Talk:Kerala Blasters FC: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Closing requested move discussion. The result was 'moved'.
m Malcolmxl5 moved page Talk:Kerala Blasters to Talk:Kerala Blasters FC: Per requested move discussion; see talk page.
(No difference)

Revision as of 23:28, 27 December 2014

WikiProject iconFootball: India Start‑class Low‑importance
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
LowThis article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Indian football task force (assessed as Low-importance).
WikiProject iconIndia Unassessed
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
???This article has not yet received a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
???This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 15 December 2014

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: moved. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 23:24, 27 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]



Added the "FC" would not only have this page be named the same way as if is officially but it would also have this page be named the same way as we have most association football clubs. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 17:13, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related page moves. GiantSnowman 20:36, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support per usual football club naming format. Number 57 22:49, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support standard naming convention. Coderzombie (talk) 03:24, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose What naming convention? The current name is more WP:PRECISE, which is policy. Football clubs should follow WP:NCCORP and avoid suffixes like "F.C." except when needed for WP:NATURAL disambiguation. Using them otherwise goes against WP:COMMONNAME. You wouldn't hear many people say, "Oh, I'm going to the Kerala Blasters FC match", and secondary sources, such as sport journalism, rarely uses such suffixes either. See also Wikipedia:Official names. --BDD (talk) 15:54, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Don't see why you are bringing WP:Official names into this? Kerala Blasters FC is the official name and the most commonly used. --ArsenalFan700 (talk) 16:22, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - as standard naming convention for football clubs. GiantSnowman 16:19, 16 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support - consensus is that football clubs have FC or the appropriate abbreviation unless there is a clear reason not to, not the other way round. Fenix down (talk) 09:51, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.