Jump to content

2010 United States Senate election in Connecticut: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
m Capitalization; candidate links are to be in alphabetical order
→‎Polling: Added some past polling figures for Rob Simmons; corrected outdated links on some of the polls. There is still more polling to re-add for Simmons, but I can't do it now.
Line 293: Line 293:


|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_CT_106925424.pdf Public Policy Polling] || rowspan=2 | January 4–5, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' || 28% || ——
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.publicpolicypolling.com/pdf/PPP_Release_CT_106925424.pdf Public Policy Polling] || rowspan=3 | January 4–5, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' || 28% || —— || ——
|-
|-
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''63%''' || —— || 23%
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''63%''' || —— || 23% || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''59%''' || —— || —— || 28%
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/toplines/toplines_election_2010_connecticut_senate_election_january_6_2010/ Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | January 6, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''58%''' || 34% || ——
|-
|-
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/toplines/toplines_election_2010_connecticut_senate_election_january_6_2010/ Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=3 | January 6, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''58%''' || 34% || —— || ——
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' || —— || 24%
|-
|-
| [http://media.economist.com/images/pdf/StatesTables20100121.pdf YouGovPolimetrix] || January 6-11, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' || 35% || ——
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' || —— || 24% || ——
|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1412&What=&strArea=;&strTime=0/ Quinnipiac] || rowspan=2 | January 8-12, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''64%''' || 23% || ——
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || —— || —— || 33%
|-
|-
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''66%''' || —— || 19%
| rowspan=2 | [http://media.economist.com/images/pdf/StatesTables20100121.pdf YouGovPolimetrix] || rowspan=2 | January 6-11, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' || 35% || —— || ——
|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/1/13/CT/428 Daily Kos/Research 2000] || rowspan=2 | January 11-13, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || 34% || ——
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''47%''' || —— || —— || 34%
|-
|-
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || —— || 33%
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1412&What=&strArea=;&strTime=0/ Quinnipiac] || rowspan=3 | January 8-12, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''64%''' || 23% || —— || ——
|-
|-
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''66%''' || —— || 19% || ——
| [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/election_2010_connecticut_senate Rasmussen Reports] || February 1, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || | 36% || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''62%''' || —— || —— || 27%
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/toplines/toplines_2010_connecticut_senate_march_2_2010 Rassmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | March 2, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' || 31% || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''57%''' || —— || 27%
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/1/13/CT/428 Daily Kos/Research 2000] || rowspan=3 | January 11-13, 2010 || {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || 34% || —— || ——
|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1433 Quinnipiac] || rowspan=2 | March 9-15, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''61%''' || 28% || ——
| {{party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || —— || 33% || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''64%''' || —— || 21%
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''54%''' || —— || —— || 35%
|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/election_2010_connecticut_senate Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | April 7, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' || 35% || ——
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/connecticut_senate_blumenthal_d_still_running_strongly Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | February 1, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || 36% || —— || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''58%''' || —— || 32%
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''54%''' || —— || —— || 35%
|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections2/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/election_2010_connecticut_senate Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | May 4, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''52%''' || 39% || ——
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/connecticut_senate_blumenthal_still_far_ahead_of_top_republicans Rassmussen Reports] || rowspan=3 | March 2, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''60%''' || 31% || —— || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''54%''' || —— || 29%
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''57%''' || —— || 27% || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''58%''' || —— || —— || 32%
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/toplines/toplines_2010_connecticut_senate_may_18_2010/ Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | May 18, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' || 45% || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''53%''' || —— || 37%
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1433 Quinnipiac] || rowspan=3 | March 9-15, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''61%''' || 28% || —— || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''64%''' || —— || 21% || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''62%''' || —— || —— || 26%
|-
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/connecticut_senate_blumenthal_still_picks_up_over_50_in_all_match_ups Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=3 | April 7, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' || 35% || —— || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''58%''' || —— || 32% || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''52%''' || —— || —— || 38%
|-
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/connecticut_senate_blumenthal_still_holds_big_lead_against_top_republicans Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=3 | May 4, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''52%''' || 39% || —— || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''54%''' || —— || 29% || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' || —— || —— || 32%
|-
| rowspan=3 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/toplines/toplines_2010_connecticut_senate_may_18_2010/ Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=3 | May 18, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''48%''' || 45% || —— || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''53%''' || —— || 37% || ——
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''50%''' || —— || —— || 39%
|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1459 Quinnipiac] || rowspan=2 | May 24-25, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || 31% || ——
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.quinnipiac.edu/x1296.xml?ReleaseID=1459 Quinnipiac] || rowspan=2 | May 24-25, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || 31% || ——
Line 339: Line 361:
| [http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/5/26/CT/532 Daily Kos/Research 2000] || May 24-26, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''52%''' || 33% || ——
| [http://www.dailykos.com/statepoll/2010/5/26/CT/532 Daily Kos/Research 2000] || May 24-26, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''52%''' || 33% || ——
|-
|-
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/election_2010_connecticut_senate Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | June 1, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || 33% || ——
| rowspan=2 | [http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/connecticut_senate_blumenthal_56_mcmahon_33 Rasmussen Reports] || rowspan=2 | June 1, 2010 || {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''56%''' || 33% || ——
|-
|-
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' || —— || 32%
| {{Party shading/Democratic}} | '''55%''' || —— || 32%

