Jump to content

User talk:Tarook97: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
→‎Moors: new section
No edit summary
Line 95: Line 95:
</div>
</div>
<!-- Message sent by User:EGalvez (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Engagement_Insights/MassMessages/Lists/2016/11-AEEN&oldid=16205357 -->
<!-- Message sent by User:EGalvez (WMF)@metawiki using the list at https://meta.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Community_Engagement_Insights/MassMessages/Lists/2016/11-AEEN&oldid=16205357 -->

== Coffee ==

Before undoing consensus edits, read through [[Talk:Coffee/Archive 4#Coffee origin]], [[Talk:Coffee/Archive 5#Recent Edits]] and [[Talk:Coffee/Archive 5#Recent edits]]. Per [[WP:BRD]]: discuss on the appropriate [[Talk:Coffee|talk page]] rather than edit war.--[[User:Loriendrew|<font color="#005000">&#9790;Loriendrew&#9789;</font>]] [[User talk:Loriendrew|<font color="#000080">&#9743;''(ring-ring)''</font>]] 18:28, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

== Image size and [[WP:IDHT]] ==

The policy/guideline/MOS does not say what you claim it says. Please reread it. Also read [[WP:BRD]] and [[WP:3RR]] and take it to the talk-page. I see no reason whatsoever to fix image sizes. [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]] ([[User talk:Kleuske|talk]]) 15:29, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

::Hi [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]], the policies state "As a general rule, images should not be set to a larger fixed width than 220px (the initial base width)" and "Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. thumb|300px), which forces a fixed image width", may I have examples of such reasons? Because as far as I know, lead images such as ''La civilització del califat de Còrdova en temps d'Abd-al-Rahman III.jpg'' and ''Granada's sunset.jpg'' are an "exception to this general rule". [[User:Tarook97|Tarook97]] ([[User talk:Tarook97#top|talk]]) 11:10, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
:::You think so, three other editors thought otherwise. Different screens have different resolutions. By fixing image width, you are making it less impossible for browsers to adapt to different screen-sizes. [[User:Kleuske|Kleuske]] ([[User talk:Kleuske|talk]]) 11:15, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
{{od}}
The policy states "Except with very good reason, do not use px (e.g. thumb|300px), which forces a fixed image width", may I have examples of such reasons? [[User:Tarook97|Tarook97]] ([[User talk:Tarook97#top|talk]]) 11:21, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

Setting particular sizes creates formatting problems on some screens and for some user bases (see [[MOS:IMGSIZE]]). Where an article has many images and not enough text, large images can overwhelm or squeeze surrounding text. Generally whether a larger or smaller size is warranted is decided locally by consensus. So you would need to convince others there is a "very good reason" for larger images. The Al-Andalus article has a glut of images and not enough text. Many sections have more than one image even though they are just a few paragraphs, giving it a cluttered look even with default sizes. The article needs further development of the content at this point, not more or larger images. [[User:Laszlo Panaflex|Laszlo Panaflex]] ([[User talk:Laszlo Panaflex|talk]]) 13:18, 3 August 2017 (UTC)

== World Heritage Site infobox at Alhambra ==

Hello. Please can you let me know why you [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Alhambra&diff=794366877&oldid=794268832 reverted my edit to Alhabra] that migrated the infobox to Wikidata? Was there a problem with how the new infobox was being displayed? Thanks. [[User:Mike Peel|Mike Peel]] ([[User talk:Mike Peel|talk]]) 19:17, 7 August 2017 (UTC)

== Moors ==

== Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion ==
[[File:Ambox notice.svg|link=|25px|alt=Information icon]]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring]] regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on [[Wikipedia:Edit warring|edit warring]]. <!--Template:An3-notice--> Thank you. [[User:Laszlo Panaflex|Laszlo Panaflex]] ([[User talk:Laszlo Panaflex|talk]]) 03:20, 31 August 2017 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:01, 1 September 2017

Welcome!

Hello, Tarook97! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing!  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 02:31, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Share your experience and feedback as a Wikimedian in this global survey

References

  1. ^ This survey is primarily meant to get feedback on the Wikimedia Foundation's current work, not long-term strategy.
  2. ^ Legal stuff: No purchase necessary. Must be the age of majority to participate. Sponsored by the Wikimedia Foundation located at 149 New Montgomery, San Francisco, CA, USA, 94105. Ends January 31, 2017. Void where prohibited. Click here for contest rules.

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey