User talk:Praxidicae: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
This user has account creator rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has autopatrolled rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user is an edit filter manager on the English Wikipedia.
Je suis Coffee
This user has new page reviewer rights on the English Wikipedia.
This user has page mover rights on the English Wikipedia.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 196: Line 196:
:{{u|Verity1964}} The issue is that neither of these sources are ''coverage'' of the individual. <span style=font-size:11px>[[User:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#614051">CHRISSY</span><span style="color:#301934;font-size:11px">'''MAD'''</span>]] <span style="color:#9090C0;letter-spacing:-2px;font-size:9px">❯❯❯</span>[[User talk:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#614051;font-size=11px">¯\_(ツ)_/¯</span>]]</span> 12:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
:{{u|Verity1964}} The issue is that neither of these sources are ''coverage'' of the individual. <span style=font-size:11px>[[User:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#614051">CHRISSY</span><span style="color:#301934;font-size:11px">'''MAD'''</span>]] <span style="color:#9090C0;letter-spacing:-2px;font-size:9px">❯❯❯</span>[[User talk:Chrissymad|<span style="color:#614051;font-size=11px">¯\_(ツ)_/¯</span>]]</span> 12:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)


== Request on 12:26:49, 3 October 2017 for assistance on [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|AfC]] submission by Verity1964 ==
{{anchor|12:26:49, 3 October 2017 review of submission by Verity1964}}
{{Lafc|username=Verity1964|ts=12:26:49, 3 October 2017|declinedtalk=Draft:Vikki_Bramshaw}}


<!-- Start of message -->


Both books give a biography of the author - one is written by the author herself but the other is an independent biography written by a different author who was publishing an anthology. There is plenty of coverage on the internet but I have used these sources because they are published books. I could remove the reference to her own book but would the independent biography be a fair reference?
Both books give a biography of the author - one is written by the author herself but the other is an independent biography written by a different author who was publishing an anthology. There is plenty of coverage on the internet but I have used these sources because they are published books. I could remove the reference to her own book but would the independent biography be a fair reference?

Revision as of 17:54, 3 October 2017

This user wishes she was back in Turks and Caicos
But this in no way affects Chrissymad's ability to respond. She just wants everyone to know.

Re: reverted changes to "Berlinette" disambiguation page.

Hello Chrissymad

I noticed that the Berlinette page was reverted. I am planning to create a new page with the content I used in the previous change and am looking for suggestions on an article name. I'm considering "Berlinette (autobody style)". The reason I made the change was that all of the disambiguation links seemed to be to secondary meanings of the word, and I had wanted to assign the basic meaning to the simplest article name. Sorry if I contravened policy.

Kumboloi (talk)

01:21:56, 18 May 2017 review of submission by 96.248.95.183


I've added a lot of references, I hope they are enough. I have been waiting since April 30th, did I do something wrong?

Request to review and publish the page, The_Asian_Age_Bangladesh

Could you please review the page and publish it, since its a daily english newspaper in Bangladesh. It should be at wikipedia page since some users want to know about this newspaper. See asian age at here, https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english , http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper [1][2]Thanks. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Asian_Age_Bangladesh


References

  1. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper
  2. ^ https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english

https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english, http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper [1] [2] http://www.bangladeshimedia.com/Bangladeshi-English-Newspaper.html[3] Bangladesh Government official tender notice published at the newspaper,[4][5] [6] [7]


https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english, http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper

[8], [9]

References

  1. ^ http://dfp.portal.gov.bd/
  2. ^ Department of Films & Publications- Bangladesh Government| চলচ্চিত্র ও প্রকাশনা অধিদপ্তর- http://dfp.portal.gov.bd/sites/default/files/files/dfp.portal.gov.bcd/page/415b6d7c_437f_4e1e_a541_aa5c33be9d01/List%20of%20Registered%20newspapers%20(March%202017)-%20B.pdf
  3. ^ http://www.bangladeshimedia.com/The-Asian-Age-Bangladesh.html
  4. ^ http://www.lged.gov.bd/UploadedDocument/Tender/ProcurementTender/1/14274/naogaon34_egp.htm
  5. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper
  6. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper
  7. ^ https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english
  8. ^ https://www.w3newspapers.com/bangladesh/#english
  9. ^ http://www.24livenewspaper.com/english-newspaper

08:14:35, 21 May 2017 review of submission by StillEvolving


I have rewritten Draft:Robert_G._Darling completely and I have provided references. Please have a look and let me know if it is OK now - Thanks for the guidance.