Revision as of 06:25, 6 August 2010

Template:FixBunching

United States Senate election in Connecticut, 2010

← 2004 November 2, 2010 2016 →
 
Nominee Richard Blumenthal
Party Democratic Republican

Senator before election

Chris Dodd
Democratic

Elected Senator

TBD

Template:FixBunching

Template:FixBunching The 2010 United States Senate election in Connecticut is a midterm election that will be held on November 2, 2010 to decide a Class III Senator from the State of Connecticut to join the 112th United States Congress. Incumbent Democratic U.S. Senator Christopher Dodd suffered from dropping approval ratings in the past few years due to major controversies, leading him to announce in January 2010 that he would not seek re-election.[1] As Dodd was a Democrat, Richard Blumenthal, incumbent State Attorney General, announced on the same day that he would run for Dodd’s seat.[2] The Connecticut Democratic Party nominated Blumenthal on May 21.

Linda McMahon won a majority of support at the Republican Nominating Convention, and became the presumptive Republican challenger on May 21. Rob Simmons decided to force a primary, which will be held on August 10 to elect a Republican nominee. Simmons later suspended his campaign, but has left his name on the ballot.[3] In late July – two weeks before the primary – however, Simmons began to re-enter the active campaign by airing ads on TV reminding voters that his name will still be on the ballot, participating in debates, and accepting interviews with editorial boards.[4] Peter Schiff, who failed to reach 15% of Republican support, successfully collected petitions to gain placement on the primary ballot.

Dodd's decline in popularity

Sen. Chris Dodd ran for re-election despite ongoing controversies. On January 6, 2010, he withdrew from the campaign.

Controversies

Chris Dodd's power and popularity may have deteriorated for three reasons since his last re-election:

  1. His poor performance in his bid for the 2008 Democratic Presidential nomination appears to have soured local voters.[5] Dodd was criticized for moving to Iowa and neglecting his Senate duties to pursue what many in Connecticut saw as a hopeless campaign. That poll, showing Dodd's job approval at 51% was taken before the scandals.
  2. Dodd received mortgage loans as part of the "Friends of Angelo Mozilo" program run by subprime mortgage lender Countrywide Financial. The Hartford Courant reported that Dodd had taken a "major credibility hit" from this scandal. A later poll in September 2008 showed Dodd's job approval declining to 43%, with 46% terming his job performance as "fair" or "poor".[6]
  3. On March 18, Dodd admitted responsibility for adding provisions in the 2009 stimulus package that allowed for controversial employee bonuses. He had previously denied responsibility, saying the Administration pushed for the bonus clauses. Dodd only admitted wrongdoing after an unnamed source within the Treasury Department provided insider information to CNN. [7] On March 19, after Dodd came forward, Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner took full responsibility, saying he pushed Dodd against executive bonus limits.[8]

