Jump to content

User talk:750editsstrong: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Notification: listing at articles for deletion of Adam (band). (Twinkle)
Line 23: Line 23:
After [[Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion]], there was an enormous amount of criticism of the project, and a clear consensus emerged that the project was a mistake, and amounted to [[WP:POINT|disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point]]. Whether you or I agree with that assessment or not is irrelevant: it was the consensus reached in discussion, and we have to accept it. Please do not continue your one-person re-run of the experiment. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 14:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
After [[Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion]], there was an enormous amount of criticism of the project, and a clear consensus emerged that the project was a mistake, and amounted to [[WP:POINT|disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point]]. Whether you or I agree with that assessment or not is irrelevant: it was the consensus reached in discussion, and we have to accept it. Please do not continue your one-person re-run of the experiment. <small>''The editor who uses the pseudonym''</small> "[[User:JamesBWatson|JamesBWatson]]" ([[User talk:JamesBWatson#top|talk]]) 14:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
:Could you show me that consensus please? Looking thru the talk page and its archives, I don't see a clear consensus either way. [[User:Oiyarbepsy|Oiyarbepsy]] ([[User talk:Oiyarbepsy|talk]]) 16:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
:Could you show me that consensus please? Looking thru the talk page and its archives, I don't see a clear consensus either way. [[User:Oiyarbepsy|Oiyarbepsy]] ([[User talk:Oiyarbepsy|talk]]) 16:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)
== Nomination of [[:Adam (band)]] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Adam (band)]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

The article will be discussed at [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam (band) ]] until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.<!-- Template:afd-notice --> [[User:Ansh666|ansh]]''[[User talk:Ansh666|666]]'' 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:39, 9 January 2015

hello and welcome to my talk page. 750editsstrong (talk) 21:10, 3 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Adam (band) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a band or musician, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. -- Orduin T 22:41, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Adam (band), a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Meters (talk) 23:01, 6 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN notice

Information icon This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--JohnBlackburnewordsdeeds 00:54, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with Adam (band). If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. While the speedy tag has been removed by another editor, removal of speedy deletion tags by the author of an article is not permitted. Robert McClenon (talk) 02:13, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your main account

750, it appears that you made this account to test how Wikipedia functions for new editors. While creating test accounts is certainly acceptable, you do need to disclose that they are the same. In your statement, you claim to have edited for 12 years, but none of those accounts you linked have edited even close to that long. We need to know your main account, and your real main account, the one that has edits in 2003. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:20, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Consensus against "Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion"

After Wikipedia:Newbie treatment at Criteria for speedy deletion, there was an enormous amount of criticism of the project, and a clear consensus emerged that the project was a mistake, and amounted to disrupting Wikipedia to prove a point. Whether you or I agree with that assessment or not is irrelevant: it was the consensus reached in discussion, and we have to accept it. Please do not continue your one-person re-run of the experiment. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 14:51, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Could you show me that consensus please? Looking thru the talk page and its archives, I don't see a clear consensus either way. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 16:01, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Adam (band) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Adam (band) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Adam (band) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ansh666 20:39, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]