy occurred after an explicit procedural warning given in the course of their examination (Section 13; and cf. Section 23 concerning the person denouncing solicitation: "… before the person is dismissed, there should be presented to the person, as above, an oath of observing the secret, threatening the person, if there is a need, with an excommunication reserved to the Ordinary or to the Holy See"), no ecclesiastical penalties were to be imposed on the accuser(s) and witnesses. "These matters are confidential only to the procedures within the Church, but do not preclude in any way for these matters to be brought to civil authorities for proper legal adjudication. The charter for the Protection of Children and Young People of June, 2002, approved by the Vatican, requires that credible allegations of sexual abuse of children be reported to legal authorities."[10]
The oath of office to be taken by the members of the tribunal was given as Formula A:
... Spondeo, voveo ac iuro, inviolabile secretum me servaturum in omnibus et singulis quae mihi in praefato munere exercendo occurrerint, exceptis dumtaxat iis quae in fine et expeditiones [recte: expeditione] huius negotii legitime publicari contingat ... neque unquam directe vel indirecte, nutu, verbo, scriptis, aut alio quovis modo et sub quocumque colorato praetextu, etiam maioris boni aut urgentissimae et gravissimae causae, contra hanc secreti fidem quidquam commissurum, nisi peculiaris facultas aut dispensatio expresse mihi a Summo Pontifice tributa fuerit. |
… I do promise, vow and swear that I will maintain inviolate secrecy about each and every thing brought to my knowledge in the performance of my aforesaid function, excepting only what may happen to be lawfully published when this process is concluded and put into effect … and that I will never directly or indirectly, by gesture, word, writing or in any other way, and under any pretext, even that of a greater good or of a highly urgent and serious reason, do anything against this fidelity to secrecy, unless special permission or dispensation is expressly granted to me by the Supreme Pontiff. |
Interviewed for a television programme in 2006, canon lawyer Thomas Doyle described the tight secrecy demanded for the procedure as "an explicit written policy to cover up cases of child sexual abuse by the clergy, to punish those who would call attention to these crimes by churchmen".[11] However, in the study of the instruction that he revised less than two years later he stated: "According to the document, accusers and witnesses are bound by the secrecy obligation during and after the process but certainly not prior to the initiation of the process. There is no basis to assume that the Holy See envisioned this process to be a substitute for any secular legal process, criminal or civil. It is also incorrect to assume, as some have unfortunately done, that these two Vatican documents are proof of a conspiracy to hide sexually abusive priests or to prevent the disclosure of sexual crimes committed by clerics to secular authorities."[12]
John L. Allen, Jr. has said the secrecy was aimed rather at the protection of all involved, the accused, the victim/denouncer and the witnesses, before the verdict was passed, and for free finding of facts.[13]
References
- ^ "Crimen sollicitationis habetur cum sacerdos aliquem poenitentem, quaecumque persona illa sit, vel in actu sacramentalis confessionis ..." (opening words of the document)
- ^ a b Thomas Doyle, The 1922 instruction and the the 1962 instruction "Crimen sollictationis" promulgated by the Vatican
- ^ De delictis gravioribus, footnote 3
- ^ Murphy Report, Irish Government, 2009. Para 4.18-19
- ^ Codex Iuris Canonici (1917), Liber quartus: De processibus
- ^ The rules concerning the secret archives, distinct from the general archives and the historical archives, are explained in John P. Beal, James A. Coriden, Thomas J. Green, A New Commentary on the Code of Canon Law, 642-644.
- ^ "Servanda diligenter in archivio secreto curiae pro norma interna. Non publicanda nec ullis commentariis augenda" (heading of the Instruction).
- ^ Allen, John L. (2003-08-07). "1962 document orders secrecy in sex cases: Many bishops unaware obscure missive was in their archives". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved 2010-03-26.
- ^ The law in force since 1983 is as follows:
Canon 1387. Sacerdos, qui in actu vel occasione vel praetextu confessionis paenitentem ad peccatum contra sextum Decalogi praeceptum sollicitat, pro delicti gravitate, suspensione, prohibitionibus, privationibus puniatur, et in casibus gravioribus dimittatur e statu clericali.
Canon 1387. A priest who in confession, or on the occasion or under the pretext of confession, solicits a penitent to commit a sin against the sixth commandment of the Decalogue (in the traditional Orthodox and Catholic numbering, the commandment against adultery - Ed.), is to be punished, according to the gravity of the offence, with suspension, prohibitions and deprivations; in the more serious cases he is to be dismissed from the clerical state.
- ^ April 2005 statement by Joseph Fiorenza, then Archbishop of Galveston-Houston
- ^ Sex Crimes and the Vatican (an October 2006 BBC documentary
- ^ Doyle, Thomas, The 1962 Vatican Instruction Crimen Sollicitationis, promulgated March 16, 1962, 1 April 2008, paragraphs 2, 4-6. (Accessed 2010-03-19). The full text of the study, distributed by Doyle himself in March 2010, can be found online on websites of organizations {http://www.bishop-accountability.org/news2010/03_04/2010_03_12_Doyle_VeryImportant.htm a website "documenting the abuse crisis in the Roman Catholic Church"] (Accessed 2010-04-02), and "supporting survivors of clergy sexual abuse and examining the cover up, causes, and effects of that abuse" (Accessed 2010-04-02)
- ^ Allen, John L. (2003-08-15). "Explaining "Crimen Sollicitationis"". National Catholic Reporter. Retrieved 2010-03-26.
It allows witnesses to speak freely, accused priests to protect their good name until guilt is established, and victims to come forward who don't want publicity. Such secrecy is also not unique to sex abuse. It applies, for example, to the appointment of bishops.
External links
- Unofficial English translation provided by the Holy See (vatican.va): INSTRUCTION: On the Manner of Proceeding in Causes involving the Crime of Solicitation
- Instructio. De modo procedendi in causis de crimine sollicitationis, original Latin text of Crimen sollicitationis with hand-written English annotations. The few lines on the final page are missing (confirmatory oath by the accused, and certification by the notary).
- Instruction on the Manner of Proceeding in Cases of Solicitation (44 pages, @ sarabite.info): private English translation of Crimen sollicitationis.
- The 1962 instruction Crimen sollicitationis: Caught red-handed or handed a red herring? by John P. Beal in Studia canonica, 41(2007), pp. 199-236
- "Vatican Document Instructed Secrecy in Abuse Cases" by Kathleen A. Shaw in Worcester Telegram & Gazette, 29 July 2003. Accessed 3 September 2007.
- 1962 document orders secrecy in sex cases: Many bishops unaware obscure missive was in their archives by John L. Allen Jr., 7 August 2003 in National Catholic Reporter. Accessed 3 September 2007.
- Explaining Crimen Sollicitationis" by John L. Allen Jr., 15 August 2003 in National Catholic Reporter. Accessed 3 September 2007.
- CBS: 1962 Vatican Document
- "The 1922 Instruction and the 1962 Instruction Crimen sollicitationis promulgated by the Vatican" by Thomas Doyle, October 3, 2008.