Jump to content

User:Soerfm/sandbox: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Infobox military conflict
===Unmanned===
| conflict = Brusilov Offensive<br>(Брусиловский прорыв)
The 20 unmanned flights used Little Joe, Redstone, and Atlas launch vehicles.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=640}} They were used to develop the launch vehicles, launch escape system, spacecraft and tracking network.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|pp=638-641}} One flight of a [[Scout (rocket family)|Scout rocket]] attempted to launch an unmanned satellite for testing the ground tracking network, but failed to reach orbit. The Little Joe program used seven airframes for eight flights, of which three were successful. The second Little Joe flight was named Little Joe 6, because it was inserted into the program after the first 5 airframes had been allocated.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=231}}{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=278}}
| partof = the [[Eastern Front (World War I)|Eastern Front]] during [[World War I]]
| image = [[File:Broussilov.jpg|200px]]
| caption = Russian general [[Aleksei Brusilov]], 1916
| date = June 4 – September 20, 1916
| place = [[Kingdom of Galicia and Lodomeria]]
| result = Russian victory
| combatant1 = {{flag|Russian Empire}}
| combatant2 = {{flag|Austria-Hungary}}<br>{{flag|German Empire}}<br>{{flag|Ottoman Empire}}
| commander1 = {{flagicon|Russian Empire}} [[Aleksei Brusilov]]<br>{{flagicon|Russian Empire}} [[Alexey Kaledin]]<br>{{flagicon|Russian Empire}} [[Vladimir Viktorovich Sakharov|Vladimir Sakharov]]<br>{{flagicon|Russian Empire}} [[Dmitry Shcherbachev]]
| commander2 = {{flagicon|Austria-Hungary}} [[Franz Graf Conrad von Hötzendorf|Conrad von Hötzendorf]]<br>{{flagicon|Austria-Hungary}} [[Archduke Joseph Ferdinand of Austria|Joseph Ferdinand]]<br>{{flagicon|Austria-Hungary}} [[Eduard von Böhm-Ermolli|Eduard von Böhm]]<br>
{{flagicon|German Empire}} [[Alexander von Linsingen]]<br>{{flagicon|German Empire}} [[Felix von Bothmer]]<br>{{flagicon|Ottoman Empire|1823}} [[Yakup Şevki Subaşı|Yakup Pasha]]
| strength1 = 40+ Infantry divisions (573,000 men)<br>15 cavalry divisions (60,000 men)
| strength2 = 39 infantry divisions (437,000 men)<br>10 Cavalry divisions (30,000 men)
| casualties1 = 440,000 dead or wounded<br>60,000 prisoners<br>'''500,000 total casualties'''<ref>''Мерников А. Г., Спектор А.А.'' Всемирная история войн. — Минск., 2005. - стр. 428</ref>
| casualties2 = '''Austria-Hungary'''<br>567,000 dead and wounded<br>408,000 prisoners<br>975,000 all casualties<br>'''German Empire'''<br>350,000 all casualties<br>'''1,325,000 total casualties'''<ref>''Мерников А. Г., Спектор А.А.'' Всемирная история войн. — Минск., 2005. - стр. 428</ref>


