User talk:TrueCRaysball

WrestleMania XXVIII

You should know that is flagrant Crystal Ball. And WWE is very unpredictable. For all we know he could tear an ACL and be out for a year.--Voices in my Head WWE 22:51, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

I'm pretty sure there's been a discussion on this issue.--Voices in my Head WWE 23:38, 30 October 2011 (UTC)

Try obeying WP's rules

CRRays, perhaps you should follow WP's rules by not using blogs as sources. I have every right to revert something b/c you fail to follow the rules. Stop using blogs! JaMikePA (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

What you have said is not a rule though. You're telling me to learn the rules, when you're citing one that doesn't exist. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 20:13, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

I've showed you the rules again and again. Ignorance is not bliss! Stop denying the rules and follow them! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Blogs_as_sources JaMikePA (talk) 22:05, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Let me try this again, that is not a rule, policy, guideline or an essay. It is a failed proposal, as such it has no barring on how the wiki is run. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 22:07, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Thanks...

...for the barnstar! WilliamH (talk) 19:23, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

TUSC token 2d024fe2abc5938a31edee9d55f7edca

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

December 2011

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on WrestleMania XXVIII. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Ioeth (talk contribs twinkle) 21:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

I know we're taking care of it. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!}

Fyi

Please accept this invite to join the Conservatism WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to conservatism. Simply click here to accept! – Lionel (talk) 10:24, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TorontoBlueJays2012cap.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TorontoBlueJays2012cap.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 11:16, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:TorontoBlueJays2012primary.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TorontoBlueJays2012primary.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 03:51, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

File:St Pete Times 10-16-08 front pg.jpg

I see that you uploaded the January 1, 2012 front page image of this newspaper, but could you have done so under a different file name? The file name implies that it's the Oct. 16, 2008 issue, as the old image was. The new file name should reflect the date and the paper's new name. The old image should probably have stayed around under the old file name. I would have fixed this myself, but I don't work with files that much so I wasn't sure how. Thanks. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 22:51, 1 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of How You Like Me Now?

The article How You Like Me Now? has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Is this disambiguation page really necessary/ doing the proper redirect job

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zzaffuto118 (talk) 19:22, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TrueCRaysball. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
Message added 03:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mtking ^(edits) 03:50, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

and again. Mtking ^(edits) 07:00, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

You don't need to do this as I can see you've replied in my contribs. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 07:05, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Helmet files

Please do not remove {{di-replaceable fair use}} from files, the template clearly and in bold informs you what should be done if you contest it. Mtking ^(edits) 04:16, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, TrueCRaysball. You have new messages at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject National Football League.
Message added 01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Mtking ^(edits) 01:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

January 2012 Newsletter for WikiProject United States and supported projects

The January 2012 issue of the WikiProject United States newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

 
--Kumi-Taskbot (talk) 19:04, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Simple English Wikipedia

Hello. I am letting you know that I have left a message on your talkpage at Simple English Wikipedia. I am notifying you here solely as I do not know if you still monitor that talkpage and if you receive any notifications from such. Normandie 13:14, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

 Done I replied but immediately archived it, so you'll have to read it there. CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 23:41, 17 January 2012 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Thanks! CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 00:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

Prince Fielder

That compromise is fine. It's just odd to have "number" listed with nothing following it. Thanks, Drmies (talk) 05:05, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

The number thing happens all the time, it's awkward at first but you'll get used to it as it's the standard. (I wrote this assuming you're new, if you're not, ignore my reply) CRRaysHead90 | ^{We Believe!} 05:57, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I guess I'm green. Drmies (talk) 13:45, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

Extreme Rules (2012)

Unfortunately not. The intention of the protection is to disallow reinstatement of the article until a day after the actual event, by which the notability of the event or lack thereof will be clearly established. Until then, relevant important information should be included on WWE Extreme Rules as appropriate. Deryck C. 07:52, 27 March 2012 (UTC)