User talk:Gilo1969: Difference between revisions
Notifying user of possible copyvio on Walter Schiller |
|||
Line 254: | Line 254: | ||
{{tmbox |
{{tmbox |
||
| type = notice |
| type = notice |
||
| image = [[File:Imperial_College_London_crest.svg|100px|right]] |
| image = [[:File:Imperial_College_London_crest.svg|100px|right]]<!--Non free file removed by DASHBot--> |
||
| style = |
| style = |
||
| textstyle = |
| textstyle = |
Revision as of 05:01, 22 February 2011
Main | Talk | Vanity | Editing | Sandbox | WIP | Exit |
---|
|
|
Sorry about that, sources told me otherwise, and I didn't see the note. Coasterlover1994 15:43, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
- No problem. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 15:44, 4 July 2010 (UTC)
CSD tags
Hey, thanks for your efforts, just a couple of quick points, then I'll let you on your way! If the entire content of the page is "'.'", then {{db-test}} (G2) might be a better option than db-nocontext. It's associated author notification template is also more friendly. The other thing is that if the article is contextless but doesn't meet any other criterion, it's sometimes better to wait for a few hours to see what the author does with it rather than risking biting a newcomer. Keep up the good work. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 01:43, 25 July 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Starman (band)
Hello Gilo1969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Starman (band), a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Having a band member with their own article is generally enough to get through A7. Take to AfD if required. . Thank you. GedUK 17:56, 10 August 2010 (UTC)
unddo MY edits!
Who are you to undo MY edits?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Papanoel2010 (talk • contribs) 21:00, 20 August 2010 (UTC)
Re:
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Tiderolls 22:29, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
Please leave new page alone for a few weeks It will grow honest Y lle could be a new programme for Welsh Youth - at present there is a title and other info will be confirmed over the coming days Thanks in advance Mike —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikegriff (talk • contribs) 17:33, 24 August 2010 (UTC)
HELLO Gilo
I need help to fix the pagew where do I need to fix. Thank you(SwaggMagazine (talk) 15:46, 18 September 2010 (UTC))
Paul Segond
Hello, Gilo.
Merci et bravo pour votre traduction de Paul Segond. Je me permets de vous signaler cependant que l'orthographe la plus courante, en français, pour l'urètre (your urethra), est urètre, et non pas urèthre, à ne pas confondre en tout cas avec les uretères (your ureter), et que c'est ainsi (urètre) que ce vaisseau est orthographié, et non pas urèthre, dans les publications de Segond que nous citons en référence.
Voyant que vous traduisez du français à l'anglais et que vous vous intéressez à la médecine, je me permets d'attirer votre attention sur la page fr:Ernest Fourneau et sur toutes celles (plus de cinquante) qui y sont liées. Cordialement. --Thierry (talk) 00:48, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- Many thanks - article now corrected. I will look into further articles on French surgeons and physicians, although with that many it may take some time... GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 18:16, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
- No thanks to me, but to you, Gilo, who have done the job. I hope to see you again, on another working may be. Cordialement. --Thierry (talk) 12:34, 1 October 2010 (UTC)
Frédéric Chaslin
Thanks for your comments to Fredchaslin about his editing of the Frédéric Chaslin wikipedia page. I also wrote on Fiftytwo thirty's talk page on this. I'm sure you immediately surmised that Fredchaslin is Frédéric Chaslin himself. I anticipate edit wars on this, so I might need your help later on it. Cheers, DJRafe (talk) 16:10, 2 October 2010 (UTC)
And the PROD was removed. Have fun creating the AFD. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 23:15, 7 October 2010 (UTC)
Altered speedy deletion rationale: A B Rajib Hazarika
Hello Gilo1969. I am just letting you know that I deleted A B Rajib Hazarika, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, under a different criterion from the one you provided, which doesn't fit the page in question. Thank you. GedUK 18:46, 17 October 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion declined: Margot Leverett
Hello Gilo1969. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Margot Leverett, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Article claims coverage in reliable sources. Thank you. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:00, 24 October 2010 (UTC)
I redirected it to Harold the Dauntless. Bearian (talk) 23:51, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
Vincent Sunderland
Hi, I am the creator of the new Vince Sunderland page that you have tagged for speedy deletion. I understand why (because there in no citations or any proof at the moment), I am working on putting it in but I am new to doing citations, I will put them in as soon as I can, but until then can you PLEASE try not to have that page deleted. Vince Sunderland was a very notable man around Greater Moncton and is looked up to by thousands. Please, just give me a few days to put proof in, I'm working on putting it in as I write this.
I hope you understand.
Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BrandonsLe (talk • contribs) 01:09, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Hello, I'm just here to inform you that Milad Omranloo is now sourced and the BLPprod has been removed. If you still question the notability of the article feel free to use the traditional prod method or send it to AfD. —J04n(talk page) 10:45, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Contested Judgement of Taekwondo of Asian Games 2010
I noted you tagged Contested Judgement of Taekwondo of Asian Games 2010. I did not start the page, but am working on it from English language news sources, though will resort to the Chinese language page and Chinese language news sources of needed for greater detail. It is still in progress, but could you take a look and give it your input. Thanks. ludahai 魯大海 (talk) 10:24, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Blind (film)
Hi. You've informed me about speedy nomination of this article. I just created it, give me a few minutes I'm working on it atm. Userpd (talk) 21:24, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
Why didn't you delete your template for deletion from this article? After I (herein) left a note to you that I'm working on it? Where's a rush to delete when it was clear (after I left a note) I will manage to bring it to a state of minimal requirement. And some random admin who wouldn't be aware of me working on it would delete it and I wouldn't have to explain him that I was working on it by the time he had deleted it. It's your fault that you didn't remove the template, thus you could prevent the article from being removed and I wouldn't have to recreate it. Userpd (talk) 00:28, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
I received your message, I take it, you didn't see my note that I left here, so it somehow knocks your guilt of not preventing the deletion of the article as it was just a casual casus. Nevermind, though. Userpd (talk) 01:08, 26 November 2010 (UTC)
Salem (UK band)
I refer to your edits to Salem (UK band). Re coi, I have checked all info and believe it is all correct. There are several references included in the entry that agree with the information provided. Also a comment has been added that confirms that all the details are accurate and impartial.
Re deletion of link to Salem In The Beginning, I can't tell if this was done by you? Again, this entry is correct and verifiable with reference to the two record companies. Please can this be reinstated?
Thanks
PaulMacnamara (talk) 11:32, 29 November 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Please review the comments above re coi. Can you remove the coi, please?
Thanks
PaulMacnamara (talk) 13:11, 20 January 2011 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Dakon band
Hello Gilo1969
I don't know if writing here is right or not... I hope it is. I'm new to Wikipedia, first article and must admit I find it difficult to understand how everything works. 3 days ago I was working on a short article about a band. However when I entered today to edit it further I saw the deletion tag and now here I am. I worked at that article till late at night gathering online resources and completing them and I did read the first article tutorial/help page. It is not finished, I read the conditions of a such an article, the band is of great success and importance in the country where it comes from, that being Moldova, proven by facts. Can you please recover it so that I can edit it further and make it right in the end on Wiki ?! Thanks!
Dakon (talk) 23:03, 6 December 2010 (UTC)
- I cannot recover the article for you, but you might want to try one of these admins who can do so. I would suggest that the best way for you to develop this article would be to set up a user subpage, such as User:Dakon/Dakon (band), then move the page to the article space once it is ready. I would also draw your attention to this and this as your name suggests that you have a connection with the subject of your article; if this is the case, it would be better for someone else to write the article. In terms of avoiding the deletion problem in the future, have a look at this for help with determining notability. Best of luck, GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 18:46, 9 December 2010 (UTC)
London Wikimedia Fundraiser
Good evening! This is a friendly message from Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry, inviting you to the London Wikimedia Fundraising party on 19th December 2010, in approximately one week. This party is being held at an artistic London venue with room for approximately 300 people, and is being funded by Ed Saperia, a non-Wikipedian who has a reputation for holding exclusive events all over London. This year, he wants to help Wikipedia, and is subsidising a charity event for us. We're keen to get as many Wikimedians coming as possible, and we already have approximately 200 guests, including members of the press, and some mystery guests! More details can be found at http://ten.wikipedia.org/wiki/London - expect an Eigenharp, a mulled wine hot tub, a free hog roast, a haybale amphitheatre and more. If you're interested in coming - and we'd love to have you - please go to the ten.wikipedia page and follow the link to the Facebook event. Signing up on Facebook will add you to the party guestlist. Entry fee is a heavily subsidised £5 and entry is restricted to over 18s. It promises to be a 10th birthday party to remember! If you have any questions, please email me at chasemewiki at gmail.com.
Hope we'll see you there, (and apologies for the talk page spam) - Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry (talk) 22:54, 12 December 2010 (UTC)
Carol Hogel Article
Hello Gilo1969,
i have added some references in my article, so I hope it's safe now. Thanks! Sausa (talk) 02:43, 13 December 2010 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/7/74/Ambox_warning_yellow.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_yellow.svg.png)
The article Excitement (emotion) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- This unsourced article does not seem to be able to be made into a full article, and is already coverered by anticipation.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sorry for the template, and I removed your speedy deletion tag as well. The context is there, but it can still be deleted. Bearian (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi. Looks like there was an edit conflict - we appear to have been tagging at the same time for much the same things. Quite honestly I'm inclined to PROD it because it has not even started working yet and cannot possibly have accumulated any notability whatsoever. --Kudpung (talk) 03:02, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
- I would tend to agree - I err on the side of caution in medical articles, but I was close to a PROD. Given that the college has not opened yet, it cannot have gained notability, as you say. I also wonder whether the page is there for advertising purposes. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 03:06, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Robert Jones (surgeon) at DYK
Nice article and a good hook; it just needs the addition of a few refs (which I think are already in the article). I found that Ref 8 leads to a blank page (perhaps it has limited access), but I found the full text available here. Do you think this might be a better one to use?--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 15:14, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for coming back to me. You are right, the PMC url is a much better idea for the main url; I have changed it accordingly. Please let me know if there are any other references required; as I mentioned in the initial edit summary, this is still a work in progress, but I thought I'd put what I had on wiki as it has taken me far too long already. Best wishes, GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 15:34, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I have asked on the DYK Suggestions page for more references. Once these are done, I shall be pleased to approve it for DYK. Cheers.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done - the reference for the mechanism of inury in the Jones fracture is very detailed; the reference for Jones's WWI activities is not so good, but the best account of this (from the Welsh Orthopaedic Society) seems now to be a dead link. Please let me know if any further detail is needed. Regards, GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 18:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry to seem pedantic, but we do need a reference after the sentence containing the hook — the second sentence in the last section. It seems petty, but that's the "rule".--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, it is mentioned in the About.com reference provided, but the best reference for this is the original paper. If the About.com reference is not good enough, could the original paper reference be moved to the end of the "hook" sentence? GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 18:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be the best. Happy New Year.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Many thanks, and a Happy New Year to you too. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 19:49, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, that would be the best. Happy New Year.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 19:24, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- No problem, it is mentioned in the About.com reference provided, but the best reference for this is the original paper. If the About.com reference is not good enough, could the original paper reference be moved to the end of the "hook" sentence? GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 18:48, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Sorry to seem pedantic, but we do need a reference after the sentence containing the hook — the second sentence in the last section. It seems petty, but that's the "rule".--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 18:43, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Done - the reference for the mechanism of inury in the Jones fracture is very detailed; the reference for Jones's WWI activities is not so good, but the best account of this (from the Welsh Orthopaedic Society) seems now to be a dead link. Please let me know if any further detail is needed. Regards, GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 18:31, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, I have asked on the DYK Suggestions page for more references. Once these are done, I shall be pleased to approve it for DYK. Cheers.--Peter I. Vardy (talk) 17:02, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Happy new year
![]() |
The New Page Patroller's Barnstar | |
In recognition of your excellent, and highly accurate, CSD tagging, particularly the nastier attack pages. Thanks, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC) |
