User talk:TruthbringerToronto: Difference between revisions
Re: General Retailers and Traders Union |
|||
Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
*I added two references to the article. Could you please take another look at it? ---[[User:TruthbringerToronto|TruthbringerToronto]] ([[User_talk:TruthbringerToronto|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TruthbringerToronto|contribs)]] 22:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
*I added two references to the article. Could you please take another look at it? ---[[User:TruthbringerToronto|TruthbringerToronto]] ([[User_talk:TruthbringerToronto|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/TruthbringerToronto|contribs)]] 22:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
**Article viability satified. I'll drop the subject with you. I only need to get it something to link to it. If you know of another article that can link to it, please let me know. Lastly, the '''References''' section corresponds to footnotes. That is when in the article you see <sup>1</sup> or '''[1]''', those numbers correspond with the notes in the '''References''' section. Should anyone have a question about the article, they can read the footnote to check the information. Please try to maintain the references, as I believe they help everyone. --[[User:Jessemonroy650|meatclerk]] 22:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
**Article viability satified. I'll drop the subject with you. I only need to get it something to link to it. If you know of another article that can link to it, please let me know. Lastly, the '''References''' section corresponds to footnotes. That is when in the article you see <sup>1</sup> or '''[1]''', those numbers correspond with the notes in the '''References''' section. Should anyone have a question about the article, they can read the footnote to check the information. Please try to maintain the references, as I believe they help everyone. --[[User:Jessemonroy650|meatclerk]] 22:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC) |
||
== Re: General Retailers and Traders Union == |
|||
No problem. I will explain {{user|Marcelmizzi}} that the fact he is a co-owner of copyright does not mean he can include such information in Wikipedia. Hopefully that will prevent new misunderstandings. -- [[User:ReyBrujo|ReyBrujo]] 05:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 05:56, 22 October 2006
Dear Truthbringer: I have revised the eTouch article to emphasize notability as requested. Below is the copy and also current Wikipedia entries for companies that have a similar offering. Please clarify why these articles are notable and why mine is not. I cannot determine the difference.
Also: eTouch's work with NASA has been documented by the San Jose Mercury News, Computerworld, Government Computer News, The Web Hosting Industry Review, and many other publications that cover the Internet as well as space exploration.
Jaymejia03 17:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)Jay MejiaJaymejia03 17:09, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
eTouch Systems is a Fremont, Calif., software company that has developed proprietary social computing technologies including an enterprise wiki solution built on a J2EE platform called SamePage. Founded in 1998, eTouch has developed collaboration software powered by a comprehensive Content Management solution. Customers include Cisco, Kaplan, Johnson & Johnson, and NASA.
As the prime contractor for NASA, eTouch led the effort to help the space agency consolidate its 3,000 web sites into a more manageable, single public web portal to inspire the next generation of space explorers. Built on eTouch’s CMS product, NASA’s public portal delivers up-to-the-minute, engaging multimedia coverage of NASA’s wide variety of programs, including dazzling photos and streaming media content from the Mars Rovers mission, the Cassini flyby and the ongoing space shuttle missions. eTouch’s partnerships with Akamai Technologies and Yahoo! ensures that the content can be delivered to anyone on earth and downloaded on the Internet in less than two seconds without interruption or failure.
Since the launch of the Mars Rover missions, NASA’s web traffic has skyrocketed to 50 Gigabytes during special space events, such as the Return to Flight shuttle mission in July 2005 and the Atlantis space shuttle mission to resume construction of the International Space Station in September of 2006. Peak traffic of 50 Gigabytes is equal to all the words in all the books that would fill the U.S. Library of Congress 63 times.
eTouch has leveraged its experience with organizations like NASA to build out an enterprise-class wiki with a blog publishing tool. eTouch SamePage provides a number of advanced features, including WYSIWYG editing, project management, permissioning, administration and support for multiple domains.
Socialtext Incorporated is a company based in Palo Alto, California that produces enterprise social software, including a software platform by the same name. It is run by CEO Ross Mayfield and CTO Peter Kaminski. It counts the Omidyar Network and Draper Fisher Jurvetson among its investors. The company's board of directors includes Jimmy Wales, Joi Ito, and Tim Draper. Other company founders are Adina Levin and Edward Vielmetti.
Socialtext is an enterprise wiki and weblog based on Kwiki. It is available as a hosted service (from Socialtext Incorporated), as a hardware appliance, and now as Open Source.
Socialtext was a sponsor of Wikimania 2005 and 2006. It also donated US$2,000 in the Wikimedia Fundraiser 2005 Q4.
JotSpot is the first application wiki company that offers enterprise social software. The product is targeted mainly to small- and medium-sized businesses. The company was founded by Joe Kraus and Graham Spencer, co-founders of Excite.
