User talk:Vanjagenije

Main Articles Files Userboxes Awards Tools News Deletion log Talk page Hello, welcome to my talk page! If you want to leave a message, please do it at the bottom as a new section, for better formatting. You can do that by simply pressing the plus sign (+) or "new section" on the top of this page. And don't forget to sign your messages with four tildes, like this: ~~~~ Attention: I prefer to keep discussions unfragmented. If you leave a comment for me here, I will most likely respond to it on this same page—my talk page—as an effort to keep the entire conversation in one place. By the same token, if I leave a comment on your talk page, please respond to it there. Remember, we can use our watchlist to keep track of when responses are made. At the same time, feel free to send an alert to me on this page about a comment you have left elsewhere. Thank you! Vanjagenije (talk)

User:Weconnectinternational

User:Weconnectinternational who you blocked for being a vandalism only account, and whose page Draft:Elizabeth A. Vazquez (the president of their company) was deleted under G12, has copied and pasted the contents of her CV onto its talk page. jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:25, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello! I'm confused on how to proceed with this. Can you please clarify?

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

AirstarAirwaysOfficial (talk) 07:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Username Change - How to proceed?

Hello! I'm confused on how to proceed with this. Can you please clarify?

Allowing username change to requested username. Please put this request in at Wikipedia:Changing username as soon as possible to avoid re-blocking. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:43, 20 November 2016 (UTC) AirstarAirwaysOfficial (talk) 07:01, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

AirstarAirwaysOfficial (talk) 07:18, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

@AirstarAirwaysOfficial: You should go to Wikipedia:Changing username (click the link) and follow instructions. What exactly is a problem? Vanjagenije (talk) 12:40, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Vanjagenije. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

Please reexamine Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/2607:fb90:2907:dc5f:0:35:ade6:9d01

You will find that the case it's supposed to be a "duplicate" of was closed out of process without being investigated in any way. There is clear evidence of a very straightforward case of puppetry requiring investigation, but because I originally listed the accounts in the apparently wrong order, the responding admin decided there was nothing there. This is incorrect, as the briefest of checks will confirm. —swpb^T 18:39, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

@Swpb: What exactly do you think should be done? We have one blocked account and several inactive IPs. I don't see any ongoing problem. The order of accounts has nothing to do with it. Vanjagenije (talk) 20:15, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

A cup of tea for you!

Thank you for your help, amigo :) TequendamaConsulting (talk) 14:48, 24 November 2016 (UTC)

UTRS 16967

Hi Vanja, I've updated UTRS 16967 if you want to follow-up. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:15, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

@Ponyo:Am I allowed to unblock? It's a checkuser block, so I'm asking for an explicit permission. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:22, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

It's always best to double check with the blocking CU. --Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:29, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

@KrakatoaKatie: Can you take a look? The link is [1]. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:38, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Fine with me, if you buy his explanation. Katie^talk 00:33, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello there, could I please get some clarification as to why the user was unblocked, as I opened the SPI which resulted in the initial block. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 16:34, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

@DUCKISJAMMMY: Because those are two persons sharing the same computer. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:31, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

Who edit in the exact same manner? ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 19:46, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

@DUCKISJAMMMY: One user proposed deletion of an article created by the other, that usually doesn't happen when accounts belong to the same person. Anyway, even if they were the same person, I don't think indefinite block is appropriate. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:52, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

It's not quite as straightforward as that though, Ameer Abdullah ‎blanked the article, then added the AfD template to their own article. Only then did Sahil complete the nomination by creating the AfD discussion & adding it to the AfD log. Therefore both accounts had the same intention. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 20:13, 26 November 2016 (UTC)

@Vanjagenije @KrakatoaKatie: @Ponyo: @GiantSnowman: I'm sorry, but this unblock was unwarranted, the user is still using alternative accounts for disruptive behaviour & no it's not a sibling, this clearly shows it's the same person. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 21:10, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

I've blocked both (indef). If anyone thinks I've been hasty/harsh, feel free to un-block. GiantSnowman 21:15, 28 November 2016 (UTC)

No title

hello,don't move my images on paul Vinzce by editing article— Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 00:20, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Bilal philosopher: There is no "my" in Wikipedia. Anybody is allowed to edit as long as WP:policies and guidelines are respected. By the way, those images represent WP:copyright violations and will be removed soon. Vanjagenije (talk) 00:24, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

edit without destroying — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 00:32, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

respect yourself and don't give me orders on my talk page , if you see any violation on my articles you can discuss it with wikioedians without acusse me derictely . respect yourself — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

• @Bilal philosopher: I am not accusing you. I just advice you to respect Wikipedia's policies. You are not allowed to remove maintenance templates without resolving the underlying issues. Vanjagenije (talk) 16:22, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

I had resolve all problems , I don't see any problem now , if u see it resolve it and remive templates !! look brother, if u are an administrator don't make people leave writing on wikipedia , some administrators are dictators , you had remove a category classicism in arcticle , images which u had remove it was not violated because it public .. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bilal philosopher (talk • contribs) 19:02, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Moved to Talk:Paul Vinzce

 – Vanjagenije (talk) 20:36, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

new account

It won't let me login to my history_loverr account I don't know what happened. — Preceding unsigned comment added by History loverr2 (talk • contribs) 20:28, 27 November 2016 (UTC)

Close a discussion of deletion

I've moved title of the Truth in Muhammad to Muhammadan Reality with new Sources empazises what I mean .--Bilal philosopher (talk) 18:31, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