| campaignbox =
{| class="wikitable sortable"
{{Campaignbox Brusilov Offensive}}
|-
{{Campaignbox Eastern Front (World War I)}}
! Mission
}}
! Launch
! Duration
! class="unsortable" | Purpose
! Result
|-
| [[Little Joe 1]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1959-08-21|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000020" | 20 s
| Test of launch escape system during flight.
| Failure
|-
| [[Big Joe 1]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1959-09-09|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="001300" |13 m 00 s
| Test of heat shield and Atlas/spacecraft interface.
| Partly success
|-
| [[Little Joe 6]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1959-10-04|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000510" | 5 m 10 s
| Test of spacecraft aerodynamics and integrity.
| Partly success
|-
| [[Little Joe 1A]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1959-11-04|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000811" | 8 m 11 s
|Test of launch escape system during flight with boiler plate capsule.
| Partly success
|-
| [[Little Joe 2]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1959-12-04|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="001106" |11 m 6 s
| Escape system test with primate at high altitude.
| Success
|-
| [[Little Joe 1B]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1960-01-21|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000835" |8 m 35 s
|Maximum-q abort and escape test with primate with boiler plate capsule.
| Success
|-
| [[Beach Abort]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1960-05-09|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000131" |1 m 31 s
| Test of the off-the-pad abort system.
| Success
|-
| [[Mercury-Atlas 1]]
|style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1960-07-29|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000318" |3 m 18 s
| Test of spacecraft / Atlas combination.
| Failure
|-
| [[Little Joe 5]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1960-11-08|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000222" |2 m 22 s
| First test of escape system with a production spacecraft.
| Failure
|-
| [[Mercury-Redstone 1]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1960-11-21|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000002" |2 s
| Test of production spacecraft at max-q.
| Failure
|-
| [[Mercury-Redstone 1A]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1960-12-19|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="001545" |15 m 45 s
| Qualification of spacecraft / Redstone combination.
| Success
|-
| [[Mercury-Redstone 2]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-01-31|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="001639" |16 m 39 s
| Qualification of spacecraft with chimpanzee.
| Success
|-
| [[Mercury-Atlas 2]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-02-21|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="001756" |17 m 56 s
| Qualified Mercury/Atlas interface.
| Success
|-
| [[Little Joe 5A]]
|style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-03-18|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="002348" |23 m 48 s
| Second test of escape system with a production Mercury spacecraft.
| Partly success
|-
| Nowrap|[[Mercury-Redstone BD]]
|style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-03-24|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000823" |8 m 23 s
| Final Redstone test flight.
| Success
|-
| [[Mercury-Atlas 3]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-04-25|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000719" |7 m 19 s
| Orbital flight with robot astronaut.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=335}}{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=275}}{{refn|A machine that produced the same heat, vapor and CO<sub>2</sub> as an astronaut.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=309}}|group=n}}
| Failure
|-
| [[Little Joe 5B]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-04-28|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000525" |5 m 25 s
| Third test of escape system with a production spacecraft.
| Success
|- style="background-color:#CDE;"
| [[Mercury-Atlas 4]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-09-13|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="014920" |1 h 49 m 20 s
| Test of environmental control system with robot astronaut in orbit.
| Success
|- style="background-color:#CDE;"
| [[Mercury-Scout 1]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-11-01|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="000044" |44 s
| Test of Mercury tracking network.
| Failure
|- style="background-color:#CDE;"
| [[Mercury-Atlas 5]]
| style="text-align:right;" |{{date|1961-11-29|mdy}}
| style="text-align:right;" data-sort-value="032059" |3 h 20 m 59 s
| Test of environmental control system in orbit with chimpanzee.
| Success
|}


The '''Brusilov Offensive''' ({{lang-ru|Брусиловский прорыв}} ''Brusilovskiĭ proryv'', lit. "Brusilov's breakthrough"), also known as the "June Advance",<ref>[http://www.hrono.ru/biograf/bio_k/kvecinski.html Biography of one of the participants] {{ru icon}}</ref> of June-September 1916 was the [[Russian Empire]]'s greatest feat of arms during [[World War I]], and among the [[most lethal offensives in world history]]. Historian [[Graydon Tunstall]] called the Brusilov Offensive the worst crisis of World War I for [[Austria-Hungary]] and the [[Triple Entente]]'s greatest victory, but it came at a tremendous loss of life.<ref>{{cite journal |first= Graydon A. |last= Tunstall |title= Austria-Hungary and the Brusilov Offensive of 1916 |journal= The Historian |volume= 70 |issue= 1 |year= 2008 |pages= 30–53 [p. 52] |doi= 10.1111/j.1540-6563.2008.00202.x }}</ref>
{{legend|#CDE|After suborbital manned flights}}

{| class="wikitable collapsible collapsed"
The offensive involved a major Russian attack against the armies of the [[Central Powers]] on the [[Eastern Front (World War I)|Eastern Front]], launched on June 4, 1916, and lasting until late September. It took place in an area of present-day western [[Ukraine]], in the general vicinity of the towns of [[Lviv]], [[Kovel]], and [[Lutsk]]. The offensive was named after the commander in charge of the [[Southwestern Front (Russian Empire) | Southwestern]] [[Front (military formation) | Front]] of the [[Imperial Russian Army]], [[General]] [[Aleksei Brusilov]].
|-

! colspan="2"|Remarks{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|pp=638–641 when nothing else is mentioned in table}}
==Background==
|-
Under the terms of the [[Chantilly Agreement]] of December 1915, Russia, [[French Third Republic|France]], Britain and Italy committed to simultaneous attacks against the Central Powers in the summer of 1916. Russia felt obliged to lend troops to fight in France and Salonika (against her own wishes), and to attack on the [[Eastern Front (World War I)|Eastern Front]], in the hope of obtaining munitions from Britain and France.<ref>Stone 1998, p221, 252</ref>
| [[Little Joe 1]]