In December 2008, it was reported that Dodd had a little less than $670,000 banked for a re-election campaign, far less than other senators anticipated to seek re-election.[9] In February 2009, a poll indicated that Dodd's favorability ratings were slipping, and many Connecticut voters were not satisfied with Dodd's explanations regarding the mortgage.[10]

On March 17, 2009, the NRSC released a web ad attacking Dodd for his Irish cottage, his mortgage, and his relocation to Iowa in 2007.[11]

Election troubles

Chris Dodd faced rising Disapproval ratings during his Senate term throughout '09 - '10

On March 2, 2009, noted pundit Michael Barone suggested Dodd was "ripe for the picking" in the 2010 election due to the fallout from his various controversies.[12] Nate Silver of the prominent website FiveThirtyEight.com suggested that if necessary, another Connecticut Democrat should primary Dodd. Silver rated Dodd as the single most vulnerable incumbent senator up for re-election in 2010. [13] On December 10, 2009 the Cook Political Report listed this race as "Lean Republican."

Democratic gubernatorial candidate Susan Bysiewicz was quoted suggesting Dodd's yet unannounced re-election bid could be a drag on the candidacies of other Connecticut Democrats in 2010. [14]

Many political leaders speculated Dodd could be persuaded to retire so as to preserve his "senior statesman" legacy.[15] Fellow Connecticut Senator Joe Lieberman had indicated that he would have supported Dodd's reelection, despite past disagreements, including Dodd's 2006 endorsement of Ned Lamont[16] and Lieberman's support of John McCain's 2008 Presidential Campaign.

In fundraising reports issued for the first quarter of 2009, Dodd reported having raised over $1 million, but reported only five contributions from Connecticut residents.[17]

Polling

A March 2009 Quinnipiac University poll confirmed Dodd's vulnerability. On April 2, 2009 Quinnipiac released a poll indicating Dodd in serious danger of losing re-election, despite the fact that Connecticut is a heavily blue state that President Obama won in 2008 with over 60% of the vote.

He failed to attain a 50% level of support against three lesser known possible Republican opponents.[18][19][20] Former U.S. Congressman Rob Simmons (R) in particular was leading in general election polling with double digit margins, and Simmons reached as high as 51% in a GQR poll.[21] Notably, Rasmussen Reports had Simmons 48% to 35% over Dodd in December 2009, a thirteen point spread.[22]

Democratic nomination

Candidates

Withdrew

Campaign

Merrick Alpert announced his candidacy to challenge current Senator Chris Dodd in May of 2009.[24] Facing grave prospects at re-election, Dodd announced his retirement from the Senate on January 6, 2010.[23] Richard Blumenthal, the Attorney General and former State Senator announced he would be running.

Debates

Merrick Alpert and Attorney General Richard Blumenthal squared-off in a debate highlighting important issues. On healthcare, Alpert revealed that he supports a single-payer system. Blumenthal explained that pool-purchasing powers should be explored. Alpert presented information as to how insurance rates have skyrocketed in Connecticut since the Attorney General took office. On the topic of war, Blumenthal pledged his support of President Obama's current plan. Alpert expressed that, being a former peacekeeper in Bosnia, he understands what policies work and which ones do not. The current one does not. Alpert set out a plan for the withdrawal of troops from the current war in Afghanistan. On a question concerning relations with Cuba, Blumenthal explained that it would take time, and that he would put together a panel of Cuban-American people to decide the best course of action. Alpert explained that he would vote on the issue that night. [25]

Polling

Poll source Dates administered Richard Blumenthal Merrick Alpert Lee Whitnum Undecided
Quinnipiac January 8-12, 2010 84% 4% –– 12%
Quinnipiac March 9-15, 2010 81% 6% –– 13%

