Jump to content

Appeal to spite: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
clarification
→‎References: External link
Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit
Line 11: Line 11:
==References==
==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Reflist}}

==External links==
* [https://logfall.wordpress.com/appeal-to-spite/ Logfall | Appeal to spite]: Logical fallacies site addressing the ''appeal to spite'' fallacy with examples.


{{Red_Herring Fallacy}}
{{Red_Herring Fallacy}}

Revision as of 07:19, 16 March 2015

An appeal to spite (Latin: argumentum ad odium)[1] is a fallacy in which someone attempts to win favor for an argument by exploiting existing feelings of bitterness, spite, or schadenfreude in the opposing party. It is an attempt to sway the audience emotionally by associating a hate-figure with opposition to the speaker's argument.

Fallacious ad hominem arguments which attack villains holding the opposing view are often confused with appeals to spite. The ad hominem can be a similar appeal to a negative emotion, but differs from it in directly criticizing the villain —that is unnecessary in an appeal to spite, where hatred for the villain is assumed.

Examples

  • Why shouldn't prisoners be forced to do hard labor? Prisons are full of scumbags!
  • "Stop recycling! Aren't you tired of Hollywood celebrities preaching to everyone about saving the Earth?"
  • Why should benefits for certain students be reinstated, when I got nothing from the state and had to sacrifice to pay for my studies?

References

  1. ^ Curtis, G. N. "Emotional Appeal". Appeal to Hatred (AKA, Argumentum ad Odium)