| Due to an electrical malfunction, the escape tower ignited ½ hour before launch and took the spacecraft with it, leaving the rocket on the ground.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=208}}
The Russians also initiated the disastrous [[Lake Naroch Offensive]] in the [[Vilnius|Vilno]] area, during which the Germans suffered only one-fifth as many casualties as the Russians. This offensive took place at French request, in the hope that the [[German Empire|Germans]] would transfer more units to the East after [[Battle of Verdun|their attack on Verdun]].<ref>Keegan 2000, p325</ref>
|-

| [[Big Joe 1]]
General Aleksei Brusilov presented his plan to the [[Stavka]], the Russian high command, proposing a massive offensive by his Southwestern Front against the [[Austria-Hungary|Austro-Hungarian]] forces in [[Galicia (Central Europe)|Galicia]]. Brusilov's plan aimed to take some of the pressure off French and [[United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland|British]] armies in France and the [[Italian Army]] along the [[Isonzo Front]] and, if possible, to knock Austria-Hungary out of the war. As the Austrian army was heavily engaged in Italy, the Russian army enjoyed a significant numerical advantage on the Galician front.
| Actually the first Mercury-Atlas flight.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=640}} Recovered by {{USS|Strong|DD-758|6}} 2,407&nbsp;km SE of Cape Canaveral.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|pp=203–204}} Altitude: {{convert|65|mi|abbr=on}} Qualified ablative heatshield.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=229}}

|-
==Prelude==
| [[Little Joe 6]]
===Plan===
| No additional tests{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=209}}
Gen. [[Alexei Evert]], commander of the Russian Western Army Group, favored a defensive strategy and was opposed to Brusilov's offensive. [[Tsar]] [[Nicholas II of Russia|Nicholas II]] had taken personal command of the army in September 1915. Evert was a strong supporter of Nicholas and the [[Romanov]]s, but the Tsar approved Brusilov's plan. The objectives were to be the cities of Kovel and Lviv, which had been lost to the [[Central Powers]] the previous year. Although Stavka had approved Brusilov's plan, his request for supporting offensives by neighboring fronts was denied.
|-

| [[Little Joe 1A]]
===Offensive preparations===
|The rescue tower rocket ignited 10 seconds too late.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=210}} Recovered by {{USS|Opportune|ARS-41|6}} {{convert|11.5|mi|abbr=on}} SE of Wallops Island.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=232}}
Mounting pressure from the western Allies caused the Russians to hurry their preparations. Brusilov amassed four armies totaling 40 infantry divisions and 15 cavalry divisions. He faced 39 Austrian infantry divisions and 10 cavalry divisions, formed in a row of three defensive lines, although later German reinforcements were brought up.<ref name="Timothy C. Dowling pp 43-44">{{cite book |first=Timothy C. |last=Dowling |title=The Brusilov Offensive |location=Bloomington |publisher=Indiana University Press |year=2008 |pages=43–44 |isbn=978-0-253-35130-2 }}</ref> Brusilov, knowing he would not receive significant reinforcements, moved his reserves up to the front line. He used them to dig entrenchments about {{convert|300|×|90|m|yd}}<!--really?--> along the front line. These provided shelter for the troops and hindered observation by the Austrians.<ref name="Timothy C. Dowling pp 43-44"/> The Russians secretly crept to within {{convert|100|yd|m|order=flip}} of the Austrian lines and at some points as close as {{convert|75|yd|m|order=flip}}. Brusilov prepared for a surprise assault along {{convert|300|mi|km|order=flip}} of front. The Stavka urged Brusilov to considerably shorten his attacking front to allow for a much heavier concentration of Russian troops. Brusilov insisted on his plan and the Stavka relented.
|-

| [[Little Joe 2]]
==Breakthrough==
| Carried Sam, a [[rhesus macaque]].{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=210}} Recovered by {{USS|Borie|DD-704|6}} {{convert|194|mi|abbr=on}} SE of Wallops Island, Virginia; altitude: 53&nbsp;mi (85&nbsp;km).{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|pp=234, 474}}
On June 4 the Russians opened the offensive with a massive, accurate but brief artillery barrage against the Austro-Hungarian lines, with the key factor of this effective bombardment being its brevity and accuracy. This was in contrast to the customary, protracted barrages at the time that gave the defenders time to bring up reserves and evacuate forward trenches, while damaging the battlefield so badly that it was hard for attackers to advance. The initial attack was successful and the Austro-Hungarian lines were broken, enabling three of Brusilov's four armies to advance on a wide front (see: [[Battle of Kostiuchnówka]]).
|-

| [[Little Joe 1B]]
The success of the breakthrough was helped in large part by Brusilov's innovation of [[shock troops]] to attack weak points along the Austrian lines to effect a breakthrough, which the main Russian army could then exploit. Brusilov's tactical innovations laid the foundation for the German [[infiltration tactics]] used later in the Western Front.
|