Results

Blumenthal won the convention overwhelmingly, disallowing any other candidate to get at least 15% of the vote necessary to get on the primary ballot. Therefore, Blumenthal will go uncontested within the Democratic Party, and is officially the Democratic nominee.[26][27][28]

Republican nomination

On February 27, 2009, Commentary magazine reported that various Washington, D.C. Republicans were seeking to get Larry Kudlow, a popular TV talk show host and columnist, to enter the race against Dodd.[29] State Senator Sam Caligiuri originally planned to run the U.S. Senate, but after doing poorly in both primary and general election polling he decided to drop out and instead run the U.S. House of Representatives in the 5th District. Tom Foley has also left the race to instead run for Governor of Connecticut, as incumbent Governor M. Jodi Rell is not seeking re-election.

After the Quinnipac poll that showed him barely edging Dodd in a potential matchup, Simmons decided to officially enter the race.[30] Upon his announcement, the DSCC attacked Simmons for his past support of George W. Bush and ties to Jack Abramoff and Tom DeLay.[31] A leading state political blogger, who had endorsed Simmons' opponent in 2006, questioned whether these issues were relevant to the 2010 race. [32] Simmons suspended his campaign after he lost the convention, but did not publicly endorse McMahon. In late July, Simmons revived his effort with a TV ad reminding Connecticut Republicans that "I'm still on the ballot."

Polling

Poll source Dates administered Rob Simmons Linda McMahon Peter Schiff
Research 2000 September 8-10, 2009 38% –– 1%
Quinnipiac September 10-14, 2009 43% –– 2%
Quinnipiac November 3-8, 2009 28% 17% 5%
Moore Information December 15-16, 2009 35% 37% 4%
Quinnipiac January 8-12, 2010 37% 27% 4%
Quinnipiac March 9-15, 2010 34% 44% 9%
Research 2000 May 24-26, 2010 44% 48% ––
Quinnipac May 24-25, 2010 23% 49% 11%
Quinnipac June 2-8, 2010 29% 45% 13%
Quinnipac July 7-13, 2010 25% 52% 13%
Quinnipac July 28-August 2, 2010 30% 47% 14%

Convention

Candidates

Results

State Republican Convention results (first round)[35]
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Linda McMahon* 737 51.76
Republican Rob Simmons* 632 44.62
Republican Peter Schiff 44 3.11
Republican Vincent Forras 7 0.49
Republican Ethan Book 0 0.00
Total votes 1,414 100.00

* Denotes candidate met the minimum threshold of 15 percent to appear on the primary ballot

Primary

Candidates

Results

Republican Primary Results
Party Candidate Votes %
Republican Linda E. McMahon
Republican Peter David Schiff
Republican Rob Simmons
Total votes

General election

Candidates

Predictions

CQ Politics has rated this election as "likely Democratic."[44] The Cook Political Report changed this race to "toss up" on May 18, 2010 following Blumenthal's misstatements about his military service.[45][46] On June 1, 2010, following a Quinnipiac poll that showed Blumenthal in the lead by 25 points, "The Cook Political Report" changed its rating to "Leans Democratic."[47]