Business customers of JotSpot include Whole Foods, eBay, Symantec, and Intel[1].
JotSpot's wiki is known for its easy to user interface and features such as the ability to send email to each page in the wiki, WYSIWYG editing, and embedded spreadsheet capabilities.
Beyond its basic wiki product, JotSpot also offers other applications including JotSpot Family Site,Class Reunion Planner, JotSpot Live, JotSpot Tracker and more.
In February 2006, JotSpot was named part of Business 2.0 Next Net 25 and in May 2006, it was honored as one of InfoWorld's 15 Start-ups to Wat
Atlassian Confluence is a commercial Java EE based knowledge management and collaboration tool produced by Atlassian Software Systems. It is a wiki, and can be used as a bliki.
Confluence is free for philanthropic and open-source projects. Academic and commercial organizations are charged based on number of users.
Some other nice features of Confluence are that it is extensible, and the source code is made available to purchasers. Confluence uses Java EE for the server side and has the ability to connect to virtually any SQL database, utilizing the JDBC-ODBC bridge driver. Formatting of the XHTML front end is done with another open-source software project, Velocity. Velocity is part of the Jakarta project (which was founded by the Apache Software Foundation, most famous for the Apache Web server and the Tomcat Application Server.
Other open-source components used include:
OpenSympony WebWork OpenSympony SiteMesh Hibernate Lucene Confluence also includes a plugin system with a variety of extension points ranging from theming capabilities and wiki macros to custom webwork actions, search extractors and event handlers. This makes Confluence a strong platform for rapid development and modification.
This is TruthbringerToronto's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Archives: 1, 2 |
![]() |
1 2 |
Personally I don't think he's notable enough outsite the band to have his own article, but I'll restore it if you want me to. -- Steel 21:26, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, please restore it. Thanks. TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 21:58, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- I've restored. Please consider merging all the content from the individual member articles into the main band article. -- Steel 22:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
Notice to editor on AfD nomination
Re you comments on my talk page, in recent times I have always gone to a prod (or sometimes speedy) before going forward with an AfD nomination. I will make a concerted effort going forward to place the AfD notice tag on an editor's page if they are not the person who removed the prod tag. If they removed the tag, I assume they are watching the article and a notice is not needed. This is a form of instruction creep.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 22:00, 27 September 2006 (UTC)
- I indicated to you I would add a notice to the user pages of the creators of pages I nominate for AfD. you left the following template as what should be used, {{subst:afd|Name of article}}, but when I went to add that to a users talk page, it did not work.--Gay Cdn (talk) (email) (Contr.) 13:29, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- I meant to say {{subst:adw|Name of article}}. adw probably stands for Article Deletion Warning. I'm sorry. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 19:44, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Can you take a look at this?
Can you look at this: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Anthropogeology and tell me what I did wrong? I have not listed an article for deletion in a while, and there have been some changes. So, apparently, I did something wrong, 'cause this does not look right. Thank you for your time. ---Charles 23:28, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for your note. There was a misplaced {{subst: which I removed. I also commented on the nomination. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 23:43, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking a look. I've listed a dozen articles, at least, for AfD, I'm not sure why I had trouble this time. ---Charles 23:48, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Murder of Angels
I don't know if reviews really count much or if the websites that did the reviews are significant. The interview barely mentions the Murder of Angels project. Still does not seem like much to me. -Sorry Nv8200p talk 04:41, 30 September 2006 (UTC)
Lloyd Levitin
I have added a comment regarding your argument on the Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Lloyd_Levitin page. Please read it and consider changing your vote. Thanks. --Ineffable3000 02:20, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
Peter Yavanov
Can you please explain why you decided to Speedy Keep Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Yavanov, a probable hoax article when all of it's votes during the day were for deletion. --Ineffable3000 07:03, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
- I did not. What you saw was a forgery by Infrogtation (talk • contribs • page moves • block user • block log) which I have just reverted. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 07:06, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Deletion of Aussie Pollie Stubs
I am very concerned about the recent deletion of around 50 stubs on Australian politicians. These articles lay the foundation for what Wikipedia will one day be..."a multilingual free encyclopedia of the highest possible quality to every single person on the planet in their own language" (Jimmy Wales). This however will not happen overnight. I draw parallels to my own project on Central Coast, New South Wales articles. 90% of the suburbs are stubs. But these stubs encourage anyone to edit. Even trivial information has a place on Wikipedia. It should not worry YOU if the articles contained very little information, but you should be happy that the articles had information. In many cases these articles only needed an infobox and they would have been reasonably adequate. In closing I ask anyone who has supported their deletion, that you reconsider your vote by visiting this page: Wikipedia:Deletion review/Log/2006 September 30#Albert Piddington (Australian politician) Todd661 10:18, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Strata
In reference to your comment about Strata touring nationally according to their website:WP:MUSIC states "Has gone on an international concert tour, or a national concert tour in at least one large or medium-sized country,[1] reported in NOTABLE and verifiable sources." (Emphasis mine) This means notability is not gained by having a national tour, but by having a national tour that was notable enough to be notable to a notable source! Sorry about the overuse of that word for a second. As far as wikipedia is concerned, I do not believe that bigger is better. It is important to stand by wikipedia policy. Green hornet 21:04, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