|-
==Battle==
| [[Beach Abort]]
On June 8 forces of the Southwestern Front took Lutsk. The Austrian commander, [[Archduke]] [[Josef Ferdinand]], barely managed to escape the city before the Russians entered, a testament to the speed of the Russian advance. By now the Austrians were in full retreat and the Russians had taken over 200,000 prisoners. Brusilov's forces were becoming overextended and he made it clear that further success of the operation depended on Evert launching his part of the offensive. Evert, however, continued to delay, which gave the German high command time to send reinforcements to the Eastern Front.
|

|-
In a meeting held on the same day Lutsk fell, German Chief of Staff [[Erich von Falkenhayn]] persuaded his Austrian counterpart [[Franz Graf Conrad von Hötzendorf|Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf]] to pull troops away from the Italian Front to counter the Russians in [[Galicia (Central Europe)|Galicia]]. [[Field Marshal]] [[Paul von Hindenburg]], Germany's commander in the East (Oberkommando-Ost), was again able to capitalize on good railroads to bring German reinforcements to the front.
| [[Mercury-Atlas 1]]

| Exploded while passing through max-q{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=276}} To save weight, the airframe had been made thinner since Big Joe, which led to a collapse. The next Atlas was strengthened by a temporary solution while the rest were made from the same specifications as Big Joe.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=243}}
Finally, on June 18 a weak and poorly prepared offensive commenced under Evert. On July 24 [[Alexander von Linsingen]] [[Battle of Kowel|counterattacked]] the Russians south of Kovel and temporarily checked them. On July 28 Brusilov resumed his own offensive, and although his armies were short on supplies he reached the [[Carpathian Mountains]] by September 20. The Russian high command started transferring troops from Evert's front to reinforce Brusilov, a transfer Brusilov strongly opposed because more troops only served to clutter his front.
|-

| [[Little Joe 5]]
===International reactions===
| The clamp holding the spacecraft was deflected by air pressure; due to this and an incorrect wiring, the escape tower ignited too early and further failed to separate spacecraft from launch vehicle.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=248}}{{refn|group=n| The clamp was subsequently tested by a rocket sled.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=248}}}} Altitude: {{convert|10|mi|abbr=on}}{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=291}}
On 18 June 1916, an article entitled "Hero of the Hour in Russia, Described Intimately by One Who Knows Him Well"<ref name="NYT">[http://query.nytimes.com/mem/archive-free/pdf?res=9805E0DF123DEF3ABC4052DFB066838D609EDE [[Aleksei Brusilov|Brusiloff]], Hero of the Hour in Russia, Described Intimately by One Who Knows Him Well], Charles Johnston, [[New York Times]], 18 June 1916, accessed 8 February 2010</ref> by Brusilov's brother-in-law, Charles Johnson, appeared in the [[New York Times]].
|-

| [[Mercury-Redstone 1]]
==Maps==
| Engine shutdown caused by improper separation of electrical cables;{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=298}} vehicle rose {{convert|4|in|cm|abbr=on}} and settled back on the pad.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=294}}{{refn|group=n|Immediately after the Redstone's engine shut down, the capsule's [[Launch escape system|escape rocket]] jettisoned itself, leaving the capsule attached to the booster. The escape rocket rose to an altitude of {{convert|4000|ft|m|abbr=on}} and landed about {{convert|400|yd|m|abbr=on}} away. Three seconds after the escape rocket fired, the capsule deployed its [[drogue parachute]]; it then deployed the main and reserve parachutes.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=294}}}}
<gallery style="float:left; margin:0em 0em 0em 0em;" widths="390" heights="300">
|-
File:EasternFront1916a2.jpg|Blue and red lines: Eastern front 1916. Brusilov offensive takes place in lower right corner
| [[Mercury-Redstone 1A]]
</gallery>
| First flight of Mercury / Redstone. Recovered by {{USS|Valley Forge|CV-45|6}}{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=297}} Altitude: {{convert|130|mi|abbr=on}}{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=310}}
<gallery style="margin:0em 0em 0em 0em;" widths="390" heights="300">
|-
File:EasternFront1916b.jpg|Left: Plan of May. Right: Fontline at the end of Brusilov offensive in September 1916.
| [[Mercury-Redstone 2]]
</gallery>
| Carried the chimpanzee Ham on suborbital flight. Recovered by {{USS|Donner|LSD-20|6}}{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=316}} {{convert|422|mi|abbr=on}} SE of Cape Canaveral; altitude: {{convert|157|mi|abbr=on}}{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|pp=638-639}}