Polling

Poll source Dates administered Richard Blumenthal (D) Linda McMahon (R) Peter Schiff (R) Rob Simmons (R)
Public Policy Polling January 4–5, 2010 60% 28% —— ——
63% —— 23% ——
59% —— —— 28%
Rasmussen Reports January 6, 2010 58% 34% —— ——
60% —— 24% ——
56% —— —— 33%
YouGovPolimetrix January 6-11, 2010 47% 35% —— ——
47% —— —— 34%
Quinnipiac January 8-12, 2010 64% 23% —— ——
66% —— 19% ——
62% —— —— 27%
Daily Kos/Research 2000 January 11-13, 2010 56% 34% —— ——
56% —— 33% ——
54% —— —— 35%
Rasmussen Reports February 1, 2010 56% 36% —— ——
54% —— —— 35%
Rassmussen Reports March 2, 2010 60% 31% —— ——
57% —— 27% ——
58% —— —— 32%
Quinnipiac March 9-15, 2010 61% 28% —— ——
64% —— 21% ——
62% —— —— 26%
Rasmussen Reports April 7, 2010 55% 35% —— ——
58% —— 32% ——
52% —— —— 38%
Rasmussen Reports May 4, 2010 52% 39% —— ——
54% —— 29% ——
55% —— —— 32%
Rasmussen Reports May 18, 2010 48% 45% —— ——
53% —— 37% ——
50% —— —— 39%
Quinnipiac May 24-25, 2010 56% 31% ——
59% —— 25%
Daily Kos/Research 2000 May 24-26, 2010 52% 33% ——
Rasmussen Reports June 1, 2010 56% 33% ——
55% —— 32%
Quinnipiac June 2-8, 2010 55% 35% ——
56% —— 29%
Quinnipiac July 7-13, 2010 54% 37% ——
58% —— 31%
Rasmussen Reports July 15, 2010 53% 40% ——
52% —— 34%
Quinnipiac July 28-August 2, 2010 50% 40% —— ——
57% —— 30% ——
54% —— —— 35%

Fundraising

Candidate fundraising figures, as of July 21, 2010 (except Blumenthal, whose figures are as of June 30, 2010). Source: Federal Election Commission.

Candidate (party) Receipts Disbursements Cash on hand Debt
Richard Blumenthal (D) $3,495,608 $1,370,207 $2,125,401 $0
Linda McMahon (R) $22,110,751 $21,349,619 $761,131 $21,500,000
Peter Schiff (R) $3,159,819 $2,686,322 $473,497 $625,000
Rob Simmons (R) $3,025,375 $2,533,055 $492,369 $0