Speedy deletion nomination of A Deadly Presence

Please don't delete this page. There is no promotion- I've described what was in the book.

12:47:22, 22 May 2017 review of submission by Suprava Saha



I want to tell you that in my article Saha APPs all the content is true.
If you do not think that it is true or not then see my website https://ssuprava2october20.wixsite.com/suprava-saha
And plz accept it.

02:18:39, 1 June 2017 review of submission by EdwGross


Hi, I now tried to use better sources for the movie - I hope this works better! Please let me know if I should do any further changes. Thank you very much for your help Edward

16:18:02, 13 June 2017 review of submission by Robert twain


Thanks Chrissymad for the review. I added a few lines to the draft to explain better who the subject is and a few more references that are easier to check than printed books. Consider that the subject is known worldwide and very appreciated in the street art context, moreover if you search for "nevercrew" on google is easy to see their actual presence and notability. I also re-read the wikipedia guidelines for notability and for sources, as you suggested, but I'm sure that what I wrote is perfectly in line with them. One of the references I added is the SIK ISEA archive, an official archive where are listed actual swiss artists with description of who they are. Let me know! Thanks!

12:01:54, 14 June 2017 review of submission by 2605:E000:6022:4500:7428:8DEB:E9BB:AA06


I would like a re-review for draft: The Orphan Age because I have added several credible and legitimate sources to the draft page. There are plenty of sources listed on the draft page now that should satisfy for acceptance onto Wikipedia. Thank you 👍

20:47:56, 15 June 2017 review of submission by Hakhond


My article was deleted twice. I would like to know what changes can I make to make it a wiki page. It is called Mind Your Work Thanks


19:08:30, 22 July 2017 review of submission by 97.68.248.132



Hello:

This event has grown to become a public health staple in this little Caribbean island. What changes would you suggest? While some countries like the United States have sporting events like the Super Bowl where the nation gets involved, this just as integrative - touching everyone on our island with direct involvement form the government, people, and tourists that come.

Thank you, Chris

07:22:23, 7 August 2017 review of submission by Freshwater.pr


To know what was exactly wrong as one whole section has been removed. Most sources had been cited. Please let me know what I should write or how to make the article better & have it published.

Freshwater.pr

RMM Page

Hello, I would like to remind you that we are allowed to edit wiki pages when they are in the deletion review process. In fact, it is encouraged. Thank you! I've reverted the page back to the version I edited, which undid your undo. If you have specific problems with the page feel free to edit! But I am well within wiki guidelines to edit the page and try to improve it based on the AfD concerns. Outlier11

Outlier11 The COI issues have not been addressed and thus I've added the tag back. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:53, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That was an oversight on my part, I meant to put it back in. Outlier11

September 2017

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Bert Biscoe. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you.  --- Α Guy Into Books™ § (Message) -  20:37, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Aguyintobooks Good faith was assumed - however what appears to be an edit war warranted my warning to you and still does. 3 reverts is when you get into block territory. That warning was a friendly reminder that you were getting to that point. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 20:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thats ok, but templates really get on my nerves, possibly they just seem patronising or something... I did put the content on the AfD discussion page rather than restoring it again, which has generated another thread of argument (as usual) so no worries!.  --- Α Guy Into Books™ § (Message) -  21:03, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

12:02:24, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Vikas2007shukla




Hello sir,

I am so sorry to past mistakes but currently person have a notabile. i requested ypu to please verify and create article.

Great to see...

Your name popping up several places on my watchlist again :) TonyBallioni (talk) 12:24, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

13:25:04, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Vikas2007shukla


dear sir , person is notable , he is famous celebrities , could you understand , previous deletion year 2015 , person has not notale, but prasent he is famous indian actor.

