Jump to content

User talk:ArmijaDonetsk: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
==Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation== Hello, I have restored the redirect per WP:REDUNDANTFORK. The best way to describe the formal legal process of Crimea's transition from the Ukraine to Russia is in a section of an already existin
Line 66: Line 66:
==[[Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation]]==
==[[Accession of Crimea to the Russian Federation]]==


[[Talk:Accession_of_Crimea_to_the_Russian_Federation]] [[User:ArmijaDonetsk|ArmijaDonetsk]] ([[User talk:ArmijaDonetsk#top|talk]]) 22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello,

I have restored the redirect per [[WP:REDUNDANTFORK]]. The best way to describe the formal legal process of Crimea's transition from the Ukraine to Russia is in a section of an already existing article such as [[Annexation _of_Crimea_by_the_Russian_Federation#Admission_treaty_and_aftermath]] or [[Political_status_of_Crimea_and_Sevastopol#Stances]]. Cheers, <sup><small><font color="green">[[Special:Contributions/Victor_falk|''walk'']]</font></small></sup> <font color="green">[[user:victor falk|''victor falk'']]</font><sup><small> <font color="green">[[user_talk:victor falk|''talk'']]</font></small></sup> 22:36, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:46, 24 April 2014

Welcome!

Hello, ArmijaDonetsk, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was 2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! RGloucester 17:51, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You violated process for link deletion [1] and reported me/my name behind my back [2]. Also you make allegations without providing evidence. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 18:21, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I have suspicions. The administrators will establish whether they are warranted or not. That's the point of the noticeboard. RGloucester 21:22, 13 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArmijaDonetsk, you are invited to the Teahouse

Teahouse logo

Hi ArmijaDonetsk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

April 2014

Information icon Please do not attack other editors, as you did on User talk:RGloucester. Comment on content, not on contributors. Personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. RGloucester 16:02, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

  • HYPOCRITE! See, how you attacked me "I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was 2014 pro-Russian protests in Ukraine, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest.". ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 16:13, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
That isn't an attack. I have nothing against you. However, policy says that usernames can't give the impression that one is editing as an organisation. Yours does, however, you were cleared in that regard, so there is nothing to worry about. RGloucester 16:15, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]
I also "have nothing against you". If a name that may represent a group is not allowed, why was I allowed to keep it? Random policy implementation? What about "RGloucester" - could also be a group, maybe a hip-hop music group. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 16:23, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ANI notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at WP:AN/I regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —RGloucester 16:35, 17 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Warning

Your edits at Annexation of Crimea by the Russian Federation‎ have been quite unacceptably tendentious. Moreover, you have been revert-warring to keep them in the article, instead of discussing.

The Arbitration Committee has permitted administrators to impose discretionary sanctions (information on which is at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions) on any editor who is active on pages broadly related to Eastern Europe. Discretionary sanctions can be used against an editor who repeatedly or seriously fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, satisfy any standard of behavior, or follow any normal editorial process. If you inappropriately edit pages relating to this topic, you may be placed under sanctions, which can include blocks, a revert limitation, or an article ban. The Committee's full decision can be read at the "Final decision" section of the decision page.

Please familiarise yourself with the information page at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions, with the appropriate sections of Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Procedures, and with the case decision page before making any further edits to the pages in question. This notice is given by an uninvolved administrator and will be logged on the case decision, pursuant to the conditions of the Arbitration Committee's discretionary sanctions system.

Fut.Perf. 16:48, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Re-Warning: User:Future Perfect at Sunrise - You are not saying the truth. I have been discussing, see the talk page of that article. ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 18:08, 22 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Charta of the United Nations, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a redirect from an implausible typo, or other unlikely search term.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you believe that there is a reason to keep the redirect, you can request that administrators wait a while before deleting it. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Toddy1 (talk) 20:10, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Accession_of_Crimea_to_the_Russian_Federation ArmijaDonetsk (talk) 22:46, 24 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]