User talk:Stolichanin

Welcome!

Some cookies to welcome you!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Stolichanin! Thank you for your contributions. I am Green Giant and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Green Giant (talk) 22:54, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Да се знае

Здравейте приятели,

Искам да споделя с вас списък с редактори в уикипедия които организирано или не, с малки и големи стъпки се опитват да принизят българската история, като крайната цел е да докаже че видете ли няма връзка между Първото и Второто Българско царство, а ако това не може то поне да се принизят постиженията на тези царства и да се преувеличат несгодите им. Ако имате възможност наглеждайте тези потребители, те са тук постоянно и са непрекъснато активни:

• Cplakidas – действа навсякъде и се опитва да принизи всичко Българско виж страницата Rus Invasion of Bulgaria и Byzantine Bulgarian Wars 970-1018
• Dr.K – същия като Cplakidas, обикновенно действат заедно
• Tourbillon – истински българомразец, съботира всичко Българско иска да премахне връзката между днешна България и старите царства, кирилицата не е Бългрска и прочее. Само вижте talk на страницата на България.
• Future Perfect at Sunrise – същия като тourbillon
• Chipmunkdavis – същия като тourbillon
• Jingiby – същия като тourbillon

Разпрострянявайте този списък, за да се знаят тези. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zoomzoom34 (talk • contribs) 21:14, 31 August 2014 (UTC)

American mosaic

I like the new mosaic you created! Although I do have one suggestion. Is it possible to remove Ulysses S. Grant because I feel there are already enough civil war figures and replace him with Ronald Reagan since he's a very much well known president. Just a suggestion. Although I really enjoy seeing that mosaic! Reply on my talk page :). --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 19:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Creating a mosaic for another article

Hey Stolichanin, I was wondering if you can create a mosaic for Ecuadorian people using ALL the pictured there. You're really good at mosaics at your latest one for Americans is beautiful. --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 22:11, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

• Another beautiful mosaic created by you! Quick question, do you enjoy making them or is it a hassle? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 02:10, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

English people mosaic

Very well done, a great improvement. I still think we could do with a painter in there but I'm not complaining.20:14, 19 September 2014 (UTC) Tigerboy1966  20:15, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Shakespear. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:21, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

Germans mosaic

Can you create a mosaic with 24 person like this you created for English people in Germans? It will be great if we have a such collage.--Kromert (talk) 13:59, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

• Can you also create one for Canadians, it looks sloppy, and one for Mexicans and Colombians? --TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 17:25, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 13

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Colombian people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Rafael Núñez. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:08, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism ?

"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content, in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia. Examples of typical vandalism are adding irrelevant obscenities and crude humor to a page, illegitimately blanking pages, and inserting obvious nonsense into a page. Abusive creation or usage of user accounts and IP addresses may also constitute vandalism."

"Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content, in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia"

"attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia"

Hello ! My modification was "attempt to compromise the integrity of Wikipedia" ?

i simply changed this picture, this is vandalism ? You really think that my modification was "irrelevant obscenities" or "crude humor" ?

please, let me edit - Khalel122 (talk) 11:07, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Sofia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alexander Nevsky Cathedral. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:04, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

November 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Bulgaria may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Bulgarian Empire|Bulgarian Empire]] during the reign of [[Simeon I of Bulgaria|Simeon I the Great]])

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 19:28, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Old Great Bulgaria

Stolichanin, there have been some disturbing changes on Old Great Bulgaria page as of late, so wanted to request your expert advice. Perdono45 (talk) 19:59, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Calligraphist (artist)

Dear Bulgarian Wikipedian: if you can find something in Bulgarian that might help the article Calligraphist (artist), please help! Thanks, Drmies (talk) 03:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

August 2015

Hello, I'm Optakeover. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Saints Cyril and Methodius  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Optakeover^(Talk) 17:52, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Thank you, Optakeover. I explain in Talk page now.--Stolichanin (talk) 17:56, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Number of bulgarians

Here is cited prof. Grigor Velev, president of association of bulgarians outside Bulgaria, who use official statistic by United nations. The article is from "Sega" - reliable source as well. According to this point the whole mumber of bulgarians is 22 milion incl. people of bulgarian ancestry, not only with citizenship - http://www.segabg.com/article.php?sid=2014103100019985022ttp://www.segabg.com/article.php?sid=2014103100019985022 — Preceding unsigned comment added by 85.118.68.9 (talk) 06:41, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