|-
==Aftermath==
| [[Mercury-Atlas 2]]
[[File:Defenders NGM-v31-p369-A.jpg|thumbnail|300px|Russian infantry]]
| Recovered by USS ''Donner''{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|pp=321–322}} {{convert|1,432|mi|abbr=on}} SE of Cape Canaveral.
Brusilov's operation achieved its original goal of forcing Germany to halt its attack on Verdun and transfer considerable forces to the East. It also broke the back of the [[Austro-Hungarian army]], which suffered the majority of the casualties. Afterward, the Austro-Hungarian army increasingly had to rely on the support of the German army for its military successes. On the other hand, the German army did not suffer much from the operation and retained most of its offensive power afterward.
|-

| [[Little Joe 5A]]
The early success of the offensive convinced Romania to enter the war on the side of the [[Triple Entente|Entente]], though that turned out to be a bad decision since it led to the [[Romanian Campaign (World War I)|failure of the 1916 campaign]]. Russian casualties were considerable, numbering up to half a million, but enemy casualties were almost triple. The Brusilov Offensive is listed among the [[most lethal offensives in world history]].
| Tower fired 14 seconds too soon; it failed to separate the spacecraft from the rocket.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=327}}

|-
The Brusilov Offensive was the high point of the Russian effort during World War I, and was a manifestation of good leadership and planning on the part of the [[Military history of Imperial Russia|Imperial Russian Army]] coupled with great skill of the lower ranks. The Brusilov offensive commanded by Brusilov himself went very well, but the overall campaign, for which Brusilov's part was only supposed to be a distraction, because of Evert's failures, became tremendously costly for the Imperial army, and after the offensive, it was no longer able to launch another on the same scale. Many historians contend that the casualties that the Russian army suffered in this campaign contributed significantly to its collapse the following year.<ref>''Defeat and Disarmament'', Joe Dixon</ref>
| Nowrap|[[Mercury-Redstone BD]]

| BD: Booster Development){{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=330}}
The operation was marked by a considerable improvement in the quality of Russian tactics. Brusilov used smaller, specialized units to attack weak points in the Austro-Hungarian trench lines and blow open holes for the rest of the army to advance into. These were a remarkable departure from the [[human wave attack]]s that had dominated the strategy of all the major armies until that point during World War I. Evert used conventional tactics that were to prove costly and indecisive, thereby costing Russia its chance for a victory in 1916.
|-

| [[Mercury-Atlas 3]]
The irony was that other Russian commanders did not realize the potential of the tactics that Brusilov had devised. Similar tactics had also been used on the [[Western Front (World War I)|Western Front]], most notably at Verdun earlier in the year, and would henceforth be used to an even greater degree by the French and Germans - who utilized "storm troopers" to great effect in the 1918 offensive - and slightly later the British, although given the higher force-space ratio in the West, much greater concentration of artillery fire was needed to make progress.
| Upgraded from suborbital flight. Was aborted when it did not go into orbit; boiler plate capsule recovered and reused in Mercury-Atlas 4.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=337}}

|-
Breakthrough tactics were later to play a large role in the early German [[blitzkrieg]] offensives of [[World War II]] and the later attacks by the [[Soviet Union]] and the Western Allies to defeat Germany, and continued until the [[Korean War]] and the [[First Indochina War]]. This helped to end the era of mass trench warfare in all but a few nations, most of them localized in [[Africa]].
| [[Little Joe 5B]]

| Concluded Little Joe program.
==References==
|-
{{portal|World War I}}
| [[Mercury-Atlas 4]]
{{Research help|Mil}}
| Completed one orbit and sent data to the ground; first orbital flight of the project.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=386-387}} Recovery by {{USS|Decatur|DD-936|6}} {{convert|176|mi|abbr=on}} east of [[Bermuda]].{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=389}}
<references/>
|-