Chester Lovelle Talton
I'm not sure that I agree that Bishops are generally notable, but I'm certainly satisfied that this Bishop is notable due to the additions you have made. Nice job. Erechtheus 03:37, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Nascar Canada
Not «Nascar Canada» the nonsense, it is the content. But the content has been change after your removal... Next time read the article before removing that tag. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Souris2005 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
Barnstar
![]() |
The Barnstar of Rescue
For the numerous Wikipedia:Articles for deletion that you have saved with a well written, well researched argument. For Wikipedia's leading inclusionist. AnonEMouse (squeak) 13:51, 4 October 2006 (UTC) |
The Ancient Apostolic Communion
Hello,
Would you please take a moment to look over The Ancient Apostolic Communion article and its talk page. It has been nominated for deletion and I believe it is just as notable as other articles on Independent Catholic Churches.
Thank you. --Kf4bdy talk contribs 01:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- I added one link I could find to an article that mentions us in the Aiken Standard newspaper. That is all I have at the moment although there have been two other articles printed one in the North Augusta Star and one in the Kentucky New Era but neither have them in archive online. Is there a way I can add the info from a print article? --Kf4bdy talk contribs 02:34, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. Just cite the print articles in the same way you would in an academic essay, and include a summary if the headline does not offer a sufficient description of the article. See Wikipedia:Citing sources, also known as WP:CITE, for a discussion how to cite newspaper articles. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 02:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Do you mind giving it another once over? I have added some reliable sources. --Kf4bdy talk contribs 03:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- I changed bi-vocational to "All clergy in the church have paid jobs outside the church", which I think says the same thing. I have heard the term "worker priest" for clergy in this situation, possibly in the context of the Liberal Catholic Church. You mention the number of clergy, but you should also mention the number of the faithful. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for all your help. I have made the changes you suggested. Just slipped my mind while working on this article. --Kf4bdy talk contribs 06:35, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- I changed bi-vocational to "All clergy in the church have paid jobs outside the church", which I think says the same thing. I have heard the term "worker priest" for clergy in this situation, possibly in the context of the Liberal Catholic Church. You mention the number of clergy, but you should also mention the number of the faithful. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 06:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Do you mind giving it another once over? I have added some reliable sources. --Kf4bdy talk contribs 03:33, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
- Yes. Just cite the print articles in the same way you would in an academic essay, and include a summary if the headline does not offer a sufficient description of the article. See Wikipedia:Citing sources, also known as WP:CITE, for a discussion how to cite newspaper articles. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 02:39, 5 October 2006 (UTC)
hi. Sarah deleted it due to copyvio. Regards, Blnguyen | BLabberiNg 01:55, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
SEDS
The problem wasn't notability; the problem was it was a copyright violation. The author needs to release the text under the GFDL before it can be reinstated. Cheers, Sarah Ewart (Talk) 01:58, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
Mount Dale
HI thanks for the info, I've contacted an admin (User:Snottygobble to delete Mount Dale, Western Australia, all the information is in Mount Dale and way. Though WP;Australia has a naming convention for mountains so he may move it to Mount Dale (Western Australia). Gnangarra 10:32, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Its been merged into Mount Dale all the others are redirects. I couldn't add to article, but will have a some more area views as opposed to specific plant life I'll upload shortly. I'll drop you a note when I do, let pick the one thats best to illistrate the page Gnangarra 13:10, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
The Tracom group
Hello - I got your message and I admit to being a little confused - but I'm trying to fix the issues that you have mentioned. Social Style is actually a model known world-wide in the human resources/training & development industries and people often ask where it originated. This page details where and how it originated. I've been researching this - speaking with professors at universities (who often also don't know where social style originated). I notice that people use style as a behavioral term and I'm not even sure if they know that it came from social style. Meaning - in the circles that I associate with this is definitely of interest to people and it's notable because it's part of the history of interpersonal skills development - and is comparable to what most people in the general public know about a Myers-Briggs test - which is personality - but social style is behavioral. My point is that I will go in and try and cite more references - but for people in the HR and Training industries - this is of importance- it tells them the history of why they use the models that they use - and where they originated.Contribute Ideas 15:13, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
It seems that this page has already been deleted and I can't go in and edit it - please get in touch with me - I'd like to cite more references. And I absolutely believe this is very notable to people in the industry.Contribute Ideas 16:08, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply; the page can now be found at User:Contribute Ideas/TRACOM. Cheers and happy editing. Lectonar 14:33, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
I'm confused :(
I would appreciate your help if possible. I'm quite new to all this and am having trouble understanding why exactly the article on Anthony Yadgaroff is being deleted.