13:26:59, 27 September 2017 review of submission by Viktor Paul


Hi Chrissymad, thanks for the feedback. I have done some changes and hope this is the right direction. It is not supposed to be an advertising article from my side! However, if you write something about an artist you likely have a collection of what he/she did which gives it a bit of a advertising feel. But that´s not the intention. Please let me know, if my changes helped or what I can improve more. Thanks a lot! Viktor.

17:14:31, 2 October 2017 review of submission by Charliepeterson123



Hi Chrissymad, I was just wondering what I can do to make my article acceptable? I would really liked to have it published and was hoping you could guide me in the next steps I should take?

Thank you so much

03:57:02, 3 October 2017 review of submission by Jzirin


I have revised my draft to include references to publications where my articles have appeared. All my books and articles are not about me but about external subjects (the courts, the law, foreign relations). SINCE ZIRIN IS NOTED AS A WRITER AS WELL AS A LAWYER AND TALK SHOW HOST, IT IS RELEVANT TO CITE HIS WRITINGS TO VERIFY THE SUBJECT'S PROMINENCE. Please tell me of anything else I need to do to qualify for publication. Thanks for your assistance. Jim Zirin (talk) 03:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC)October 2, 2017[reply]

Jzirin, the Golden Rule for Articles says that you must have independent sources that discuss the subject in detail. There is nothing wrong with including some of Zarin's publication history or listing some of his publishers, but in order to demonstrate notability you must include what other people have said about him. Otherwise, it's just a promotional page with no verifiable substance. On that note, I highly recommend you check out WP:REFB Section 3.1 for more information about adding references to an article. Primefac (talk) 11:57, 3 October 2017 (UTC) (talk page stalker)[reply]

Request on 12:16:24, 3 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Verity1964


Hello! I don't know how I can make my sources any more verifiable, they are from published books which I thought would be more than adequate for a reference. Can you tell me where I am going wrong? Verity (trying to make up the Vikki Bramshaw article)

Verity1964 (talk) 12:16, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Verity1964 The issue is that neither of these sources are coverage of the individual. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 12:17, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Both books give a biography of the author - one is written by the author herself but the other is an independent biography written by a different author who was publishing an anthology. There is plenty of coverage on the internet but I have used these sources because they are published books. I could remove the reference to her own book but would the independent biography be a fair reference?


Verity1964 (talk) 12:26, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 17:28:26, 3 October 2017 for assistance on AfC submission by Blue416


I would like to refer you to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKC455 which is another campus radio station at another campus of our university. There page has even less of what you have outlined on details, yet is approved and displayed without issue.

I have demonstrated its notability through newspaper articles, media releases including Rogers TV, the biggest media network other than Bell in the area, and the sources (a number of them), are reliable, independent and totally unaffiliated with the article's topic.

The criteria has been met according to the details, and your response is contrary to what has been posted. I believe the due-diligence in this instance has been overlooked. How do I escalate the issue?

Blue416 (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Blue416 (talk) 17:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

17:33:45, 3 October 2017 review of submission by Blue416


I would like to refer you to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CKC455 which is another campus radio station at another campus of our university. There page has even less of what you have outlined on details, yet is approved and displayed without issue.

I have demonstrated its notability through newspaper articles, media releases including Rogers TV, the biggest media network other than Bell in the area, and the sources (a number of them), are reliable, independent and totally unaffiliated with the article's topic.


The criteria has been met according to the details, and your response is contrary to what has been posted. I believe the due-diligence in this instance has been overlooked. How do I escalate the issue?

It was not given "mere mentions". Rogers TV did a complete feature on the station. Varsity newspaper did a full article on the station. The local newspaper did an interview feature as well. What do you want to see, because everything you mention is currently included?

Blue416 the sources you've included are largely run of the mill and lack significant in depth independent coverage.

Please also review our guidelines on editing with a conflict of interest. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 17:45, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Praxidicae&oldid=803629810"