User talk:184.58.24.163

Welcome to Wikipedia!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Intuitive guide to Wikipedia

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but you may want to consider creating an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (184.58.24.163) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

August 2013

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes song) has been reverted.
Your edit here to Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge_NiWX6tzg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 02:05, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

September 2013

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed an external link you added to the page Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes song), because it seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ge_NiWX6tzg) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:33, 27 September 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

November 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Beauty and the Beast (soundtrack) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "{}"s likely mistaking one for another. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:18, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 07:25, 23 November 2013 (UTC)

Donna Pinciotti

I realized that your edit wasn't vandalism right after I made the revert. --Jakob (Scream about the things I've broken) 23:44, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

Hello, I'm I am One of Many. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Red Forman without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry: I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, you can use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! I am One of Many (talk) 23:58, 25 November 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Talk:That '70s Show with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ (talk) 05:42, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

block notice

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  - Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:45, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

184.58.24.163 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

First of all I was not doing anything wrong, except trying to reach a consensus. Second, this user was making threats to me and I am very uncomforted by it and would appreciate it if he was either talked to or blocked himself for making threats when he was wrong in the first place. Seems to me an abuse of administrative powers if you ask me, first of all if your an admin on any site you should no better then to threaten anyone on any website, yet it is okay for an admin to threaten an IP address and not only get away with it but block the IP address, especially when they the admin were in the wrong? There was another conversation for the same reason over Laurie Forman on the same talk page and yet that is okay but when I do it it is not? Seems to me that it is discrimination because I am under an IP address and not a user and that is unfair! So my block was unjustified and there is no wrong in removing stuff that has nothing to do with the discussion nor is it wrong to keep the discussion where it should be so if anyone should be blocked it should be User:Barek not me. Thanks and thanks for the unblock! 184.58.24.163 (talk) 5:52 am, Today (UTC+0)

Decline reason:

Looks pretty justified to me; you were repeatedly blanking information after being told to stop. Blocking is par for the course in such situations. Barek hasn't threatened you at all (and it would be irrelevant to your unblock request even if he had). Please read the guide to appeals before filing an unblock request again. Addendum You don't get to revert refused unblocks that you disagree with. If you do so again, your talkpage access will also be removed. Take that as a threat if you must, but don't ever revert an unblock refusal again. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:13, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were not blocked for starting the discussion on the talk page. You were blocked for blanking discussions after having received multiple warnings to stop. The other discussion you reference was not disputed after three months of being on the talk page, so no AfD was needed.

I took no position whatsoever in the discussion that you initiated, only agreeing with the comment that an AfD should be done for the article you wished to redirect. You repeatedly blanked the portions of the active discussion to which you disagreed (ie: the comments suggesting to use an AfD) and ignored warnings that such disruption can result in a block. And yes, selectively archiving portions of an active discussion to which you disagree counts as blanking. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:05, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

You mean you made multiple threats. 184.58.24.163 (talk) 07:30, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

I am sorry but saying "you will be blocked" is not a warning it is a threat. It is surprising that people are allowed to get away with threatening people on here, particularly an admin and be allowed to get away with calling it a warning. 184.58.24.163 (talk) 07:33, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Also saying "your account can be blocked" is a threat as well. 184.58.24.163 (talk) 07:36, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

Whatever; how else can an admin (or anyone else) warn people of the consequences of their inappropriate behavior without saying what those consequences are? If you wish to call it a threat, that's fine, but it's also completely within Wikipedia's policies and social structure. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 09:12, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

No, Baker pretty much told me to do as he said or get blocked and that is wrong. So do not put your comment on things you know nothing about.

Also, if I do not get unblocked within the next 24 hours I will just switch my IP address and continue editing anyway and dare you all to prove it is me. Thanks! 184.58.24.163 (talk) 09:53, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

I have undone your strikethrough of Jpgordon's comments above - do not refactor other editor's talkpage comments. Threatening to engage in sockpuppetry is not going to help your unblock request. Yunshui 雲‍水 09:59, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

184.58.24.163 - As can be seen in the talk page history, my warnings were quite clearly stated: blanking the discussions was disruptive and the consequence of not heeding that warning was also clearly stated, that it could result in a block if the blanking continued, and you were warned multiple times to stop that disruption before I carried through on the consequences of not heeding the warning. You were free to continue the discussions, and free to take or leave the advice to use an AfD (although it was clear that no consensus existed for an immediate redirect without one). The block is only for 72 hours (less than 60 still remaining), you are welcome to continue contributing to articles and discussions at that time, provided you stop the disruptive behavior. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 16:35, 26 November 2013 (UTC)

December 2013

Hello, I'm Walter Görlitz. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Spitfire (LeAnn Rimes album), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. You might want to check WP:RS. The reprint of http://www.hittingalltherightnotes.com/2013/09/leann-rimes-birmingham.html at http://www.leannrimesworld.com/news/178263 is still a user review: "Mon, Sep 16, 2013 at 10:46 AM by User" and it's self-published. It does not meet the threshold of RS. If you would like to have my opinion challenged, to it at WP:RSN not in the article. Walter Görlitz (talk) 02:04, 3 December 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page The Last Time (Taylor Swift song), because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to The Last Time (Taylor Swift song) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QuijXg8wm28) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy, as well as other parts of our external links guideline. If the information you linked to is indeed in violation of copyright, then such information should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file, or consider linking to the original.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 00:22, 4 December 2013 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Please do not add or change content, as you did to ITunes Session (Kelly Clarkson EP), without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 23:38, 16 December 2013 (UTC)