User talk:StillEvolving

Welcome![edit]

Hello, StillEvolving, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:01, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license[edit]

Unspecified source/license for File:Darling Photo.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Darling Photo.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 23:01, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Darling Photo.jpg listed for discussion[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Darling Photo.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination.

ATTENTION: This is an automated, bot-generated message. This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 23:55, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Robert G. Darling has a new comment[edit]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Robert G. Darling. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 00:09, 3 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert G. Darling (May 7)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chrissymad was:

Needs to be rewritten entirely as I've gutted it due to a massive copyvio. This needs to be written in your own words not copied from other sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert G. Darling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! StillEvolving, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 11:56, 7 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert G. Darling (June 26)[edit]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheSandDoctor was:

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Robert G. Darling and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TheSandDoctor (talk) 19:22, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question[edit]

Hello, StillEvolving! I'm Jcc. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. jcc (tea and biscuits) 22:06, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your advice Jcc and especially your encouragement - I will work some more on it. How would I go about providing verification for education - I have looked a few other pages but I do not see examples of this - for example Eleanor Mariano has a link from her school to the wiki of the school but here is nothing that proves she goes to that school. StillEvolving (talk) 22:52, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Well, where did you get the information from about his school? Normally 'proof' might come from a name-drop in a news article, or the subject's autobiography. With regards to the Eleanor Mariano article, the section has been tagged since 2012 and in theory any editor could remove the uncited information. jcc (tea and biscuits) 18:36, 27 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jcc - some general education info I got from his website or LinkedIn page - I put such up there as general background, as I did not think they were contentious - I figured one could go to the college/institute to verify further but this is not published for immediate access in the public domain. Shall I just delete things like education if there is not a readily available link ? Thanks again for this help. StillEvolving (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The guideline on using LinkedIn as a source says that it can be used if the subject's LinkedIn is verified, but if his is not, then just removing it will be easier. On another note- do you have any relationship which might result in a conflict of interest with Robert? If you do it's best to declare anything now to avoid problems down the line. jcc (tea and biscuits) 16:10, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Jcc - sorry for the delay -Summer heats up for me busy-wise. Re conflict of Interest - I do not think I have a conflict but maybe you can tell me if you consider that I do and I will be happy to do what ever is right. I met Dr. Darling a few months ago through some temp work that I do (bookkeeping/admin). I thought his background was fascinating and would be a good addition to Wikipedia. At that point I had edited a few pages and was looking for topics to contribute. I did seek his permission and I also asked him for a photo which he provided to me. If you can tell me whether this would be considered a conflict and if so how I indicate this I would appreciate it. Re LinkedIn Thanks for the guidance on LinkedIn. I do not see where his page is verified so I have removed all of the background things that I found there. I have only left the things that can be verified by third parties. Please have a look and let me know what other changed I may need to make. I appreciate you working with me on this. StillEvolving (talk) 13:52, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, the article looks a lot better now. With regards to conflict of interest, what I've done is place a note on the Draft talk page saying that you are professionally connected with Dr. Darling. This doesn't affect your ability to edit the article. I've also moved the article to mainspace, where it can still be further improved. Best wishes, jcc (tea and biscuits) 08:46, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Robert G. Darling has been accepted[edit]

Robert G. Darling, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 08:44, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for all of your help Jcc - I will continue to improve this and other articles.StillEvolving (talk) 11:38, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]