User talk:SwisterTwister

Please sign your messages with four tildes ('''~~~~''') and please be as specific and concise as possible. If I reviewed your Articles for Creation submission, please read the message(s) at the draft page clearly before adding a message here. As this has happened multiple times, please ensure your message is only posted here once (not doubled).

PLEASE ADD YOUR MESSAGE AT THE BOTTOM and generally, I will reply here so please watch this page for a response. Unless it's an AfC page, where I'll usually comment there and you will get a notification for that. If I have taken time reviewing your draft, please be patient and I will get to it as I am quite busy with other tasks but am certainly willing to look at it and will not need reminding.

New users: If you want to learn the basics of Wikipedia, my page for new users here contains useful information. Information such as citing sources, submitting images and changing & deleting username. If that page hasn't answered your question(s), contact me here.

• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 1 (2008-May 2012)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 2 (May 2012-November 2015)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 3 (November 2015-March 2016)
• User talk:SwisterTwister/Archive 4 (April 2016 - present)

13:24:38, 5 June 2017 review of submission by Rhish

• Rhish (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Hannah Woolmer (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

I've added a range of published articles about her could you review these? —Preceding undated comment added 13:24:38, 5 June 2017

16:54:02, 5 June 2017 review of submission by Tuula38

• Tuula38 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Pekka Nuikki (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hi again. Just wondering the reasons for decline - is it so that when someone is not willing to give interviews or be photographed as Mr. Nuikki is, it is impossible to have a wikipedia profile, which I think is the only "way" he wanted to be found on internet?

I am askin as Mr. Nuikki has created some of the worlds largest services like tastingbook.com, which is the world´s largest wine information source with over 1.5 million visitors in every month, also founder of the world leading wine publications which have 9 different magazines, also founder of the BWW - world´s largest wine competition etc...publiched over 30 book in five lanquages, Editor in Chief of nine international magazines like world's only Champagne Magazine and world's only Wine Investing magazine, Indias Only official wine magazine, Germany's biggest wine magazine ewtc...he has also awarded with the highest Advertising awards like Kodak Prp-prize, Clio, Cresta, Epica - over 150 international awards and many other great things?

Just wondering why as many of his co-workers who work for him, in his projects, are in Wikipedia?

• Tuula38 Currently the specific concerns is, even considering the publication name or similar, the content weigh is simply not significant and we would need a better focus in only the best major independent news, not simply announcements or notices. Awards are actually not comparably convincing since they can either be industry-focused, similar, etc. SwisterTwister talk 19:22, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

FYI, you are mentioned at Wikipedia:New_pages_patrol/Analysis_and_proposal

FYI, thought it might be of interest. Sadads (talk) 01:43, 6 June 2017 (UTC)

Collaborating, learning and adapting

@SwisterTwister: I noticed that you declined an AfC submission of Draft:Collaborating, Learning and Adapting on 6 April 2017 for lack of notability. The article was created anyway by User:Oscoda092, and I recently recommended that it be merged into another article. You are welcome to comment at Talk:Collaborating, learning and adapting § Merge proposal if you wish. Biogeographist (talk) 15:46, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

16:20:51, 7 June 2017 review of submission by Florine Calleen

• Florine Calleen (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Johannes Susen (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello Swister Twister,

it's me again concerning "Johannes Susen". I've changed some points, but the article is not jet approved. The weblinks and sources are all prooved. Johannes Suses work together with Will Shortz, the puzzle editor of the New York Times: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Will_Shortz

They are both members of the World Puzzle Federation and took part in many international Puzzle Champinships:

http://www.worldpuzzle.org/members/usa/ http://www.worldpuzzle.org/members/germany/

May be this can help us?

I am very much looking for an answer and wish you a plesant week,

Florine Calleen

Florine Calleen (talk) 16:20, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

• Florine Calleen It's a start but we would still need all available major independent news to add. SwisterTwister talk 16:23, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

Florine Calleen (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your quick answer, Swister Twister!

But what can we do?

May be my explanations concerning the links will help:

• WDR – Lokalzeit aus Köln (regional TV news magazine) on 18th December 2013: The Crossword Puzzle Inventor (de)

—> that’s one of the biggest independent broadcast ("öffentlich-rechtlich") – in this case the section TV

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westdeutscher_Rundfunk#Television

• WDR5 Zeitzeichen (daily radio broadcast with historical topics) on 21th December 2013: First crossword puzzle to be pulished (de)

—> in this case the culture radio program

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westdeutscher_Rundfunk#Radio

• Kölner Stadt-Anzeiger (local daily paper), 4th/5th August 2007: A mystery man – A man from Brühl invents mental puzzles (de)

--> The daily newspaper in Cologne (one of the oldest in Germany); this has been a newspaper article, we just put the link to the online version

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/K%C3%B6lner_Stadt-Anzeiger https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/M._DuMont_Schauberg

Thanks again and best regards! Florine Calleen (talk) 14:30, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Dear Swister Twister,

here some more information which could help:

The worldwide Newsletter of WPF (World Puzzle Federation) and in fact, in every issue Susen am mentioned as a representative of the German puzzle community at GA (general assembly). There is also an article from me in issue no. 13 of 2008 + about the "Activities of the German Puzzle Federation by Johannes Susen".

