Jump to content

User talk:Shellwood: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
→Do-gooder: new section
Line 184: Line 184:


:{{re|Suffusion of Yellow}} Thanks for the notice, it was legit after all. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood#top|talk]]) 22:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
:{{re|Suffusion of Yellow}} Thanks for the notice, it was legit after all. [[User:Shellwood|Shellwood]] ([[User talk:Shellwood#top|talk]]) 22:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)

== Do-gooder ==

you're a wanker shellwood

Revision as of 23:52, 15 July 2018

Thank you very much

The RfC discussion to eliminate portals was closed May 12, with the statement "There exists a strong consensus against deleting or even deprecating portals at this time." This was made possible because you and others came to the rescue. Thank you for speaking up.

By the way, the current issue of the Signpost features an article with interviews about the RfC and the Portals WikiProject.

I'd also like to let you know that the Portals WikiProject is working hard to make sure your support of portals was not in vain. Toward that end, we have been working diligently to innovate portals, while building, updating, upgrading, and maintaining them. The project has grown to 80 members so far, and has become a beehive of activity.

Our two main goals at this time are to automate portals (in terms of refreshing, rotating, and selecting content), and to develop a one-page model in order to make obsolete and eliminate most of the 150,000 subpages from the portal namespace by migrating their functions to the portal base pages, using technologies such as selective transclusion. Please feel free to join in on any of the many threads of development at the WikiProject's talk page, or just stop by to see how we are doing. If you have any questions about portals or portal development, that is the best place to ask them.

If you would like to keep abreast of developments on portals, keep in mind that the project's members receive updates on their talk pages. The updates are also posted here, for your convenience.

Again, we can't thank you enough for your support of portals, and we hope to make you proud of your decision. Sincerely,    — The Transhumanist   18:08, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S.: if you reply to this message, please {{ping}} me. Thank you. -TT

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
Thanks for your diligent fighting against vandalism on Wikipedia! EggRoll97 (talk) 13:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@EggRoll97: Thanks a lot for this. I'm glad to see that you have started reverting vandalism too. Keep it up! Shellwood (talk) 22:56, 27 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User LucasD3000

Just giving you a heads up that he removed my level 2 warning earlier. FigfiresSend me a message! 23:01, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Summertime Ball

Do you want to handle the reverts and I'll warn the accounts and IPs? -- Mr X ☎️ 11:54, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr Xaero: I'm afarid it is not very helpful to warn them in situations like this. We just have to keep on reverting until the page is protected. Shellwood (talk) 11:57, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Shellwood:If we go through the backlog and provide warnings, we might be able to stop some of this mass vandalism Mr X ☎️ 11:58, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Shellwood:, thanks for the assist on that article. Mr X ☎️ 12:09, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr Xaero: You're welcome! Shellwood (talk) 12:23, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Notice

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Robert McClenon (talk) 16:52, 1 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Reverts

@Shellwood you reverted an edit I made on Cantonese. I did not source the information from any website but from my personal knowledge since my relatives originate from China, HongKong — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lcs ylz (talk • contribs) 19:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lcs ylz: We dont build articles here based on personal opinions or experiences, see WP:OR. Please dont make these kind of changes again. Shellwood (talk) 19:39, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shellwood Re: Margaret Sanger. OK, I suppose. It's not a big deal; it's already mentioned in the next graf. I just thought it worthwhile to hoist that info in thumbnail form to the start of the article, because it's one of the major points someone would want to know about her at a glance. I came to the article, for instance, to fact-check that point in particular. Far from being destructive, I thought I was helping the next person like myself to come along and verify that point in haste. 162.221.175.130 (talk) 16:15, 13 June 2018 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 162.221.175.130 (talk)

Review page

Hey! All other articles of similar kind have been reviewed by various wikiusers, however this one some how got missed [1]. Can you please review it so that it is officially on the go! TIA! (Regent007 (talk) 00:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC))[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
You revert edits faster than me every time!!!! ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 00:46, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Abelmoschus Esculentus:Thanks a lot for this, keep up the good work! Shellwood (talk) 09:30, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Elimination Drive

Hello Shellwood, thank you for your work reviewing New Pages!

We can see the light at the end of the tunnel: there are currently 2900 unreviewed articles, and 4000 unreviewed redirects.

Announcing the Backlog Elimination Drive!

  • As a final push, we have decided to run a backlog elimination drive from the 20th to the 30th of June.
  • Reviewers who review at least 50 articles or redirects will receive a Special Edition NPP Barnstar: Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar. Those who review 100, 250, 500, or 1000 pages will also receive tiered awards: 100 review coin, 250 review coin, 500 review coin, 1000 review certificate.
  • Please do not be hasty, take your time and fully review each page. It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing.

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings. — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 06:57, 16 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Teardrop Nirvana may be a hoax

Xx236 (talk) 09:29, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Xx236: Hello there and thanks for bringing light into this. The whole thing looks very suspicious and I cant seem to find any information about this park. The AfD debate you opened is well justified. Shellwood (talk) 15:01, 19 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A kitten for you!

Thanks for being awesome!

Amb1985 (talk) 21:43, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have unreviewed a page you curated

Thanks for reviewing Patrick Tissier, Shellwood.

