Talk:Kara Young: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 11:47, 5 September 2011

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Actors and Filmmakers Stub‑class

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Fashion Stub‑class Low‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

her husband is not a billionaire

but someone keeps adding it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.20.105 (talk) 22:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The FT article begs to differ. Fasttimes68 (talk) 03:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

why isn't it on the internet then? fornes, furtune, ny times, no one says he is a billionaire because he is not. that article does not say anything and people should not have to register on some site to verify information that is already known to be false. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.41.20.105 (talk) 13:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This article in the June 11 issue of the Financial Times (which is a reliable source) says "The approach has worked well for Mr Georgiopoulos personally – he claims a net worth of $2bn." [1]-- — Keithbob • Talk • 15:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is not an article about him, and since it is just a "claim" it's not a completely verified, publicized fact. 108.46.128.94 (talk) 23:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

your comment is a bit bizarre. The RS verifies facts, not editors. Fasttimes68 (talk)< —Preceding undated comment added 23:33, 4 September 2011 (UTC).[reply]

My comment is normal. He's not reported in Forbes or Fortune as being a billionaire. He himself claims he is a billionaire. Anyone can claim anything and it can still be false. State that he "claims" it. Your reverting the article so many times is a bit bizarre actually. 108.46.128.94 (talk) 23:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Forbes and Fortune are not the only RS that exist. Furthermore it is irrelevant if a fact is true or not. It only matters if it is cited by a RS. And your request for someone to provide a non registration link is unreasonable. Online cites are NOT required per wikipedia guidelines. . Fasttimes68 (talk) 04:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That factoid, useless, trivial allegation contributes nothing to this article, which is not even about him. She's not a billionaire, he only claims to be one in a brief interview, and no where in his official biography listed here[[2]] here[[3]] or here[[4]] does it state such by third party sources. Hershebar (talk) 11:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 04:52, 5 September 2011 edit Fasttimes68 (talk \| contribs) 1,710 edits No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 11:47, 5 September 2011 edit undo Hershebar (talk \| contribs) 2 edits →‎her husband is not a billionaire: Not Next edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:

	: Forbes and Fortune are not the only RS that exist. Furthermore it is irrelevant if a fact is true or not. It only matters if it is cited by a RS. And your request for someone to provide a non registration link is unreasonable. Online cites are NOT required per wikipedia guidelines. . [[User:Fasttimes68\|Fasttimes68]] ([[User talk:Fasttimes68\|talk]]) 04:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)		: Forbes and Fortune are not the only RS that exist. Furthermore it is irrelevant if a fact is true or not. It only matters if it is cited by a RS. And your request for someone to provide a non registration link is unreasonable. Online cites are NOT required per wikipedia guidelines. . [[User:Fasttimes68\|Fasttimes68]] ([[User talk:Fasttimes68\|talk]]) 04:45, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

			::That factoid, useless, trivial allegation contributes nothing to this article, which is not even about him. She's not a billionaire, he only claims to be one in a brief interview, and no where in his official biography listed here[[http://people.forbes.com/profile/peter-c-georgiopoulos/1797]] here[[http://investing.businessweek.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=1134249&ticker=GMR:US]] or here[[http://www.generalmaritimecorp.com/our-team.aspx]] does it state such by third party sources. [[User:Hershebar\|Hershebar]] ([[User talk:Hershebar\|talk]]) 11:47, 5 September 2011 (UTC)