- Btw, your userpage says you're in London. Don't know if you'd have any interest in this. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:28, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks, and Happy New Year to you too. I have thought about coming along, but not yet been able to. I must drag myself away from my PC one of these weekends... Cheers. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 05:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I just zapped another one of your speedies! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Good work. It's good to get a little positive feedback; I'm not always sure about NPP, and most feedback for it is negative. Thanks again, and I'll try to make it to one of these. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 05:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Such is life, especially for a WP admin! All too often we're only noticed when we make a mistake (Wikipedians in general and admins in particular), but I guess we just have to make the effort to compliment each other on a job well done once in a while. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Very true. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 05:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Such is life, especially for a WP admin! All too often we're only noticed when we make a mistake (Wikipedians in general and admins in particular), but I guess we just have to make the effort to compliment each other on a job well done once in a while. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:54, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Good work. It's good to get a little positive feedback; I'm not always sure about NPP, and most feedback for it is negative. Thanks again, and I'll try to make it to one of these. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 05:41, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Fair enough. I just zapped another one of your speedies! ;) HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 05:34, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
- Many thanks, and Happy New Year to you too. I have thought about coming along, but not yet been able to. I must drag myself away from my PC one of these weekends... Cheers. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 05:32, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
DYK for Robert Jones (surgeon)
![]() | On 2 January 2011, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Robert Jones (surgeon), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the first patient in whom Sir Robert Jones described his eponymous fracture was himself? You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, quick check) and add it to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
Materialscientist (talk) 20:17, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
Neil March
You removed the article for deletion tag for this person.
Are you convinced he meets notability criteria?
The article reads like an autobiography or fan pov.Tomintoul (talk) 16:48, 3 January 2011 (UTC)
deleting article
Hi,I wrote an article about an architect I like, but it has been deleted by you because you think is for advertising. Can you please at least remove completely the article or tell me how can I do it? It is not very good publicity for him to appear in wikipedia like someone who has been deleted for matters of advertising! Thank you very much — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anyacacciapuoti (talk • contribs) 13:32, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
You do English very well!
I don't speak English very well.--환골탈태 (talk) 00:50, 16 January 2011 (UTC)
Hangon
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/23/Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg/40px-Nuvola_apps_edu_languages.svg.png)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Help
What template did you use to add the speedy deletion table on my talk page. I know how to add it on an article, but I don't know how to warn a user. Any help would be appreciated... Mìthrandir (talk) 14:51, 28 January 2011 (UTC)
Patliputra karuna stupa
Hi Gilo1969.
That's the third time the CSD templates have been removed by that other IP editor, in case you didn't notice. We had an (edit conflict) when I was trying to warn 117.197.65.13 (talk · contribs). - 220.101 talk\Contribs 13:49, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Indeed - I am watching the page. Refer for admin review? GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 13:52, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Too late - been deleted. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 13:54, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
- Should 'delete' the editor too!. Oh dear, AGF failure! I wonder if it was the same editor, Ajnabe.kumar (talk · contribs), that created this, and the other 6 rather poor articles? (7 in an hour!) - 220.101 talk\Contribs 15:07, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
The Contribution Team cordially invites you to Imperial College London
100px|right | For our first official recruitment drive! Starting on Wednesday the 9th of February at 12:30pm. We would love to have you! |
All Hail The Muffin Nor does it taste nice... 18:19, 5 February 2011 (UTC)
Schlieffen Plan
Why did you revert the edit by 187.67.4.172? It was right. Boolyme बूलीमी Chat बोलो!! 20:04, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
- As far as I can tell, it was not correct; the section is about criticism of the plan, and explains that advances in warfare made the plan unfeasible. The quote immediately after states that "the plan would again become possible in the next generation". I am, however, not an expert in this area, and if I am wrong please feel free to revert the edit. Regards, GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 20:10, 12 February 2011 (UTC)
equipe europe
Hi Gilo,
Thank you for your help , i have a lot of thing to learn before to know how taking charge Wikipedia. Add flags, pictures and all the other stuff.
Thank you again,
Guillaume. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gmahe (talk • contribs) 22:42, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
- No problem. GILO ACCIDENT & EMERGENCY 22:45, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/c/cf/Copyright-problem.svg/40px-Copyright-problem.svg.png)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Walter Schiller, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.jewsofchina.org/JewsOfChina08/SendFile.asp?DBID=1&LNGID=1&GID=579.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.
If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 22:35, 15 February 2011 (UTC)