| [[Mercury-Scout 1]]
===Bibliography===
| Was aborted after malfunction of guidance system;{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=397}} results of Mercury-Atlas 4 and Mercury-Atlas 5 were used instead.{{sfn|Catchpole|2001|p=312}}
* Washburn, Stanley. [https://archive.org/details/russianoffensive00washrich The Russian offensive, being the third volume of "Field notes from the Russian front," embracing the period from June 5th to Sept. 1st, 1916]
|-
* Liddell Hart, B.H. ''The Real War: 1914–18'' (1930), pp.&nbsp;224–227.
| [[Mercury-Atlas 5]]
* Schindler J. "Steamrollered in Galicia: The Austro-Hungarian Army and the Brusilov Offensive, 1916", ''War in History'', Vol.&nbsp;10, No.&nbsp;1. (2003), pp.&nbsp;27–59.
| Chimpanzee [[Enos (chimpanzee)|Enos]] completed a two-orbit flight, performing tasks to prove it possible for a person to function during a flight.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=404}}{{refn|group=n|Was given a reward in the form a banana pellet or a punishment in the form of mild electrical shocks depending on whether or not he gave the right response to a given signal; by mistake he was sometimes given shocks on right answers.{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=405}}}} Last Mercury-Atlas test flight. Recovery by {{USS|Stormes|DD-780|6}}{{sfn|Alexander & al.|1966|p=406}} {{convert|255|mi|abbr=on}} SE of Bermuda.{{sfn|Grimwood|1963|p=169}}
* {{Cite book|title=The Russian Army in the Great War: The Eastern Front, 1914-1917|last1=Stone|first1=David|publisher=[[University Press of Kansas]]|location=Lawrence|year=2015|isbn=9780700620951}}
|}
* Stone, Norman: ''The Eastern Front 1914–1917.'' Penguin Books Ltd., London 1998, ISBN 0-14-026725-5
* Tucker, Spencer ''The Great War: 1914–18'' (1998) ISBN 978-0-253-21171-2
* [[Sergei Sergeyev-Tsensky]], ''Brusilov's Break-Through: a Novel of the First World War'', translated into English by Helen Altschuler, Hutchinson & Co, London, 1945.
* B. P. Utkin [http://www.hrono.ru/statii/2001/brusil.html ''Brusilovskij proryv''] (2001) {{Ru icon}}
* [http://www.hrono.ru/sobyt/1900sob/1916brusil.html Операция русского Юго-Западного фронта летом 1916 года] {{Ru icon}}
* {{cite book|title = The First World War |author = Keegan, John|publisher = Vintage Canada|place=Toronto|year = 2000|isbn = 0-676-97224-1|authorlink = John Keegan}}
* {{cite book|title = The First World War (I); The Eastern Front 1914-1918 | author = Jukes, Geoffrey | publisher = Osprey Publishing | place = Minneapolis|year = 2003|isbn = 0-415-96841-0}}
* {{cite book|title = History of World War I; The Eastern Front 1914-1920 |author1 = Neiberg, Michael|author2= Jordan, David | publisher = Amber Books | place=London| year = 2003|isbn = 0-415-96841-0}}

==External links==
{{Commons category|Brusilov Offensive}}
* [http://www.firstworldwar.com/source/brusilovoffensive_brusilov.htm Primary Documents: Alexei Brusilov on the Brusilov Offensive, June 1916]
* [http://www.worldwar1.com/tlbruoff.htm 4 June 1916 - The Brusilov Offensive] on [http://www.worldwar1.com Trenches on the Web]
* http://www.historyofwar.org/articles/battles_kovel_stanislav.html
* [http://maps.omniatlas.com/europe/19160920/ Map of Europe] during the Brusilov Offensive at omniatlas.com

{{World War I}}

{{coord missing|Ukraine}}

{{DEFAULTSORT:Brusilov Offensive 1916}}
[[Category:Austria-Hungary in World War I]]
[[Category:Conflicts in 1916]]
[[Category:Battles of World War I involving Austria-Hungary]]
[[Category:Battles of the Eastern Front (World War I)]]
[[Category:Battles of World War I involving Germany]]
[[Category:Battles of World War I involving Russia]]
[[Category:Russian Empire in World War I]]
[[Category:1916 in Russia]]
[[Category:Galicia (Eastern Europe)]]
[[Category:Volhynian Governorate]]

Revision as of 12:28, 11 July 2016

Brusilov Offensive
(Брусиловский прорыв)
Part of the Eastern Front during World War I

Russian general Aleksei Brusilov, 1916
DateJune 4 – September 20, 1916
Location
Result Russian victory
Belligerents
 Russian Empire  Austria-Hungary
 German Empire
 Ottoman Empire
Commanders and leaders
Russian Empire Aleksei Brusilov
Russian Empire Alexey Kaledin
Russian Empire Vladimir Sakharov
Russian Empire Dmitry Shcherbachev

Austria-Hungary Conrad von Hötzendorf
Austria-Hungary Joseph Ferdinand
Austria-Hungary Eduard von Böhm

German Empire Alexander von Linsingen
German Empire Felix von Bothmer
Ottoman Empire Yakup Pasha
Strength
40+ Infantry divisions (573,000 men)
15 cavalry divisions (60,000 men)
39 infantry divisions (437,000 men)
10 Cavalry divisions (30,000 men)
Casualties and losses
440,000 dead or wounded
60,000 prisoners
500,000 total casualties[1]
Austria-Hungary
567,000 dead and wounded
408,000 prisoners
975,000 all casualties
German Empire
350,000 all casualties
1,325,000 total casualties[2]