Unfortunately Kudpung has just gone over this page again and unreviewed it. Their note is:

Unattributed machine translation from fr.Wiki

To reply, leave a comment on Kudpung's talk page.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 June 2018

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:29, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template warnings

Re this. Template warnings serve a useful function, but in this case the issue was a simple one: the user was adding content to the wrong article. When this was pointed out to them, they stopped. Inundating them with several lengthy template messages that accuse them of disruptive editing at best only distracts from the point; at worst it's plain wrong: the user was not vandalising anyting, they were simply editing the wrong article. – Uanfala (talk) 12:25, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Uanfala: No, the user continued the editing after you removed the warnings, but now it seems to have stopped. Shellwood (talk) 12:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Editing on Nolan's page

Hello, I just saw you undid my editing on Nolan's bio. I think i explained why i did what i did, why did you undo? Moved the information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_awards_and_nominations_received_by_Christopher_Nolan

All the best, — Preceding unsigned comment added by 185.176.244.75 (talk) 11:05, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, I have undone my revert. Shellwood (talk) 11:10, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NPP Backlog Drive Appreciation

Special Edition New Page Patroller's Barnstar
For completing over 50 reviews during the 2018 June Backlog Drive, please accept this Special Edition Barnstar. Thank you for helping New Page Patrol and keep up the good work. Cheers! — Insertcleverphrasehere (or here) 19:01, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Albere Schröder Clarification

I wanted to follow up on the page Albert Schröder. I just want to politely clarify that the article is false and was being done so for the purposes of a University project. Following it being flagged as a hoax I immediately flagged it for speedy deletion as I do not want it to remain on wikipedia. I wanted to thank you for the time you have spent to fact check the work on wikipedia. The thesis I am working on in University has been to document the increase load of false or misleading information that has been created on the web. Over the past few months myself and two undergraduates have been stress-testing information sites of varying reliability in order to gauge how efficient and fast that site’s administrative community is at eliminating and fact checking false information. My apologies for unnecessarily taking up your time however hopefully the results of my research may hopefully, in the future, be applied to better help the curating community in combatting the spread of disinformation online. Infinityplatinum (talk) 5:53, 4 July 2018 (UTC)

@Infinityplatinum: Please don't repeat this experiment here again. Even though your thoughts may have been sincere Wikipedia does not allow such testing, see WP:HOAX. Shellwood (talk) 10:36, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Infinityplatinum: This was disrupting Wikipedia to illustrate a point and if you do anything like this ever again, I will block you indefinitely. Deliberately putting false information on Wikipedia is vandalism - do not think you are the Frank Abagnale of Wikipedia (and even Frank admits he was stupid and paid the price for his actions). Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:19, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:SameAbe

I blocked for 24 hours because they violated WP:3RR. Their unblock request shows they were editing in good faith, if disruptively, so a vandalism block is not appropriate. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 11:16, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: I hear what you say, but the content is still there. Labeling the band as "a white colonialist one" solely on the basis of their band name is baseless and OR. No sources or comments from the group themselves on issues like colonialism or politics in general can be found, so it is safe to say that this slur should be removed from the article at once. Shellwood (talk) 10:49, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cameroon

Please stop reverting totalitarian to authoritarian. 1) You’ve provided a link from Vox, which is a very UNRELIABLE news source largely due to its bias to the left-wing. 2) Cameroon’s President has granted himself unlimited power over any laws including constitution, dictator for 42 years and continuous suppression of Anglophone population, by international standards, Cameroon can be regarded as totalitarian regime. 59.102.33.100 (talk) 06:20, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Provide support for your claim that Vox is an unreliable source, simply screaming "left wing biased" won't help you. And a source that supports your claim that Cameroon is a totalitarian state. Shellwood (talk) 06:25, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New editor

I am a former ip editor (i can email you my former ips).Can you please nominate the Shirin Oskooi article for deletion (i can't i'm not confirmed). She is not notable and we can't have articles on this site for every reality show contestant. Please. Someone changed her redirect to an article and she is not notable at all. thank you ip 9+ — Preceding unsigned comment added by JasonJudsonOd (talk • contribs) 03:54, 13 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle message

Hello. I just want to let you know that in the coming version of Huggle (3.4.5), there will be a new feature of editing pages directly inside Huggle using an edit form. The edit form functions same as the web one. The default shortcut for this is E and the shortcut for "Edit page in browser" (which previously was E) has changed to Alt+E. If you want more non-automated edits or you prefer editing pages in the browser, you can swap the shortcuts of the above. If you have any questions, feel free to ask me or Petrb. Thank you. ~ Abelmoschus Esculentus (talk to me) 01:56, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fight Club revert

Hey there. I noticed on the 27 of April you reverted an edit by 2A02:587:3A14:9400:F4E9:AC74:9B81:D708 and kept the edit from being viewed publicly. I don’t mean to snoop around, but why was this edit not shown, pages are vandalised all the time, what made this one special? I’m sure you had good reason, I’m just very curious Ducktech89 (talk) 04:10, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ducktech89:Hi, I can't remember the details on this one but as you can see here[2] it was a serious BLP violation. Shellwood (talk) 04:22, 14 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Tham Luang cave rescue

I'm not sure this is vandalism. Though I admit I almost reverted too. Suffusion of Yellow (talk) 22:33, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Suffusion of Yellow: Thanks for the notice, it was legit after all. Shellwood (talk) 22:43, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do-gooder

you're a wanker shellwood

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Shellwood&oldid=850453691"