User talk:Rockdwane

Talkback

Hello, Rockdwane. You have new messages at Cyphoidbomb's talk page.
Message added 16:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:35, 15 March 2016 (UTC)

Rockdwane, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Rockdwane! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Liz (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 16 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi Rinku1d (talk) 14:54, 19 March 2016 (UTC)

Improper tone

Hi there, regarding these edits, content needs to be written in a proper professional tone. Slang like "go on floors" is meaningless to a global audience and is not the proper tone expected of an encyclopedia. If you're not great with writing in English, you should consider posting requests on the article's talk page, or asking for help at WP:ICTF. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 05:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

OK

Ok, As u said earlier i am not a great with writing in english, i agree with u . bt i am not bad in english. Next i try my level best. Thanking U... Rockdwane (talk) 06:40, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

More improper tone

Re: this edit, please stay away from subjective labels like "blockbuster", "super-hit", "hit", "flop", "failure". These are of no encyclopedic value. The trades use these labels to make themselves sound important. Wikipedia only cares about objective facts, not that a random publication "declared" a film "all-time blockbuster status". That's not a fact, that's an opinion. We wouldn't, for instance, say, "the film was declared rotten" just because that's the label Rotten Tomatoes uses for a bad film. Thanks. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:45, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Nathu La (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Indian

Pooja Gandhi (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Upendra

S. D. Burman (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Bengali

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:22, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Thiruvannamalai (film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Kumar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

March 2016

Your addition to Pooja Gandhi has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Diffs: [1] The content you added in these edits is clearly copied word-for-word from Filmibeat. You cannot do this. All prose needs to be written from scratch, not copied or even closely paraphrased. What you did constitutes plagiarism, which is a serious violation of academic ethics, and it also constitutes a copyright violation, which has legal implications. If writing professional prose is not within your skillset, you're going to have to find other ways to contribute constructively.

Tangentially, we do not use blogs as references, so your use of this source, celebrity.psyphil.com, is inappropriate. Any random person with an internet connection can create a blog and pretend to be an expert on a subject. Wikipedia only cares what reliable published sources with established reputations for fact-checking, and clear editorial policies have to say about any given subject. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 16:16, 28 March 2016 (UTC)

Block evasion

Just a friendly advice: Do not create multiple accounts to evade a block. Also, don't shoot yourself in the foot with comments like this. If you want to know why verifiability doesn't grant inclusion, read WP:ONUS. And, if you did indeed create this account to evade a block employed in another account, there is a good chance that this account will also get blocked for sock puppetry/block evasion; if you didn't, then it's all good. In any case, stick to policies like WP:CCPOL and WP:NOT. Cheers! -- ChamithN (talk) 18:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)