The Brusilov Offensive (Russian: Брусиловский прорыв Brusilovskiĭ proryv, lit. "Brusilov's breakthrough"), also known as the "June Advance",[3] of June-September 1916 was the Russian Empire's greatest feat of arms during World War I, and among the most lethal offensives in world history. Historian Graydon Tunstall called the Brusilov Offensive the worst crisis of World War I for Austria-Hungary and the Triple Entente's greatest victory, but it came at a tremendous loss of life.[4]

The offensive involved a major Russian attack against the armies of the Central Powers on the Eastern Front, launched on June 4, 1916, and lasting until late September. It took place in an area of present-day western Ukraine, in the general vicinity of the towns of Lviv, Kovel, and Lutsk. The offensive was named after the commander in charge of the Southwestern Front of the Imperial Russian Army, General Aleksei Brusilov.

Background

Under the terms of the Chantilly Agreement of December 1915, Russia, France, Britain and Italy committed to simultaneous attacks against the Central Powers in the summer of 1916. Russia felt obliged to lend troops to fight in France and Salonika (against her own wishes), and to attack on the Eastern Front, in the hope of obtaining munitions from Britain and France.[5]

The Russians also initiated the disastrous Lake Naroch Offensive in the Vilno area, during which the Germans suffered only one-fifth as many casualties as the Russians. This offensive took place at French request, in the hope that the Germans would transfer more units to the East after their attack on Verdun.[6]

General Aleksei Brusilov presented his plan to the Stavka, the Russian high command, proposing a massive offensive by his Southwestern Front against the Austro-Hungarian forces in Galicia. Brusilov's plan aimed to take some of the pressure off French and British armies in France and the Italian Army along the Isonzo Front and, if possible, to knock Austria-Hungary out of the war. As the Austrian army was heavily engaged in Italy, the Russian army enjoyed a significant numerical advantage on the Galician front.

Prelude

Plan

Gen. Alexei Evert, commander of the Russian Western Army Group, favored a defensive strategy and was opposed to Brusilov's offensive. Tsar Nicholas II had taken personal command of the army in September 1915. Evert was a strong supporter of Nicholas and the Romanovs, but the Tsar approved Brusilov's plan. The objectives were to be the cities of Kovel and Lviv, which had been lost to the Central Powers the previous year. Although Stavka had approved Brusilov's plan, his request for supporting offensives by neighboring fronts was denied.

Offensive preparations

Mounting pressure from the western Allies caused the Russians to hurry their preparations. Brusilov amassed four armies totaling 40 infantry divisions and 15 cavalry divisions. He faced 39 Austrian infantry divisions and 10 cavalry divisions, formed in a row of three defensive lines, although later German reinforcements were brought up.[7] Brusilov, knowing he would not receive significant reinforcements, moved his reserves up to the front line. He used them to dig entrenchments about 300 by 90 metres (328 yd × 98 yd) along the front line. These provided shelter for the troops and hindered observation by the Austrians.[7] The Russians secretly crept to within 91 metres (100 yd) of the Austrian lines and at some points as close as 69 metres (75 yd). Brusilov prepared for a surprise assault along 480 kilometres (300 mi) of front. The Stavka urged Brusilov to considerably shorten his attacking front to allow for a much heavier concentration of Russian troops. Brusilov insisted on his plan and the Stavka relented.

Breakthrough

On June 4 the Russians opened the offensive with a massive, accurate but brief artillery barrage against the Austro-Hungarian lines, with the key factor of this effective bombardment being its brevity and accuracy. This was in contrast to the customary, protracted barrages at the time that gave the defenders time to bring up reserves and evacuate forward trenches, while damaging the battlefield so badly that it was hard for attackers to advance. The initial attack was successful and the Austro-Hungarian lines were broken, enabling three of Brusilov's four armies to advance on a wide front (see: Battle of Kostiuchnówka).

The success of the breakthrough was helped in large part by Brusilov's innovation of shock troops to attack weak points along the Austrian lines to effect a breakthrough, which the main Russian army could then exploit. Brusilov's tactical innovations laid the foundation for the German infiltration tactics used later in the Western Front.

Battle

On June 8 forces of the Southwestern Front took Lutsk. The Austrian commander, Archduke Josef Ferdinand, barely managed to escape the city before the Russians entered, a testament to the speed of the Russian advance. By now the Austrians were in full retreat and the Russians had taken over 200,000 prisoners. Brusilov's forces were becoming overextended and he made it clear that further success of the operation depended on Evert launching his part of the offensive. Evert, however, continued to delay, which gave the German high command time to send reinforcements to the Eastern Front.