References

  1. ^ http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/stories/U/US_DODD_RETIREMENT?SITE=AP&SECTION=HOME&TEMPLATE=DEFAULT. Retrieved 2010-06-10. {{cite news}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)[dead link]
  2. ^ "Christopher J. Dodd : Christopher J. Dodd News and Photos". Courant.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  3. ^ "Simmons scaling back campaign". YouTube. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  4. ^ Davis, Susan (July 28, 2010). "Washington Wire Q&A: Rob Simmons". The Wall Street Journal (blog). Retrieved July 29, 2010. {{cite web}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help)
  5. ^ Quinnipiac University - Office of Public Affairs (2008-03-27). "Connecticut (CT) Poll * March 27, 2008 * Independent Voters Give Obama - Quinnipiac University – Hamden, Connecticut". Quinnipiac.edu. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  6. ^ "Topic Galleries". Courant.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  7. ^ "BREAKING: I was responsible for bonus loophole, says Dodd". CNN.com. CNN. March 18, 2009.
  8. ^ "Geithner: Treasury pushed for bonus loophole". CNN.com. CNN. March 19, 2009.
  9. ^ http://images.nictusa.com/cgi-bin/fecgifpdf2/?_28196+29020071245.pdf
  10. ^ "Connecticut's Rell Is Queen Of The Hill At Midterm, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Dodd Has Worst Approval Ever". Quinnipiac University Poll (Press release). February 10, 2009.
  11. ^ "Just in time for St. Patrick's Day!". Ctlocalpolitics.net. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  12. ^ Michael Barone (March 2, 2009). "Chris Dodd is Ripe for the Picking". U.S. News and World Report.
  13. ^ Silver, Nate (2009-02-04). "Politics Done Right: Should the Democrats Primary Chris Dodd?". FiveThirtyEight. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  14. ^ Zeke Miller (March 6, 2009). "Dodd yet to declare bid". Yale Daily News.
  15. ^ Dean Pagani (January 19, 2009). "The New Guard". HartfordBusiness.com. Hartford Business Journal.
  16. ^ J. Taylor Rushing (March 11, 2009). "Frenemies Dodd and Lieberman make nice". The Hill.com. The Hill.
  17. ^ [1][dead link]
  18. ^ "Connecticut's Dodd Tied With Simmons, Quinnipiac University Poll Finds; Voters Say Loosen Pot Laws And Sell Liquor On Sunday". Quinnipiac University Poll (Press release). March 10, 2009.
  19. ^ http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/04/should-democrats-primary-chris-dodd.html
  20. ^ http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2009/12/craziness-with-touch-of-nutmeg.html
  21. ^ http://www.pollster.com/blogs/ct_2010_sen_gqr_121517.php
  22. ^ http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/elections/election_2010/election_2010_senate_elections/connecticut/toplines/toplines_connecticut_senate_race_december_7_2009
  23. ^ a b "Sen. Chris Dodd won't seek reelection - Alex Isenstadt and Josh Kraushaar". Politico.Com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  24. ^ Merrick Alpert. "Merrick Announces His Candidacy for the United States Senate | Merrick Alpert for US Senate". Merrickforachange.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  25. ^ Stuart, Christine (2010-03-02). "Alpert Goes On Offensive, Makes Most of First Debate". CT News Junkie. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  26. ^ http://blogs.courant.com/capitol_watch/2010/05/merrick-alpert-blocked-from-sp.html
  27. ^ "5/21 Democrats Nominate Blumenthal For Senate Seat". Courant.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  28. ^ Riz, Joe. "Capitol Watch Blog - Connecticut Politics, Political News and Legislation". Blogs.courant.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  29. ^ 02.27.2009 - 9:44 AM (2009-02-27). "Commentary » Blog Archive » What If?". Commentarymagazine.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.{{cite news}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  30. ^ "Topic Galleries". Courant.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  31. ^ Eric Kleefeld (March 16, 2009). "DSCC Launches Anti-Bush Strategy To Attack Simmons". TPM Election Central. Talking Points Memo.
  32. ^ "The Buzz on Simmons". Ctlocalpolitics.net. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  33. ^ Loh, Tim (2010-02-26). "Ethan Book announces bid for U.S. Senate - Fairfield Citizen". Fairfieldcitizenonline.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  34. ^ a b [2][dead link]
  35. ^ ANDY BARR. "McMahon wins GOP nod in Conn. - Shira Toeplitz and Maggie Haberman". Politico.Com. Retrieved 2010-06-10. {{cite news}}: Text "5/20/10 10:02 PM EDT" ignored (help)
  36. ^ "Linda Wins « Linda McMahon for Senate". Linda2010.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  37. ^ "Simmons: Grudging retreat, but no surrender - Connecticut Post". Ctpost.com. 2010-05-25. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  38. ^ http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-503544_162-20012079-503544.html
  39. ^ Altimari, Daniela (September 17, 2009) "Peter Schiff Launches Senate Run", Hartford Courant. Retrieved on 2009-09-17.
  40. ^ "Poll shows Blumenthal regaining lead - The Middletown Press : Serving Middletown, CT". The Middletown Press. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  41. ^ "Peter Schiff sweeps Tea Party endorsements". Retrieved 2010-07-11.
  42. ^ "US Senate candidate John Mertens gains ballot line in CT". Independent Political Report. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  43. ^ http://articles.courant.com/2010-07-27/news/hc-ct-senate-debate-0728-20100727-12_1_linda-mcmahon-connecticut-for-lieberman-party-john-mertens
  44. ^ CQ Politics - Connecticut Senate Race Updated March 24, 2010
  45. ^ "The Cook Political Report - Charts - 2010 Senate Race Ratings". Cookpolitical.com. 2010-06-01. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  46. ^ "2010 Senate - CT | The Cook Political Report". Cookpolitical.com. Retrieved 2010-06-10.
  47. ^ "The Cook Political Report - Charts - 2010 Senate Race Ratings". Cookpolitical.com. 2010-06-01. Retrieved 2010-06-14.

External links

Official campaign websites