Link Newsletter: http://www.worldpuzzle.org/publications/wpf-newsletter/ Link Newsletter 2008: http://www.worldpuzzle.org/publications/wpf-newsletter/newsletter-13-2008/

Thanks and best regards,

FlorineFlorine Calleen (talk) 16:50, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

• Florine Calleen It's still a start but all additional sourcing would certainly help. SwisterTwister talk 17:40, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Talk about edit on Draft page about Patricia D'Amore

Thanks for looking at the page I started. I had not thought of looking for information in the Scholar profile. I hope you approve of the further information I included from that source. Still not ready to approve as I am waiting for some extra biographical info. Timlev37 (talk) 15:32, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

Loom Systems - Submission declined

Hi, On March 29, 2017 you've declined the draft of Loom Systems due to insufficient amount of reliable references. I've added some new references that we're not a "not-yet established" company anymore :)

Can you please help me understand if it's OK now? if not, what's missing?

Thanks Dvirperetz (talk) 08:49, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

• Dvirperetz Although you added sources, those are still only based on what the company either announced or said itself, whever published and it's simply not enough in notability; for example, industry awards or funding is still too trivial for us as it shows they still need support and, as for the awards, they're only trade-focused or similar. We've rarely accepted newly started companies is simply because it's nearly always too soon. SwisterTwister talk 15:55, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks for your response! I agree with the attitude of not accepting newly started companies, but actually we are not so new anymore.. I've added some unbiased sources such as the one from TheNewStack, the unbiased Gartner's Cool Vendor, a customer interview with Bicycle Transit, and our $6M fundings, may you please help me realize what type of references is missing to prove our establishment?

Thanks! Dvirperetz (talk) 07:38, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

13 June 2017, new unreviewed article

Hello!

Would you mind having a look at my new unreviewed article?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andreas_Wallraff

Thanks!

Tyttcfm (talk) 08:38, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

• Tyttcfm Noticed and reviewed, yes, the two highest cited papers by one major publisher is enough to show significance by WP:PROF. SwisterTwister talk 08:53, 13 June 2017 (UTC)

User talk:Rikirimler

When you leave messages on talk pages, please sign them. Thanks. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 08:59, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

01:03:02, 15 June 2017 review of submission by Jenv Corre

• Jenv Corre (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Alice Eduardo (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

The page is currently going re-review. My question is how can I remove this: This article or section is in the process of an expansion or major restructuring. You are welcome to assist in its construction by editing it as well. If this article or section has not been edited in several days, please remove this template. If you are the editor who added this template and you are actively editing, please be sure to replace this template with

during the active editing session. Click on the link for template parameters to use.?

Thank you.

Jenv Corre (talk) 01:03, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) @Jenv Corre: Removed. jcc (tea and biscuits) 13:38, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Couple of things

Hi SwisterTwister

• Firstly I note that you have automatic archiving set up, but it is not catching nearly 200 older threads which are clogging up your talk page and making it slow to load. Would you mind doing a manual cleanup and getting it down to a manageable size?
• Secondly I'm sure that you are following the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Mass creation of improperly referenced BLPs by User:SwisterTwister and I appreciate it may be unpleasant and stressful to see the strength of feeling there. I understand if you prefer not to respond there, but would you please consider making a short statement on your talk page to say that take the concerns on board and how things will change going forward? I fear that in the absence of a conciliatory response some editing restriction will likely be imposed on you.

Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:08, 17 May 2017 (UTC)

Please could you respond to these when you have time? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 11:54, 25 May 2017 (UTC)

Still waiting ... — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:12, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

• MSGJ Yes, I'll see what I can archive today. SwisterTwister talk 15:32, 7 June 2017 (UTC)

  I don't see that you have made any effort to archive your talk, as it is still extremely long. Would you mind if I did a manual archive? And could you please respond to my second point as well? — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:46, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

  • Yes you can but, about the second point, I had made a statement there and I don't see how I can answer the second point as I had commented there and I've improved a mass number of the relevant articles. SwisterTwister talk 17:02, 14 June 2017 (UTC)

I have archived your talk page - looks much tidier now! The problem is that users are not signing/dating their posts so the automatic archiving is not happening. I wonder why User:SineBot is not visiting this page because that would be useful. I must have missed your statement but will go check it now. Regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:01, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

Why have you redirected the page?