In a meeting held on the same day Lutsk fell, German Chief of Staff Erich von Falkenhayn persuaded his Austrian counterpart Franz Conrad von Hötzendorf to pull troops away from the Italian Front to counter the Russians in Galicia. Field Marshal Paul von Hindenburg, Germany's commander in the East (Oberkommando-Ost), was again able to capitalize on good railroads to bring German reinforcements to the front.

Finally, on June 18 a weak and poorly prepared offensive commenced under Evert. On July 24 Alexander von Linsingen counterattacked the Russians south of Kovel and temporarily checked them. On July 28 Brusilov resumed his own offensive, and although his armies were short on supplies he reached the Carpathian Mountains by September 20. The Russian high command started transferring troops from Evert's front to reinforce Brusilov, a transfer Brusilov strongly opposed because more troops only served to clutter his front.

International reactions

On 18 June 1916, an article entitled "Hero of the Hour in Russia, Described Intimately by One Who Knows Him Well"[8] by Brusilov's brother-in-law, Charles Johnson, appeared in the New York Times.

Maps

Aftermath

Russian infantry

Brusilov's operation achieved its original goal of forcing Germany to halt its attack on Verdun and transfer considerable forces to the East. It also broke the back of the Austro-Hungarian army, which suffered the majority of the casualties. Afterward, the Austro-Hungarian army increasingly had to rely on the support of the German army for its military successes. On the other hand, the German army did not suffer much from the operation and retained most of its offensive power afterward.

The early success of the offensive convinced Romania to enter the war on the side of the Entente, though that turned out to be a bad decision since it led to the failure of the 1916 campaign. Russian casualties were considerable, numbering up to half a million, but enemy casualties were almost triple. The Brusilov Offensive is listed among the most lethal offensives in world history.

The Brusilov Offensive was the high point of the Russian effort during World War I, and was a manifestation of good leadership and planning on the part of the Imperial Russian Army coupled with great skill of the lower ranks. The Brusilov offensive commanded by Brusilov himself went very well, but the overall campaign, for which Brusilov's part was only supposed to be a distraction, because of Evert's failures, became tremendously costly for the Imperial army, and after the offensive, it was no longer able to launch another on the same scale. Many historians contend that the casualties that the Russian army suffered in this campaign contributed significantly to its collapse the following year.[9]

The operation was marked by a considerable improvement in the quality of Russian tactics. Brusilov used smaller, specialized units to attack weak points in the Austro-Hungarian trench lines and blow open holes for the rest of the army to advance into. These were a remarkable departure from the human wave attacks that had dominated the strategy of all the major armies until that point during World War I. Evert used conventional tactics that were to prove costly and indecisive, thereby costing Russia its chance for a victory in 1916.

The irony was that other Russian commanders did not realize the potential of the tactics that Brusilov had devised. Similar tactics had also been used on the Western Front, most notably at Verdun earlier in the year, and would henceforth be used to an even greater degree by the French and Germans - who utilized "storm troopers" to great effect in the 1918 offensive - and slightly later the British, although given the higher force-space ratio in the West, much greater concentration of artillery fire was needed to make progress.

Breakthrough tactics were later to play a large role in the early German blitzkrieg offensives of World War II and the later attacks by the Soviet Union and the Western Allies to defeat Germany, and continued until the Korean War and the First Indochina War. This helped to end the era of mass trench warfare in all but a few nations, most of them localized in Africa.

References

Template:Research help

  1. ^ Мерников А. Г., Спектор А.А. Всемирная история войн. — Минск., 2005. - стр. 428
  2. ^ Мерников А. Г., Спектор А.А. Всемирная история войн. — Минск., 2005. - стр. 428
  3. ^ Biography of one of the participants Template:Ru icon
  4. ^ Tunstall, Graydon A. (2008). "Austria-Hungary and the Brusilov Offensive of 1916". The Historian. 70 (1): 30–53 [p. 52]. doi:10.1111/j.1540-6563.2008.00202.x.
  5. ^ Stone 1998, p221, 252
  6. ^ Keegan 2000, p325
  7. ^ a b Dowling, Timothy C. (2008). The Brusilov Offensive. Bloomington: Indiana University Press. pp. 43–44. ISBN 978-0-253-35130-2.
  8. ^ Brusiloff, Hero of the Hour in Russia, Described Intimately by One Who Knows Him Well, Charles Johnston, New York Times, 18 June 1916, accessed 8 February 2010
  9. ^ Defeat and Disarmament, Joe Dixon

Bibliography