Jump to content

User talk:Nemanja Kasikovic: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Hello :)
Line 86: Line 86:
--[[User:Nemanja Kasikovic|Nemanja Kasikovic]] ([[User talk:Nemanja Kasikovic#top|talk]]) 11:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Please find in bellow e-mail from Scopus prrevaluation. If it is neccesery, I will send you pfd file with preevaluation results. This month we bought doi numbers and that is reason why we are waitning for September. Also, in 2019 we will apply for Web of Sciences.
--[[User:Nemanja Kasikovic|Nemanja Kasikovic]] ([[User talk:Nemanja Kasikovic#top|talk]]) 11:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Please find in bellow e-mail from Scopus prrevaluation. If it is neccesery, I will send you pfd file with preevaluation results. This month we bought doi numbers and that is reason why we are waitning for September. Also, in 2019 we will apply for Web of Sciences.
If you have more information about citation our journal, I will send you results next week.In that results you can see that our journal is cite in a lot of journals indexed in the best bases like WoS or Scopus.
If you have more information about citation our journal, I will send you results next week.In that results you can see that our journal is cite in a lot of journals indexed in the best bases like WoS or Scopus.

==Removal of email content==
Hi {{u|Nemanja Kasikovic}}, as you see I have removed the email you posted- it was unnecessary in any case, as it does not prove the journal's notability, but most important is that is is unlikely (correct me if I'm wrong, of course) that you had permission from the sender to publish the communiqué under a creative commons licence (as we use here). So it is removed. On the other matter, the journal is possibly notable- but at the moment the only [[WP:RS|sources]] you have provided to verify this are [[WP:PRIMARY|primary sources]] (directories, etc), and these are insufficient I'm afraid. May I ask, do you have a professional or commercial relationship with the journal, its editorial board, or in any other way? Cheers, &mdash; [[User:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:maroon; text-shadow:#666362 0.2em 0.2em 0.4em;">'''O Fortuna!'''</span>]][[User talk:Fortuna Imperatrix Mundi|<span style="color:navy"><sup>''''' Imperatrix mundi.'''''</sup></span>]] 11:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)

== Nomination of [[:Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design]] for deletion ==
== Nomination of [[:Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design]] for deletion ==
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].
<div class="floatleft" style="margin-bottom:0">[[File:Ambox warning orange.svg|48px|alt=|link=]]</div>A discussion is taking place as to whether the article '''[[:Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design]]''' is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to [[Wikipedia:List of policies and guidelines|Wikipedia's policies and guidelines]] or whether it should be [[Wikipedia:Deletion policy|deleted]].

Revision as of 11:46, 1 April 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Nemanja Kasikovic! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  Masum Ibn Musa  Conversation 13:39, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

The article Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable journal. Not indexed in any selective databases, no independent sources. Does not meet WP:NJournals or WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Randykitty (talk) 10:20, 1 April 2017 (UTC) --Nemanja Kasikovic (talk) 10:41, 1 April 2017 (UTC) We are indexed in DOAJ, BASE and EBSCO. You can find more information about our indexid on links bellow https://www.base-search.net/Search/Results?lookfor=journal+of+graphic+engineering+and+design&type=all&oaboost=1&ling=1&name=&newsearch=1&refid=dcbasen https://www.ebscohost.com/titleLists/a9h-journals.htm https://doaj.org/toc/2217-9860?source=%7B%22query%22%3A%7B%22filtered%22%3A%7B%22filter%22%3A%7B%22bool%22%3A%7B%22must%22%3A%5B%7B%22term%22%3A%7B%22index.issn.exact%22%3A%222217-9860%22%7D%7D%2C%7B%22term%22%3A%7B%22_type%22%3A%22article%22%7D%7D%5D%7D%7D%2C%22query%22%3A%7B%22match_all%22%3A%7B%7D%7D%7D%7D%2C%22from%22%3A0%2C%22size%22%3A100%7D Also World Cat is popular base for indexing journals. I have results from preevaluation in Scopus base. Results is positive and we will apply in September. --Nemanja Kasikovic (talk) 11:34, 1 April 2017 (UTC) Please find in bellow e-mail from Scopus prrevaluation. If it is neccesery, I will send you pfd file with preevaluation results. This month we bought doi numbers and that is reason why we are waitning for September. Also, in 2019 we will apply for Web of Sciences. If you have more information about citation our journal, I will send you results next week.In that results you can see that our journal is cite in a lot of journals indexed in the best bases like WoS or Scopus.[reply]

Removal of email content

Hi Nemanja Kasikovic, as you see I have removed the email you posted- it was unnecessary in any case, as it does not prove the journal's notability, but most important is that is is unlikely (correct me if I'm wrong, of course) that you had permission from the sender to publish the communiqué under a creative commons licence (as we use here). So it is removed. On the other matter, the journal is possibly notable- but at the moment the only sources you have provided to verify this are primary sources (directories, etc), and these are insufficient I'm afraid. May I ask, do you have a professional or commercial relationship with the journal, its editorial board, or in any other way? Cheers, — O Fortuna! Imperatrix mundi. 11:46, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Journal of Graphic Engineering and Design until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 11:44, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]