You are over WP:3RR on this article. Please start using the talk page. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:26, 10 October 2015 (UTC)

Image

Hello, Stolichanin. I think you deny to see your wrongs at the mosaic of Sofia. Without much stares it is obvious that there are mostly churches at the mosaic which does not summarize a good diversed view. I don't have anything against churches, the mosaic of Sofia must have a church but this is excessive and anytthing with no limits leads to failure. You give me examples with other articles, may you search around WIkipedia's city articles and you will not find a collage with three churches. You keep your strong neglect for your own mistakes and I would advise you that you should take into account others' remarks and reach an agreement, Wikipedia is a team work, not mine or your private website. If you insist your mosaic to be used so much please upload a new version of it and correct the obvious ridiciliousness. Your removal of a verified text in place of yours is not an improvement by any definition. Regards.--Serdik (talk) 10:38, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

OK! What are your suggestion for the collage?--Stolichanin (talk) 11:30, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I think you can reduce the churches to 1 and make a diversified image. And just watch out not to include much images already in the article, that's all I don't have any other requirements. Actually this version seems better, but better don't revert it try something. https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/6/6f/20150125125825%21Sofia_mosaic_5.jpg

--Serdik (talk) 11:42, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

I created a template with changable mosaic so any of us can take part in its creation. This is the easiest way to resolve the dispute and to edit it when it's necessary.--Serdik (talk) 05:29, 19 October 2015 (UTC)

New mosaic for Italians

Hello, Stolichanin!

Can you make a mosaic with signifacant people in Italians? Something looks like in Germans and English people. The current version is too overweigted.--Kargoncium (talk) 11:32, 13 October 2015 (UTC)

София

Привет и тук! Аз смятам, че би било добре да използваш твоя колаж от българската уикипедия и в англоезичната. В момента там е сложен един малко "соц" колаж с не особено добро качество на фотографиите. Освен това липсват важни обект и символи на града като Народния театър и " Св. София", които обаче са налице в твоя колаж. И накрая, с риск да стана досаден, да не забравиш за Карлово! :)--Green skokljo (talk) 09:31, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Е, какво точно означава "малко соц"? Той си е просто една малко по-различна гледна точка. И аз бях обърнал внимание на редактора, който я добави, че липсват историческите сгради, античността, средновековието. Продължавай да бъдеш така възпитан и учтив (не всеки ден се срещат тези качества), но ако имаш някаква идея да подобриш дадена статия, просто действай! И не съм забравил за Карлово, просто сега нямам много свободно време, но ще се постарая, обещавам.--Stolichanin (talk) 09:55, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Имам предвид, че НДК като представител на соцархитектурата е напълно достатъчно. В София има много забележителности и места, които да заслужават да бъдат представени. А и самият колаж изглежда мрачно и някак заводски. Все пак София се слави като " една от най-зелените столици" в Европа и така беше описвана ( и още е) в чуждите справочници, а в този колаж липсва каквато и да е зеленина. И благодаря предварително за Карлово!--Green skokljo (talk) 10:05, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Аз вече го промених.--Stolichanin (talk) 10:11, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Какво Карлово, то е ясно че това си си ти? Гениално, диплома от НАТФИЗ?--Serdik (talk) 11:32, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Очевидно вие двамата си имате някакви стари вражди в които не желая да се намесвам. Мисля, че е глупаво обаче да ги решавате чрез статията. Аз обясних защо смятам, че Sofia 333.jpg трябва да стои в кутията и защо го добавям там.--Green skokljo (talk) 09:56, 3 November 2015 (UTC)

Articles about Bulgaria are covered by discretionary sanctions under WP:ARBEE

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Eastern Europe, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Template:Z33 EdJohnston (talk) 15:01, 12 November 2015 (UTC)

Further reverts

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you get reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Please don't play dumb. Your "last correction" is a partial repeat of a previous revert, and as such, a revert itself.

The picture you again tried to introduce only shows the Vitosha mountain without a view of the city of Sofia, while the previous picture explicitly included its skyline, so it's a bit disingenuous to call it a simple "correction" based on the idea that somehow it's better to show the mountain in spring than in winter.

Please note that your granted request to be unblocked was partly based on a promise of not editing the Sofia article again.

LjL (talk) 18:34, 19 November 2015 (UTC)