His name was listed on another wikipedia entry (for Bhukaran Jews) and thus we decided to put some information up about him should people want to read it.
I have tried to verify things by adding web sites for various mentioned companies etc, but it seems this is not good enough. It may just be me but I am very confused about what is actually wanted from me in order for this article to remain live.
I am quite happy to change it so that it follows the rules, but I'm just not sure how!
If you could please help that would be brilliant. Thanks.Kimwatkins 13:51, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
- You need to edit the article to demonstrate that this person satisfies WP:BIO. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 17:42, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks for your help. I have had a look at the WP: BIO page and do believe that Anthony Yadgaroff satisfies two of the categories, namely:
- The person made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in their specific field; and also the alternative test
- Google Test - Does a search for the subject produce a large number of distinguishable hits on Google or other well-known Internet search engine?
With this is mind, I would appreciate it if you could reconsider the deletion of this article.
Many thanks. Kimwatkins 16:10, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Bob Bradley.
Ok. It's just a rubbish article then. Go inclusionism. Dev920 (Tory?) 20:02, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Clark Mills (boatbuilder and designer)
Good catch. Evidently I didn't do a very good job of looking for the man. Thanks again ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 22:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)
Zaner Article
Thanks for improving the article. It has been improved to a level beyond deletion status. Still pretty stubby, but much improved with the references and such. --Jayron32 03:14, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Because of your input on previous music AfDs, I was hoping you would take a look at this article and provide your thoughts on whether or not it meets WP:MUSIC its latest AfD. PT (s-s-s-s) 18:29, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks!
Thanks for informing me of the improvements made in the Niles McKinley High School article. I have posted my comments here. Sr13 01:41, 11 October 2006 (UTC)
Contested Prod
Prod to AfD
Hi TT: just to let you know, I have moved the contested prod for Knox Glass Bottle Company to AfD. Cheers! Eusebeus 13:40, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
David Kendall
Just wanted to say thanks for bringing the David E. Kendall AFD to my attention. —Lowellian (reply) 23:02, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Storybook Land Canal Boats
I greatly expanded the Storybook Land Canal Boats article, and so I removed your proposal to merge the article with the Disneyland article. Disneyfile 05:58, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
- Well done. Thank you. I agree that a merger is no longer appropriate. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 12:43, 16 October 2006 (UTC)
Please review this newest AfD, your opinion would be appreciated. PT (s-s-s-s) 00:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)
Thanks very much for saving the article and adding the references. Unfortunately, the Centre's web presence is poor but I managed to find one other relevant link
Hello, Ronnie Nader's www.ecuadoralespacio.org reference is not a government official page, is a paid support for an aggency. In fact, Ronnie Nader's article in Wikipedia Spanish is sommeted to a votation for delete. The content of the article is made by the same Ronnie Nader if you see. Futhermore, he is not an astronaut but a space tourist.--Voidido 15:25, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
- I concure with the above comment. Please check out his talk page and contributions. He is trying to promote a private space tourism company. --SquidSK (1MC•log) 15:54, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
--Voidido 15:45, 19 October 2006 (UTC)
PostalWatch Incorporated
I nominated this article for deletion. Thanks for adding info and removing the tag. With your additions, I agree that it should stick around. --Wordbuilder 03:36, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Is unchanged since Sept 8, 2006? Is it possible no references are available for it as a legitimate entry? Should I AfD it? I prefer not to. Comments. --meatclerk 20:46, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- I added two references to the article. Could you please take another look at it? ---TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 22:31, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
- Article viability satified. I'll drop the subject with you. I only need to get it something to link to it. If you know of another article that can link to it, please let me know. Lastly, the References section corresponds to footnotes. That is when in the article you see 1 or [1], those numbers correspond with the notes in the References section. Should anyone have a question about the article, they can read the footnote to check the information. Please try to maintain the references, as I believe they help everyone. --meatclerk 22:44, 20 October 2006 (UTC)
Re: General Retailers and Traders Union
No problem. I will explain Marcelmizzi (talk · contribs) that the fact he is a co-owner of copyright does not mean he can include such information in Wikipedia. Hopefully that will prevent new misunderstandings. -- ReyBrujo 05:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)