Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 21: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:53, 28 February 2011

< February 20	February 22 >

February 21

File:Trapped underground.jpg

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:21, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. It was only orphaned because someone removed it from the template it was on, and anyway it's freely licensed so it doesn't have to be used. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 11:10, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- You just made the argument about why we should move it to Commons and delete the local copy. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm saying that someone asked that a local copy be kept, and that as a matter of courtesy to them, and because the image is free and therefore harmless, we should allow it. Our hosting of this image does not affect you, or anyone else. SW, this petty application of rules, or the invention of rules that no one's agreed to, is driving editors away. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 15:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Not an orphan. See 7 July 2005 London bombings. Jimmy Pitt talk 15:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Not an orphan, no reason to delete, has a KeepLocal template on it. Jayjg ^(talk) 17:51, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Winslow.jpg

Orphaned. SchuminWeb (Talk) 06:28, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Again, it's freely licensed, so it doesn't have to be used. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 11:11, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

- You just made the argument about why we should move it to Commons and delete the local copy. SchuminWeb (Talk) 15:16, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See above. SlimVirgin ^{TALK|CONTRIBS} 15:50, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

At a future date, I will require that image. Otherwise, I would not have spent a great deal of time drawing it. Who the hell is SchuminWeb to be telling me what I do and do not need? I don't beleive I have come across him before - I do not wish to do so again. When I require it, it will cease to be orphaned - the precise timing of my work is one of the few things that Wikipedia's peurile and grossly overstaffed beaurocracy has no jusidiction over. Now, untill I tell you that you may delete, you will leave it exactly where it is. Giacomo 19:39, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia is not your personal Webhost. If you find the file so useful, I'm surprised that you haven't saved it to your own computer so that you can have it. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:16, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't be presumptious with me. If I have gone to the bother of drawing and uploading an image for a future article there will be a very good reason and it's not your place to reason why. Once I have uploaded a required file that is it, I don't need it on my computer are you seriously suggesting that I do not know what I am talking about when it comes to Wikipedia articles? Please go about your "admin" duties, but don't bother me with them. Giacomo 19:52, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep on the basis that it's harmless, legal, and someone plans to use it in the future. What is the benefit in deleting it? Thparkth (talk) 02:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It is unused and it has a bad description and therefore I think it is not usable and out of scope. We should keep usable files if the license is ok but we should not keep all free files. A "KeepLocal" should not be used as a way to get unusable files kept on Wikipedia forever. It should be used if the file is usable and there is a good reason to keep it on enwiki. Giacomo should by the way learn not to attack other users and that Wikipedia is not a personal homepage. --MGA73 (talk) 18:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A personal home page? You idiot! Have you the remotest idea what you are talking about? Giacomo 19:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:EarlyDesigns.jpg

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the media below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was: delete. Would otherwise have been a keep if not for File:TheClevelandShowPromo.png, which also illustrates the family, and the article contains no discussion of the characters' original appearances, which would be required for the contextual significance requirements of WP:NFCC#8. SchuminWeb (Talk) 13:42, 28 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This image does meet the non-free image policy. Only one rationale in one article, not in the other article. JJ98 (Talk) 09:02, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The fair use rationale for The Cleveland Show seems pretty reasonable. Remove the image from the other article if necessary, but don't delete the image itself. Thparkth (talk) 02:23, 25 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the media's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Delete, per nom. 117Avenue (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment the file license says that's it's not copyrighted, I assume because it's supposed to be a "panorama" type image. 65.95.14.96 (talk) 03:39, 22 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Psp4805.JPG

Orphaned, photo of copyrighted dvd covers Calliopejen1 (talk) 20:15, 21 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 34: / Line 34: @@
 *'''Keep''' on the basis that it's harmless, legal, and someone plans to use it in the future. What is the benefit in deleting it? <span style="border-radius: 3px; padding: 2px; border: 1px solid #808080; font-size: x-small; font-family: Lucida Console, Monaco, monospace">[[User:Thparkth|Thparkth]] ([[User_Talk:Thparkth|talk]])</span> 02:20, 25 February 2011 (UTC)
 *'''Delete'''. It is unused and it has a bad description and therefore I think it is not usable and out of scope. We should keep usable files if the license is ok but we should not keep all free files. A "KeepLocal" should not be used as a way to get unusable files kept on Wikipedia forever. It should be used if the file is usable and there is a good reason to keep it on enwiki. Giacomo should by the way learn not to attack other users and that Wikipedia is not a personal homepage. --[[User:MGA73|MGA73]] ([[User talk:MGA73|talk]]) 18:26, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
+::A personal home page? You idiot! Have you the remotest idea what you are talking about? <small><span style="border:1px solid black;padding:1px;">[[User:GiacomoReturned|<span style="color:White;background:Black;font-family:sans-serif;">'''&nbsp;Giacomo&nbsp;'''</span>]]</span></small> 19:53, 28 February 2011 (UTC)
 ====[[:File:EarlyDesigns.jpg]]====

Wikipedia:Files for deletion/2011 February 21: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 19:53, 28 February 2011

February 21

File:Trapped underground.jpg

File:Winslow.jpg

File:EarlyDesigns.jpg

File:Cannibal holocaust.png

File:Gurch-barnstars.png

File:We go green bay.jpg

File:AVPRefections.jpg

File:AeroMint.jpg

File:Arbys7751.JPG

File:Ayman.jpg

File:Bernie - 2006-09-03 - 11-53 AN - 26 Seconds - Sunday.jpg

File:Benztropine.png

File:Zamaneh Workshop 2006.JPG

File:Zellers7778.JPG

File:Adecco-CIMG4904.JPG

File:Molson7734.JPG

File:Hungry7787.JPG

File:Mikes6978.JPG

File:Edmonton-sun6345.JPG

File:Psp4805.JPG