Hi SwisterTwister,

I could not understand why Netmagic Solutions page was redirected to its parent page, NTT, when Netmagic Solutions as a subsidiary merits a separate page. Please restore or let me know what kind of changes is required to comply with wiki policies.Pramuwi (talk) 09:35, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

• Pramuwi None of it satisfies our set policies and, actually, its information and sources were too promotional to separate what the company itself would advertise and what an independent uninvolved encyclopedia would publish instead. Focusing in only what genuinely independent coverage has said about the company, and not simply announcements or notices will help convince us. SwisterTwister talk 03:32, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Tomasz Wójcik draft

Hi SwisterTwister,

I added two portfolios, featuring graphic works by Tomasz Wójcik as well as his animated posters and film trailers. I hope this will be enough to restore the normal status of Tomasz Wójcik's website. Best regards --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 08:35, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

Help Needed

I don't know why wikipedians keep deleting "UrbanClap" page that I created, it is a notable company and passes WP:GNG and has reliable sources to establish notability as well. As far as language is concerned I have checked a lot of similar pages with similar language.Bulle Shah (talk) 12:57, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

09:22:56, 18 June 2017 review of submission by 130.54.130.240

• 130.54.130.240 (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Naohiro totsuka (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

SwisterTwister said that this article is enough major independent news, but he was referring in other pages. For example, on the main page "Hiroshima symphony orchestra", it was written that he was a music director...

• Your current sources are not significant in showing significant coverage for the person. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Yair Tarchitsky

Hi! I saw this draft which you rejected a few months ago. I think the article meets the notability guidelines. He very well known in israel. There are many reliable sources in the Hebrew Wikipedia article about him. Would you reconsider? Thanks, Atbannett (talk) 20:57, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

• Atbannett The current sources are not significant enough in showing Notability, we would need all additional major independent news alone since that best helps. SwisterTwister talk 21:05, 18 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you. There are many articles which show notability, but they are in Hebrew. this one for example. Isn't that enough? Atbannett (talk) 06:11, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Atbannett In this case, one wouldn't be enough, you're welcome to find any others and we'll consider that. SwisterTwister talk 06:15, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Thanks. here is an article about his victory for 2nd term as Chairman of Israel's Union of Journalists. Do you need more? Atbannett (talk) 07:34, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Request on 02:42:16, 19 June 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Wanganuimatt

• Wanganuimatt (talk · contribs)
  • Draft:Matt Ember (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

What the heck? I have legitimate, credible sources. Why is this being rejected?

Wanganuimatt (talk) 02:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

• Wanganuitmatt All that happened was a housecleaning deletion, you can either so the person who deleted it or at WP:Requests for undeletion. SwisterTwister talk 02:45, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Marc A. Zimmerman

Just curious... why just one tag? ^{Atsme📞📧} 04:29, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

• Atsme I've worked extensively in these subjects and, as long as there's published paper showing they're a significant figure in that field they're notable (the GoogleScholar link I listed showed high citations by peers as a scientist). I added other relevant sources so the only remaining applicable one is COI, which is not a serious concern. SwisterTwister talk 04:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Thank you for the timely response. I appreciate your experience which is why I was asking. I never doubted his notability but what does concern me is the fact that there's not one cited reference that Zimmerman didn't author or co-author. There's no way to know for certain if the author of the BLP has a COI, although it's rather obvious. The problem is that the article reads like a self-serving promotion, not an encyclopedic BLP. Notability doesn't dismiss the need for inline citations or the requirement for citing independent RS, and that's what the article needs and should be tagged as such. Perhaps you disagree? ^{Atsme📞📧} 12:05, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Atsme GoogleScholar is actually an independent website since it's not the school website; these sources are considered independent by WP:PROF so it would be appropriate to remove the current template. I had removed some of the worst "promo" parts but it wasn't too severe; this is what our academics articles have always looked since their publications are what establishes Notability. For example, what else better to show his research is significant than the publishings themselves? News media is never considered a fully reliable source for this in science given it's not fully or always fully informed about science subjects. SwisterTwister talk 16:36, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

But the author of the references cited for the BLP is the BLP. Hope you don't mind, but I'm going to ping David Eppstein to take a look at this as a second opinion...just for reassurance so I don't get in trouble with NPR. ^{Atsme📞📧} 17:10, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Request assistance for Draft:Unigma

User:CorbuleacM (talk) - 19:20, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Hi SwisterTwister,

I've added two more independent sources to Draft:Unigma. All of them are unique. I really hope it will be enough to get the wiki page published.

Best regards,

Mihai.