Jump to content

Wikipedia:Featured list removal candidates/List of birds of Puerto Rico/archive1: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 11: Line 11:
:'''Delist'''. As pointed out above, it would be a major project to bring the referencing up to FL standard. [[User:Dudley Miles|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles|talk]]) 09:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
:'''Delist'''. As pointed out above, it would be a major project to bring the referencing up to FL standard. [[User:Dudley Miles|Dudley Miles]] ([[User talk:Dudley Miles|talk]]) 09:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
:'''Delist''': Per above, standards are and should be much higher now. <span style="background-color:#cce4fa"><span class="nowrap">&nbsp;[[User:SchreiberBike|SchreiberBike ]]&#124;[[User talk:SchreiberBike#top| ⌨&nbsp;]]</span></span> 17:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
:'''Delist''': Per above, standards are and should be much higher now. <span style="background-color:#cce4fa"><span class="nowrap">&nbsp;[[User:SchreiberBike|SchreiberBike ]]&#124;[[User talk:SchreiberBike#top| ⌨&nbsp;]]</span></span> 17:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

Sigh, delisting. --'''[[User:PresN|<span style="color:green">Pres</span>]][[User talk:PresN|<span style="color:blue">N</span>]]''' 01:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)

{{FLCClosed|removed}}

Revision as of 01:50, 30 September 2017

List of birds of Puerto Rico (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Notified: Joelr31, WikiProject Birds

Someone posted a request to have this article listed on FLRC talk a while back, and it was never done. I decided to have a look at the list, and it has obvious deficiencies that cause it to fail the FL criteria. The most pressing of these is a lack of inline citations; there's only one in the whole article, and the body doesn't have any. In addition, it has the old-fashioned "This is a list of" opening, and the formatting in general pales in comparison to modern FLs such as List of parrots. Giants2008 (Talk) 02:09, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Although the content is uncontroversial, the standard is well below what is required for a featured list now. Unless someone is prepared to take on the considerable task of salvaging this, it should be delisted Jimfbleak - talk to me? 05:54, 28 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delist. As pointed out above, it would be a major project to bring the referencing up to FL standard. Dudley Miles (talk) 09:08, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delist: Per above, standards are and should be much higher now.  SchreiberBike | ⌨  17:29, 21 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sigh, delisting. --PresN 01:50, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Closing note: This candidate has been removed, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through.