User talk:NE Ent: Difference between revisions

	; Archives (Index) ;
	Meet the Press; 2008/December; 2014; 2009; 2010; 2011; 2012; 2013; 2015; 2016; 2017; 2018; 2019; 2020; 2021; 2022; 2023; 2024;

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 06:20, 20 September 2015

Last word: Montanabw (talk).

Arbitration amendment request archived

Hi NE Ent, the Revised plan for relocating arbitration pages arbitration amendment request, which you were listed as a party to, has been closed and archived to the newly created WT:AE. (In personal capacity: congrats and thanks on getting it changed.) For the Arbitration Committee, L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 03:33, 7 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to query

In reply to [1] ... I was using the encyclopedia as a reader and found content that could use some help, so logged back in around 22 August [2] NE Ent 01:28, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Because you obviously don't have enough responsibilities. I think you should start closing some RfCs.

Drmies (talk) 01:42, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Okay: [3] NE Ent 01:46, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

MFD for User:Gregaga

Hi,

You closed Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Gregaga stating there was no attempt to resolve this with the editor. As stated in the nomination, this is not the first go around with this editor for misuse of user space a a web host. His sandbox was previously deleted for this same reason. He had an alternate account which he used for the same purpose. Please reconsider your non-admin closure. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 16:33, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Long ago the individual was a contributor, and in the past they were assisted in keeping the page by an admin, so it doesn't really hurt anything to attempt to resolve the issue with the least amount of intervention, which is simply blanking the page and leaving them a note. Hopefully by suggesting the alternate of wikia.com they'll find a non-disruptive way to pursue their interest, and by leaving the content accessible in the edit history they can copy the content without having to have pester an admin to email it to them or temporarily restore the page. I've got the page watchlisted and if they restore the content we can take more assertive measures then. NE Ent 00:17, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

That assistance was in 2009. Since 2009, he has repeatedly used Wikipedia as a web host. I will take this to DRV. Regards. -- Whpq (talk) 00:29, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion review for User:Gregaga

An editor has asked for a deletion review of User:Gregaga. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- Whpq (talk) 00:39, 12 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA- formatting?

Hi NEEnt, and thanks for your support. Just popping by to note that you didn't bold your !vote on my RfA. Does that matter for the bot that counts these? Montanabw^(talk) 00:46, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I certainly hope not. That'd be bureaucratically stupid. But I've typed six ' for you. NE Ent 02:24, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I never know what the bots do, Saw that I'm getting some criticism for my AfD stats, but notice that the bot for that one doesn't track the stuff that's "similar but not identical". Which I suppose everyone at AfD has to deal with, but it makes it tough where there is no clear scale. Montanabw^(talk) 22:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Naw, !votes without a bolded word are counted properly regardless. What matters is that the numbered indentation remains intact: any properly indented comment in either s/n/o section is counted. Sometimes you'll even see joking "Oppose" comments in the Support section being properly counted as "support". :) ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 22:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

RfA question

NE Ent, is anyone actually "in charge" of the RfA process? Something totally bizarre has happened at my RfA that may raise RL concerns, and I believe that I may need to privately forward some emails to the powers that be. Who is to be contacted? Montanabw^(talk) 01:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

privacy real life stuff goes to arbcom. Email them. Or maybe wmf? NE Ent 04:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's about this (and link there to main page). Your thoughts? Montanabw^(talk) 06:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 46: / Line 46: @@
 ::I never know what the bots do, Saw that I'm getting some criticism for my AfD stats, but notice that the bot for that one doesn't track the stuff that's "similar but not identical".  Which I suppose everyone at AfD has to deal with, but it makes it tough where there is no clear scale. [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 22:18, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
 *{{tps}} Naw, !votes without a bolded word are counted properly regardless. What matters is that the numbered indentation remains intact: any properly indented comment in either s/n/o section is counted. Sometimes you'll even see joking "'''Oppose'''" comments in the Support section being properly counted as "support". :) <span style="font-size:10pt;color:white;background:black;padding:0 3px;"><big>☺</big>&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User:Salvidrim!|<span class="smallcaps" style="font-variant:small-caps;"><span style="color:white">Salvidrim!</span></span>]]&nbsp;·&nbsp;[[User talk:Salvidrim|<span style="color:white">&#9993;</span>]]</span> 22:28, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
+== RfA question ==
+NE Ent, is anyone actually "in charge" of the RfA process?  Something totally bizarre has happened at my RfA that may raise RL concerns, and I believe that I may need to privately forward some emails to the powers that be. Who is to be contacted? [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 01:24, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
+:privacy real life stuff goes to arbcom. Email them. Or maybe wmf? <small>[[User talk:NE Ent|NE Ent]]</small> 04:06, 20 September 2015 (UTC)
+::Well, it's about [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Requests_for_adminship/Montanabw#Montanabw_here:_making_one_comment_-_and_pinging_Bureaucrats this] (and link there to main page).  Your thoughts?  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|<font color="purple">(talk)</font>]]</sup> 06:20, 20 September 2015 (UTC)