Jump to content

Talk:David Freiheit: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
SineBot (talk | contribs)
Line 18: Line 18:


I totally agree. Viva is extreme hard right. His streams consist of non-stop flows of fake news, conspiracy theories and lies. The page is not accurate in the current state. [[User:TruthBuster21223|TruthBuster21223]] ([[User talk:TruthBuster21223|talk]]) 21:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
I totally agree. Viva is extreme hard right. His streams consist of non-stop flows of fake news, conspiracy theories and lies. The page is not accurate in the current state. [[User:TruthBuster21223|TruthBuster21223]] ([[User talk:TruthBuster21223|talk]]) 21:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)
:Stupid smear is stupid. I've watched his videos for years, and if he's "hard-right" to you, you're left of Stalin.
:Stupid smear is stupid. I've watched his videos for years, and if he's "hard-right" to you, you're left of Stalin. <!-- Template:Unsigned IP --><small class="autosigned">—&nbsp;Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|unsigned]] comment added by [[Special:Contributions/2601:647:4F00:113A:F918:A2BA:61E:4AE1|2601:647:4F00:113A:F918:A2BA:61E:4AE1]] ([[User talk:2601:647:4F00:113A:F918:A2BA:61E:4AE1#top|talk]]) 18:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)</small> <!--Autosigned by SineBot-->


== your live feed ==
== your live feed ==

Revision as of 19:00, 4 April 2022

Characterization of DF's views

We need more than DF's own opinion of where he stands on the political spectrum for this article. Relying on his own opinion of himself isn't NPOV. The term "non-partisan" is narrow and only means that one isn't a member of a political party. He could still be left or right wing (or something else) regardless of party affiliation. When you look at his YouTube channel and his Twitter feed, they are pretty clearly targeted at an audience that is sympathetic to views that are anti-left in the American context, eg: support for Michael Flynn, criticism of Breonna Taylor and criticism of Covid 19 restrictions in various jurisdictions. While he presents his opinions as merely those of a "lawyer explaining the law", they are very skewed and in some cases untenable legal opinions. We can do better here. 192.252.235.6 (talk) 05:28, 14 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-left? Or anti-mainstream? He fully supports his opinions with factual information, usually information that is avoided by mainstream media and corporate news. I have found some of his opinions disagreeable, but never untenable. Not to mention that many of his opinions and controversial views have proven to be true after a while. I'm tired of Wikipedia's bad practices of sourcing opinions that blatantly mislabel individuals (or organizations) as skewed or extreme when they're clearly not. I would not consider anything DF says is purposefully skewed. It just so happens the information that is provided by the mainstream happens to be skewed more to the right because the information he tries to bring forward is information that gets buried. Thus, you will be conflating he stands on the political spectrum with what he is trying to bring to light, which would be a type of unfair mischaracterization. 76.184.97.233 (talk) 00:55, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

POV: Political views

The section describing his political views is laughable; the only sources are himself and a random blog. More neutral sources are urgently needed. The fact that he is claimed to be politically neutral right above a section detailing his membership in a right-wing political party is ridiculous. Stockmausen (talk) 10:40, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

   I second the laughability that Freight's views as being being politically neutral. Someone who is neutral doesn't sing the praises of every rightwing conspiracy theory that comes his way. People who run for office under the banner of far-right quasit-fascist parties shouldn't be called neutral. Brian L Raney (talk) 12:11, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I totally agree. Viva is extreme hard right. His streams consist of non-stop flows of fake news, conspiracy theories and lies. The page is not accurate in the current state. TruthBuster21223 (talk) 21:59, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Stupid smear is stupid. I've watched his videos for years, and if he's "hard-right" to you, you're left of Stalin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:647:4F00:113A:F918:A2BA:61E:4AE1 (talk) 18:59, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

your live feed

fantastic thx michael 67.69.76.108 (talk) 16:46, 8 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Inaccurate description of his role and his views.

He is a far-right conspiracy theorist and spreads disinformation. The description currently is not accurate. The page should reflect his extremist, hard-right and conspiratorial views. TruthBuster21223 (talk) 21:55, 26 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You are a lefty trying to push your inaccurate spin on events and attempt to shut down anyone who disagrees with your lies. 81.99.135.43 (talk) 17:16, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
TruthBuster21223, the content you added was not adequately supported by the source. You need better sources before updating the article. Schazjmd (talk) 20:27, 14 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Repeated vandalism, please lock

This article has repeatedly been subject to vandalism by partisan hacks who makes outlandish and frankly laughable claims trying to push his point of view. I therefore request for the time being this article be locked for any and all edits from the version it is at, at the time of writing this 46.230.133.45 (talk) 08:48, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]