@Bilal philosopher: WP:AfD template may not be removed until the discussion is closed. Vanjagenije (talk) 19:43, 29 November 2016 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:United States presidential election, 2020. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Biffstack

Vanja, when you have a moment, could you please clean this up? Thanks.--Bbb23 (talk) 17:41, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

Talkback

Since I've found pings on SPI case pages to be unreliable, I figured I'd inform you here that I've responded to your request for additional information at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Antony1821. Sir Sputnik (talk) 22:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)

FinanceOnWikipedia

The block came too fast to allow a decent case to be built, and in that sense I support an unblock, but I do believe we are being taken for a ride here. There is a little more evidence than has thus far been presented. Please keep an eye on this.--Atlan (talk) 23:36, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

BBC 12-hour Editathon - large influx of new pages & drafts expected

AfC Reviewers are asked to be especially on the look out 08:00-20:00 UTC (that's local London time - check your USA and AUS times) on Thursday 8 December for new pages. The BBC together with Wikimedia UK is holding a large 12-hour editathon. Many new articles and drafts are expected. See BBC 100 Women 2016: How to join our edit-a-thon. Follow also on #100womenwiki, and please, don't bite the newbies :) (user:Kudpung for NPR. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:02, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Hi, I'm Cahk. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Boonkiet Chokwatana, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Cahk (talk) 08:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Timi Phoenix

I have added references to the page Timi phoenix. Kindly check for review again — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fatold (talk • contribs) 17:03, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• @Fatold: Please, see WP:RS and WP:GNG. What you added are not sources, let alone reliable sources. Source must be (a) reliable, (b) independent of the subject, and (c) to have significant coverage of the subject (see WP:42). What you added are just song listings with no coverage of the subject at all. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Declined speedy deletion

Hi, Vanjagenije. Thanks for your work on patrolling new pages. I've declined your deletion request for 2017 GT3 Le Mans Cup, a page that you tagged for speedy deletion, under criterion A7 because the criterion you used or the reason you gave does not cover this kind of page. There is an article for the previous season of this cup, 2016 GT3 Le Mans Cup, which includes multiple reliable sources; this indicates the potential of notability for the next season. Thanks! Appable (talk) 18:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Untitled

Dear ____________ Stop replacing my articles. I worked hard on those, and you keep messing them up, Thank you.... Respect My Articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dehawki1 (talk • contribs) 21:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

• @Dehawki1: Ok, I sent Miss west virginia 2015 results to the AfD. Let's see what other editors have to say. Vanjagenije (talk) 21:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia article

Not delete of my article, this is my life. So, I create the Philippine brands not created. This is reviewed to be 5.3 million Wikipedia articles. -- cyɾʋs ɴɵtɵ₃at ^BULAGA!!! 01:10, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

• @Cyrus noto3at bulaga: I don't want to interfere with your life. But, you are not allowed to created articles for topics that are not WP:NOTABLE. Notability is proven by citing reliable sources (see WP:42). Vanjagenije (talk) 15:58, 9 December 2016 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/OfficialPankajPatidar

Hi Vanja, can you please take care of the merging I requested in this case? There's a new case I'm working on (with lots of socks) that I will merge to it, but I don't want to do that until after you're finished and the case is archived. I can do the archiving after you're done and the SPI is closed. Thanks!--Bbb23 (talk) 19:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Done. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)

Edit warrior

Violation of 3RR at Battle of Doiran (1918). Petty nationalist dispute regarding Macedonia's official name. 23 editor (talk) 18:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@23 editor: We have a noticeboard for these types of reports Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring, it's best to make your reports there. - Mlpearc (open channel) 18:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@23 editor: WP:3RR was not violated by the user. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Ah, yes. It's been slightly over 24 hours. In any case, if he reverts you, he would have. 23 editor (talk) 18:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

@23 editor: The user made 3 reverts total. 4 reverts are needed to violate the WP:3RR. Vanjagenije (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Revision

Hello Vanjagenije, any hope that the visibility of this junk can be wiped from public view? I'm involved with the article at the moment and I really don't want to be visiting this possible "private grudge" every time I go backward or forward with revisions. Thanks. --OJ (talk) 10:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

•  Done. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:34, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

SPI clerking

I have a question for you. Are non-clerks allowed to perform uncontroversial clerical functions (archiving closed cases, marking cases as closed etc.)? Thanks in advance. Sir Sputnik (talk) 16:32, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

(talk page watcher) generally no. Closing and archiving both involve checks that the clerks have experience with (tagging users, moving/merging cases, etc). It's probably best left to clerks. If you're interested in clerking, you can sign up at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/SPI/Clerks. Ivanvector (^Talk/_Edits) 18:12, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

@Ivanvector: Thanks for the quick answer. I had assumed there would be something similar to WP:NAC for very obvious clerical actions. For what it's worth, I signed up for clerking some months and haven't heard anything back since. Sir Sputnik (talk) 19:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)

• @Sir Sputnik: No, and that is explained at WP:SPI/PROC. There is a huge backlog at Wikipedia_talk:Sockpuppet_investigations/SPI/Clerks#New_requests, but nobody has enough time to train new clerks. That's a problem that is going on for years now. In May, I proposed to take you as a trainee clerk when I find time (see User_talk:Bbb23/Archive_36#Training), and I hope it will be soon. Vanjagenije (talk) 10:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)